Comments by "MrEkzotic" (@MrEkzotic) on "Here's what we know so far in Texas mall shooting" video.

@kairidon3363 The cops in Uvalde were cowards.
18
@kairidon3363 Well, if we'd address the root causes and stop blaming guns, we could get somewhere. Even if getting rid of guns wasn't a gross violation of our rights, it would still be impossible to do.
8
@og_ludachris5611 Well, the cop couldn't do anything until he got there.
7
@kairidon3363 How about we look at the other differences as well, let's not focus on only one factor. How many people in the US are on SSRIs versus other nations? How many countries have the level of cultural and ethnic diversity that we have in the US? Are the traditional values of other countries being destroyed like they are here in the US? Are kids in other nations as addicted to social media as in the US? Do other nations have drugs pouring across the border? If people were morally upright and not mentally ill from destructive upbringing, owning guns wouldn't be a problem. This is why the Constitution only works for a moral and just people.
6
@cfromkc5096 Better than -30.
6
Some of them, not most.
5
@cfromkc5096 No. Fewer people were killed because of the actions of the cop. I'm not sure how you think 9 dead is just as bad as 30 dead.
5
@dpkny71 Banning guns would not have saved all nine of them.
4
@kairidon3363 So you want private, law biding citizens to be disarmed, but the government should be armed?
4
@kairidon3363 I see you don't want to address any of the other potential factors, just the guns. This shows you aren't serious about solving the actual problem. You're being disingenuous, so what are your true motives for wanting to violate the 2A? Yes, if the US population wasn't armed, there would be no deterrent to tyranny and the cultural Marixst would be able to pass their regressive dystopian agendas far more easily.
4
@kairidon3363 Yes, you can carry in Switzerland.
4
 @RogerRandolph-eq6id 😂👍
3
 @glencmac The DOJ and the FBI are targeting law abiding American citizens..... huge difference.
3
@KOLA.. You're 100% wrong. The fact that guns need a person to pull the trigger shows you that the person is the problem, not the tool. It's common sense. Either we address the root causes (not guns), or this will continue to occur on a regular basis.
3
@kairidon3363 They actually had automatic weapons when the 2A was written. Private citizens owned cannons when the 2A was written.
3
@KOLA.. Read my earlier reply to Kair Idon above. I listed several possible factors.
3
@kairidon3363 No, the ship hasn't sailed. You don't understand all the dynamics of how a revolutionary war would progress. For one thing, there is guerilla warfare, which doesn't require tanks and planes to frustrate and force an enemy to give up (the US lost Vietnam and Afghanistan, and others). Another is the fact that the military would split into factions, with some supporting the people, and some supporting the government, so the people would have access to significant military hardware. You're allowing the government to tell you the people have no chance...it wants you to feel weak so you will give up your defense against it. These patterns are repeated throughout history, I wish more people would learn from them.
3
@hanshansen3885 Would you please clarify if you're trying to make a point or are just posting information? Thank you.
3
@kairidon3363 Switzerland is culturally and ethnically homogenous, and their values are being destroyed by cultural Marxists, and most of them aren't on mind-altering SSRIs which have been shown to increase aggression and lower impulse control; they are also 3rd in number of guns owned per capita.
2
@kairidon3363 Right from the Switzerland website. But I'm not sure why that matters anyway. Clearly, carry laws don't stop criminals from using guns. If you wish to carry a weapon in a public place, you must obtain a permit do so from the cantonal authorities. The permit is valid throughout Switzerland and you must have it on you at all times.
2
 @kairidon3363 Wow. I actually agree with you on one thing. LOL
2
@KOLA.. Here. I'll repost my response to Kair Idon for your convenience: How about we look at the other differences as well, let's not focus on only one factor. How many people in the US are on SSRIs versus other nations? How many countries have the level of cultural and ethnic diversity that we have in the US? Are the traditional values of other countries being destroyed like they are here in the US? Are kids in other nations as addicted to social media as in the US? Do other nations have drugs pouring across the border? If people were morally upright and not mentally ill from destructive upbringing, owning guns wouldn't be a problem. This is why the Constitution only works for a moral and just people.
2
Andy Watt It is madness. It's due to several factors. These types of shootings were rare until the 1990s, and then the rate increased exponentially. I noticed that the first SSRI drug was approved for use in 1987...I think we should definitely take a look to see if that might be a factor. In the 1980s, we had very few mass shootings.
2
@andrewpriester6994 Agreed. These leftists know guns aren't the problem, they just want it to be. They want to disarm us for control, not for safety.
1
@greyscout01 I would have to disagree with you. Police will generally follow the orders of their superiors even if those orders are illegal or unconstitutional. Look at what they did in Canada and Australia. And US police would be even worse because they are protected by qualified immunity and because of their training to "shoot first and ask questions later." Look what they did to citizens because they didn't wear a stupid mask.
1
@kairidon3363 Of course not everyone should have a gun. Suicides are another result of the breakdown of family and noble values. We've gone from extreme religious fundamentalism in the 50s to a free for all in the 2000s, where no positive values are taught. I'd like to see things brought back to somewhere in the middle, around the 1980s. How many kids died from school shootings in the entire 1980s? 12 I ask you, what is the difference between the 1980s and now?
1
@hemanthb9723 So you want the government to try violate our 2A rights. That would cause a revolutionary war. The people disarmed while the government is armed is a very dangerous situation.
1
@bobwoods1302 Human sacrifices? A bit hyperbolic, don't you think?
1