Comments by "MrEkzotic" (@MrEkzotic) on "Bad News For Trump—Hush Money Trial Will Include ‘Access Hollywood’ Tape, Judge Rules" video.

  1. How is that even relevant? It's completely prejudicial and has no probative value.
    93
  2. ​ seanarel2684  She has absolutely no evidence, she contradicted many of the details, and she couldn't even remember the year it happened. But that isn't even what this case is about.
    11
  3. ​ @corbonik8100 He has never been convicted in court of any crime. This case is utterly ridiculous.
    6
  4. I disagree.
    4
  5. ​ @For_The_Watch It's not probative, and it's being used to prejudice the jury.
    3
  6.  @Jeremyramone  Actually, he didn't, he was speaking in generalities; further, that's not even what this case is about.
    2
  7.  @For_The_Watch  I'm not radical, I'm just sane. You are the radical.
    2
  8. ​ @rofflestomp684  He's allowed to enter into an NDA. Campaign donations must be material to the campaign, and this was not.
    2
  9.  @For_The_Watch  In any case, the judge denied entry of the tape into evidence because it's too prejudicial, just like I said. 🙂
    2
  10. Thank you for being a reasonable and objective individual.
    2
  11. ​ @For_The_Watch These payments had nothing to do with his campaign.
    2
  12.  @BM_623  I don't have to be a practicing lawyer to form reasoned opinions. Do you need to be a biologist to know what a woman is?
    1
  13.  @For_The_Watch  Ok. How is that relevant to this discussion?
    1
  14.  @km666  The traditional rules of evidence prohibit the admission of defendant’s prior bad acts to suggest to the jury that defendant’s propensity or character is to engage in the charged conduct.
    1
  15.  @calamityjehn  The traditional rules of evidence prohibit the admission of defendant’s prior bad acts to suggest to the jury that defendant’s propensity or character is to engage in the charged conduct.
    1
  16.  @For_The_Watch  No, it had nothing to do with that. I was simply saying that one doesn't need to have a college degree on a given subject to intelligently speak on it...that was my point.
    1
  17.  @For_The_Watch  Ok. Fine. I don't need to be a mechanical engineer to understand how to calculate gear ratios.
    1
  18. ​ @calamityjehn  I heard the judge precluded the tape.
    1
  19.  @For_The_Watch  I'm not led by anyone, I'm a highly intelligent and well read individual who applies reason and logic to issues and challenges. Maybe you're just a young kid with little life experience...hopefully you'll wake up some day.
    1
  20.  @For_The_Watch  The money paid was not a campaign finance donation. Campaign donations must be material to the campaign. The NDA was a personal expenditure. If there was a crime, it was falsifying business records, upon which the statute of limitations has already run out. You can't bootstrap an expired misdemeanor into a felony. Even if Trump loses, it would never survive an appeal.
    1
  21.  @For_The_Watch  Ok. Thanks for the clarification, I was going by the video's title.
    1
  22.  @km666  I know they do. But, if I'm crazy for wanting secure borders, low taxes, peace in the world, and opportunities for prosperity, then so be it.
    1
  23.  @km666  Well, the judge isn't even a natural born US citizen, and he looks like Stalin without a mustache. No US citizen should support and defend banana republic tactics.
    1
  24.  @For_The_Watch  Still on the what is a woman thing, huh? Did that trigger you? I'm sorry, but when you have a SCOTUS nominee who doesn't know what a woman is, it is not me who is crazy. Sanity in this country needs to return.
    1
  25.  @km666  Because he already did during his term. Where were you? Are you completely ignoring what's going on now?
    1
  26.  @For_The_Watch  A twelve year old is an individual who has attained the age of 12 years. What is a woman?
    1
  27.  @km666  I love how you harp on all of Trump's failures more than his successes. What has Biden done? Has Biden ever tried to build something? Has Biden ever done anything other than get rich from the backs of taxpayers. Yes, I'll take someone who made mistakes over someone who has never built a thing in his entire life and allowed the world to fall into utter chaos.
    1
  28.  @For_The_Watch  You're not even making any sense. You're unhinged.
    1
  29.  @km666  The tax cut was across the board, not just for wealthy people. I received a big tax cut and so did you. Jealous is one of the primary causes of career/business failure.
    1
  30. Unbelievably, CNN is actually correct.
    1
  31. ​ @For_The_Watch So Trump is guilty of falsifying business records, and that's a misdemeanor.
    1