Youtube comments of Neil of Longbeck (@neiloflongbeck5705).
-
441
-
374
-
319
-
307
-
270
-
249
-
163
-
112
-
111
-
109
-
106
-
95
-
85
-
85
-
74
-
72
-
72
-
71
-
As the song goes:
Cold falls the night,
Cold rolls the ocean
And colder blows the breath of fate
That sends the roaring gale.
The stars give their light
For duty or devotion,
But a sailor's heart needs more than prayer
When eye and compass fail
And more than hope to guide his lonely sail.
By sea and land John Harrison's hands
Made sure for ever more
That sailors could find longitude
To bring them safe ashore.
Your work was long,
Your days were driven.
You knew that you could build a clock
To marry space and time.
But your one great wrong
Was never forgiven -
For to be better than your betters
Was worse than any crime,
And their envy was a hill you would not climb.
By sea and land John Harrison's hands
Made sure for ever more
That sailors could find longitude
To bring them safe ashore.
And the prize of thirty thousand pounds
Was more than just a prize.
It was dignity and justice
Over bitterness and lies -
And the longer they denied you,
Attacked you and decried you,
The more you saw the weakness in their eyes.
How many lives,
How many talents,
Were tainted by the poisoned well
Of power from which they drank?
But the wind that drives
The bold topgallants
Was harnessed by a man with
Neither privilege nor rank,
And the sailor lads, they knew and gave their thanks.
67
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
63
-
62
-
61
-
58
-
56
-
55
-
54
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
49
-
45
-
43
-
37
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
What you are circling at the 10:05 mark is a trip cock, interlocked with signal 156 (hence the orange cable). These are automatically lowered when a signal indicate a proceed aspect, but should the pneumatic motor fail they are sprung loaded to return to the stop position. These have been in use on London Underground (LU) since before WW1. LU was already in the process of introducing speed control equipment, similar in nature to the trip cock system already in place, at locations were lines ended in a tunnel after an accident involving an empty train at Tooting Broadway in 1971. By the time of the Moorgate Accident, 12 of the 19 locations had been fitted with this equipment. After Moorgate in July 1978 an new system involving 3 trip cocks was introduced, with the first being at the entry pointwork to the platform, the 2nd at the start of the platform and the 3rd halfway down the platform. If the train's speed exceeds 12.5mph at any one of these, then the emergency brake is applied. They also put resistors in the power supply to prevent trains accelerating into the platform. These are switched out for departures.
Also, there were changes to the signalling into dead-end platforms. Previously, the preceding signal would show a green proceed aspect if the platform was clear and a yellow caution aspect if the platform was partially occupied. Afterwards, the driver would see a yellow aspect if the platform was clear or red aspect with 2 white lights at 45 degrees if the platform was partially occupied if the signalman was giving permission to proceed.
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
A very superficial telling of the reign of Edward II and the death of Piers Gaveston. The death of Gaveston was much more interesting than given here. Edward II and Gaveston were at Knaresborough in January 1312 and were in Newcastle in May when Thomas of Lancaster force marched his men to the city, including the Earl of Pembroke, Henry Percy and Robert Clifford. The King and Gaveston barely escaped. They ended up in Scarborough and when the King left for York Lancaster placed his men between the two whilst the men under Pembroke, Percy, Clifford and Earl Warenne besieged Scarborough Castle. Gaveston surrendered and was taken to York, where negotiations with Edwatd II were to be conducted. Gaveston was be released on 1st August if negotiations with Edward II failed. He was then taken south to Oxfordshire, in Pembroke's custody to Deddington, where he was kidnapped by Thomas of Lancaster's men and taken to Warwick for his trial. Found guilty he was taken to the nearest piece if Lancaster's land and beheaded by 2 Welshmen. The kidnapping drove a wedge between Pembroke and Lancaster and made Pembroke the King's man. Much more interesting than the bland account given here.
Hugh Despenser the Younger becomes a sea monster (ie a pirate) when he was banished.
Lancaster was supposed to come to Badlesmere's aid but refuse because he didn't like Badlesmere. Lancaster was supposed to move to the Welsh Marches but did not, forcing the Mortimers (Roger of Chirk and his nephew Roger of Wigmore (the one that escaped from the Tower of London and allegedly became Queen Isabella's lover)) to surrender. One his escape from the Tower of London Roger of Wigmore fled to France, where he became the focal point of the resistance to Edward II, so much so that before Queen Isabella was allowed to go to France Roger and the other exiles had to be banished from France.
The Mortimers claimed to be descended from the legendary King Arthur through Llewellyn the Great, his maternal grandfather. There was a legend that a son of the Mortimer house would one day be King of England. Thomas of Lancaster wasn't the King Arthur named in these letters.
Thomas of Lancaster was captured the morning after the Battle of Boroughbridge. It took 3 blows to remove his head, he was dead after the 1st blow.
