Comments by "Stephen47 22" (@Stephen-bq4nq) on "CRUX" channel.

  1.  @terencefranks1688  Wrong time for Russia to get out of Ukraine. The west is there by invite.
    2
  2. Yeah it's going so well they're going around their prisons trying to find volunteers.😂🤡
    2
  3. The Ukrainian need to send their special forces after the Wagner group and show them no mercy
    2
  4. The US army is recieving it's first operational hypersonic missile this year and other hypersonic missile systems are making good progress the situation isn't as bad as some want to believe
    2
  5.  @dab0331  No one clown running his mouth on the video said Western soldiers were cowards and how do you know he wasn't a coward. The Afgans use to feed false information to US forces to get airstrikes called in on other Afgans to settle scores You also seem to conveniently ignore all the afgans shot and bombed to death by the Taliban. Throughout the history of warfare soldiers of all ethnicities have struggled under the strain of artillery fire and this war is no different and that includes Ukrainians and Russians. The Taliban hid behind civilians while using IED so many US veterans said they hardly ever saw a Taliban they were doing sneaky hit and run attacks and using civilians as shields so the US couldn't use their heavy firepower. The Taliban fought that way because they had to but it doesn't take balls to lay an IED The ultimate weapon the Taliban used was time they new the US couldn't stay their forever so they avoided direct confrontation and waited them out and that doesn't take balls..
    2
  6.  @dab0331  Clown do you think typing in upper case makes your argument stronger? It doesn't so don't bother doing it.
    2
  7. @agapp11able Western forces are trained for all types of warfare they don't just train for insurgency operations
    2
  8.  @johnnyappleswope1821  the Russians should have stayed home
    2
  9. Should everyone have surrendered to the nazi. Russia gets out of Ukraine the war will end
    2
  10.  @ChinCycling  no it's not the Ukrainian werent supplied with modern artillery and MLRS or modern air defence systems by NATO. Even the anti tank weapons were rushed in at the last minute. It's Russia that's been embarrassed in this war
    2
  11.  @philipnankabao9290  lack of courage 🤡 the Ukrainian have shown loads of courage. Give them the same airpower and artillery as Russia then we will see how tough the Russians are.
    2
  12.  SF  Russia doesn't want to be a friendly trading partner they want Ukraine to be their colony
    2
  13.  @abdulrashidabang5583  the Taliban have decades of experience and they use draganov snipers rifles,belt fees machine guns, RPG and IED.
    2
  14. COPE of the year😂
    2
  15. The Russians had superiorty in numbers of men and armoured vehicles plus artillery and airpower it was always going to fall in the end under those conditions.
    1
  16. ​ @Tonyx.yt. No it's superiorty in numbers of men and armoured vehicles plus superiorty in artillery and airpower.
    1
  17. ​ @Linda-0-0p He forgot superiority in artillery and airpower plus more men and armoured vehicles
    1
  18. ​ @ridvanpeshkopia8751 they had superiority in manpower and armoured vehicles plus artillery and airpower the city was always going to fall under those disadvantages. What people are ignoring is with all those advantages how much Russia is struggling to take objectives.
    1
  19. ​ @mpravica The Russians aren't quickly demolishing these small cities
    1
  20. ​ @yomamabinfartin. The latest NATO tech 😂😂😂😂 not even close.
    1
  21. ​ @chopstixsix802 insurgency style tactics are going to help Ukraine in the long run it will drag out the duration of the war and cost Russia more money and cargo200. At some point russian families are going to have to ask themselves what Ukraine is worth to them because Russia will never pacify the Ukrainian population
    1
  22. ​ @ridvanpeshkopia8751 what a joke NATO has committed a tiny portion of it's combat power to Ukraine. Russia has superiorty in numbers of manpower, artillery,airpower and ammunition and they're still struggling to capture small cities taking months and ten of thousands of casualties.
