General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

3namechangezalowd Evry90dayzlernmor
MSNBC
comments

Comments by "3namechangezalowd Evry90dayzlernmor" (@3namechangezalowdevry90day7) on "MSNBC" channel.

@jannagerber4374 Nope. Satan, Moloch, Baal and whoever else wants child sacrifice can shut up. We believe in human rights here.
10
Require them to teach SPELLING! TALE=story, TAIL=@$$!🤦😂😂😂
6
@jannagerber4374 Any god that's ok with having his innocent creations dismembered is a JOKE.
5
Pregnancy is not a disease.
4
@mamadragonful They said it wrong. MARRIED women couldn't open accounts without their husband's consent.
4
@kcar8974 You DON'T actually want to hear anything or you wouldn't remove replies.
4
@TheMormonSorceress Are you INSANE? There's nothing in any of these laws prohibiting adoption!
4
@Missy-Missy1111 Orwell's 1984 is a SOCIALIST government gone wrong! I'd say he nailed the part about controlling thought by controlling language. He also predicted machine-generated music and book content!
3
@kontrygrll01amerika54 Your behavior is ABSOLUTELY God's business. It's also the responsibility of MORAL people in society to fight for what's right. Do you think it's ok to run over a child because " many children die in car accidents"? Then why do you think miscarriage justifies deliberate abortion? Do you think burying a person that's ALIVE is the same as burying a dead person? Do you get the difference between ALIVE and DEAD? Then stop your play-acting like removing a dead baby, is the same as killing and removing a live one!
3
@robynandrews4384 I think you need to re read it.
3
@davidsmith385 Well, if she had had a husband at the time, they might have asked him. The policy was probably in place to prevent men from suing the bank for allowing their wives to divert money. Otherwise the bank would want as many people depositing as possible.
3
It's what you KEEP, not earn. USE 401k/IRA to pay LESS in taxes. Live below your means and avoid debt like the plague.
2
@Missy-Missy1111 *451
2
@kimvarki Then the kind of "Socialism' Orwell's for is just capitalism with unions and more perks (paid for with higher taxes). It's not the type of socialism people are complaining about. People complain about N. Korea and Venezuela not Australia . I don't think discussing stuff is pointless! It's a good way to see what people actually think, not just be told what they think by media pundits!
2
@Tipperary757 Would you say the same about posting 🌈 flags in classrooms?
2
@mellie4174 That's not the POINT. If Trump wanted to do the type of policies mentioned in the document, he had 4 years in which to enact them. Do you really think he'd risk NOT getting re-elected by hiring a far right think tank to put the 2025 stuff out?
2
@rastalique8114 Do you want well-educated women who can support their families or do you want to do it through your tax dollars?
2
@FreddieVee Gee, guess we'll be living in The Handmaid's Tale if Trump wins and Red Dawn if Harris wins! How awful! At least these fine unbiased news stations are giving us the "heads up" so we can prepare!🤦😂😂😂😂😂
2
@kontrygrll01amerika54 Do you think it's ok for you to run over a child because "many children die in car accidents"? Then why are you play-acting like miscarriage justifies deliberate abortion?
2
@MarquisLeary34 Does your Bible have just nine commandments? Do you consider dismembering someone because they're inconvenient to you to be loving your neighbor as yourself?
2
@OllamhDrab When two organisms' DNA combines to form a third organism, that third organism is referred to as the child of the first two organisms, who are referred to as parents. Your DNA is the same as it was at conception. The only variable is time. Science isn't on your side, either. So you try to shift the debate from "life" to "personhood, " which is arbitrary and varies from society to society.
2
@MarjenaSloan The law does not apply to babies that are dead already or to the removal of uterine polyps! This is the first world and we have ultrasounds and fetal heart monitors and endoscopes. They can tell whether a baby is dead or not! The monitor data in the patient's chart is a matter of LEGAL RECORD, as are the mother's vital signs and lab work which will show if she is going septic! Anyone who claims they were "scared of the law" is covering up malpractice.
2
@SweetTea2 Morality comes from religion and is the basis for the legal system. You benefit from having those laws in place. Would you rather go back to "the law of the jungle" where the weak feed the strong? Most people are not going to behave and respect others if fear of the cops is the only deterrent, because they know those cops are outnumbered.
2
@Courtannica It's not that the Founding Fathers didn't want religion tainting politics... what they didn't want was POLITICS tainting religion!
2
@jaj4706 If the woman's life was in immediate danger, the MD would have been covered. If the woman's water broke, there is a chance that she could recover if put on bed rest. What do they mean "bleeding out internally"? Babies that implant outside the uterus are also unable to survive and would be a threat to the mother, so that would be covered. What is the name of the paper and reporter writing this nonsense?
2
@annramsey7907 You could have your own things if you were a widow/ old maid.
2
@Lorrdd The draft was made law when ONLY men could vote. An ERA would have made it legal to draft women. It's ridiculous to blame women for a policy based on sexism that they had nothing to do with.
2
@mamadragonful Widows/old maids didn't have a husband to sign for them. The bank wasn't going to turn down the chance to invest that amount of money! Plus, with Winchester's social status, bankers may have been friends of the family. There's always going to be an exception to the rule, (the "free black who owned slaves" for example), but it's dishonest to use these rare situations to pretend that oppression is a "choice".
2
@VAwitch There are exceptions for life of the mother in all 50 states.
