Youtube comments of Neil of Longbeck (@neiloflongbeck5705).

  1. 441
  2. 374
  3. 319
  4. 307
  5. 270
  6. 249
  7. 163
  8. 112
  9. 111
  10. 109
  11. 106
  12. 95
  13. 85
  14. 85
  15. 74
  16. 72
  17. 72
  18. 71
  19. 67
  20. 66
  21. 65
  22. 65
  23. 65
  24. 63
  25. 62
  26. 61
  27. 58
  28. 56
  29. 55
  30. 54
  31. 53
  32. 52
  33. 52
  34. 51
  35. 51
  36. 49
  37. 45
  38. 43
  39. 37
  40. 36
  41. 35
  42. 35
  43. 35
  44. 33
  45. 33
  46. 32
  47. 31
  48. 31
  49. 31
  50. 30
  51. What you are circling at the 10:05 mark is a trip cock, interlocked with signal 156 (hence the orange cable). These are automatically lowered when a signal indicate a proceed aspect, but should the pneumatic motor fail they are sprung loaded to return to the stop position. These have been in use on London Underground (LU) since before WW1. LU was already in the process of introducing speed control equipment, similar in nature to the trip cock system already in place, at locations were lines ended in a tunnel after an accident involving an empty train at Tooting Broadway in 1971. By the time of the Moorgate Accident, 12 of the 19 locations had been fitted with this equipment. After Moorgate in July 1978 an new system involving 3 trip cocks was introduced, with the first being at the entry pointwork to the platform, the 2nd at the start of the platform and the 3rd halfway down the platform. If the train's speed exceeds 12.5mph at any one of these, then the emergency brake is applied. They also put resistors in the power supply to prevent trains accelerating into the platform. These are switched out for departures. Also, there were changes to the signalling into dead-end platforms. Previously, the preceding signal would show a green proceed aspect if the platform was clear and a yellow caution aspect if the platform was partially occupied. Afterwards, the driver would see a yellow aspect if the platform was clear or red aspect with 2 white lights at 45 degrees if the platform was partially occupied if the signalman was giving permission to proceed.
    30
  52. 30
  53. 30
  54. 29
  55. 29
  56. 28
  57. 27
  58. 27
  59. 27
  60. 27
  61. 26
  62. 26
  63. 25
  64. 25
  65. 25
  66. 25
  67. 25
  68. 24
  69. 24
  70. 23
  71. 23
  72. 23
  73. 23
  74. 23
  75. 22
  76. 22
  77. 22
  78. 22
  79. 22
  80. 22
  81. 21
  82. 21
  83. 21
  84. 20
  85. 20
  86. 19
  87. 19
  88. 19
  89. 19
  90. 19
  91. 19
  92. 19
  93. 19
  94. 18
  95. 18
  96. 18
  97. 18
  98. 18
  99. 18
  100. 17
  101. 17
  102. 17
  103. 17
  104. 17
  105. 17
  106. 17
  107. 17
  108. 17
  109. 17
  110. 17
  111. 17
  112. 17
  113. 16
  114. A very superficial telling of the reign of Edward II and the death of Piers Gaveston. The death of Gaveston was much more interesting than given here. Edward II and Gaveston were at Knaresborough in January 1312 and were in Newcastle in May when Thomas of Lancaster force marched his men to the city, including the Earl of Pembroke, Henry Percy and Robert Clifford. The King and Gaveston barely escaped. They ended up in Scarborough and when the King left for York Lancaster placed his men between the two whilst the men under Pembroke, Percy, Clifford and Earl Warenne besieged Scarborough Castle. Gaveston surrendered and was taken to York, where negotiations with Edwatd II were to be conducted. Gaveston was be released on 1st August if negotiations with Edward II failed. He was then taken south to Oxfordshire, in Pembroke's custody to Deddington, where he was