Comments by "Stephen47 22" (@Stephen-bq4nq) on "Ukraine Troops Retreat From Avdiivka After Russia Deploys 15,000 Troops, Drops 80 Glide Bombs A Day" video.

@zvonkobogdan9634 A pathetic military performance is Russia in Ukraine they have every advantage in manpower, ammunition supplies, artillery and airpower but are struggling to capture even small cities. As for Afghanistan the US and NATO were there 20 years and took less casualties than Russia did in 9 years.
2
The Russians had superiorty in numbers of men and armoured vehicles plus artillery and airpower it was always going to fall in the end under those conditions.
1
 @Tonyx.yt. No it's superiorty in numbers of men and armoured vehicles plus superiorty in artillery and airpower.
1
 @Linda-0-0p He forgot superiority in artillery and airpower plus more men and armoured vehicles
1
@ridvanpeshkopia8751 they had superiority in manpower and armoured vehicles plus artillery and airpower the city was always going to fall under those disadvantages. What people are ignoring is with all those advantages how much Russia is struggling to take objectives.
1
 @mpravica The Russians aren't quickly demolishing these small cities
1
 @yomamabinfartin. The latest NATO tech 😂😂😂😂 not even close.
1
@chopstixsix802 insurgency style tactics are going to help Ukraine in the long run it will drag out the duration of the war and cost Russia more money and cargo200. At some point russian families are going to have to ask themselves what Ukraine is worth to them because Russia will never pacify the Ukrainian population
1
@ridvanpeshkopia8751 what a joke NATO has committed a tiny portion of it's combat power to Ukraine. Russia has superiorty in numbers of manpower, artillery,airpower and ammunition and they're still struggling to capture small cities taking months and ten of thousands of casualties.
1
@zvonkobogdan9634 You can't compare supporting the Mujahedeen to Ukraine. Ukraine aren't religious extremist and they not doing terrorist attacks around the world. Doesn't matter how much equipment was left behind both Russia and the US couldn't find an answer to the insurgency
1
@melchizedeksalem6470 the untrained men in slippers with AK-47 routine is getting tired. The Taliban had a lot of experience and knew the terrain plus they had a lot more than AK-47 the main weapon was the IED which could destroy most armoured vehicles. They also could hide in the civilian population or run into Pakistan where they were safe. Neither the US or Russia could solve the problem of fighting an insurgency in Afghanistan and comparing fighting an insurgency to a conventional war is like comparing apples and oranges.
1
@melchizedeksalem6470 The Ukrainian military hasn't been well supplied at the start of the war in 2022 most of their equipment was old Russian stock and they had an airforce that was out numbered by the Russians 10-1 and had minimal SAM systems as well as industrial capacity to produce ammunition. A week ago I saw an interview with a Ukrainian officer in Avdiivka and their artillery piece had two shells and no gunpowder so they couldn't fire them. Another soldier said they could only fire one rocket out of their grad MLRS then had to stop because of ammunition shortages. If the Ukrainian military was destroyed the Russians would already be in Kiev. Fanboys try to hype up the help Ukraine has received from NATO when the reality is only a tiny portion of NATO firepower has been provided. With all the advantages Russia has they should be taking objectives because the Ukrainian casualty ceiling for an objective will always be lower than Russia who has more people. Ukraine will always put up a hard fight to defend an objective for a period of time then have to withdraw.
1