2
@davidsmith385 Are you sure your Dad didn't have to sign so she could have her own account? And even if he didn't have to, the point is. it wasn't an ACROSS THE BOARD thing. There were still banks discriminating until the Supreme Court ruled.
2
@utualan What "favor"? Women still lag men in political power and are CEOs of fewer companies. The USA still has no equal rights amendment (passed but never ratified by states).
2
 @churblefurbles Right... So you consider telling women "better gibs us sum or we'll be angry and then you'll be sorry" to be " treating them with respect and equality"?🤦
2
@loverrlee Well, the parents need to grow up and take some responsibility or else put the child up for adoption! "Society" didn't impregnate them! You sound like an elitist that thinks poors are just insta-criminals! People with low morals exist at all levels of society.
2
@bonD6002 That's another issue. Those people need to act right or CPS needs to take their kids. Sometimes it's just that they've never been taught how to handle things because the Grandparents were also abusive.
2
This "leaving dead babies and tubal pregnancies in women so they die" stuff is pure PROPAGANDA. The patient's chart (including ultrasounds, lab work. etc.) is a LEGAL DOCUMENT that would justify intervention if it was needed.
1
@theswiftschoolofselfhealing Women and black people are in the amendments , which are part of the Constitution already.
1
@theswiftschoolofselfhealing You are in the Amendments, which are part of the Constitution! Someone slept through govt. class! 🤦😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
Government regulation is what protects your safety AND your privacy in the first place!
1
@monicavarni9285 If the child is also her husband's, he should pay child support. Try and "walk the path" of not being w horse. The collective reputation of modern women is already in the toilet..
1
@monicavarni9285 If she wants to "walk her own path," great! You don't "walk your own path" by hooking up with some dude and then lying about your baby not being his! Even if he didn't marry her, he still has parental rights. This is flaky, irresponsible behavior, and that's putting it politely.
1
@KimHutchinson-qx4gh "Women would be forced by law to carry dead babies" is fake news! The law does not apply to babies that are dead already or to the removal of uterine polyps! This is the first world and we have ultrasounds and fetal heart monitors and endoscopes. They can tell whether a baby is dead or not! The monitor data in the patient's chart is a matter of LEGAL RECORD, as are the mother's vital signs and lab work which will show if she is going septic! Any OB/GYN who claims they were "scared of the law" is covering up malpractice.
1
@vanessar.6085 STOP YOUR LYING FALSE NARRATIVE! Are you really arguing that Doctors and Nurses are TOO DUMB to tell a live baby from a dead baby, even with fetal heart monitors and ultrasounds? That they don't know anatomy and can't tell that a baby in a fallopian tube can't survive? THIS IS 100% FALSE! THE REALITY IS MEDICAL STAFF ARE HIGHLY EDUCATED AND LIVE IN FEAR OF MALPRACTICE LAWSUITS FROM PATIENTS!
1
@christianbarlow5587 Good deal. Don't forget to feed your retirement accounts to drop your taxes!
1
@AstraCielo BULLCRAP. The USA is a first world country with ultrasound machines and fetal heart monitors. They know when the child is no longer alive. We're also a nation where doctors and nurses live in FEAR of malpractice lawsuits for NOT treating a patient!
1
@darlingdear2687 BULLCRAP AGAIN. All states have exemptions for life of the mother and all have equipment to see if the baby is dead.
1
@AstraCielo @marjo3713 BULLCRAP. The USA is a first world country with ultrasound machines and fetal heart monitors. They know when the child is no longer alive. We're also a nation where doctors and nurses live in FEAR of malpractice lawsuits for NOT treating a patient!
1
@AstraCielo THIS IS 100% FALSE PROPAGANDA! Abortion laws prevent killing babies, not removing dead babies!
1
@darlingdear2687 This "leaving dead babies and tubal pregnancies in women so they die" stuff is pure PROPAGANDA. The patient's chart (including ultrasounds, lab work. etc.) is a LEGAL DOCUMENT that would justify intervention if it was needed.
1
@Freaysclaw56 Well. the laws against abortion would have prohibited exactly NONE of that! Do you think Doctors are so "vague" that they can't tell a live baby from a dead one?
1
@LoveJoyPeace4612 Stop this! STOP PLAY-ACTING that Doctors can't tell a live baby from a dead one! None of this post-miscarriage medical care is even prohibited!
1
@Wi-Fi-El FALSE! Doctors know the difference between a live and a dead baby and there are exceptions for "life of the mother" even if the baby is alive.
1
@AstraCielo STOP LYING NOW! THERE'S NOTHING IN THESE LAWS AGAINST REMOVING A DEAD CHILD! AN MD WHO DIDN'T WOULD BE SUED FOR MALPRACTICE!
1
@leaann6445 FALSE. REMOVAL OF A DECEASED BABY IS NOT PREVENTED BY THE LAW.
1
@KimHutchinson-qx4gh You can stop using these tragedies as "doorstops" for abortion on demand because there's NOTHING in the law against removing a dead child! A doctor who didn't would be sued for malpractice!
1
@amberscoutstarwatcher THERE ARE LIFE OF THE MOTHER EXCEPTIONS IN THE LAWS ALREADY! THERE'S NOTHING IN THESE LAWS AGAINST REMOVING A DEAD CHILD! AN MD WHO DIDN'T WOULD BE SUED FOR MALPRACTICE!
1
Saving babies is cruel. Ignorance is Strength. 2024 is 1984.