kidnapped by Thomas of Lancaster's men and taken to Warwick for his trial. Found guilty he was taken to the nearest piece if Lancaster's land and beheaded by 2 Welshmen. The kidnapping drove a wedge between Pembroke and Lancaster and made Pembroke the King's man. Much more interesting than the bland account given here. Hugh Despenser the Younger becomes a sea monster (ie a pirate) when he was banished. Lancaster was supposed to come to Badlesmere's aid but refuse because he didn't like Badlesmere. Lancaster was supposed to move to the Welsh Marches but did not, forcing the Mortimers (Roger of Chirk and his nephew Roger of Wigmore (the one that escaped from the Tower of London and allegedly became Queen Isabella's lover)) to surrender. One his escape from the Tower of London Roger of Wigmore fled to France, where he became the focal point of the resistance to Edward II, so much so that before Queen Isabella was allowed to go to France Roger and the other exiles had to be banished from France. The Mortimers claimed to be descended from the legendary King Arthur through Llewellyn the Great, his maternal grandfather. There was a legend that a son of the Mortimer house would one day be King of England. Thomas of Lancaster wasn't the King Arthur named in these letters. Thomas of Lancaster was captured the morning after the Battle of Boroughbridge. It took 3 blows to remove his head, he was dead after the 1st blow. The landings of Queen Isabella and Roger Moryimer of Wigmore was in the Orwell estuary, which us not known for white cliffs. They had come from Hainault with a small army, of about 4,000 men.
    16
  115. 16
  116. 16
  117. 16
  118. 16
  119. 16
  120. 16
  121. 15
  122. 15
  123. 15
  124. 15
  125. 15
  126. 15
  127. 14
  128. 14
  129. 14
  130. 14
  131. 13
  132. 13
  133. 13
  134. 13
  135. 13
  136. 13
  137. 13
  138. 13
  139. 12
  140. 12
  141. 12
  142. 12
  143. 12
  144. 12
  145. 12
  146. 12
  147. 12
  148. 12
  149. 12
  150. 12
  151. 12
  152. 12
  153. 12
  154. 12
  155. 12
  156. 12
  157. 12
  158. 12
  159. 11
  160. 11
  161. 11
  162. 11
  163. 11
  164. 11
  165. 11
  166. 11
  167. 11
  168. 11
  169. 11
  170. 10
  171. 10
  172. 10
  173. 10
  174. 10
  175. 10
  176. 10
  177. 10
  178. 10
  179. 10
  180. 10
  181. 10
  182. 10
  183. 9
  184. 9
  185. 9
  186. 9
  187. 9
  188. 9
  189. 9
  190. 9
  191. 9
  192. 9
  193. 9
  194. 9
  195. 9
  196. 9
  197. 9
  198. 9
  199. 9
  200. 9
  201. 9
  202. 9
  203. 9
  204. 9
  205. 9
  206. 9
  207. 9
  208. 9
  209. 9
  210. 8
  211. 8
  212. 8
  213. 8
  214. 8
  215. 8
  216. 8
  217. 8
  218. 8
  219. 8
  220. 8
  221. 8
  222. 8
  223. 8
  224. 7
  225. 7
  226. 7
  227. 7
  228. 7
  229. 7
  230. 7
  231. 7
  232. 7
  233. 7
  234. 7
  235. 7
  236. 7
  237. 7
  238. 7
  239. 7
  240. 7
  241. 7
  242. 7
  243. 7
  244. 7
  245. 7
  246. I think Miranda Sykes put it best in her song "The Lily and the Rose": O, twas early in the springtime Nineteen hundred and sixteen My sweetheart sailed to Flanders To serve the King and Queen We cheered them from the quayside And as our cries arose He threw my way a sweet bouquet A lily and a rose O, the rose and tender lily Still bloom within their beds They cut the rose for lovers The lily for the dead And hope, which springs eternal Swells every bud that grows Each bloom, for me, a memory The lily and the rose O, his letters brimmed with courage Until July the first Behind his gentle humour I knew he feared the worst And on that fateful morning Amidst the