Comments by "Michael Jackson\x27s a Guilty Preferential Pea Dough" (@michaeljacksonsaguiltypref3600) on "COURT TV" channel.

  1. OJ Simpson was never proven guilty of murdering his wife. Do you think that makes any difference to his wife?
    41
  2.  @kathleenmaclachlan1541  his wealth helped a lot in affording the best lawyers and being able to silence his accusers.
    21
  3.  @erenyeeagah204  it's not an excuse, it's an analogy to point out the flaw in the "he was proven innocent" excuse. Firstly, Jackson was never proven innocent. The verdicts are guilty or not guilty Stop clinging to a 17 year old case that was wrongly dismissed. Again, the verdict was not guilty for ONE BOY ONLY, why are you ignoring his other victims? The verdict does not mean that he was innocent or that he was not a pedophile. He paid off several other victims multiple millions of dollars to silence them. Two more victims are going to be having their cases heard in Court in the future. Lots of evidence was found of Michael Jackson's guilt. Being found “not guilty” of a crime doesn’t mean the accused didn’t do it and doesn’t mean the accused is proven innocent”. It just means the “accused wasn’t convicted. What is putting the evidence before a court of law for? To try to convince a jury of peers that the evidence against him met the burden of proof. In this 2005 case, a jury of MJ’s “peers” (odd how the celebrity worshipped around the world as a god / "the king of pop" could have any impartial peers don't you think? ) determined the evidence that they were presented with by the prosecution (evidence that wasn’t blocked by the defence because it was too incriminating) did not meet the burden of proof. Michael Jackson's received celebrity Justice from biased jurors who were fans. That is all. OJ Simpson was also found not guilty of the murder of his wife, he was not innocent because he murdered her. It is naive to act like a court verdict can change whether a person committed a crime or not. R Kelly was also acquitted and found not guilty in 2008, but he was just as guilty as Michael Jackson of the same crime.
    8
  4.  @JacksonStar4757  James was abused in bed, in hotel rooms in closets, in showers, in tee pees etc... the train station was there much earlier than the records indicate and there was a earlier station there when he was a boy. Even if he had a mix up dates, this was caused by the trauma from the abuse.
    6
  5. I hope they get paid well in compensation for Michael Jackson's actions.
    6
  6. He did it.
    5
  7.  @jonelrobinson2231  he did. Stop hating on the victims, troll.
    5
  8.  @charrielyn1231  loads of Jimmy Savile's victims have come out many years after his death as well. It can take many years and even into Adulthood for victims of CSA to come forward.
    5
  9. He was too old for Michael Jackson
    5
  10.  @Snyper1405  his victims know more than you.
    5
  11. I wish him the best of luck with his new job. I hope he doesn't get manipulated again like he was by Michael Jackson.
    5
  12. Don't be silly. The complaint is against the companies and persons who enabled the abuse.
    4
  13.  @Snyper1405  pedophile defenders need to be locked up.
    4
  14.  @marymoore5776  no that is not a lie. The train station was actually built before the permit was given according to Michael Jackson's photographer Harrison funk so it was built before September 1993. There is also evidence of an earlier train station on that same site. Regardless of this fact, it is very common with survivors of CSA to have mix-ups in their memory due to the abuse. This is because it was so traumatising that they forget minor details such as dates or maybe which room they were abused in. Human memory is fallible, so if he's wrong about the date, it is a memory issue not lie. He was abused in multiple locations, there would be no reason to lie about a train station.
    4
  15. But he didn't get to experience a childhood, so in order to experience one, he needed to sleep with boys during their childhoods until they got too old, then he got younger boys to sleep with to experience their childhoods until they got too old, then he got younger boys to sleep with... and on and on until he died. He ended up experiencing more "childhoods" than anyone on the planet.
    3
  16.  @Illustraful  well, he named one of "his" kids "Blanket" 😄
    3
  17. He's guilty
    3
  18.  @hoopjab  does a documentary need to be filmed in one day and in one cut?
    3
  19.  @jazmorrison9030  so did Wade Robson at first, but now he's Revealing the truth that he was abused.
    3
  20. ​ @davidw5731 well said, my man!
    3
  21.  @edwinacaparelli9911  no, it's not.
    3
  22.  @Snyper1405  you need to be, yes.
    3
  23.  @Snyper1405  the word is spelt *perjurers Now they are telling the truth
    3
  24.  @Snyper1405  no lies other than when they said that Michael Jackson didn't abuse them.