1
@Slim333yBoi None of the "quality" or "rights" or "resources " matter if you're dead.
1
@Slim333yBoi We need a right to life amendment. Because without life "resources" don't matter.
1
Pack of trendy truisms. Reminds me of "Freakanomics".
1
@CBlargh You can't really make that "reproductive slavery" argument unless the mother was forcibly impregnated in the first place.
1
@CBlargh They should ban surrogate motherhood. It's another way for poor women to become w horse.
1
@kgs2280 Yes, but exceptions for r@p€ ALREADY EXIST, so what's the point of arguing when you already got your way? Is it that you NEED these cases of abuse to exist so you can use them as "doorstops" so you can keep abortion on demand for any reason?
1
@Did.a_flip Yes, in that specific type of case you could argue that. But exceptions ALREADY EXIST.
1
@meredithheath5272 Where are you guys going with this "eminent domain" argument? If CPS took your baby, NO, you don't get paid.
1
@kgs2280 The point is, such cases of abuse shouldn't be used for "doorstops" to keep abortion on demand legal.
1
@CBlargh Exceptions in the law for cases if abuse already exist. Stop using these cases as "doorstops" to justify abortion on demand.
1
@CBlargh You don't get to "just change your mind" and quit taking care of your kid! This is a person, not a job. You have to raise the kid or legally give it up for adoption if you can't do so.
1
@user-ii3vn8tn3q Pregnancy is not a disorder.
1
Stop your propaganda shell- games, labelling DELIBERATE killing of a baby "reproductive care", same as removal of a dead one!! Where are these imaginary people that are in favor of leaving a dead fetus inside a woman so she goes septic? This is the FIRST WORLD! We have fetal heart monitors and ultrasounds that show the baby's heartbeat and we are not morons! Do you think burying a person that's ALIVE is the same as burying a dead person? Do you get the difference between ALIVE and DEAD? Then stop your play-acting like removing a dead baby, is the same as killing and removing a live one!
1
@enravotaboyadjiev7466 Do you know what the NUMBER ONE pre-birth defect babies are killed for is? Lack of a pp! We saw it in rural China during the one-child policy, NINE males born for every female! So-called "women's rights"! Rights don't matter too much if you're dead!
1
@enravotaboyadjiev7466 Do you know what the NUMBER ONE pre-birth defect babies are killed for is? Lack of a pp! We saw it in rural China during the one-child policy, NINE males born for every female! So-called "women's rights"! Rights don't matter too much if you're dead!
1
@enravotaboyadjiev7466 Stop your propaganda shell- games, labelling DELIBERATE killing of a baby "reproductive care", same as removal of a dead one!! Where are these imaginary people that are in favor of leaving a dead fetus inside a woman so she goes septic? This is the FIRST WORLD! We have fetal heart monitors and ultrasounds that show the baby's heartbeat and we are not morons! Do you think burying a person that's ALIVE is the same as burying a dead person? Do you get the difference between ALIVE and DEAD? Then stop your play-acting like removing a dead baby, is the same as killing and removing a live one!
1
@enravotaboyadjiev7466 No! Stop using these cases as "doorstops" so you can have abortion on demand ( for any or no reason).
1
@enravotaboyadjiev7466 "Women would be forced by law to carry dead babies" is fake propaganda! The law does not apply to babies that are dead already or to the removal of uterine polyps! This is the first world and we have ultrasounds and fetal heart monitors and endoscopes. They can tell whether a baby is dead or not! The monitor data in the patient's chart is a matter of LEGAL RECORD, as are the mother's vital signs and lab work which will show if she is going septic! Any OB/GYN who claims they were "scared of the law" is covering up malpractice.
1
@enravotaboyadjiev7466 They go to the Doctor Who kills TARD|S
1
@enravotaboyadjiev7466 STOP LYING NOW! THERE'S NOTHING IN THESE LAWS AGAINST REMOVING A DEAD CHILD! AN MD WHO DIDN'T WOULD BE SUED FOR MALPRACTICE!
1
@airenmarie1250 If doctors are committing malpractice, that's up to the State Medical Board. This is a first world country with fetal heart monitors, ultrasounds and labs. There are life of the mother provisions in all these laws.
1
 @Sundae_Times Amendments are part of the Constitution.
1
Amendments are part of the Constitution.
1
@kgs2280 Orwell just flipped the digits of the year he wrote the book. No particular significance to 1948/1984. Orwell was a Socialist disillusioned with Socialism.
1
@Missy-Missy1111 Orwell's Animal Farm is a fable about a Socialist revolution gone wrong.
1
@sumiland6445 Well, they need data if they want to see what's causing the miscarriages.
1
@kimvarki Yes, Orwell was a SOCIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH SOCIALISM! Haven't you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals.
1
@kimvarki Yes, Orwell was a SOCIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH SOCIALISM! Haven't you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals.
1
Yes, Orwell was a SOCIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH SOCIALISM! Haven't you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals.
1
@kimvarki @kimvarki Yes, Orwell was a S0CIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH S0CIALISM! Haven't you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals.
1
Orwell was a S0CIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH S0CIALISM! Haven't you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals.
1
1984's author, Orwell was a SOCIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH SOCIALISM! Have you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with "Animalism" a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals to be butchered.
1
@kimvarki 1) Orwell
1
@kimvarki 2)was
1
@kimvarki 3) disillusioned
1
@kimvarki 4)with
1
@kimvarki 5)Socialism!
