Comments by "Stephen47 22" (@Stephen-bq4nq) on "Daniel Davis / Deep Dive" channel.

  1.  @mikibajrektarevic2543  regardless of numbers their armoured forces have been devastated it's obvious by the types of vehicles they're sending troops into battle on
    8
  2. The mayor of moscow said Russia has a military rehab hospital that has seen 600K wounded pass through it . Russia would have at least 150 KIA based on the number of wounded
    6
  3. 700K killed and wounded
    5
  4.  @mikibajrektarevic2543  i don't care what you think the video evidence is there to prove what I said
    5
  5.  @ChrisoKyriacou  They haven't defeated them because the west never committed ground forces, navy or air force to the battle they provided limited support
    5
  6. The war has been going one month short of 3 years so approximately 1065 days. Average 100 dead per day you get 106,500. Average 500 KIA and wounded per day for 1065 days you get 532,500. Both sides would have taken at least these numbers in casualties. We won't know the real numbers until the war is over.
    4
  7. The families of the KIA aren't laughing
    4
  8. Yes and when America finds it's self fighting China and it's allies don't turn to NATO for help you're on your own
    4
  9. The genius of Russia 😂😂😂 you need to check into rehab
    3
  10. Putin needs to go
    3
  11.  @God1stForever  no they don't plenty of russian soldiers have admitted they received a few days training and were sent to the front
    3
  12. Any type of escalation would be suicidal for everyone including Russia
    3
  13. ​ @garykappes4654 because it's not fact
    3
  14. @JohnWick-d1b2b  NATO countries do actually have ships, submarines and planes. America gets into a fight with China and it's allies don't think at some point they won't have to ask NATO for help
    3
  15.  @Windband1  video evidence all over the internet
    3
  16.  @Windband1  yes video evidence is all over the internet
    3
  17.  @svenhanson398  it does add up because the Ukrainian have mastered drone warfare to destroy armoured vehicles and they have also been supplied with thousands of anti tank missiles. The Russians have been sending their armoured vehicles forward in columns completely exposed and taken terrible losses throughout the war. That's the reason they have been sending soldiers forward on bikes and in vans or anything else they could find
    3
  18. @zani1106  I know the truths hard 😂
    3
  19. @islandwills2778  the Ukrainian are producing over 1 million per year and the Russian drones are not better than the Ukrainian ones they're both using drones with fibre optic cables to defeat EW. The Russians massed drones in Kursk for their offensive on other parts of the front I've seen videos of Russian soldiers complaining that the Ukrainian have the advantage with their drones
    3
  20. Pay compensation to Russia for an illegal invasion 😂😂🤡
    3
  21. Where's the wreckage of these planes the photo Iran released wasn't an F35 the canopy was totally different.
    3
  22.  @bovellois  the way things are playing out with agent Orange and Vance I bet a lot of them regret going anywhere near the Americans
    2
  23. You don't know what NATO generals are capable of
    2
  24. Because if they try a big offensive they offer up a big target and the casualties especially in vehicles is terrible
    2
  25. Scott Ritter doesn't have a clue
    2
  26. ​​ @lightworker2956 it depends on how accurate the artillery is and how well defended the people are that are getting shot at.
    2
  27. No one knows the casualties on either side it won't be known until the war is over
    2
  28. Yes and never been stronger
    2
  29. Russia didn't invade Ukraine because they didn't want NATO on their border if that was the case they would have invaded Finland when they joined. They attacked Ukraine to build their empire and here is a Russian admitting it.. https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx0QOX47b7X0MV2iW5AfoDOoLbgllG4QfJ?si=dZbymiP45V5qm2I9
    2
  30. @louiscypher4186  good comment NATO does stop their expansion it's why the Baltic states haven't been attacked
    2
  31. More cannon fodder
    2
  32.  @bilic8094  if Ukraine had suffered 800K KIA their total casualties would be around 2.4 million which isn't realistic their military would have collapsed. How much damage you inflict with your artillery depends on how accurate it is and also how well entrenched the people are you're firing at. There are plenty of examples of heavy artillery bombardments not taking out the defenders it happened a lot in the two world wars. You also have to factor in who is attacking who is defending for so much of this war it's the Russians attacking out in the open sending in repeated attacks per day against the same objectives with no regard for casualties. I've seen videos of Russian soldiers admitted their units had taken casualties ranging from 70-90%. The Russians never take light casualties in their combat operations
    2
  33.  @bilic8094  yes and what I said still applies
    2
  34. If you're country was invaded would you have the same opinion I seriously doubt it
    2
  35. Oh well they can look forward to facing a long drawn out drone insurgency
    2
  36. The Russian economy is struggling no matter how much people want to deny it they have high inflation and interest rates at 21%. Businesses are struggling to pay back loans and are looking at laying off workers..
    2
  37.  @davidlazarus67  it's going to get worse
    2
  38.  @lightworker2956  the inflation and 21% interest rate is a disaster long term. Businesses are struggling to pay back loans let alone make a profit and are looking at laying off staff.
    2
  39.  @deadpoolguy283  stop coping
    2
  40. @DIREWOLFx75  major companies are struggling to pay loans the situation is going to get worse just watch
    2
  41.  @TomaKic  no they haven't that would put their daily casualties at levels worse than WW2 4 million casualties works out at 3686 casualties a day which is 25,806 a week. The Ukrainian military would have collapsed a long time ago
    2
  42. @mikeykeyes  the Russians did massacre civilians in Bucha and the North Koreans did take thousands of casualties that's why they were pulled out of the line. The Russians do have problems in their military predominantly with the supply of armoured vehicles but their not on the brink of collapse
    2
  43. Russia isn't fighting the entire west no western infantry units have been deployed,no navy or air force. Only a small % of firepower has been sent to Ukraine. Russia also lost in Afghanistan insurgencies are very difficult to deal with.
    2
  44. No the conventional war would have been short then the insurgency would have started
    2
  45.  @fanman8102  No the conventional war would have ended and an insurgency would have started
    2
  46. @igorrromanov  no it's not about Russia being safe and secure here is a Russian admitting the truth. https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx0QOX47b7X0MV2iW5AfoDOoLbgllG4QfJ?si=oE7Z_EyUXaG23saw
    2
  47. Desert storm 1991 ​ @junktex 
    2
  48. Yep no matter how fast the Russians build equipment the Ukrainian can build FPV drones faster and cheaper. The issue for Ukraine will be manpower they will have to fight an insurgency at some point which can be done with 10% of their current land force which will reduce casualties and demands on manpower
    2
  49. No they wanted their terms agreed too
    2
  50.  @larrybrus6209  No they didn't they have said their terms are non negotiable.
    2