    3
  25. These victims have never had a trial.
    3
  26.  @carolinagonzalezs.  Keep denying
    3
  27. Stop victim blaming
    3
  28. Because he was guilty
    3
  29. What do you care? Let his victims get the justice they deserve.
    2
  30. We do.
    2
  31. What concrete proof would you accept that he abused children?
    2
  32. He abused them, like all the rest.
    2
  33. His child victims couldn't defend themselves against him. F*ck him.
    2
  34.  @MrBibi86  Jimmy Saville also gave millions to charities.
    2
  35. ​ @neithyjohnson1066 Wade was always abused, but he did not think of his sexual relationship with Michael Jackson as abuse until he had his own son.
    2
  36.  @ChokeslamToHell  no, it's not BS that is consistent with the experiences of CSA survivors. It was shortly after the birth of his kid that he began to understand it was abuse. He turned down the role within Cirque du Soleil because of the pressures of work commitment and having a kid. This is when the trauma of the abuse was starting to really affect him.
    2
  37. Guilty, sexual abusing monster.
    2
  38.  @jonelrobinson2231  no, they ARE victims. You do not know more than them. It is common for victims to have inconsistencies in their stories. You cannot tell what a true victim would or would not do. You want him to be innocent so badly that you're willing to deny all the evidence. Take away the name Michael Jackson, take away the moonwalk, take away his music, if he was just a guy down the street who has sharing his bed with little boys, and was accused as much as he was, you would not be defending him. You are suffering with celebrity worship syndrome. Get some help an ease on down somewhere.
    2
  39. I've done unbiased research and I can confidently say that he is 1000% guilty of abusing boys. The building did exist, it's just not officially recorded. Wade was abused in other locations, he could have been abused multiple times while he stayed at Neverland at one particular time. It has been shown that Wade was left alone with Jackson. You get all your lies from MJ Fan blogs and fan made propaganda documentaries.
    2
  40.  @Snyper1405  truthful documentaries don't need to be made in one cut. The truth is the truth, no matter how cuts.
    2
  41.  @Snyper1405  the truth was that they were all abused.
    2
  42. ​ @ilenhalogram his fans are mindless drones repeating the same rhetoric.
    2
  43. The defenders🤥 will join their holy Idol 🔥🔥🔥👿👹💩💀 hee hee
    2
  44.  @christaylor7916  you saying "I'm not even a fan" is funny, Stanny. His victims know he is guilty and so does anyone who isn't a fan blinded by his stardom like you 😂
    2
  45. He was guilty as f!
    2
  46.  @scarlettdenoe6649  no, he did not think of it as abuse until 2013.
    2
  47. Any of those.
    2
  48. They're suing his companies.
    2
  49. Anyone who defends a grown man sleeping in bed with unrelated boys is also perverted.
    2
  50. The little boys couldn't defend themselves when he abused them.
    2
  51.  @oxid71  I also agree.
    2
  52. Yes, he said he found out that Michael Jackson was guilty of doing far worse to boys than m*lesting them.
    2
  53.  @BabyGirlTiny  other what?
    1
  54.  @elenanegrea3123  they didn't know that Michael Jackson was a pedo.
    1
  55. I feel bad for the kids he abused.
    1
  56. Money is Justice, it is compensatory Justice. Money pays for therapy to help you heal. They'll get the recognition that they are survivors, that's what they deserve. I've studied the cases from unbiased sources (Court documents and transcripts, experts, law officials, lawyers etc) = MJ was guilty.
    1
  57. He touched him in multiple locations
    1
  58. Are they pro Michael Jackson?
    1
  59.  @EazyRocko  it was hush money according to His own lawyer Carl Douglas who said they paid to silence the accuser and it was not the insurance who paid, it was Michael Jackson.
    1
  60.  @elisabettabergese8140  hi, you posted no facts. The opinion from the general public is correct. MJ did not want a criminal trial, he wanted to avoid it at all costs. Evan Chandler would have had a criminal trial but Michael Jackson paid him off. It would not have given away the defense to prosecution if the civil trial went first, because if they changed their evidence afterwards, the defense would have pointed this out to discredit them. If Michael Jackson was innocent there will be nothing to hide. After the civil trial, the Chandlers did not proceed with the criminal trial because they were paid off to not proceed with the criminal trial. Evan did not run with the money, he was paid to not continue with the criminal case. Jordan was given most of the money and Evan was given some as well as Jordan's mother June. Evan did not abandon his son, after Jordan emancipated from his parents he carried on living with his father Evan for several years. When Jordan was 18, he filed another lawsuit against Michael in 1998 along with his father. There was so much evidence and that is the reason why Michael Jackson paid them off. Michael Jackson's own lawyer Carl Douglas said that the reason why Michael Jackson settled was to "Silence the accuser" to obviate the criminal case. Evan was not caught admitting the whole thing was an extortion scheme in a tapped phone call. The phone call recording was deceitfully edited by crook Anthony Pellicano who is working for Michael Jackson. Even so, nowhere in the phone call recording did Evan ever mention a scheme to extort money from Michael Jackson.