1
@kimvarki 6)Read
1
@kimvarki 7)Animal
1
@kimvarki 8) Farm!
1
Just reverse engineering to figure out what the "bad word" that's getting my reply removed for Thought Crime is! 😂
1
Looks like the thoughtcrime word of the day is 7) "any mall" ,as in "the any mall kingdom" ! Read Orwell's book Any mall Farm which is about a revolution gone wrong!
1
@kimvarki Orwell's famous book "Any mall" Farm is about a left revolution that becomes corrupt! There's a cartoon and a movie if you don't want to read it.
1
@kimvarki "Any Mall" Farm is about the Russian revolution. He knew mankind was corrupt and Socialism didn't always lead to Democracy.
1
@kimvarki So, Socialism Lite where people vote? 1984 describes a single party system, not democracy.
1
@kimvarki Then the kind of "Socialism' Orwell's for is just capitalism with unions and more perks (paid for with higher taxes). It's not the type of socialism people are complaining about. People complain about N. Korea and Venezuela not Australia . I don't think discussing stuff is pointless! It's a good way to see what people actually think, not just be told what they think by media pundits!
1
@amethystwitch3270 False. The Separation of Church and State just bans the establishment of a state religion! It doesn't ban the voters from passing laws based on their moral beliefs. For example, we have laws against theft and murder.
1
@Aster_Risk No, they're an attempt to normalize deviance and an attack on Christian values. Do you feel the same about flags for PDF files. etc.?
1
@Aster_Risk You benefit from living in a society with moral traditions against stealing and murder and adultery, etc. These came from religion. Sure, not everybody believes ot complies, but you're still better off than in a godless society where the strong feed on the weak. But then you whine like an ingrate about how "religion only does harm".
1
@Tipperary757 How does looking at the Ten Commandments remove your freedom? Those laws keep you safe. Maybe you feel guilty?
1
@YoshuaMidas Who are these countries you like who ban freedom of religion? Most likely they do it to promote worship of the government. If you're willing to give up freedom of religion in return for lower crime, you're a fascist. And where's your proof "morals have existed long before religion" when archaeology demonstrates that even the earliest civilizations were theistic?
1
@YoshuaMidas Where's YOUR proof "morals existed before religion"? Even the earliest civilizations were theistic. Where are these fascist countries that ban freedom of religion? Most likely they do it to promote WORSHIP OF THE STATE.
1
@KIxYOSHI2077 Where's YOUR proof "morals existed before religion"? Even the earliest civilizations were theistic. Where are these fascist countries that ban freedom of religion? Most likely they do it to promote WORSHIP OF THE STATE.
1
@YoshuaMidas What countries forbid religion and have low crime? I know the USSR did for awhile. Low REPORTED crime being the keyword. Would you give up your freedom of thought for low crime?
1
@YoshuaMidas Where do you get "morals have existed long before religion"? Where's your evidence?
1
@YoshuaMidas What's the difference, or the problem then? All that's prohibited is the establishment of a state religion. Candidates are not prohibited from expressing their moral beliefs or enacting policy in line with those beliefs. Voters can vote for whichever candidate supports the policies they want.
1
@YoshuaMidas How do you know cavemen had no morals? Or worshipped no god/s? Just because they didn't build cathedrals? That's not critical thinking, that's " tail wagging the dog" reasoning! 🤦
1
@YoshuaMidas Not me! If I have to listen to idiots from time to time, I'm glad to pay that price for freedom of speech! And I'm better prepared hearing someone say he hates my guts based on heredity, etc. than thinking he's my friend! I'm not an absolutist, though. I don't believe freedom of speech covers false alarms to incite panic, terroristic threats, and obscenity.
1
@YoshuaMidas Not me! If I have to listen to idiots from time to time, I'm glad to pay that price for freedom of speech! And I'm better prepared hearing someone say he hates my guts based on heredity, etc. than thinking he's my friend! I'm not an absolutist, though. I don't believe freedom of speech covers false alarms to incite panic, terroristic threats, and obscenity.
1
@YoshuaMidas Not me! If I have to listen to idiots from time to time, I'm glad to pay that price for freedom of speech! And I'm better prepared hearing someone say he hates my guts based on heredity, etc. than thinking he's my friend! I'm not an absolutist, though. I don't believe freedom of speech covers false alarms to incite panic, terroristic threats, and obscenity.
1
@YoshuaMidas They'd still know what church you go to if you're a public figure. What a ridiculous law. What country are you saying does that?
1
@YoshuaMidas That's the OPPOSITE of morality, it's "the law of the jungle"! The strong eat the weak. The strongest male beats up the others and mates with all the females including his daughters until a stronger male beats him up, kills his offspring and mates with all the females. How is that morality? Why would you want to elect politicians that support that?
1
@YoshuaMidas Animals live by the "law of the jungle" which is the OPPOSITE of morality.
1
@YoshuaMidas We can absolutely make laws BASED on religion and religious values such as protecting innocent life. We just can't have a state religion. You don't give up the right to express your beliefs when you run for office or enter the voting booth. What good is having morals anyway if you're too afraid of offending people to practice them?
1
@YoshuaMidas Yes, all those things could happen, because in a Democracy (Technically a Democratic Republic), there's "Tyranny of the Majority". This means the laws are based on what MOST of the people voted for. Because the USA is fortunate enough to have those Judeo-Christian values, the Pagan who burns their child in an oven so that Moloch grants a good harvest goes to prison! Why didn't you learn this in school?