whistle blows He plucked for me so valiantly The lily, not the rose O, the rose and tender lily Still bloom within their beds They cut the rose for lovers The lily for the dead And hope, which springs eternal Swells every bud that grows Each bloom, for me, a memory The lily and the rose Now and then I read his letters Written many years before As young men over England Depart again for war And in my summer garden They stand in selfless rows As sweet today as that bouquet The lily and the rose. It always brings tear to my eye.almost as much as Steve Knightley' "Coming Home" with it sad final line: Born in the north country, raised in the west It was his mother and sister that knew him the best Eager to learn but struggled at school Too swift with his fists, too slow with the rules All through this town he raised hell with his mates They only slowed down when they started to date A natural made father as fine as his own Into the man the boy had now grown So he tattooed their names, a heart and a crest He fought with his brothers and seved with the best Twenty years, three months and a week Since the day he was born He's coming home now The family have been informed
    7
  247. 7
  248. 7
  249. 7
  250. 7
  251. 7
  252. 7
  253. 6
  254. 6
  255. 6
  256. 6
  257. 6
  258. 6
  259. 6
  260. 6
  261. 6
  262. 6
  263. 6
  264. 6
  265. 6
  266. 6
  267. 6
  268. 6
  269. 6
  270. 6
  271. 6
  272. 6
  273. 6
  274. 6
  275. 6
  276. 6
  277. 6
  278. At least they did repeat the old lies about de Havilland coming up with the idea of the fast unarmed bomber, that the Air Ministry or RAF were opposed to such designs, or that he insisted that they use wood. George Volkert had submitted an unarmed design proposal (called the Handley Page Unarmed Bomber) along side the HP.56 to meet Air Ministry Specification P.13/36. This bomber was designed carry a normal bomb load of 3,000lb instead 1,000lb of the P.13/39 and would, on paper, have been 1,165lb lighter and 22mph faster at cruising speed (300mph over 278mph). Captain Liptrot (at that time Research Director Aircraft 3) calculated that this twin-engined bomber could be fastervthan the Spitfire. He acknowledged the counter-argument of the fighters would get faster but he had been arguing that this margin would never exceed 15% with advanced versions of current technology. In late July 1937 R H Verney (Director Technical Development) gave guarded support to further research into such a concept. In April 1938 the CinC of Bomber Command Air Chief Marshall E R ludliw-Hewitt gave his support to the unarmed bomber concept, although he objected to the use of the word "unarmed". He also requested in August 1939 that a fast bomber be developed as soon as possible. The ACAS (at the time W Sholto Douglas) did not believe that the speed advantage would last, but still encouraged the DTD to develop a fast bomber (this was the Blackburn B.28). This exposes the lie that the authorities were against de Havilland. As for the use of timber, this was covered by the Air Ministry Specification B.9/38 which called for a medium bomber that did not require the use of aluminium alloys or other metals already in use for aircraft production. De Havilland was asked to provide a design to meet this requirement but he refused. Armstrong Whitworth and Bristol were also approached and provided designs to meet the specification. In the end the AW.41 Albermarle was selected. Another nail in the coffin of the lie that no one at tge Sir Ministry wanted timber combat aircraft.
