Comments by "" (@baronvonlimbourgh1716) on "Wagner GOT AMBUSHED in Bakhmut. Ukraine SWITCHES TO OFFENSIVE Mode. Russians BACKSTAB THEIR OFFICERS" video.

@Andy-ub3ub i don't know. I think he just sees it differently then the rest of us. He probably is able to see the logistics and tactical cooperation in it and exlude the thing they are actually doing. Like how footbal is played, someone who is into it can see the plays forming and enjoy how a team executes that, while for me it's just a bunch of guys running after a ball an kicking it forward. I enjoy circuit racing and everything that is involved in that, while for others is just mindlessly going round a track and they are bored to death. At least that's how i see it. Can't look inside his head though. In the end if patreon doesn't want to be asociated with his content it is their call to allow it or not. People shouldn't complain so much. It is their precious free market at work.
4
@snowdogthewolf no company wants to be associated with this kind of stuff. Running your own website is the only real way to freely post this kind of material. Any backlash will be small i imagine.
2
@Andy-ub3ub i guess it is how you look at it and how you define glorifying. Is giving theorethical education to new recruits glorifying violence? From what i have seen of these breakdowns on youtube (not a patreon sub) i imagine that not being to different. He mostly rambles on about who needs to do what, and why one formation is good and another isn't. To me that's the kind of stuff they teach you in soldier school. Perhaps with visual aids as well. It is just the job that needs doing, and it includes violence sadly enough. Maybe what i'm saying is that i think he aproaches it in a professional manner. Doctors can talk in what are to us graphic ways to eachother when discribing something horifying, ut for them it is just part of the trade. Do we want young kids watching someone else cutting someone open, probably not. But that doesn't make it glorifying cutting people open. The violence is just the job we ask soldiers to do. It is a means to an end. Glorifying in my opinion is when the violence becomes the goal and encouraging that. It's nuanced and context matters i think. And like i said, youtube and patreon are in the end arbiter of what they think is suited and what is not. They follow what is in their best interest and if you want to use their platform you have to stay within those limits. If you don't they will kick you out.
2
I thought it could be the most eastern of the two, melitopol i think, just south of bakhmut. If they can get to the sea, hook east to the russian border and then turn north into the donbas they can attack from the south and behind russian defenses. And they can destroy the crimean bridge from there to isolate the western russian army and basicly siege them there without fighting just hold the line to their west untill the russians run out of food and other supplies. Or until they have captured the donbas and then mop up what is left of the russians.
2
There wont be a nuclear attack.
1
Panzer haubitze 2000 carries that title usually. But in the end they are all pretty much the same in capability.
1
There honestly isn't happening that much. Nothing has changed in months. Russian offensive was a small sizzle and ukraine has been on the defence since they took large parts of territory before winter. It has been bakhmut for nearly half a hear now. And bakhmut is pretty insignificant in the larger picture of this war. But concidering what it has done to russia, it's army, the politics in moscow and to wagner i must say it has been pretty succesful for ukraine. At least if the casualty ratio is true.
1
For a lot of the rest of the world they aren't that scary anymore though. It's that ukraine doesn't have a modern airforce, otherwise this conflict would have panned out quite differntly.
1
It is hard to tell. Ukraine aint saying anything and russians do not nearly post film or pictures as much as ukrainians. So very few of the russian claims can actually be confirmed like they can with russian casualties.
1
@ubiergo1978 if they do the same as last time they start in the north again and push south lol. We just don't know but in the end there are only a handful of viable strategies left now. I don't think they will go after crimea though honestly. They'll save that for last because it probably is the easiest because they can basicly cut it off from russia and prevent resuply and then grind them down at their own leisure.
1