1
Groups of "animals living together" is the Law of the Jungle, which is the OPPOSITE of morality.
1
@YoshuaMidas Groups of "animals living together" is the Law of the Jungle, which is the OPPOSITE of morality.
1
@YoshuaMidas If people learn right and wrong based on religious beliefs today, and they also did in the historic past, they most likely also did in the prehistoric past.
1
@YoshuaMidas That's because your BELIEF is that there is no God to say what's right or wrong. Atheism is. the religion that believes it's not a religion.
1
@YoshuaMidas 1)Morals are
1
@YoshuaMidas 2)not based
1
@YoshuaMidas 3)on biology.
1
@YoshuaMidas 4)The law
1
@YoshuaMidas 5)of the jungle
1
@YoshuaMidas 6)is the OPPOSITE
1
@YoshuaMidas 7)of morality.
1
What are they going to do? Whine louder? Can you imagine them at Valley Forge? If they don't have the self discipline to work hard, save and invest, they're not going to be able to go without and make the sacrifices required to fight any kind of "revolution".
1
@beingsshepherd I'm not guilty! Shopaholism and fashion is for suckers.
1
@robertlindey2538 "Zero sum" doesn't apply to the housing market. The builder gets paid and the buyer gets a home that saves him $ on rent.
1
@Governor_William_J_Lepetomane Nope. Wildlife and parks produce quality of life. Don't let that slide. Better a high rise surrounded by parkland than a bunch of McMansions. Plus, you might need that open land to graze cattle or produce food one day.
1
@CCJJ160Channels There's no reason those SAME benefits (such as lower tax on cap gains, etc.)can't be used by young people! Don't you get that if older people can't afford to retire, young people stay at the bottom of the career ladder? Also, OLD DOES NOT EQUAL RICH! Old people on a fixed income suffer the most from inflation.
1
@DmitriStrelnikov Who "closed the door of opportunity behind them"? This is all very vague and dramatic. YOU can use a 401k or IRA to pay less in taxes, YOU can pay lower taxes on long term investments held outside those accounts and YOU can write off investment losses.
1
@wetlifesports Nope. The 30 year old "children" can grow up and take care of themselves. Feral pets and poor elderly that benefit from charities cannot earn their food. Those who have EARNED the money should decide where best to spend or donate it. You have no right to take what others have earned for your twenty and thirty year old "babies".
1
@brocasimp8320 DIY stuff. Live the simple life. Pay off any debt, highest interest rate first. Eliminate vice and entertainment spending until you are out of debt.
1
@secondarytrollaccount666 You don't want the boomers' investments to do well? You SHOULD, because that's what lets them RETIRE! You think they LOVE working in their 70s?🤦😂
1
@secondarytrollaccount666 You don't want the boomers' investments to do well? You SHOULD, because that's what lets them RETIRE! You think they LOVE working in their 70s?🤦😂
1
@DmitriStrelnikov Who "closed the door of opportunity behind them"? This is all very vague and dramatic. YOU can use a 401k or IRA to pay less in taxes, YOU can pay lower taxes on long term investments held outside those accounts and YOU can write off investment losses.
1
@DerMoerpler Stop with the "SoMeOne sHoUld SAvE uS oR ELSE". Save money, buy a plot of land outside the city (with few restrictions) and build on that. With your two hands.
1
Boring pointless book
1
@SarafinaSummers I had a visceral reaction, too! I kept feeling ripped off because no ACTION took place in the whiny bore-fest of a book! There's a part where she steals a pat of butter, and I was like, alright, let's see what cool MacGyver scheme she uses this for... and the b|mb0 just used it for moisturizer!!
1
@ES-qt6yo That "figurehead" description also applies to Biden! But Trump has the knack of appointing somebody and having THEM take the fall when the plan fails! I doubt Vance will run the show, Pence didn't.
1
@MrWyzdum This is all public already. Why wouldn't Trump speak to a conservative group to try and get their votes? That doesn't mean he commissioned them to do his thinking for him! Trump believes and does whatever HE wants, not some group's to do list!
1
@MrWyzdum Yes, but that doesn't mean he'll DO their policies. Haven't you noticed politicians promise a bunch of different stuff to a bunch of different groups? He needs their backing to get elected. He's not going to call them "useful idiots" .
1
@rustyshackleford9006There are Ukrainian women in their military.
1
@rustyshackleford9006 I don't know too much about their politics. I assume If they had an ERA both sexes would have been forced to stay.
1
@viperaaspis Well, you have HIPPA. Most of these abortions are done for non-medical reasons anyway. Some are done for GENDER SELECTION . Families who can only afford one will pick that good wage earner.
1
FALSE. Infants are easy to find homes for. Stop racist adoption policies and let older people adopt.
1
Boring, pointless book with very little action.
1
@BennyRuff For me it's the euphemistic shell-games, such as labelling both DELIBERATE abortion of a live baby and removal of a dead baby as " reproductive care" as if it's the SAME THING! That and play-acting like doctors and nurses can't tell the difference between ALIVE and DEAD, even with first world tech such as fetal heart monitors and ultrasounds!
1
@stephanien6237 Should Red Dawn be required viewing, then? Equally far-fetched scenario (Communists conquering the USA in the 80s) but with a conservative slant. Might be interesting to compare and contrast the two " if you don't watch it, THEY'LL take over" propaganda pieces. At least it would get the kids THINKING.