    6
  279. 6
  280. 6
  281. 6
  282. 6
  283. 6
  284. 6
  285. 6
  286. 6
  287. 6
  288. 6
  289. 6
  290. 6
  291. 6
  292. 6
  293. 6
  294. 6
  295. 6
  296. 6
  297. 5
  298. 5
  299. 5
  300. 5
  301. 5
  302. 5
  303. 5
  304. 5
  305. 5
  306. 5
  307. 5
  308. 5
  309. 5
  310. 5
  311. 5
  312. 5
  313. 5
  314. 5
  315. 5
  316. 5
  317. 5
  318. 5
  319. 5
  320. 5
  321. 5
  322. 5
  323. 5
  324. 5
  325. 5
  326. 5
  327. 5
  328. 5
  329. 5
  330. 5
  331. 5
  332. 5
  333. 5
  334. 5
  335. 5
  336. 5
  337. 5
  338. 5
  339. 5
  340. 5
  341. 5
  342. 5
  343. 5
  344. 5
  345. 5
  346. 5
  347. 5
  348. 5
  349. 5
  350. 5
  351. 5
  352. 5
  353. 5
  354. 5
  355. 5
  356. 5
  357. 5
  358. 5
  359. 5
  360. 5
  361. 4
  362. 4
  363. 4
  364. 4
  365. 4
  366. 4
  367. 4
  368. 4
  369. 4
  370. 4
  371. 4
  372. 4
  373. 4
  374. 4
  375. 4
  376. 4
  377. 4
  378. 4
  379. 4
  380. 4
  381. 4
  382. 4
  383. 4
  384. 4
  385. 4
  386. 4
  387. 4
  388. 4
  389. 4
  390. 4
  391. 4
  392. 4
  393. 4
  394. 4
  395. 4
  396. 4
  397. 4
  398. 4
  399. 4
  400. 4
  401. 4
  402. 4
  403. 4
  404. 4
  405. 4
  406. 4
  407. 4
  408. 4
  409. 4
  410. 4
  411. 4
  412. 4
  413. 4
  414. 4
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 4
  419. 4
  420. 4
  421. 4
  422. 4
  423. 4
  424. 4
  425. 4
  426. 4
  427. 4
  428. 4
  429. 4
  430. 4
  431. 4
  432. 4
  433. 4
  434. 4
  435. 4
  436. 4
  437. 4
  438. 4
  439. 4
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442. 4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472. 4
  473. 4
  474. 4
  475. 4
  476. 4
  477. 4
  478. 4
  479. 3
  480. 3
  481. 3
  482. 3
  483. 3
  484. 3
  485. 3
  486. 3
  487. 3
  488. 3
  489. 3
  490. 3
  491. 3
  492. 3
  493. 3
  494. 3
  495. 3
  496. 3
  497. 3
  498. 3
  499. 3
  500. 3
  501. 3
  502. 3
  503. 3
  504. 3
  505. 3
  506. 3
  507. 3
  508. 3
  509. 3
  510. 3
  511. 3
  512. 3
  513. 3
  514. 3
  515. 3
  516. 3
  517. 3
  518. 3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522. 3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 3
  527. 3
  528. 3
  529. 3
  530. 3
  531. 3
  532. 3
  533. 3
  534. 3
  535. 3
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556. 3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. 3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. 3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 3
  623. 3
  624. 3
  625. 3
  626. 3
  627. 3
  628. 3
  629. 3
  630. 3
  631. 3
  632. 3
  633. 3
  634. 3
  635. 3
  636. 3
  637. 3
  638. 3
  639. 3
  640. 3
  641. 3
  642. 3
  643. 3
  644. 3
  645. 3
  646. 3
  647. 3
  648. 3
  649. 3
  650. 3
  651. 3
  652. 3
  653. 3
  654. 3
  655. 3
  656. 3
  657. 3
  658. 3
  659. 3
  660. 3
  661. 3
  662. 3
  663. 3
  664. 3
  665. 3
  666. 3
  667. 3
  668. 3
  669. 3
  670. 3
  671. 3
  672. 3
  673. 3
  674.  @johnburns4017  from what I've read prior and going from memory both Groves and Arnold wanted an American plane if at at possible but were not adverse tk using the Lancaster. The reason why the B-29 was prioritised for the Far Eastvwas more to do with delivery delays. By the end of 1943 100 B-29s had been delivered but only a dozen or so remained airworthy. These aircraft had originally been slated to go to Egypt and from their bomb Germany and other Axis targets as the airbases in the UK were deemed to be too crowded. At this point in time there was no certainty that either atomic bomb shapes would ever become a viable bomb. The B-29 was designed to drop a large conventional bomb load. The use of the British Type G single point attachments and the Type F releases as use on the Lancaster B.1 Specials used to carry the Tallboy bombs was because the American release mechanisms being used for the testing mic the Thin Man bomb shape were less than reliable. Going from memory from a book on the development of atomic bomb the American bomb release mechanism would release late or not at all it in one case before the bomb bay doors were opened. The crew chief of that particular aircraft was not pleased with the damage caused by the bomb passing through them whilst flying to the range. The Americans are not stupid and chose to use a proven system. Yes, a Lancaster could have reached Hiroshima from Tinian and then got to Iwo Jima to refuel provided it escaped the shockwave from the bomb going off. I do know that Spaatz wanted some Lancaster B.1 Specials on Okinawa for the planned invasion to drop Tallbiys on selected targets.