    1
  61.  @ChokeslamToHell  yes, he was initially offered it and he turned it down.
    1
  62.  @ChokeslamToHell  no, he turnded down the Cirque du Soleil position because he had other work commitments such as the movie, he was going through an emotional time after having his son and the effects of the trauma from the abuse starting to get worse.
    1
  63.  @neithyjohnson1066  he lied in 2005 to protect his abuser because he didn't realise that the relationship he had with Michael Jackson was abuse until after he had his first child.
    1
  64.  @dolly-gq9lr  he turned it down initially, then he changed his mind. What's your point?
    1
  65.  @dolly-gq9lr  maybe or maybe not. That does not mean that the allegations are false.
    1
  66.  @vivp9593  there was evidence for the criminal case in 1993 that's why Michael Jackson settled to "silence the accuser" in order to "obviate the criminal case", these other words of Carl Douglas who was Michael Jackson's attorney 1993. The reason why there was a case that went to court in 2005 is because Michael Jackson could no longer settle out to obviate the criminal case said Carl Douglas. There was no falsification of dates or evidence by the prosecution. You have done no research, you have only believed lies.
    1
  67.  @dolly-gq9lr  "in your book", what do you believe is irrelevant. He knows he was abused by Michael Jackson, whether you like it or not.
    1
  68.  @dolly-gq9lr  no, it is not relevant. What do you believe does not determine whether someone was abused or not. People can lie under oath. He is now telling the truth about him being abused. It is going to trial, he has said that he lied because he was defending Michael Jackson. He was abused. If the estate pay a settlement it shows that they are admitting guilt.
    1
  69. ​ @dolly-gq9lr  it is not relevant. You obviously do not understand the effects abuse has on a survivor. It is well known within psychology that survivors often will not reveal that they have been abused for many years and sometimes never at all. He is telling the truth now about being abused by Michael Jackson.
    1
  70.  @MrBibi86  they are specifically referring to the 1993 case.
    1
  71. ​​ @MrBibi86 no, Michael Jackson paid them off to not peruse the criminal case. Don't you think that it's suspicious that Michael Jackson paid them off with millions of Dollars after the description the boy gave of Michael Jackson's privates matched to obviate the criminal case? Michael Jackson and his lawyers wanted to avoid the criminal case at all costs. I've listened to the phone call recording that was the chiefly edited by Anthony Pellicano, there is no mention of them being after money. Jordan Chandler never said that Michael Jackson did not touch him. Everything you said is false.
    1
  72. No
    1
  73.  @Snyper1405  that doesn't make any sense. Michael Jackson was a pedo who sleeps with boys. Do you also sleep with boys?
    1
  74. She was threatened to not reveal what she knew in court.
    1
  75. She is definitely a biased Michael Jackson Stan.
    1
  76. So was OJ Simpson.
    1
  77.  @jonelrobinson2231  I wouldn't call hundreds of photos of naked children nothing.
    1
  78.  @Snyper1405  were you in bed with them?
    1
  79.  @mjmedia09returns  Brooke Shields was not his girlfriend, James was his boyfriend / fiance.
    1
  80. The victims know and they're still alive.
    1
  81. He never defended himself when he WAS here either. He paid off multiple victims multiple millions of Dollars to avoid defending himself in court. The one time he did go to court, he never defended himself and refused to take the stand. Stop defending that criminal, he's dead.
    1
  82. No, a better question is why would Michael Jackson abuse boys that he was entrusted with?
    1
  83.  @neithyjohnson1066  his victims did
    1
  84. No
    1
  85. He was not proven innocent, he was found not guilty. However, as a verdict, "not guilty" means the fact finder finds that the prosecution did not meet its burden of proof. A not guilty verdict does not mean that the defendant truly is innocent but rather that for legal purposes they will be found not guilty because the prosecution did not meet the burden. R Kelly received the same verdict in 2008.