    1
  23.  @zvonkobogdan9634  You can't compare supporting the Mujahedeen to Ukraine. Ukraine aren't religious extremist and they not doing terrorist attacks around the world. Doesn't matter how much equipment was left behind both Russia and the US couldn't find an answer to the insurgency
    1
  24.  @melchizedeksalem6470  the untrained men in slippers with AK-47 routine is getting tired. The Taliban had a lot of experience and knew the terrain plus they had a lot more than AK-47 the main weapon was the IED which could destroy most armoured vehicles. They also could hide in the civilian population or run into Pakistan where they were safe. Neither the US or Russia could solve the problem of fighting an insurgency in Afghanistan and comparing fighting an insurgency to a conventional war is like comparing apples and oranges.
    1
  25.  @melchizedeksalem6470  The Ukrainian military hasn't been well supplied at the start of the war in 2022 most of their equipment was old Russian stock and they had an airforce that was out numbered by the Russians 10-1 and had minimal SAM systems as well as industrial capacity to produce ammunition. A week ago I saw an interview with a Ukrainian officer in Avdiivka and their artillery piece had two shells and no gunpowder so they couldn't fire them. Another soldier said they could only fire one rocket out of their grad MLRS then had to stop because of ammunition shortages. If the Ukrainian military was destroyed the Russians would already be in Kiev. Fanboys try to hype up the help Ukraine has received from NATO when the reality is only a tiny portion of NATO firepower has been provided. With all the advantages Russia has they should be taking objectives because the Ukrainian casualty ceiling for an objective will always be lower than Russia who has more people. Ukraine will always put up a hard fight to defend an objective for a period of time then have to withdraw.
    1
  26.  @RobertA-oi6hw  what it does is let the Russians know that any seaborne landings on southern Ukraine coast will be suicide
    1
  27. The drones will be shot down
    1
  28.  @tiglishnobody8750  a swarm of drones will be detected long before they get near the HIMARS the drones Russia are getting arn't stealthy
    1
  29.  @tiglishnobody8750  yeah I know about Iran. Their drones will be detected if they fly high and if they try to fly low they can be observed with the naked eye and shot down with manpads
    1
  30.  @goranvuksa1220  seriously you use 1 tank engagement to make your argument 🤦🤡. The large majority of tank losses are still from drones, mines, artillery. The T72 has a 125mm cannon if it can get into a good firing position and get off the first shot there is always a chance of getting a kill but it rarely happens.
    1
  31.  @goranvuksa1220  funny you must have missed all the Russian armoured vehicles with hatches left open. The T90 have been getting destroyed as well and you know one got dealt to by Bradley IFV. Winning a tank engagement isn't just about the tank it's about the skill of the crew putting the tank in the right place. When the US crewed Abrams went up against T72 they wiped them out..
    1
  32.  @goranvuksa1220  keep coping 🤡 all the interviews with Ukrainian crews they love the vehicles. That T90 got wreaked by those Bradley it lost control of the turret it was spinning around and around and the tank drove into a tree. The US crews receive way more training than what the Ukrainian crews receive that's why in desert storm they slaughtered the T72..
    1
  33.  @goranvuksa1220  your just coping the crews have no reason to lie the crew survivability has been proven. The T90 got trashed I watched the video the turret was spinning out of control and the tank hit a tree and the crew bailed out. The T72 that the republican guard divisions used were still in good condition they were Saddam's main divisions. The US crew training means everything being able to fully utilize your tank and work alongside other tanks is what enables you to get into good firing positions and win engagements. No US personnel are serving in those Abrams tanks and the tanks have had all the lastest armour packages and other sensitive equipment stripped out before they were sent over so they basically a standard Abrams from the 1980's. There are no British or German crews in the challenger and leopard tanks either..
