Comments by "MrEkzotic" (@MrEkzotic) on "Economists Say Second Trump Term Would Be Bad for U.S. Economy" video.

  1. Hmm. Is that like the "51 very credible, very independent, and really, really, really super-dooper smart intelligence operatives?"
    5
  2. Yeah, ok. 😏
    5
  3.  @patrisshajones4121  Exactly. Biden is the proof.
    5
  4. That's what's happening right now. We need DT to pull us out of this nightmare.
    3
  5.  @WarnTwice  Tell me, how many unskilled migrants does A2030 say we need in the United States?
    3
  6. Lol
    3
  7.  @WarnTwice  Because I'm not ignorant. 😉
    2
  8.  @WarnTwice  Oh my. You are the type of person who scares me. Besides all the pretentious buzzwords and platitudes designed to deflect and lull normies into a false sense of security, do to know what an Agenda 2030 world would look like? The Orwellian terms of "sustainable" and "reimagine" should prompt any thinking human being to question specific goals and motives.
    2
  9.  @WarnTwice  That's a deflection, not an argument.
    2
  10. Fun Fact: Biden is on track to add more to the national debt than Biden by the end of his first time (hopefully, his last). And Biden didn't have a pandemic to deal with.
    1
  11. ​ @WarnTwice I'm only too happy to oblige. 😘
    1
  12.  @WarnTwice  Not all of it, but a lot of it I do. Do you support Agenda 2030? Also, Project 2025 does not mirror Trump's position on many ssues.
    1
  13.  @WarnTwice  Agenda 2030 calls for 600 million unskilled people to migrate to the United States. Do you think that's socially, economically, and environmentally "sustainable"?
    1
  14.  @MattBuild4  The removal of DEI, department of education reform, secure border, creating systems of accountability for the DOJ, FBI, etc.
    1
  15.  @WarnTwice  Terms like "sustainable" and "reimagine" are often derided as Orwellian because critics perceive them as euphemisms that obscure or distort the true intentions behind policies or initiatives. The term "Orwellian" itself refers to the dystopian society depicted in George Orwell's novel 1984, where language is manipulated to control thought and suppress dissent.Manipulation of Language:Critics argue that words like "sustainable" are used to cloak the true costs or consequences of certain policies, particularly environmental and economic ones. For instance, "sustainable development" might imply a balance between economic growth and environmental protection, but some see it as a way to justify restrictions or changes that could harm economic interests or individual freedoms [❞] [❞].Ambiguity and Vagueness:Terms like "reimagine" are criticized for being intentionally vague, allowing policymakers to push through broad and sometimes radical changes under the guise of improvement without providing clear specifics. This vagueness can mask the actual impacts and lead to a lack of accountability [❞].Propaganda and Persuasion:These terms are seen as part of a broader strategy to use positive-sounding language to gain public approval for policies that might be controversial if described more bluntly. This tactic aligns with the concept of "Newspeak" in 1984, where language is designed to diminish the range of thought and make dissent difficult [❞] [❞].Historical and Political Context:The use of such terms is often linked to political agendas. For example, "sustainable" might be associated with environmental regulations that some view as overreaching, while "reimagine" is frequently used in contexts like law enforcement or urban planning to imply significant changes that could be ideologically driven [❞].In summary, terms like "sustainable" and "reimagine" are viewed by some as Orwellian because they can be used to obscure true intentions, manipulate public perception, and avoid direct accountability, drawing parallels to the manipulative use of language described in George Orwell's 1984.
    1
  16. When Trump is elected, your wages will go up, gas will go down, and interests rates will fall. The first three years of Trump were an economic wet dream.
    1
  17.  @SayWhaaaaat426  That's incorrect.
    1
  18.  @bjornstahle4652  The Biden administration will exceed that amount by the end of the term, and Biden had no pandemic to deal with. In any case, presidents don't appropriate funds, Congress does.
    1