Comments by "3namechangezalowd Evry90dayzlernmor" (@3namechangezalowdevry90day7) on "'I Know What I'm Trying To Get At': Blackburn Clashes With Pro-Choice Witness About Fetal Heartbeats" video.

@ColonelFredPuntridge The cells in the heart would be alive until they died. What does this have to do with abortion? A fertilized ovum begins growing by cell division. Dead things do not grow by cell division. You could make the excuse that someone brain dead has heart and lung function, but is dead, but this doesn't apply to a fetus.
1
@armandoperez7108 That's inaccurate. We have no idea when self consciousness occurs and it's false that babies don't feel pain.
1
@drackoni-han13 From the time you were an embryo, you grew by cell division. Dead things such as pencils, do not grow by cell division.
1
@vicom134 Fetuses aren't "grown in vitro". An embryo or zygote is implanted in the mother and grows into a fetus.
1
@amiehulscher7156 Ma'am, that's just dumb. They know what the mother's heart beat sounds like by listening to it. They know what the "artifact" sounds from the equipment sound like because they use the equipment every day. An unborn baby's heart rate is more rapid than an adult human's. A baby's heart can also be visually observed to be beating using an ultrasound.
1
@ColonelFredPuntridge That's a weird argument because right to privacy only goes so far. You don't get to kill whoever as long as they're within the "jurisdiction" of the house you own. You don't even legally get absolute bodily autonomy. For example, you can be jailed for doing drugs or fined for not wearing your seatbelt.
1
@ColonelFredPuntridge So , if you don't want the fetus in you, why not deliver the baby? "Castle doctrine" doesn't exactly apply to a member of the family that you let in and who did you no harm.
1
@sanai2256 What debate? Is it a duck fetus? Is it an elephant fetus? No, if it's inside a human mother, it's a human fetus. That's a fact. A pro-abortion advocate will try to shift away from scientific fact to philosophical concepts such as "personhood".
1
@ColonelFredPuntridge So, wait until it's viable.
1
@ColonelFredPuntridge You're still trying to claim "castle doctrine"? Castle doctrine applies to a threatening intruder, not an innocent family member you invited in and who can't leave for medical reasons. If you're mentally unable to comprehend that sex results in offspring, you shouldn't legally be having sex.
1
@sanai2256 I'm saying facts matter to rational people. Whether something is alive or not is a fact. Some people are irrational but their opinion doesn't change facts.
1
@armandoperez7108 Being able to recognize yourself isn't the same as being aware you exist. Are you for allowing only the more humane abortions performed before the baby's nervous system has connected with the brain?
1
@armandoperez7108 Being able to recognize yourself in a mirror isn't self consciousness any more that IQ result is intelligence. It's a test that may vary in accuracy. For instance, if you had an elderly confused person, they might not recognize themselves in a mirror, but they're aware that they're a person with needs..
1
@Lilackitty417 You don't understand the discussion. I'm responding to this guy Puntridge who's arguing that BECAUSE you can kill someone in your house due to castle doctrine, therefore you can have an abortion due to his concept of "body doctrine". I'm telling him neither doctrine is absolute.
1