The landings of Queen Isabella and Roger Moryimer of Wigmore was in the Orwell estuary, which us not known for white cliffs. They had come from Hainault with a small army, of about 4,000 men.
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
I think Miranda Sykes put it best in her song "The Lily and the Rose":
O, twas early in the springtime
Nineteen hundred and sixteen
My sweetheart sailed to Flanders
To serve the King and Queen
We cheered them from the quayside
And as our cries arose
He threw my way a sweet bouquet
A lily and a rose
O, the rose and tender lily
Still bloom within their beds
They cut the rose for lovers
The lily for the dead
And hope, which springs eternal
Swells every bud that grows
Each bloom, for me, a memory
The lily and the rose
O, his letters brimmed with courage
Until July the first
Behind his gentle humour
I knew he feared the worst
And on that fateful morning
Amidst the whistle blows
He plucked for me so valiantly
The lily, not the rose
O, the rose and tender lily
Still bloom within their beds
They cut the rose for lovers
The lily for the dead
And hope, which springs eternal
Swells every bud that grows
Each bloom, for me, a memory
The lily and the rose
Now and then I read his letters
Written many years before
As young men over England
Depart again for war
And in my summer garden
They stand in selfless rows
As sweet today as that bouquet
The lily and the rose.
It always brings tear to my eye.almost as much as Steve Knightley' "Coming Home" with it sad final line:
Born in the north country, raised in the west
It was his mother and sister that knew him the best
Eager to learn but struggled at school
Too swift with his fists, too slow with the rules
All through this town he raised hell with his mates
They only slowed down when they started to date
A natural made father as fine as his own
Into the man the boy had now grown
So he tattooed their names, a heart and a crest
He fought with his brothers and seved with the best
Twenty years, three months and a week
Since the day he was born
He's coming home now
The family have been informed
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
At least they did repeat the old lies about de Havilland coming up with the idea of the fast unarmed bomber, that the Air Ministry or RAF were opposed to such designs, or that he insisted that they use wood. George Volkert had submitted an unarmed design proposal (called the Handley Page Unarmed Bomber) along side the HP.56 to meet Air Ministry Specification P.13/36. This bomber was designed carry a normal bomb load of 3,000lb instead 1,000lb of the P.13/39 and would, on paper, have been 1,165lb lighter and 22mph faster at cruising speed (300mph over 278mph). Captain Liptrot (at that time Research Director Aircraft 3) calculated that this twin-engined bomber could be fastervthan the Spitfire. He acknowledged the counter-argument of the fighters would get faster but he had been arguing that this margin would never exceed 15% with advanced versions of current technology. In late July 1937 R H Verney (Director Technical Development) gave guarded support to further research into such a concept. In April 1938 the CinC of Bomber Command Air Chief Marshall E R ludliw-Hewitt gave his support to the unarmed bomber concept, although he objected to the use of the word "unarmed". He also requested in August 1939 that a fast bomber be developed as soon as possible. The ACAS (at the time W Sholto Douglas) did not believe that the speed advantage would last, but still encouraged the DTD to develop a fast bomber (this was the Blackburn B.28). This exposes the lie that the authorities were against de Havilland.
As for the use of timber, this was covered by the Air Ministry Specification B.9/38 which called for a medium bomber that did not require the use of aluminium alloys or other metals already in use for aircraft production. De Havilland was asked to provide a design to meet this requirement but he refused. Armstrong Whitworth and Bristol were also approached and provided designs to meet the specification. In the end the AW.41 Albermarle was selected. Another nail in the coffin of the lie that no one at tge Sir Ministry wanted timber combat aircraft.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The homophones have got you again. The architect was Archibald Kier Leitch. He was responsible for the following English and Scottish football grounds: Anfield, Highbury, Ayresome Park, Bramall Lane, Celtic Park, Craven Cottage, Deepdale, The Old Den, Dens Park, The Dell, Ewood Park, Fratton Park, Goodison Park, Hampden Park, Home Park, Ibrox, Hillsborough Stadium, Molineux, Old Trafford, Roker Park, Saltergate, Selhurst Park, Stamford Bridge, Villa Park, West Ham Stadium and White Hart Lane.
He also worked in Ireland (Lansdown Road) and Wales (Cardiff Arms Park) plus Twickenham.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheImperatorKnight nobody needs to label you as a conspiracy theorist, you've already done it. As for economics, yes you don't know as much as you think, after all you think a plc and a state owned company are the same thing. In a plc the shares are traded publicly on a stock exchange and in a state owned business no shares are traded. Which means they are not the same. Yes a government can retain a share in a plc, like they did with the Royal Mail until quite recently.
