Comments by "Stephen47 22" (@Stephen-bq4nq) on "Военное телевидение" channel.

  1. As a kiwi you certainly don't speak for me
    25
  2. Their an armoured transport providing a level of protection it's better than riding in a standard truck
    24
  3. The Americans lost Abrams in Iraq the reality is Iraq was 20 years ago and there weren't drones. All tanks are struggling with the drone threat.
    12
  4. No they're not they've shown good crew survivability
    9
  5.  @eaglesnest1960  if you end up fighting China remember not to ask for help
    8
  6. Yeah like the T90 that Putin said was the best in the world
    8
  7. Yes the soldiers have a better chance of survival which is the whole point
    8
  8. Tell that to putin
    8
  9.  @TomasFunes-rt8rd  yes I'm for real they're an infantry transport that provides better protection than a standard truck with the infantry in the back completely exposed
    7
  10. It has plenty of history 🤡
    6
  11. No crew survival rates are very good
    6
  12. Standing up against a tyrant
    6
  13. What rubbish there has never been a vehicle in the history of warfare that couldn't be destroyed
    5
  14.  @Ulises-Gonzalez-3131  the T90 is no better than any other MBT
    5
  15.  @ozzyolof9209  No their own history and most of it is being persecuted by Russia
    5
  16. The V shaped hull gives the people in the vehicle a good chance of survival it's shown good protection against mines and IED so as a troop transport it's doing it's job
    5
  17.  @mirandela777  yeah and the point is it doesn't have to be anything special it does the job it was designed for
    4
  18.  @tonyp2865  No they're not they have a V shaped hull for mine IED protection and they offer protection from small arms fire, shrapnel and are mobile. Like any vehicle they will need some kind of drone defense once they have that they will be fine.
    4
  19.  @eaglesnest1960  they don't own them yet they sanctioned Australia for not behaving and Australia didn't bow down to them
    4
  20. The bushmaster offers a good level of protection and mobility when transporting infantry. It offers protection against IED, mines,small arms fire and shrapnel and is much better than a standard truck with the infantry exposed in the back. No vehicle is impervious to enemy fire it's war..
    4
  21. Yeah so did Russia it's their first real opponent since world war two
    3
  22. No that's all the russian IFV😂
    3
  23. @AlexLaw-y9j  No the bombs in Afghanistan were far bigger than that they had IED that were sending Humvees flying into the air. The bushmasters were hit with IED with 23Kg of explosives and the soldiers in the vehicles survived
    3
  24. The Abrams, Bradley and Stryker had been knocked out in conflicts before the Ukraine war and so had the leopard so it was already obvious they weren't invincible. There has never been an armoured vehicle in the history of warfare that couldn't be knocked out.
    3
  25.  @Ha36ykBbI  No one said western systems were invincible that's absurd
    3
  26. 🤡🤡🤡🤡
    3
  27.  @tonyp2865  No they're not
    2
  28. It provides good protection against mines and IED which is important when transporting infantry
    2
  29.  @mirandela777  there is nothing wrong with it's mobility it dealt with the terrain in Afghanistan very well. Every model of russian transport has been smashed in Ukraine so their not a good comparison
    2
  30. Yeah russian tanks and IFV are meeting the same fate
    2
  31.  @Ha36ykBbI  those drones are destroying the best Russian armoured vehicles and SAM systems
    2
  32. No it's got very good mine resistance
    2
  33. Anything that moves is a drone magnet
    2
  34. Yeah kind of like the russian hypersonic missiles that haven't changed anything
    2
  35. Yeah if Australia finds itself fighting China don't ask any other countries for help
    2
  36.  @TheBikeOnTheMoon  China wants hedgemoney in the Asia Pacific and that includes positioning the Solomon islands as a military base
    2
  37. It will obviously be used against low risk targets like a convoy of freighters after the escort ships have been taken out by longer range anti ship missiles.
