Youtube comments of Le YASEP (@leyasep5919).
-
248
-
218
-
161
-
121
-
91
-
87
-
86
-
83
-
46
-
42
-
38
-
33
-
31
-
30
-
26
-
26
-
24
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
19
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@mr_chauve C'est tant mieux pour toi :-)
La glorification du vandalisme (qu'il soit physique ou sur internet) est aussi la faute des journalistes, comme dans ce reportage. Cela incite des crétins à faire des conneries, pour grossir leur ego, au détriment de tous.
Au contraire, il est préférable de faire des choses bénéfiques à tous, construire, concevoir, créer : c'est le sens premier du mot "hacker" : on "bricole" et on repousse les limites de la technologie, pas pour la gloire ou l'argent, mais parce qu'on est obligé de faire soi-même quelque chose qui n'existe pas dans le commerce par exemple.
Par exemple, Richard Stallman (l'initiateur du projet GNU) ou Linus Torvalds (auteur du noyau Linux) sont des hackers dans le sens premier du terme et leurs travaux, soutenus par une grande communauté pendant de nombreuses années, a permis à tous d'utiliser le système d'exploitation GNU/Linux. Leur impact sur la société a été des millions de fois plus bénéfique que ce que timcode a fait pour la gloire ou l'argent.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@dand337 more replies 🙂
> Is riscv modern enough isa to be realistically considered?
modernity is not a criterion for adoption, there are more practical issues to solve before : is the platform widely adopted ? This means : how many people do use it, developing tools and enhancing them ? Is there some support or dynamic ?
RISC-V is modular and adds extensions here and there and wherever they like or fancy. So there will be adaptation, though also some fragmentation because few chips can have all the extensions, creating a want for more features or a race to the latest feature level... such a race is a dynamic that the industry loves and there is little risk for them.
Now adoption depends on the specific needs of each project. RISC-V is quite good for microcontrollers and can displace several ARM offerings but I believe it is a bit less efficient or compact because RISC-V tries to "be good enough at everything" but it can't perfectly match everything.
> I mean chinese are literally copying mips with loongarch so ISA doesn't seem to be a very important factor.
Some Chinese have adapted RISC-V to support more flexible addressing modes that are sorely lacking, due to the mantra of minimalism that reduces the ILP. Ideally this should be backported into the main ISA but I have no idea what's going on there, and there might be some "not invented here" syndrome, and/or philosophical fundamentalism, who knows, but the Chinese can adapt whatever they care to copy... I'm more interested at what they could invent from the ground up, if they ever dare.
I don't know if I answered all your questions but that's quite some food for thought.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ryzyooritzz : yup.
Contrary to proprietary software suites, Free Software allows a lot of trials&errors, freedom to see what works best in each case... and each part of the OS can be swapped for alternative, which creates more variety and more resilience if one part fails.
The "BSD" line of OS component has not been covered and they have a different license but they are often used along GNU SW modules. However, until maybe 20 years ago, the BSD license was not free (held by a university and other companies) so it did not "take off" and GNU's aim was to rewrite an equivalent of BSD that is totally ununcumbered. Well, the BSD saga took a crazy turn AFTER Linux appeared, thanks to the efforts of the GNU folks to rewrite ALL the necessary components (compiler, in part created by Richard Stallman, system libraries, system utilities, terminal shell...)
Today "Free and Open Source Software" comprises a lot of diversity and you are free to make your own blend :-)
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@LordofSyn By the way,
"mathematics behind the Einstein-Rosen bridge "
Let me remind you :
- mathematics is a tool, garbage in, garbage out, and it will all depend on your assumptions. ERBs predate many recent measurements and experiments,
- Einstein's fields have not been merged yet with Quantum Theory, so GR has many blind spots. These mathematical loopholes can be abused and give ridiculous results. But yeah it's just maths and nobody ever cheks the strange alien signs in the papers.
- The existing, real world has no obligation to bent to somebody's will (and not someone else, as it ever mattered). That would be magic, not science.
- Even Wikipedia says ERBs are speculative and postulates, relying on physics that has no reasonable reason to exists. In other words: ERBs are a fantasy.
Do you see my points ?
Leave these bridges/tunnels/whatever where they belong : in bad science fiction.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@АлексейЛукьянов-ц6ц Mon cher Alexey, j'attends toujours tes références, sources, liens.
Tu sais, on peut passer sa vie à se tambouriner le torse comme des gorilles sur Internet. ça ne restera que ça.