    1
  86. Exactly, some victims never disclose that they were abused. Wade and James are very brave for coming forward.
    1
  87.  @EazyRocko  Jimmy Savile was never proven to be a Child abuser in a court of law. We have the victims testimonies like we have Michael Jackson's victims testimonies. Many of Jimmy Savile's victims didn't come forward until after Savile had died and they were adults.
    1
  88.  @EazyRocko  I would want money for damages if Michael Jackson had abused me. I don't know if I would be as brave as these two men though, even for money. There's no guarantee that they get money, there is no way that they would be exposing themselves to all this hate unless they were really abused.
    1
  89.  @elenanegrea3123  that's because stans don't like facts. You're boring me with your excuses for Michael Jackson's pedophilic behaviour.
    1
  90.  @christaylor7916  aww you're also arguing on this video too. I'll never stop exposing Michael Jackson until the whole world knows he's guilty. When are you going to give up obsessively defending a deceased nonce?? Cope harder.
    1
  91. Amen
    1
  92. I hope he wins. He should give some of thw money to Gavin as well.
    1
  93. He liked little white butts and he cannot lie The other pedos can't deny
    1
  94. ​ @neithyjohnson1066 they knew what they did but they didn't realise that it was abuse.
    1
  95. Michael jackson is guilty.
    1
  96. But CSA is fine?
    1
  97. You're damn right!
    1
  98.  @EazyRocko  there is lots of evidence of his guilt. R Kelly was also found not guilty on 14 counts in 2008. Not guilty does not mean innocent. There are no proven lies in the accuser stories. Inconsistencies is common in stories of CSA victims. The Arvisos never wanted any money. Wanting money as compensation is not an indication that abuse did not occur. The police were involved in several of the victims' cases. The first accuser has not come out and said that their father made them lie for money. You need to do YOUR research because everything that you said was a LIE.
    1
  99. ​​​​ @JacksonStar4757 he fit all the characteristics. There are different types of pedo, he was a preferential. He likely had many more victims, but only needs one to be guilty. He had at least 7 known accusers that have not been found to be lying. They are all credible. You are biased.
    1
  100. Very obsessed
    1
  101.  @JacksonStar4757  this is very common for CSA survivors to have mix-up in dates or mixing up which building they were abused in on a certain date. Harrison Funk said the train station was built before the permit. Other witnesses place it being there much earlier than 1994 as well and there was even an earlier station. Michael Jackson didn't care about laws and regulations lol. Try again.
    1
  102.  @SaimaSalim-p7q  yes, the boys thought they were in a loving relationship with him and it wasn't until they were older that they realise that their relationship was abuse. At firsts Gavin Arvizo was like loving being at Neverland and his mother could see how Michael Jackson was trying to get too close so she took him away for his safety. Then when they got them back in never that abused him.
    1
  103. False. How many times do you want me to prove you wrong? There is evidence of a train station being there for longer than official records show. James was also abused in many locations inside and outside Neverland. You are also ignoring how trauma affects CSA victims.
    1
  104. It was extremely sexual. Most people always knew.
    1
  105.  @elifdemirtas5614  no, your hero.
    1
  106. 5) He was a pedo
    1
  107. So? He was guilty.
    1
  108. I know of a pedophile called Michael Jackson. I think there was also a pedophile sports coach that did the same.
    1
  109.  @EazyRocko  adults sleep in bed with other adults, pedos sleep in bed with other people's kids.
    1
  110.  @jamesway  my username shows the conclusion when you do unbiased research.
    1
  111.  @elenanegrea3123  he still did what he did no matter how many years he's been gone.
    1
  112. Shhhhhh🤫
    1
  113.  @kathleenmaclachlan1541  I'm good thanks, you? I can see this comment but it still happening to me with other comments. I can only see some comments when I happened to be looking back through a particular thread. It's so annoying!
    1
  114. Foget all of that. He was a pedo.
    1
  115. Jimmy Savile is dead too.
    1
  116. And it's not the fault of the person who actually physically abused them?
    1
  117. You not wanting to believe it does not change the fact that he was a guilty pedophile. There is no excuse for him sleeping in bed with related little boys.
    1
  118. ​ @mennamentos-ht1my Jordan was credible.
    1
  119. King of pedophiles
    1
  120. No.
    1
  121. Wade and James have never had a trial.
    1
  122. I do.
    1