    2
  38. Why?
    2
  39. It will be used against freighters after their escort ships have been taken out by longer range anti ship missiles
    1
  40. They lead the world in stealth technology and lasers
    1
  41. As a kiwi I'm appalled what a ignorant fool you are
    1
  42.  @stuartneary3067  No Russia are the Nazi
    1
  43. ​ @JohnJones-k9d No all modern MBT can destroy each other it just comes down to who gets in the first hit. The US fought well in world war 2 and they certainly didn't run away in Korea the communists were pushed out of South Korea. Vietnam was never a winnable war the US weren't prepared to put ground forces into North Vietnam so all they were doing was holding the line and they were only going to do that fight a limited amount of time at some point they were going to go home. The Chinese invaded Vietnam in 1979 and they didn't last long and what do you think would have happened to Russia if they went into Vietnam they would have lost
    1
  44.  @tonyp2865  No they're not they've taken heavy casualties in men and vehicles plus the black sea fleet has been smashed and their economy is struggling. I laugh when you Putler fanboys try to say Russia is fighting 51 countries when organisations like NATO have only used a small portion of their firepower. Theirs a good reason Putler hasn't attacked a NATO country he knows what will happen.
    1
  45. The Bradley has performed very well in Ukraine it's been the best IFV on either side. The Abrams has struggled the same as every other tank including the russian T90 because they weren't designed to withstand drone attack.
    1
  46. ​ @ronanrogers4127 the IED were big in Afghanistan
    1
  47. You could always just bend over and hold into your ankles the Chinese and Russians would love that
    1
  48. I dont know why people obsess over a vehicle getting destroyed it's war. Look at world war two the best vehicles got knocked out nothing is impervious to enemy fire. The bush master provides a good level of protection for transporting infantry and isn't too expensive. It's shown good crew survivability when hit with IED and mines but its also light enough to be mobile..
    1
  49.  @clown-hr7ic  🤡 I'm not getting paid anything the bushmaster was designed as a troop carrier which would provide more protection than a standard truck and it does that..
    1
  50.  @TomasFunes-rt8rd  they're an infantry transport they provide good protection against IED,mines,small arms fire and shrapnel. They provide a combination of protection and mobility and are much better than infantry traveling in the back of trucks completely exposed. Anti tank missiles can penetrate the armour of main battle tanks so it doesn't matter what you transport your infantry in there is risk.
    1
  51.  @BangDingOw777  the bushmaster will offer protection against 7.62mm fire
    1
  52. What an ignorant comment it doesn't matter what country you're in if you run over a mine your vehicle will get wreaked.
    1
  53. The S400 was supposed to take out the stealth aircraft but in Ukraine it's been getting taken out with ATACMS. Iran's russian air defence systems were taken out by F35 with not one aircraft lost. The Russians SAM systems have underperformed in Ukraine they've struggled to even defend against subsonic missiles If the patriot was so obsolete the Russians would be flying all over Ukraine at will and they're certainly not doing that they have already had aircraft shot down by patriot. The F35A can pull 9G manoeuvres it's more agile than people give it credit for.
    1
  54. ​ @ricardolevy885 they obviously did have stealth coatings in the bomb bay no doubt they do now
    1
  55. ​ @wassim-akkari the F22 was carrying external fuel tanks which affect it's stealth and agility no fighter pilot in real combat will dog fight with external fuel tanks. The typhoon on the other hand were flying in a clean configuration which maximises agility. Tell the whole story not just the part that's suits your argument
    1
  56. ​ @DrDupor Russian military technology isn't ahead of America the russian black sea fleet couldn't even defend against subsonic cruise missiles the Russian SAM systems have been getting destroyed in big numbers in Ukraine. The Israeli used F35 to wipe out russian designed SAM systems in Iran.
    1
  57. The damage the russians claim to have done to ukranian forces in kursk is laughable if the Ukrainian force in kursk had lost that many men and equipment they wouldn't have anyone left
    1
  58. There has never been an armoured vehicle in the history of warefare that couldn't be knocked out people need to stop getting so excited when a tank gets knocked out. Putin said the T90 was the best tank in the world and plenty of them have been destroyed
    1
  59.  @peterwilson5528  russian armoured vehicles have certainly got the whole world laughing
    1
  60.  @peterwilson5528  russian armoured vehicles have got the whole world laughing.
    1
  61. Russian armour has the whole world laughing😂
    1
  62. It will be good against freighters carrying military supplies after the escort ships have been sunk by more expensive anti ship missiles.
    1
  63. Russia didn't defeat the US or NATO they're not even on the battlefield
    1
  64. @Ha36ykBbI  funny drones are destroying Russian tanks like the T90 which Putin said was the best in the world and they're also destroying Russian SAM systems that we heard were the best in the world
    1
  65. @SG-gt3zm  type in English
    1
  66.  @vgames6792  dude give me a break the only people who talk about wonder weapons are people in the media who peddle sensationalism to get people watching. It's as bad as Putin's fanboys beating their chests about hypersonic missiles that haven't changed the war. Russia has lost a lot of men and equipment but they're a bigger country than Ukraine and always fight their opponents with mass and have no regard for casualties. NATO isn't demoralised they have new members and have only had to commit a small portion of their available firepower against Russia.