1
@stephanien6237 Should Red Dawn be required viewing, then? Equally far-fetched scenario (Communists conquering the USA in the 80s) but with a conservative slant. Might be interesting to compare and contrast the two " if you don't watch it, THEY'LL take over" propaganda pieces. At least it would get the kids THINKING.
1
@FreddieVee Should Red Dawn be required viewing, then? Equally far-fetched scenario (Communists conquering the USA in the 80s) but with a conservative slant. Might be interesting to compare and contrast the two " if you don't watch it, THEY'LL take over" propaganda pieces. At least it would get the kids THINKING.
1
"DEAD BABIES BEING LEFT IN WOMEN" IS A 100% FALSE NARRATIVE TO SPREAD FEAR IN THE UNEDUCATED! Do you really think Doctors don't know that a baby in a fallopian tube can't survive? Do you really think they can't tell a live baby from a dead one? That they'll just let women die because they don't mind malpractice lawsuits?
1
I'm sure theistic satanism endorses the sacrifice of innocents. But majority rules.
1
@stevenhuntley8706 What "multiple times"? And what does that have to do with people wanting" abortion on demand" ? Even a devout atheist should be able to figure out that killing another human because they are inconvenient is wrong.
1
@Courtannica So, we can't have a law against murder because most religions are against murder? Separation of Church and State just bans the ESTABLISHMENT OF A STATE RELIGION. It doesn't ban the public from voting or enacting laws in line with their moral beliefs.
1
@kgs2280 You're being lied to. The USA is a litigious society where doctors pay more in malpractice insurance than you probably make in a year. They're going to risk losing millions by letting a woman go septic or hemorrhage? You think they can't read lab results and they don't know how to use the ultrasound machines and heart monitors to see if the baby is already dead? This is fake propaganda. Nobody's leaving dead babies and tubal pregnancies inside women so they die. That's not the intent of the law. Even if the law were incredibly vague, the patient's chart is a LEGAL DOCUMENT and serves as evidence of the need for intervention.
1
@johnleonard9090 This "leaving dead babies and tubal pregnancies in women so they die" stuff is pure PROPAGANDA. The patient's chart (including ultrasounds, lab work. etc.) is a LEGAL DOCUMENT that would justify intervention if it was needed.
1
@kgs2280 @kgs2280 You're being lied to. The USA is a litigious society where doctors pay more in malpractice insurance than you probably make in a year? They're going to risk losing millions by letting a woman go septic or hemorrhage? You think they can't read lab results and they don't know how to use the ultrasound machines and heart monitors to see if the baby is already dead? This is fake propaganda. Nobody's leaving dead babies and tubal pregnancies inside women so they die. That's not the intent of the law. Even if the law were incredibly vague, the patient's chart is a LEGAL DOCUMENT and serves as evidence of the need for intervention.
1
@whatamidoing4890 You're just playing dumb now. Apparently you were never taught that taking innocent life was wrong? Even a devout atheist who claims to be "evolved" and "humanistic" should be able to figure that out. Why are you 🙈 play-acting like all abortions are done by pill and surgical abortion is no longer a thing?
1
@whatamidoing4890 You're just playing dumb now. Apparently you were never taught that taking innocent life was wrong? Even a devout atheist who claims to be "evolved" and "humanistic" should be able to figure that out. Why are you 🙈 play-acting like all abortions are done by pill and surgical abortion is no longer a thing?
1
@whatamidoing4890 @whatamidoing4890 You're just playing dumb now. Apparently you were never taught that taking innocent life was wrong? Even a devout atheist who claims to be "evolved" and "humanistic" should be able to figure that out.
1
@whatamidoing4890 Why are you 🙈 play-acting like all abortions are done by pill and surgical abortion is no longer a thing?
1
@whatamidoing4890 You're just playing dumb now. Apparently you were never taught that taking innocent life was wrong? Even a devout atheist who claims to be "evolved" and "humanistic" should be able to figure that out. Why are you 🙈 play-acting like all abortions are done by pill and surgical abortion is no longer a thing?
1
@whatamidoing4890 What kind of "logic" is that? If someone tells you "killing your Mama with an axe is bad" would you think that meant it was ok for you to go drown her?
1
@whatamidoing4890 What kind of "logic" is that? If someone tells you "killing your Mama with an axe is bad" would you think that meant it was ok for you to go drown her?
1
@jannagerber4374 What did I say that you're calling inaccurate? Got anything to prove me wrong with?
1
@jannagerber4374 People don't just automatically "have morality inside them" ! They have to be trained to know right from wrong from an early age and some people are more hard-headed than others! Some people act right for awhile then backslide. Some people are psychos who see others as tools and toys, or kleptomaniacs who feel guilty when they pass up an opportunity to steal something. Others have low lives and criminals for parents who teach them " take and don't get took" rather than the golden rule. That's why a legal system is necessary for societal function. If people were all angels with unfailing morality installed, any system, or even complete anarchy would work just fine!
1
@jannagerber4374 People don't just automatically "have morality inside them" ! They have to be trained to know right from wrong from an early age and some people are more hard-headed than others! Some people act right for awhile then backslide. Some people are psychos who see others as tools and toys, or kleptomaniacs who feel guilty when they pass up an opportunity to steal something. Others have low lives and criminals for parents who teach them " take and don't get took" rather than the golden rule. That's why a legal system is necessary for societal function. If people were all angels with unfailing morality installed, any system, or even complete anarchy would work just fine!
