General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Stephen47 22
Военное телевидение
comments
Comments by "Stephen47 22" (@Stephen-bq4nq) on "Russia Successfully TAKING DOWN Australian Bushmaster in Ukraine!" video.
As a kiwi you certainly don't speak for me
25
Their an armoured transport providing a level of protection it's better than riding in a standard truck
24
No they're not they've shown good crew survivability
9
@eaglesnest1960 if you end up fighting China remember not to ask for help
8
Yes the soldiers have a better chance of survival which is the whole point
8
Tell that to putin
8
@TomasFunes-rt8rd yes I'm for real they're an infantry transport that provides better protection than a standard truck with the infantry in the back completely exposed
7
It has plenty of history 🤡
6
No crew survival rates are very good
6
Standing up against a tyrant
6
What rubbish there has never been a vehicle in the history of warfare that couldn't be destroyed
5
@ozzyolof9209 No their own history and most of it is being persecuted by Russia
5
The V shaped hull gives the people in the vehicle a good chance of survival it's shown good protection against mines and IED so as a troop transport it's doing it's job
5
@mirandela777 yeah and the point is it doesn't have to be anything special it does the job it was designed for
4
@tonyp2865 No they're not they have a V shaped hull for mine IED protection and they offer protection from small arms fire, shrapnel and are mobile. Like any vehicle they will need some kind of drone defense once they have that they will be fine.
4
@eaglesnest1960 they don't own them yet they sanctioned Australia for not behaving and Australia didn't bow down to them
4
The bushmaster offers a good level of protection and mobility when transporting infantry. It offers protection against IED, mines,small arms fire and shrapnel and is much better than a standard truck with the infantry exposed in the back. No vehicle is impervious to enemy fire it's war..
4
No that's all the russian IFV😂
3
@AlexLaw-y9j No the bombs in Afghanistan were far bigger than that they had IED that were sending Humvees flying into the air. The bushmasters were hit with IED with 23Kg of explosives and the soldiers in the vehicles survived
3
🤡🤡🤡🤡
3
@tonyp2865 No they're not
2
It provides good protection against mines and IED which is important when transporting infantry
2
@mirandela777 there is nothing wrong with it's mobility it dealt with the terrain in Afghanistan very well. Every model of russian transport has been smashed in Ukraine so their not a good comparison
2
No it's got very good mine resistance
2
Anything that moves is a drone magnet
2
Yeah kind of like the russian hypersonic missiles that haven't changed anything
2
Yeah if Australia finds itself fighting China don't ask any other countries for help
2
@TheBikeOnTheMoon China wants hedgemoney in the Asia Pacific and that includes positioning the Solomon islands as a military base
2
As a kiwi I'm appalled what a ignorant fool you are
1
@stuartneary3067 No Russia are the Nazi
1
@tonyp2865 No they're not they've taken heavy casualties in men and vehicles plus the black sea fleet has been smashed and their economy is struggling. I laugh when you Putler fanboys try to say Russia is fighting 51 countries when organisations like NATO have only used a small portion of their firepower. Theirs a good reason Putler hasn't attacked a NATO country he knows what will happen.
1
@ronanrogers4127 the IED were big in Afghanistan
1
You could always just bend over and hold into your ankles the Chinese and Russians would love that
1
I dont know why people obsess over a vehicle getting destroyed it's war. Look at world war two the best vehicles got knocked out nothing is impervious to enemy fire. The bush master provides a good level of protection for transporting infantry and isn't too expensive. It's shown good crew survivability when hit with IED and mines but its also light enough to be mobile..
1
@clown-hr7ic 🤡 I'm not getting paid anything the bushmaster was designed as a troop carrier which would provide more protection than a standard truck and it does that..
1
@TomasFunes-rt8rd they're an infantry transport they provide good protection against IED,mines,small arms fire and shrapnel. They provide a combination of protection and mobility and are much better than infantry traveling in the back of trucks completely exposed. Anti tank missiles can penetrate the armour of main battle tanks so it doesn't matter what you transport your infantry in there is risk.
1
@BangDingOw777 the bushmaster will offer protection against 7.62mm fire
1
What an ignorant comment it doesn't matter what country you're in if you run over a mine your vehicle will get wreaked.
1
@peterwilson5528 russian armoured vehicles have certainly got the whole world laughing
1
@peterwilson5528 russian armoured vehicles have got the whole world laughing.
1
Russian armour has the whole world laughing😂
1
@tangofox7124 go read up on the Ukrainian starved to death by Stalin in the 30's they died in the millions. The Russians have treated Ukrainian people like second class citizens they have nothing but contempt for them
1
@TheBikeOnTheMoon yes Stalin deleted millions of them in the 1930's
1
When Australia ends up fighting China don't expect anyone else to help you
1
It's like attempting diplomacy with the Nazi. Russia is attacking Ukraine because Ukraine didn't want to be a vassal state of Russia
1
@jpyt7022 No they didn't they're attacking Ukraine because Ukraine wasn't bowing down to them and agreeing to be a Vassal state
1
@OldManPaul yeah mind your business until the Chinese who are allied with Russia are on your doorstep
1
@gapho5198 They want hedgemoney over the Asia Pacific region and are building the military to attempt it.
1
@gapho5198 they want hedgemoney over the Asia Pacific region and are building their military up to attempt it
1
China,Iran and North Korea are helping Russia
1