    1
  67.  @vgames6792  only the media talk about wonder weapons and they peddle sensationalism to attract viewers. The Russians have taken heavy losses because they fight with mass and have no regard for casualties but they're a bigger country than Ukraine with more manpower. Russia hypersonic missiles haven't changed the direction of the war and to say the west is demoralised is laughable NATO has new members Russia has taken heavy losses their economy is under severe stress with high inflation and interest rates and NATO hasn't had to deploy much of their military capability..
    1
  68.  @tangofox7124  go read up on the Ukrainian starved to death by Stalin in the 30's they died in the millions. The Russians have treated Ukrainian people like second class citizens they have nothing but contempt for them
    1
  69.  @TheBikeOnTheMoon  yes Stalin deleted millions of them in the 1930's
    1
  70. What went wrong is they were sent without drone protection and every other tank on the battlefield including the T90 had the same problem
    1
  71. No they're not the Bradley has proven highly successful in Ukraine the crews love the vehicle it provides good crew survivability,mobility,firepower The Abrams has struggled the same as every other tank because it was never designed to withstand drone attack and Russian tanks have suffered the same fate..
    1
  72. Russia doesn't have any game changing weapons they're simply a big country fighting a small country and their using mass to gain the advantage.
    1
  73. When Australia ends up fighting China don't expect anyone else to help you
    1
  74. No they actually work very well
    1
  75. ​ @stemup they don't need to do a mobilisation they're paying big contracts to entice people to volunteer
    1
  76. ​ @n3rdy11 no man portable anti tank weapons aren't obsolete because you may not always have a drone available to you. The western weapons like javelin ,nlaw have proven to be very effective weapons along with the switch blade 600 anti armour drone, HIMARS,Bradley IFV, TOW missile systems m777 artillery, storm shadow cruise missiles
    1
  77. ​ @georgefabian6193 the western nations only supplied a small portion of their equipment
    1
  78. ​ @stemup their propagandists were bragging it would be over quickly I've seen the video
    1
  79. ​ @Татарин-т5з the Russians weren't expecting a long war
    1
  80. It's like attempting diplomacy with the Nazi. Russia is attacking Ukraine because Ukraine didn't want to be a vassal state of Russia
    1
  81.  @TimothyVaughan-je5du  the Taliban aren't farners
    1
  82.  @TimothyVaughan-je5du  the Taliban aren't farmers
    1
  83.  @nafiznastaim7491  the Russians are finding out the Ukrainian aren't helpless civilians in Aleppo
    1
  84. ​@benanders-g9sNo they would have been very helpful targeting SAM systems and russian aircraft that were dropping the glide bombs
    1
  85. ​ @jpyt7022 No they didn't they're attacking Ukraine because Ukraine wasn't bowing down to them and agreeing to be a Vassal state
    1
  86.  @OldManPaul  yeah mind your business until the Chinese who are allied with Russia are on your doorstep
    1
  87.  @gapho5198  They want hedgemoney over the Asia Pacific region and are building the military to attempt it.
    1
  88.  @gapho5198  they want hedgemoney over the Asia Pacific region and are building their military up to attempt it
    1
  89.  @RoboRat-b7r  It would be used against merchant ships and supply ships that are more vulnerable. You can use missiles to take out the escort ships at long range which will leave the merchant ships defenseless then the merchant ships and military supply ships can be taken out using the bombs which are cheaper than a missile and there are more of them. Swarms of stealth missiles like LRASM will be used to target air craft carriers
    1
  90. China,Iran and North Korea are helping Russia
    1
  91.  @ReadyOnThree  no it's not it has GPS/INS plus IRR targeting
    1
  92. ​​ @puravida1159 yeah such a myth that they've flown through enemy defences without getting shot down and China is now looking to build stealth bombers.
    1
  93. ​​ @puravida1159 yeah such a myth that they fly through enemy defences without getting shot down and now china is developing their own version
    1
  94. You clearly didn't stop to think that the defences will be taken out before they use it🙄
    1
  95. ​​​ @binchen the peasents hid in the civilian population until the US left and they did the same to the Russians.
    1