It's amazing that You Tube is so bothered by your comments they have taken no real action, after all they are a private business, a Limited Liability Corporation, and can legitimately silence you without infringing your freedom of speech. But they don't seem to have done this, although they did make it harder for people to see your video about the Greek famine in WW2 by not recommending it this is not censorship to all but thinnest of skinned conspiracy theorists. You Tube, is there to make money for its owners, Google, and films about famines or other disasters including wars are not money makers for them.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Emdee5632 the headline "Fog in the Channel. Continent cut off" although fictitious sums up our isolationist attitude held by many British people. The kind of people who complain that immigrants to the UK gather together in little enclaves, eat strange food, wear strange clothes and refuse to speak English, whilst when travelling abroad won't try the fod of that country and want English food, won't speak that country's language and look for the nearest British pub. This attitude goes back a long way, Churchill espoused such sentiments in 1953, but it goes back further. This attitude, although widespread, does not infect everyone, 48% of those who voted in the 2016 referendum voted to remain in the EU, but only 72% of the electorate voted - some 13 Million could not be bothered to vote.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ModernKnight the modern stories do, but they also include Friar Tuck (introduce to cannon around 1470) and Maid Marion (introduced to cannon around 1600). But historically, there I nothing to link Robin Hood to the reign of King John. A lot of the action takes place outside of Nottinghamshire.Robin and the Knight, part of A Gest of Robin Hood takes place at the Sayles, near Wentbridge in Barnsdale, which is in Yorkshire during the reign of Edward. The story involves the unnamed abbot of St Mary's, York. The Sheriff of Nottingham or to give him the correct title, the Sheriff of Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and the Royal Forests, appears in several of the fyttes, but in his role of the Sheriff of the Royal Forests but is never named unlike his henchman, Guy of Gisborne.
Additionally, the cult of the longbow dates from later in history. It wasn't until 1252, a I'm no doubt that you a aware, that it became law for all men between the ages of 15 and 60 to be proficient in the use of the longbow. So whilst the longbowwas in use, it wasn't until the latter stages of Henry III's reign that it became part of English society.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheImperatorKnight you don't have a clue about what you are talking about. Public limited company has a very specific meaning AND I'll repeat it for you. It means a company whose shares are traded so that anyone may buy them and that those shareholders are not responsible for any debts the company incurs. The company is privately owned, which simply means that it is not owned by the state (see the definition of private below). A private limited company is one where the shares in the company cannot publicly traded. THIS IS ECONOMICS 101, and if you can't understand this you have no place discussing economics or busi ess ownership.
I own a car, but have to follow the laws governing driving and car ownership by your logic the car is now owned by the government as I have to obey the law. THIS IS NOT WHAT HAPPENS.
The FTSE250 is a capitalisation-weighted index of the 101st to 350th largest companies listed of the London Stock Exchange, which is owned by the London Stock Exchange Group, a public limited company (see above for what this means). It is not under the control of the Bank of England nor had it ever been, although, just like with driving, government has set the ,awx under which it operates.
As for a dictionary definition of the word private please note the following definition option given by the Cambridge Online Dictionary: belonging to or managed by a person or company rather than the government. Cambridge in thus case means the Cambridge University Press which is a publisher owned by, and run independently to, Cambridge University. Please don't try playing silly word games it just makes you look more foolish.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
WRONG! Your quoted loss rate is for ALL of member command. It includes the crews of Battles, Wellesleys, Blenheims, Wellingtons, Whitleys, Herefords, Hampdens, Stirlings, B-17s, Mosquitos, Halifaxs and the Lancaster.
You really need to be more careful.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@garethbaus5471 you contradicted yourself. There are no natural sources of petrol or diesel. Both have to be extracted from crude oil. And if your value of the amount if 4negry required to release it from crude oil is correct, and I will accept for argument's sake, then petrol and diesel engines should be, by your logic, slightly less efficient than claimed. This energy cost, still doesn't address the energy used to extract the crude oil or to transfer it to the refinery, or the energy required to move the petrol and diesel to their place of retail. And yet, we have to fo this for hydrogen, simple because it is locked up in water. The petrol and diesel were safely locked in crude oil and that was, in most places, safely locked in rocks layers deep under the ground.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Now, what do you mean not strictly prohibited? The Hague Conventions of Land and Naval warfare prohibit the targeting an undefended civilian dwelling or town. But, there was no such convention on Aerial warfare. This makes the case of whether the bombing of civilians is a war crime a bit as clear cut as you're trying to make out. Göring and the other Luftwaffe commanders were never charged with the bombing of civilians just for waging a war of aggression and the wanton destruction of property beyond that needed for military necessity (the means of which was not stated). The along with divers other persons, during a period of years preceding 8 May 1945, participated as leaders, organizers, instigators, or accomplices in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit, or which involved the commission of, Crimes against Peace, War Crimes, and Crimes against Humanity, as defined in the War Crimes Commission, and, in accordance with the provisions of the War Crimes Commisson, are individually responsible for their own acts and for all acts committed by any persons in the execution of such plan or conspiracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I see you know a little about railways. The Russian gauge in WW2 was only 89mm wider than the German gauge. If modern track is to go by with a sleeper length of 2,560mm the rails would on standard gauge track would have the inner edge of the rail about 532mm in from the ene of the sleeper, for Russian gauge it would be 488mm in from the end. However, the length of sleeper is a pure guess, as there is nothing I can find on the internet to say just how long the sleepers were on the railways of the Soviet Union. In the UK prior to WW1 the standard length of a sleeper had standardised on most railways to 2,745mm and afterwards, as a cost saving measure, to 2,592mm. The decrease in inset distance on the assumed sleeper length is not that significant as timber sleepers are often cut shorter than normal to around fixed obstructions, and all without train falling over at those points.