Et sérieusement j'en ai ras la casquette des discours menaçants, belliqueux, chauvinistes, nationalistes, "moi je suis mieux que les autres" car au final ça finit par des charniers.
Dis-moi, mon ami russe, es-tu favorable à cette "opération spéciale" ou bien tu viens sur les chaines française faire la publicité pour les armes de guerre de ton pays ? Ou bien juste toucher tes 10 roubles par commentaire ?
Au fait, les traductions automatiques sont de mauvaise qualité...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@99bits46 a belief ? why would you even care about what I believe ?
Now, NOWHERE have I seen a scientist forcefully imposing his/her vision of the world under threat of death/retaliation/shame/whatever. On the contrary : I see in this video an open discussion, and there are even people who study two or more of the competing theories to draw bridges between them (Lee Smolin for example).
Equating science to religion is one of the usual memes among the religious people, indeed... (thereby showing their misunderstanding of what science is and how it works because they only have one frame of reference they are taught to never question).
Now for your "belief" tirade : whenever you work on a model (like, huh, in science ?) you make assumptions and use methods and axioms. Each of these tools have a well defined domain of validity (for example : Newton's law break down at high energies/velocities etc.) and you expect that your work and guesses are wrong. That's basic humility.
" There's no data to prove those assumptions, so let us just believe in them and see where they take us." You fail as soon as you "believe". Scientists don't "believe". They put an amount of confidence on given assertions, but they are ready to retreat when proven wrong. Why ? Because their ego and "vision of what the truth must be" doesn't matter if it doesn't WORK.
A scientist will take a wild guess as a "working assumption". If it doesn't work they try something else. If it works, they try to throw more guesses and determine a domain of validity, then throw "attacks" at it.
Whenever a religion has been attacked (with counter-arguments, I mean), the results were pretty savage... Ask Galileo.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TurboLoveTrain
Thanks for the laugh. Let's recap:
1) make a grandiose declaration that contradicts everything. Just because you can and you don't have to pay by the character today.
2) invent words like "corporate science" and equate theoretical physics to a cult (you must know a thing or two about cults, I suppose, *from experience*)
3) never back your declaration. That would be too easy, "do your homework".
4) instead, move to other declarations, start rambling, but NEVER address your first point.
5) claim that I don't own my equipment (as for my results, french law grants me irreversible rights to my published articles)
6) accuse everybody and their dog of the plague, or something. We'll never know either. It doesn't matter, they're evil. I don't know why we're even talking about that but you must have a reason, right ?
7) feel vindicated because someone on the internet said you're wrong.
8) Earn your crackpot badge
Admit it : you don't "need a large wipe board to explain both the answer to this as well as why you deserved to be mocked for even asking it." You have opinions and you make things up to attack them, like a dog chasing his tail...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TotoToto-jw7fx hmmmmm ... il doit te manquer quelques informations, il me semble. Mais tu es libre d'aller t'engager dans la légion étrangère ukrainienne. Ou chez Poutine. Tu verras donc de toi-même la situation réelle, et pas juste les images qui filtrent au travers de la censure.
> nous assistons à une guerre russo-americaine sur le sol ukrainien
bon déjà on est d'accord que c'est une guerre. Ensuite, c'est les ukrainiens qui trinquent à cause de.... de quoi déjà ?
Parce que les américains sont méchants ?
Ou juste parce que Poutine se prend pour un grand Tsar et veut laisser une trace dans l'histoire ?
C'est une guerre américaine parce que Vlad a obligé les ukrainiens à chercher de l'aide pour défendre leur nation souveraine, après que les US les aient forcés à se débarrasser de toutes leurs armes soviétiques et nucléaires "car on sait jamais".
> la Russie ne peut se permettre de perdre cette guerre.
Personne ne peut se permettre de perdre une guerre donc bon.
En attendant c'est les ukrainiens qui se font raser villages après villages, villes après villes, systématiquement, pour détruire l'Ukraine. Si c'est ça qui te plaît, c'est ton problème.
> On en reparle en fin d'année
ben écoute, si ça tenait qu'à moi, ça serait déjà fini, mais Vlad s'accroche comme une teigne à son délire expansionniste et ses conneries, donc je ne parierai pas sur une quelconque échéance. Vlad est un sadique sociopathe qui veut voir le monde brûler et il accuse les autres de ce qu'il est... donc on a bien le temps de se fritter dans les commentaires avant que la Russie se retire.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yaelelerner3544 bon, je la joue sarcasme, boulet, ou liondemer avec toi ? Tu sembles en savoir beaucoup sans rien dire, donc ... sais-tu vraiment ce que tu sais ou alors tu as l'impression de savoir ? C'est quoi la bonne approche avec un complotiste ?