1
@jannagerber4374 People don't just automatically "have morality inside them" ! They have to be trained to know right from wrong from an early age and some people are more hard-headed than others! Some people act right for awhile then backslide. Some people are psychos who see others as tools and toys, or kleptomaniacs who feel guilty when they pass up an opportunity to steal something. Others have low lives and criminals for parents who teach them " take and don't get took" rather than the golden rule. That's why a legal system is necessary for societal function. If people were all angels with unfailing morality installed, any system, or even complete anarchy would work just fine!
1
@jannagerber4374 You BENEFIT from being in a society with people that have been taught right from wrong and vote to enact laws accordingly. Even if you yourself are completely godless and anti-moral, it's to your advantage to not be r worded, killed and eaten, right?
1
@gailhitson7340 Freedom of religion just bans the establishment of a state religion. It doesn't ban Christians, pagans, or atheists from voting to enact laws according to their beliefs.
1
@kgs2280 The vital signs, lab work, ultrasounds, etc. let the staff know the patient's condition. These are part of the chart, which is a LEGAL DOCUMENT that covers the hospital.
1
@kgs2280 The vital signs, lab work, ultrasounds, etc. let the staff know the patient's condition.
1
@kgs2280 The patient's chart functions as a LEGAL DOCUMENT that covers the hospital.
1
@kgs2280 The vital signs, lab work, ultrasounds, etc. let the staff know the patient's condition. These are part of the chart, which is a LEGAL DOCUMENT that covers the hospital.
1
@rhino5100 All 50 states have EXCEPTIONS for life of the mother.
1
@sirloxleymendoza972 She was running as a protest and to get attention for issues. She picked ex-slave public speaker Frederick Douglas as VP nominee! She knew she had no real chance to win, just like the third party candidates of today.
1
@sirloxleymendoza972 She was running as a protest and to get attention for issues. She picked ex-slave public speaker Frederick Douglas as VP nominee! She knew she had no real chance to win, just like the third party candidates of today.
1
@sirloxleymendoza972 She was running as a protest and to get attention for issues. She picked ex-slave public speaker Frederick Douglas as VP nominee! She knew she had no real chance to win, just like the third party candidates of today.
1
@sirloxleymendoza972 She was running as a protest and to get attention for issues. She picked black public speaker Frederick Douglas as VP nominee! She knew she had no real chance to win, just like the third party candidates of today.
1
@sirloxleymendoza972 She was running as a protest and to get attention for issues. She picked black public speaker and journalist Frederick Douglas as VP nominee! She knew she had no real chance to win, just like the third party candidates of today.
1
@craftmom5302 This is about the most slanted news source you could find. Total propaganda.
1
@craftmom5302 "Nice" to hear propaganda? Nice to have the news anchors to do your thinking for you?
1
@craftmom5302 Wish I could vote against the fascist comment removal bots🤖🥊🤖🥊🤖🥊🤖🥊
1
So, he's saying they're too lazy to poke a phone and buy a low cost index fund?
1
@cassady7169 "Immigrants can't be broke" is a bizarre assumption. People come here broke all the time, often in debt to the cartels that smuggle them across the border!
1
@alexandercurtis4671 Telling kids to get their act together is about his only legit point! Don't you get that the time to work hard. save, and invest is now? The earlier the better, while health and energy and compound interest are on your side! If you devote your teens and twenties to political activism, doomspending, slacking off, and running up debt, you'll work much harder in your 30s and 40s.
1
@alexandercurtis4671 An ADULT fixes problems whether they caused the problem or not. Sometimes the "cure" has side effects. Getting rid of slums leading to more homelessness, for example.
1
@cassady7169 I'm talking about REALITY. The MAJORITY of immigration is done illegally these days! AND the cartels smuggle people from all over the world across the border! Whoever can pay. Lochamp specifically said his/her family got here with $50 and you're ignoring that and saying "naah, you must be rich".
1
@IamJMcGill @ebrens says "greedy billionaires are to blame". And they're not about to quit being greedy, no matter how much you shake your fist, so it's time to DO FOR YOURSELF by working hard. saving, and investing.
1
@secondarytrollaccount666 , you don't want the boomers' investments to do well? You SHOULD, because that's what lets them RETIRE! You think they LOVE working in their 70s?🤦😂
1
@IamJMcGill @wetlifesports Nope. The 30 year old "children" can grow up and take care of themselves. Feral pets and poor elderly that benefit from charities cannot earn their food. Those who have EARNED the money should decide where best to spend or donate it. You have no right to take what others have earned for your twenty and thirty year old "babies".
1
@IamJMcGill Who "closed the door of opportunity behind them"? This is all very vague and dramatic. YOU can use a 401k or IRA to pay less in taxes, YOU can pay lower taxes on long term investments held outside those accounts and YOU can write off investment losses.
1
@skygarden I'm not ageist or sexist but I laugh my butt off at all this "HaRd tHinG cAN't Be DoNe bECauSE iT's HAAARD!!",, 😂😂😂😂 " SOmEone oUt TheRE hAs NO BOOTS, tHerefore BoOtstRappIng imPoSSibLe, sO i wIll slEep iN anD eAt dooR daSh" 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
@craftmom5302 "Nice" to hear propaganda? Nice to have the news anchors to do your thinking for you?