The Germans whilst retreating from Russia also used railway ploughs which ripped the sleepers in half and damaged the track bed, so the Soviets would have had to restore the track bed in order to lay down new tracks, with new sleepers. Damage to the track bed is a more likely source of derailments. A lot of effort is taken in peacetime to ensure that railways are kept as level as possible as passengers don't like being thrown around. But it's not just for our convenience, trains don't like it either. A typical steam locomotive has a very limited amount of play in its suspension, unlike a car, lorry or dare I say it a tank, most of the suspension of the train actually comes from its trackbed being flexible to absorb the weight if the train whilst being rigid enough to not collapse. Quickly repaired or badly maintained track may be more like a rollercoaster than a a railway and that means either limiting speed of trains or derailments.
As for the train loading policies of both the Soviet and German armies, there us something to be said for mixed loads. At least you'll get some of what you need on each train that arrives at the rail head, provided the correct items were dispatched. In the way of these things if you put the loads on trains in the most effective manner, the train that is lost to enemy action will be the one filled with the most vital supplies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@neilkurzman4907 beyond 18ft we use relatives and motion to give us our perception of distance, so it becomes harder to tell howfar you are away from something, even the ground if you go beyond the average human's steroscopic rangof about 18ft. As for knowing what height thesaly pioneers of aviation were flying at prior to the invention of the accurate altimeterrelies on subjective estimations. But I've never used that argument in any of my comments. What I have said is that you can be at altitude of 2,000ft and be at a height of only 200ft above the ground. This is not the same as what you are trying and failing to suggest. Even at 200ft without seen a recognisable object of an easily assesed height, such as another human being, house, car, or farm animal will lead to an error in estimating your height above the ground.aspart of my flight training I was required to an approach and landing without reference to my altimeter, but I got that exercise in early by misreading the altimeter by about 300 hundred feet, and that was over an area that I flown over many times and was familiar with. It was full of reference points that I was ignoring, just like this aircrew. But unlike them, I wasn't being filmed. I also got back to the airfield without incident and learnt a valuable lesson. Gliding is full of such lessons as you have only one chance to get it right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GNMi79 are we talking about 1,000ft AGL or 1,000ft AMSL? At Cavelese 1,000ft AGL is 4,000ft AMSL, where I am at this moment it's only 400ft AGL to be at 1,000ft AMSL. Now, if a pilot is relying solely on their instruments to keep them safe then they've just bust the the 500ft minimum altitude in the UK, the only set of rules I'm familiar enough with to comment on. They should, of course, not be relying solely on their instruments, but people but people don't always believe what they're seeing or choose to ignore their instruments. And at 9 miles per minute, as in this tragedy, you have to react so much faster than you have to in a Cessna 150 pootling along at a much lower speed.
As for flying over a populated area, that can be allowed at 1,000ft (the rules in the UK, for example,fot all pilots allow flight over a built up area at 1,000ft AGL provided it's possible to glide clear to a safe landing spot should there be an engine failure).
None of this condones what this aircrew did, but is an attempt to explain what might have been happening in their heads. If you want to read more about the human factors in air crashes, there are some good books out there.
1
-
1
-
@GNMi79 the over water flight situation was an example of when pilots can't be trusted ousetheir 9wn judgement on altitude. It was not a representation of the situation this case. And, whilst pilots should be able to tell their altitude is too low by visual reference to structures they can see. It all depends on the structure. A house, yes, but the pillar for a cable car without the gondola, maybe not (no gondola may indicate a non-operational cable car with no strung cables, i.e., an abandoned system). You need a reference point to start estimating heights. Estimating heights is easy when you have a reference point and the time to make the estimate, as you do when flying along at, say around 2 miles a minute in a Cessna 152, this aircrew, had they been paying attention had even less time to estimate their height as they were doing 9 miles per minute. Remember, they thought they were at 1,000ft AGL at the time, the safe altitude according to the chart they had used.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1