Non parce que bon, le refrain Ukraine=nazis, c'est éculé, ridicule, surtout quand on sait l'instrumentalisation que Poutine fait de ses propres nazillons chez lui. C'est tellement plus facile d'accuser les autres de ce qu'on est.
Quant aux fameux labos, ben.... y'a pas que RT dans la vie... Vlad voudrait nous faire le remake de l'Irak 20 ans plus tard ? 😀
On sait bien que Vlad a été jaloux, et surtout s'est senti menacé, particulièrement quand il a vu le sort qu'on réserve aux dictateurs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@angelmendez-rivera351 "the fact that you have to rely on links, rather formal source citation," => I can strip the URL from the DOI refs but it felt nicer to provide the text as well.
Now you might have seen that wheel sieves are used for certain kinds of factorisation. You seem to have stopped there. It does not have to be limited to this application though.
Here is the output of a sample wheel code that was initialised with 1:
New prime: 2
Primorial: 2
New size: 1
New wheel: [2]
New prime: 3
Primorial: 6
New size: 2
New wheel: [4, 2]
New prime: 5
Primorial: 30
New size: 8
New wheel: [6, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 6, 2]
New prime: 7
Primorial: 210
New size: 48
New wheel: [10, 2, 4, 2, 4, 6, 2, 6, 4, 2, 4, 6, 6, 2, 6, 4, 2, 6, 4, 6, 8, 4, 2, 4, 2, 4, 8, 6, 4, 6, 2, 4, 6, 2, 6, 6, 4, 2, 4, 6, 2, 6, 4, 2, 4, 2, 10, 2]
Tell me how it didn't generate a sequence of prime numbers. Tell me how the fact that you think I don't understand this mechanism makes this somehow impossible.
The result is there : the wheel sieve can be configured to generate a new prime from the previous (and a previous wheel) and the algorithm was primed with a single 1.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@josephbryant8799
> You should stay here,
I go wherever I want, but thanks.
> ThunderF00t is only in it for the money
It's YouTube. This very channel has 11 million subscribers. Show me a "famous" youtuber who is not concerned by money.
> and he has gotten things wrong on many occasions
I have, too. And you too, likely.
That's part of the learning process, right ?
> I really hate to gate keep but as an aerospace engineer,
Well, build a better gate ?
> I really think I can say ThunderF00t has no business talking about this stuff. He should stick to chemistry.
Now, as a sarcastic internet troll who doesn't know you, I really think I can say you have no business talking about this stuff. You should stick to aerospace.
Wait, hmmm, that sounded like sarcasm 🙂
Now, I'm here to learn, not to be "right". That's part of the process of getting "Smarter Every Day" as the channel's name says.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Giacomo
I wanted to tell "you do not just sound like a crackpot, you are one".
After looking at the stupid conspiracy videos you like, I admit I'm wrong. It's even worse.
You are the one who does not understand science. You can't relabel your fantasy world as "new paradigm". You want to be the new Enrico Fermi or Marconi but you don't even understand what they have done because you don't "like" it. The world MUST conform to your opinion.
Write science fiction novels. It's the best way to let your imagination fly without having to explain why you dismiss more than a century of research, discovery, understanding. If it's too complex for you, simply admit it and do something else rather than claim you know better than those who have invested years in real research. You can't reinvent the world in your armchair, you know, you can't even learn science on youtube, but with books, experiments, exercises, conferences, you know, things that hurt your brain because they require EFFORTS.
Who am I to tell you this ? Oh, I must certainly be part of a cabal that conspires against you and wants to impose an evil worldview on the planet, or something like that..
Grow up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tonito-cc1lp je suis juste réaliste, étant ingénieur, je vois comment se font les choses, pas seulement techniquement... Ensuite, vu le CV de son promoteur, j'imagine déjà qu'il a des soutiens financiers car je ne le vois pas faire ces machines de ses seules petites mains, c'est un gars de Polytechnique qui gravite dans les hautes sphères et sait convaincre.
On verra dans 1 ou 2 ans si son prototype fonctionne encore et remplit toutes ses promesses.
J'ajouterai encore que cette machine (un déshumidificateur d'air, comme on en trouve pour 200€ un peu partout pour un modèle de salon) ne CRÉE pas de l'eau, elle l'extrait de l'air à grand renforts d'énergie, génère beaucoup de chaleur et ne peut que séparer l'eau qui existe dans l'air. Donc dans des climats hyper secs, on peut toujours se brosser.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1