    3
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712.  @TheScotsalan from my engineering materials notes. In 1842 William John Macquorn Rankine recognised the importance of stress concentrations in his investigation or railway axle failures. The following year Joseph Glynn identifies the keyway as the crack origin whilst investigating the failure of an railway axle. In 1849 Braithwaite was granted money bybthe British government to ascertain the effect of continuous changes in loads on iron structures in order to determine the max load that would not cause failure. He also coined the word fatigue in 1854 . Fairburn and Wohler undertake system research into fatigue in 1860, which lead Wohler to conclude in 1870 that it is the cyclic stress range rather than the peak stress that is the ruling factor in fatigue and came up with the term endurance limit. Sur James Ewing in 1903 that fatigue originates from microscopic cracks. Basquin in 1910 came up with the log-log relationship for S-N curves from Wohler's rest date. In 1954, the year if the Comet disasters, Coffin and Manson explain fatigue crack growth in terms of plastic strain in the tip of the crack (I can't say which came first). In 1970 Elber demonstrated the importance of crack closure on fatigue crack growth due to the wedging effect of plastic deformation, and finally in 1973 Briwn and Miller noticed that in multiaxial conditions the fatigue life of an objectbus governed by the direction receiving the most damage and that both tension and shear loads on the critical plane must be considered. As you can see the majority of the published work came before Comet.
    2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768. 2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. 2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777. 2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820. 2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. Stop repeating the old debunked tales about the Mosquito and do some proper research. Try books like British Secret Projects - Fighters and Bomber 1935-1950 by Tony Buttler and not Wikipedia-type books. De Havilland proposed a militarised version of the Albatross to meet the requirements of the Air Ministry Specification P.13/36 which called for a twin-engined medium bomber for world wide use with a speed of not less than 275mph at 15,000ft on 66% engine power and a range of 3000 miles with a 4000lb bomb load. The required aircraft was to be a medium bomber, general reconaisance and general purpose aircraft all rolled into one and capable of carrying2 18in torpedoes. it was to be armed with 2 2-gun turrets fore and aft.THe Albatross design to carry 6000lb bombs to Berlin and back at 11,000 ft. This aircraft was rejected and the Avro Manchaster was selected to fill the specification. Howwever, the Airministy by 1938 were concerned that there wasn't enough aluminium alloy for aircraft production should war break out and put out specification B.9/38 for a bomber of composite construction to Bristol, Armstrong Whitworth and de Havilland. This required an aircraft that did not use any materials currently used for the construction of aircraft structures namely wood and steel tubes. tIt was the Air Ministry and not de Haviland who where looking at the woodworking industry.the Armstrong Whitworth Albermarle was selecteded by the Air Ministry. In May 1937 George Volkert of Handley Page had proposed a high-speed unarmed bomber with a crew of 2 to meet the P13/36 specification. In his proposal he pointed out that an armed version of his design would fly some 25 mph slower than the unarmed version and would need more aircrew. Volkert's aircraft could carry 3000lb of bombs internally in the fuselage and be able to cruise at 300mph. Captain Liptrot (Research Director Aircraft 3) declared that this design had the potential to be faster than the Spitfire. Volkert's and Liptrot's ideas gave rise to the consideration that defensive armaments were not needed and should be eliminated. So the ground was already well prepared for the Mosquito.