1
@KimHutchinson-qx4gh "Women would be forced by law to carry dead babies" is fake news! The law does not apply to babies that are dead already or to the removal of uterine polyps! This is the first world and we have ultrasounds and fetal heart monitors and endoscopes. They can tell whether a baby is dead or not! The monitor data in the patient's chart is a matter of LEGAL RECORD, as are the mother's vital signs and lab work which will show if she is going septic! Any OB/GYN who claims they were "scared of the law" is covering up malpractice.
1
@KimHutchinson-qx4gh "Women would be forced by law to carry dead babies" is FALSE PROPAGANDA! The law does not apply to babies that are dead already or to the removal of uterine polyps! This is the first world and we have ultrasounds and fetal heart monitors and endoscopes. They can tell whether a baby is dead or not! The monitor data in the patient's chart is a matter of LEGAL RECORD, as are the mother's vital signs and lab work which will show if she is going septic! Any OB/GYN who claims they were "scared of the law" is covering up malpractice.
1
@vanessar.6085 STOP YOUR LYING FALSE NARRATIVE! Are you really arguing that Doctors and Nurses are TOO DUMB to tell a live baby from a dead baby, even with fetal heart monitors and ultrasounds? That they don't know anatomy and can't tell that a baby in a fallopian tube can't survive? THIS IS 100% FALSE! THE REALITY IS. MEDICAL STAFF ARE HIGHLY EDUCATED AND LIVE IN FEAR OF MALPRACTICE LAWSUITS FROM PATIENTS!
1
@vanessar.6085 STOP YOUR LYING FALSE NARRATIVE! Are you really arguing that Doctors and Nurses are TOO DUMB to tell a live baby from a dead baby, even with fetal heart monitors and ultrasounds? That they don't know anatomy and can't tell that a baby in a fallopian tube can't survive? THIS IS 100% FALSE! THE REALITY IS MEDICAL STAFF ARE HIGHLY EDUCATED AND LIVE IN FEAR OF MALPRACTICE LAWSUITS FROM PATIENTS!
1
@KimHutchinson-qx4gh "Women would be forced by law to carry dead babies" is fake news! The law does not apply to babies that are dead already or to the removal of uterine polyps! This is the first world and we have ultrasounds and fetal heart monitors and endoscopes. They can tell whether a baby is dead or not! The monitor data in the patient's chart is a matter of LEGAL RECORD, as are the mother's vital signs and lab work which will show if she is going septic! Any OB/GYN who claims they were "scared of the law" is covering up malpractice.
1
@KimHutchinson-qx4gh NO. THIS IS A 100% FALSE NARRATIVE TO SPREAD FEAR IN THE UNEDUCATED! Do you really think Doctors don't know that a baby in a fallopian tube can't survive? Do you really think they can't tell a live baby from a dead one? That they'll just let women die because they don't mind malpractice lawsuits?
1
@KimHutchinson-qx4gh False information and blocking the truth.
1
@KimHutchinson-qx4gh The part about doctors not removing dead babies is BS.
1
@tophat5870 The part about doctors not removing dead babies is BS.
1
@vanessar.6085 The part about doctors not removing dead babies is BS.
1
@theswiftschoolofselfhealing Yeah, the USA news is STOOPID PARTISAN! Whether it's 🦊 or MS|\|BC all the segments are " Watch reporter EVISCERATE Politician".
1
@theswiftschoolofselfhealing Yeah, the USA news is STOOP|D PARTISAN! Whether it's 🦊 or MS|\|BC all the segments are " Watch reporter EVISCERATE Politician".
1
@BoinkrNanis Talk stupid, get looked at stupid! 😂
1
@scoruja If the "greedy billionaires are to blame" and they're not about to quit being greedy, no matter how much you shake your fist, then it's time to DO FOR YOURSELF by working hard. saving, and investing.
1
@kcar8974 If Mom and Dad are unfit, give the child to someone who wants it! Adoption is a thing! There will be more demand now that China has shut it's doors to foreign adopters.
1
@kcar8974 If Mom and Dad are unfit, give the child to someone who wants it! Adoption is a thing! There will be more demand now that China has shut it's doors to foreign adopters.
1
@loverrlee You are an ELITIST who thinks poors are insta-criminals. People with low morals exist at all levels of society.
1
Well, the parents need to grow up and take some responsibility or else put the child up for adoption! "Society" didn't impregnate them! Loverlee here sounds like an elitist that thinks poors are just insta-criminals! People with low morals exist at all levels of society.
1
@loverrlee Hey, Zombie Margaret Sanger! Back from the dead to "prune" those black and brown "human weeds"?
1
@TGFriosania23 ???? Talk English. Or something that can be translated.
1
@asamicat8323 Who is "they"? The people whose replies you guys take?
1
@asamicat8323 Well. loverrlee up at the top seems to think they're all insta-criminals.
1
@blacky_Ninja Infants are EASY to find homes for. Older kids that have criminal records, not so much.
1
@maryfrump7937 Women's rights start with a woman's right to be BORN. Don't ignore what happened in China.
1
@maryfrump7937 @maryfrump7937 Women's rights start with a woman's right to be BORN. Don't ignore what happened in China.
1
Stop taking down replies! It's fascism.
1
@krisroberts9123 Both parties printed money through tax cuts and stimuli. If you think China, etc. won't hit us consumers back with higher prices if proposed tariffs go through, you're very naive.
1
@krisroberts9123 So you admit you WANT inflation on basic goods that's going to hit the poor hardest? Because it's ok for them to go without as long as the factory owners do well? Do you get why people might not like that?
1