Comments by "Caesar Renasci" (@CaesarRenasci) on "Раввин Михаил Финкель"
channel.
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
Israeli institutions does not do any research for rhe United States: they do that for Yahoo, IBM, Intel, Microsoft..
Finkel has no idea what he is talking about and, like a typilcal Russian, peddles conspiracy theories. The remark about Machiqvelli's "The Prince" is sovput of context that is assinine. But that's how he creates the aura of being an intellectual.
This man, who pretends to be a writer, a "politolog," a jurist, and a Rabbi, should stick with making trade deals in Russia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
With all due respect, Rabbi, you clearly lack the rudimentary knowledge of economics and certainly the knowledge of financial economics, which is more confusing to most people. In consequence, you have perpetuated, and by the force of your title have given credence to, the most vile anti-Semitic tropes popularized recently by Adolph. A reasonable viewer who takes your falsehoods for truth should conclude that (i) all money in the world belongs to the Jews and (ii) even a single Jew I'd so powerful that he can topple a government. That it what Adolph screamed to the crowds, that is what you said in your video. Both are false.
Shiff did not topple the Russian government: he has refrained from prolonging its inevitable death. The tsarist government fell for the same reason the Soviet one fell: a country where people hold medeival views on the value of human life, dignity and property of others, and prefer power to the rule of law --- such a country is not competitive and eventually unable to survive. Tsars and Soviets died of natural causes.
You made Shiff some kind of tsar of money. This is a joke: the vast majority of money in the world has always belonged to Gentiles. If Shiff is so powerful and evil -- why even talk to him, why not go to another, more powerful, bank? Most banks in the Anglo-American world were anti-Semitic in XIX century: no Jew could not get a job of a janitor at places such as JP Morgan or Brown Brothers Harriman before WW II (yes, that Harriman who was the American ambassador in Moscow). JP Morgan has personally prevented a crisis once by paying the debt of American government -- the government of an economic colossus. He was way more powerful than Shiff, and could certainly bail out a much smaller arussian ecobomy. Why not go to him for a loan?
Answer: Russia could not get sufficient credit from anybody. Beeing backward, illiterate, and inaptly managed, it was not creditworthy. Banks deny credit to those who cannot pay back the loans. Did Shiff make Rissia backward, did he make Nicholai so spwctacularly inept, did he make the nobility so self-centered and resistant to reforms? Certainly not. Values have consequences. Whereas in the West nobility was raised with the sense of noblesse oblige (noble obligation to take care of ordinary people), no such though even existed in Russia until XIX century. The opposite is true: ordinary people were despised and abused by the nobility. The vast majority of American slaves were treated better than the vast majority of Russian serfs. No Shiff and no orher Jew has made Russia heartless.
Similarly, a loan to Japan or any other country is not philanthropy: if Shiff gave such a loan, it was because Japan was creditworthy. Which implies that Japan could get a loan from another bank. This is basic economics, Rabbi.
You have presented rational financial decisions of people as if they were acts of Zeus on Olympus: Shiff plays the role of Zeus and does whatever he wants with the mortals. One should normally laufh upon hering such ignorance, but I feel Luke crying.
This is because your authoritatively presented ignorance has just empowered every anti-Semite in a country that is full of them. They will quote you for decades: "here, the Jews rule the world, a single one can topple a government, even their Rabbis says so."
If what you said were true (it is not), how should an average Russian, Ukranian, or Belorussian feel and react? He must protect himself from the danger of "foreign" interference; that is the only logical conclusion he can reach. But the peemise is false, the conlusion stems from a lie.
The lie that "the Jews rule the world" is a recent one. Until mid-1800s Europrans were largely Christian and another lie -- that Jews killed Christ - was sufficient. But how can you justify your hatred if are an atheist amd don't care about Christ? A new lie is needed: "thevJews are too prominent amd must be brought to heel."
That is what you perpetuated and amd gave credence to, Rabbi. If I made such a mistake, I would get off the stage (stop making videos) forever and ask the Creator forgiveness every day for the rest of my life. Dismiss your admirerers, Rabbi: their praises appears to have gone to your head.
Having dabbled into many areas -- with success in some, to be sure -- you began to believe that you have no limits. Your ignorance of rudimentary economics is not accidental, Rabbi: it is ignorance of arrogance.