    1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270.  @rob5944  a bit like every government since the mid-1960s with the ending of the British East of Suez commitments. But he did have to cut his cloth in line with the country's financial situation. Since the 1967 devaluation we had had the best part of 15 years of industrial turmoil and decline. In 1982 many parts if the country were still dealing with the recession of the early 1980s with no view of any prosperity that was supposed to come from the slimming down of the nationalised industries. Tax income had fallen with each person removed from the workforce and each business closed. If was political suicide to cut the welfare state including the NHS or education, but cutting military spending was seen as fair game as was reducing the number of people who could call themselves British, which including the people of the Falklsnds (one of the reasons why the Argentinians though we wouldn't fight for them). Unfortunately political actions and inactions tend to blight the country hard a decade or more down the line. An example if this us the devaluation of November 1967. After the best part of 3 years trying to support the value of the Pound the Labour government had to allowing to be devalued by 14%. The causes are many, but include a worse balance of payments deficit (£800 million instead of the expected £400 million run up under the preceding Conservative government), overmanning in industry encouraged by Conservative policies intended to reduce unemployment, lack of investment in new equipment and techniques and unions resisting to changes (some of which would have benefitted their members in terms of health and safety and other areas).
    1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. Back in1996 Iris Dement sang a song called "Living in the Wastelland of the Free" decaying how bad life in America had become. Trump and MAGA decided to make it come true. We got preachers dealing in politics and diamond mines And their speech is growing increasingly unkind They say they are Christ's disciples But they don't look like Jesus to me And it feels like I am living in the wasteland of the free We got politicians running races on corporate cash Now don't tell me they don't turn around and kiss them peoples' ass You may call me old-fashioned But that don't fit my picture of a true democracy And it feels like I am living in the wasteland of the free We got CEO's making two hundred times the workers' pay But they'll fight like hell against raising the minimum wage And If you don't like it, mister, they'll ship your job To some third-world country 'cross the sea And it feels like I am living in the wasteland of the free Living in the wasteland of the free Where the poor have now become the enemy Let's blame our troubles on the weak ones Sounds like some kind of Hitler remedy Living in the wasteland of the free We got little kids with guns fighting inner city wars So what do we do, we put these little kids behind prison doors And we call ourselves the advanced civilization That sounds like crap to me And it feels like I am living in the wasteland of the free We got high-school kids running 'round in Calvin Klein and Guess Who cannot pass a sixth-grade reading test But if you ask them, they can tell you The name of every crotch on mTV And it feels like I am living in the wasteland of the free We kill for oil, then we throw a party when we win Some guy refuses to fight, and we call that the sin But he's standing up for what he believes in And that seems pretty damned American to me And it feels like I am living in the wasteland of the free Living in the wasteland of the free Where the poor have now become the enemy Let's blame our troubles on the weak ones Sounds like some kind of Hitler remedy Living in the wasteland of the free While we sit gloating in our greatness Justice is sinking to the bottom of the sea Living in the wasteland of the free.