    1
  34.  @goranvuksa1220  the fact you keep making excuses for the T90 when the Bradley video is there for all to see strips you of any credibility. That T90 got it's ass kicked by two Bradley IFV. There are no NATO soldiers in the tanks. The US in Vietnam won every major battle but lost the war politically because the public didn't support it the fighting ability of the US forces wasn't the issue and on top of that the only way to win that war was to send forces to Hanoi and take out the communist regime but the US government wouldn't put ground forces into North Vietnam so the war never had any chance of being won. The Vietnamese had a conventional military which was equipped with the latest Russian equipment and they had the Viet Kong insurgents they weren't just some guys running around with AK-47. In Afghanistan like everyone else who goes there the US were able to take the cities and push the Taliban out of power but that doesn't mean you control the country. They were never able to turn the Afgan army into a self sustaining self led fighting force because so many of them were drug users, illiterate and corruption was rife it's part of their culture and unfortunately for the Americans the success or failure of the Afgan national army was going to decide the outcome of the operation. The Taliban could hide in the civilian population and retreat to Pakistan if they needed to they avoided major direct confrontations and just used time as a weapon waiting the US out because they knew they would have to leave the country at some point. If the Afgan army stood up and defended the country by themselves the US could leave and consider the operation a success if the Afgan army fell over the Taliban would sweep back into power and everything would be lost. The outcome of the war was always going to be decided by the success or failure of the Afgan national army so the US were foolish putting themselves in that situation. As for the intensity of the fighting in Ukraine no country has experienced that level of war since the Korean war 1950-1953 and that includes Russia. The Iraqi military in 1991 was still well funded at that time it hadn't been ground down by the sanctions that were put in place after the invasion of Kuwait. As far as tanks go the way you over exaggerate the loss of the Abrams and down play the loss of the T90 shows how object you are. The Abrams that were sent to Ukraine have been stripped of the latest armour protection and other sensitive equipment and don't have the trophy active defense system either so the tank is basically a standard version of the Abram that was fielded in the 1980's and with the quality of the anti tank missiles systems that are on the battlefield these days plus the drones it makes the tank more vulnerable. All the tanks have powerful cannon of 120mm the T72 is 125mm so they all have the potential to knock each other out it comes down to who can get into the best position and get off the first shot even a T55 with a 100mm cannon could knock out a Abram if it could flank it and shoot into its side where the armour is thinner. Tank battles aren't just about the quality of the tank it's about the tactical skills of the crew putting themselves in the best position. Without an active defense system that can intercept missiles and drones before they hit the tank no tank will have a good chance of surviving on a modern battlefield the Ukraine war has shown it and it has also been demonstrated in Syria and Yemen.
    1
  35.  @timoftecatalin8357  The Bradley's still kicked ass they were well handled in that engagement. They have also destroyed russian tanks in Ukraine with their TOW missiles and are very effective at destroying Russian IFV and attacking trench systems so they've been a good all around vehicle for the Ukrainian forces
    1
  36.  @timoftecatalin8357  🤡🤡🤡🤡..
    1
  37.  @timoftecatalin8357  bye 🤡🤡.
    1
  38.  @timoftecatalin8357  Bye bye go have a cry.
    1
  39.  @ZHOUKINGS  Russia is a joke
    1
  40. ​ @dipshayam2768  totally different situation to a conventional war. the Taliban avoided direct large scale engagements and used time as their main weapon simply waiting the western forces out
    1
  41. ATACM will be replaced with the precision strike missile I think next year. it will be faster and have a range of at least 500 KM and they have applied for funding to get the missile doing at least 1000km. they will also be putting a seeker on it so it can target moving objects at sea which will make it a very effective anti ship missile system
    1
  42.  @ZincFold  the Chinese caught up and surpassed the US because they made hypersonics a priority they were spending billions the US wasn't. Now the US is spending billions and look how quickly they have moved to fielding a hypersonic missile
    1
  43.  @lionelhowell4972  the US has a hypersonic missile ready in a few weeks? I heard they had recently successfully tested a scramjet engine
    1
  44.  @EckRD  bullshit the forces the Russians were facing over the last 30 years were no better trained or equipped than the forces western countries have faced
    1
  45. Even 100 MLRS with precision guided rockets will destroy the Russian artillery. Ukraine will lose the Donbas before the long range weapons arrive
    1
  46.  @darianvergof2508  keep coping🤡
    1
  47.  @darianvergof2508  calling it propaganda that the Russians are struggling for manpower and have had recruiters going around the prisons and even homeless shelters to find recruits. The Russians are going to lose this war
    1
  48. Zelensky was voted in by around 73% of the Ukraine people he's no puppet. The problem Russia has with him is he doesn't want to be a russian puppet
    1
  49. COPE 🤡🖕
    1
  50.  @929Ethan  the Russian manpower is just cannon fodder they are poorly trained and will just add to the death toll for Russia.
    1