Your motivation was noble, I am sure -- to admit candidly that many Jews sold out Judaism for the communist idol, just as many Christians and Muslims did. Denied citizenship everywhere in Europe until Naoleon and falsely portrayed as "Christ-killers" by the Church, they were particularly vulnerable to propaganda that promised them EQUALITY FOR THE FIRST TIME and embraced the idol in great numbers. Whatever your motivation was, Rabbi, what you actually did was perpetrating a lie, a lie of the lowest, gutter, kind. Have you heard of the commandment "Thou shall not serve as false witness?" You have just served as false witness and done a great disservice to Jews and Gentiles alike.
I wish you well, Rabbi. May HaShem count only your merits.
1
-
No, not at all. Capitalism and socialism give different answers to the question:: who has the rights over THINGS --- and only things, nothing else. Capitalism is a system where YOU have the right to do what you want with YOUR things. Socialism says, in essence, that things that are YOUR do not exist: everything belongs to "the people" in theory and to the government in practice.
The question is very small, as you cam see; it deals only about freedoms relayed to THINGS. Western society has in addition Judeo-Christian morality and a variety of faiths --- Jewish, Catholic, Protestant, Mormon....
People that don't follow G-d's law may steal, commit murders, and other sins. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WIRH CAPITALISM: it is all about the presence or absence of morality.
Marx could not see that, because he rejected all Judeo-Christian morality (this is why it is moral to kill in the name of comommunism, for the sake of the "future man"). Marx therefore attributed all evil to... Capitalism. As you can see., this is simply illogical . This is like saying, "I am hungry, right now, because my neighbor is playing violin." Yes, bo4h exist in the world but they are unrelated, hunger is caused by chemical processes and not by the sounds of violin. Similarly, sinfulness comes from not following the word of the Creator and nothing else. It has nothing to do with capitalism, and it has nothing to do with wealth or poverty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Turkish Sultan, by contrast, invited the Jews expelled by Spain. He even questioned the intelligence of the monarchs, to wit: "I heat that Ferdinand and Isabella arw wise rulers, but hoe can wiae rulers expel the most productive members of society?"
That's the difference between you even today amd the Sultan in 1492. You perceive everything as a zero-sum game: if someone gains it must be that someone loses. You are not alone: Greeks thought so, too, but 2300 years ago. Your mind, as you van see is not even medieval: it is ancient.
The vast majority of interactions among people are not zero-sum games: people do have different interests (a seller wants to sell at a higher price and a buyer wants to buy lower), but the solution (exchange in this example) benefits both parties. Both profit, the sum of their gains is not zero but greater than zero.
Maybe it is time to update your views from 2300 years ago?
If you were to think and read more about what I said, you'd be amazed at how differently you would look at almost everything around you. These ideas are one fundamental ones, and many others flow from them.
It is unlikely that you will even reread my post. Why change? My ancient thinking is familiar and comfortable (between disasters). It is truecthat I live in violence and govno, but it is my violence and my govno. The trick is to get to find a spot where YOU are protected from violence and where govno does not smell too much. It is comfortable to blame the Mongols, the Germans, the Americans. the Georgians, the Ukranians --- and always the Jews, of course. You are such dushevnye peoole but victims of terrible people.
The naive Weat kept hoping that you would catch up with modern times some day but certainly has no illusions now. You LIKE living in sh-t and violence, bribing and kissing behinds of people in power -- and blaming others for your backwardness.
Hate makes people stupid and leaves their children without hope for better, my friend, and you are full of hate.
You always have a choice, however. You can stop hating in a heartbeat. It is difficult to decide whom to love, but you can always stop hating. Do it for the sake of your children I'd not for yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How Marxist of you! Everyrhing is determined by material factors. People don't have ideals, faith, feelings -- the robots that eat food and excrete leftovers.
Just think how stupid it is. Suppose you have soup with beef, vegetables, and spices in pan. Suppose I pour the soup out, show you the empty pan, and claim that only metal exists in the world, there is no such thing as soup.
That is what Marx does: he "pours" out all spiritual world of the human being, shoes you the empty physical body, and THEN claims that only the material world matters. Of course only the left foot remains after you chop off the right one.
Marx wrote this nonsense almost 200 years ago. It is time you catch up with modern times see hid nonsense for what it is.
Finally, by what measure do you determine that the Earth is overpopulated? You should publish your findings in a scientific journal: nobody in the world knows this "fact."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1