    1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582.  @TheImperatorKnight  you don't have a clue about what you are talking about. Public limited company has a very specific meaning AND I'll repeat it for you. It means a company whose shares are traded so that anyone may buy them and that those shareholders are not responsible for any debts the company incurs. The company is privately owned, which simply means that it is not owned by the state (see the definition of private below). A private limited company is one where the shares in the company cannot publicly traded. THIS IS ECONOMICS 101, and if you can't understand this you have no place discussing economics or busi ess ownership. I own a car, but have to follow the laws governing driving and car ownership by your logic the car is now owned by the government as I have to obey the law. THIS IS NOT WHAT HAPPENS. The FTSE250 is a capitalisation-weighted index of the 101st to 350th largest companies listed of the London Stock Exchange, which is owned by the London Stock Exchange Group, a public limited company (see above for what this means). It is not under the control of the Bank of England nor had it ever been, although, just like with driving, government has set the ,awx under which it operates. As for a dictionary definition of the word private please note the following definition option given by the Cambridge Online Dictionary: belonging to or managed by a person or company rather than the government. Cambridge in thus case means the Cambridge University Press which is a publisher owned by, and run independently to, Cambridge University. Please don't try playing silly word games it just makes you look more foolish.
    1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771.  @infantryattacks  your experience is neither here nor there because whilst no 2 event are ever identical they can be analogous. There are always lessons learnt from each event and that as part of your training and that of each NCO and officer above you in the chain of command would have learnt. And this goes back to the days of the first battle ever fought. Hence why would be need staff colleges? Of course they forces landed at Anzio could do everything but they did have an operational plan. Just because Clark didn't tell Lucas everything that he was to do he did give him the overall operational plan, and left it up to Lucas to come up with the plans to achieve these goals, which as a general he should have been able to do. Kesselring reacted in predictable ways, just like the Turks at Gallipoli, and tried to push the invaders back into the sea. Oh but by your illogic that shouldn't have happen Kesselring should have reacted differently to the Turks. So, what Kesselring did shouldn't have happened. But as it did there must be standardised tactics for dealing with an invasion which must be based on an original reaction to an invasion from some point in history. And that point is so far back in time it has been forgotten. The ancient Britons did exactly the same when Julius Caesar invaded Britannia in 54BC. But wait that means the Turks were copying the ancient Britons when they tried to thrown the French, British and Empire forces from Turkish soil in 1915, if your illogic is to hold. All of those battles Caesar's invasion of Britannia, Gallipoli and Anzio are all analogous but all are different due to the technology in use was different.
    1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886.  @FranciscoJG  in 2008 the UK government announced plans to construct new nuclear powerplants at current nuclear powerplants. One such location was announced in 2010 was Sizewell in Suffolk. The energy company EDF back in 2012 agreed to construct 2 reactors. They intended to work with China General Nuclear Power Group (CGN). On 27/5/2020 a development convent order application was submitted (yes after 8 years they started the process to get permission to start construction). Suffolk County Council rejected the application on environmental impact grounds due to the intended number of heavy goods vehicles going to and from the site. The planning application was finally approved on 20/7/2022. On 3/11/2022 the programme was put on review under a government spending review but on 17/11/2022 the go ahead wax given, but the government bought out CGN's 20% share on security grounds. No physical construction has so far started since planning consent was granted. Construction and commissioning is estimated to take between 9 and 12 years. So, that's 2 years to decide upon the location, 10 years to design the site and get permission to build, just over a year to get financing in place and for tendering fir contracts and upto a dozen years before it starts earning its keep. That means it will be producing electricity between 2033 and 2036 or about a quarter of a century after the site was selected by which time its electricity will be well overdue. Now, tell me again that the planning costs are insignificant?
    1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108.  @Biketunerfy  dear gullible, I've read what passes as research on that clearly biased website. It's a pity that your mind is so closed to the truth. There were no alien craft. All we had was a duck being filmed either in the IR portion of the EM spectrum or the visible light spectrum using a low-light TV system (it even saws which system was being used at top of the screen). What you laughingly called the HUD is nothing more than a recording of the WSO's screen in the rear cockpit. In 2 of the 3 clips the aircraft is clearly in a turn of approximately 30 degrees angle of bank. Yes, there is a speed figure in the lower left, but that is the plane's speed not the target's (below it is the speed in Mach numbers - IIRC it's 0.55 Mach in the first, 0.58 Mach in the 2nd and 0.61 Mach in the last). Whilst you can use passive systems to detect range quiet easily, it's another matter to calculate speed using one (the average speed measurement systems use 2 passive devices known distance apart, but in these clips we have 1 camera fo.lowing the duck and that means you can't calculate the duck's speed unless you do speed matching for which there is no evidence).On the right we can see the altitude, which is around the 20,000 foot mark. In all 3 cases we see at the top or off to the top left of the screen the slew angle for the camera (ie the horizontal angle from the line of flight for the camera - in the 3rd clip the slew angle the anglewas about 41 degrees to the left). I'd go on but I'm bored with trying g to get the facts into your closed mind. The report you so gullibiy accept as true was written by someone who has already made up their mind that what is one the footage is alien technology. The footage does not match with the conclusion reached by the authors.
    1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. I see you know a little about railways. The Russian gauge in WW2 was only 89mm wider than the German gauge. If modern track is to go by with a sleeper length of 2,560mm the rails would on standard gauge track would have the inner edge of the rail about 532mm in from the ene of the sleeper, for Russian gauge it would be 488mm in from the end. However, the length of sleeper is a pure guess, as there is nothing I can find on the internet to say just how long the sleepers were on the railways of the Soviet Union. In the UK prior to WW1 the standard length of a sleeper had standardised on most railways to 2,745mm and afterwards, as a cost saving measure, to 2,592mm. The decrease in inset distance on the assumed sleeper length is not that significant as timber sleepers are often cut shorter than normal to around fixed obstructions, and all without train falling over at those points. The Germans whilst retreating from Russia also used railway ploughs which ripped the sleepers in half and damaged the track bed, so the Soviets would have had to restore the track bed in order to lay down new tracks, with new sleepers. Damage to the track bed is a more likely source of derailments. A lot of effort is taken in peacetime to ensure that railways are kept as level as possible as passengers don't like being thrown around. But it's not just for our convenience, trains don't like it either. A typical steam locomotive has a very limited amount of play in its suspension, unlike a car, lorry or dare I say it a tank, most of the suspension of the train actually comes from its trackbed being flexible to absorb the weight if the train whilst being rigid enough to not collapse. Quickly repaired or badly maintained track may be more like a rollercoaster than a a railway and that means either limiting speed of trains or derailments. As for the train loading policies of both the Soviet and German armies, there us something to be said for mixed loads. At least you'll get some of what you need on each train that arrives at the rail head, provided the correct items were dispatched. In the way of these things if you put the loads on trains in the most effective manner, the train that is lost to enemy action will be the one filled with the most vital supplies.
    1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499.  @brianperry  watched it and read the Murder of the TSR2 and as much other material as possible. They all gloss over the economic situation. The UK simply couldn't afford all of its spending commitments in the 1960s. The so-called economic golden age of the 1950s wix nothing more than a pack if lies. The 1950s were a series of economic bond and busts caused in part by the economic policies of the Conservatives who encouraged over manning in all sectors of industry making British products more expensive than yjisr if our industrial rivals in order to keep unemployment artificially low. Productivity in British industry was falling due to failures to adapt to the changing economic situations, part of this lies with the unions becoming more militant and part with the business owners failing to invest in new equipment and methods of working. The end result was, after 3 years of trying UK support the Pound at an exchange rate of £1 to US$2.80 we were forced to devalue it by 14% to £1 to US$2.40, and that was after securing loans from the other central banks and the IMF, no e if which required the scrapping of the TSR2 to obtain. In fact the Americans didn't want us to abandon our commitments east of Suez, for which an sir RAF with the TSR2's capabilities were required. IIRC the TSR2 was the 12th or 13th military programme we cancelled in the 1950s and 1960s, all of which are quietly forgotten and they were not as glamourous as the TSR2. One of these programmes involved a more advanced version of the Victor bomber.
    1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1