Comments by "Stephen47 22" (@Stephen-bq4nq) on "History of Boxing EN" channel.

  1. ​ @chuckemeade  no it waste the loss didn't hurt Tua reputation at all it was a great fight and Tua fought very well
    3
  2. ​ @grattanvaz1614  Tyson was a better all round fighter the Tyson from 85-88 would have beaten him on points he barely beat Tua
    2
  3. ​ @obinnaoke587  Tyson out jabbed Tony tucker who was 6 ft 5 with an 8 inch reach advantage. He also had faster hands and was a superior counter puncher than Ike
    2
  4. Ike was a good fighter but a total piece of shit end of story
    2
  5. Bullshit holyfield was fighting on a higher level Ike went to prison before he ever got a title shot
    2
  6. Tyson from 86-88 would have beaten. Ike. Ike would have beaten the Tyson who got out of jail
    1
  7.  @grattanvaz1614  I grew up watching Tyson I was 13 when he beat Trevor Berwick to win his first title. He was far superior to David Tua and Mike Tyson was durable anyone who beat him had to beat him down over a prolonged period to stop him. Tyson went 12 rounds on several occasions and was effective like the second fight with razor Ruddock which was a war he also fought hard for 10 rounds against Jose Ribalta. Mike Tyson had faster hands and feet than Tua,better defence,better jab,better combination puncher,better counter puncher threw a wider variety of punches.
    1
  8.  @grattanvaz1614  I think holyfield and Lennox Lewis were better but not Tua
    1
  9.  @grattanvaz1614  Tyson was more of a complete package than Tua he had a far better jab and was a superior counter puncher with faster hands. He also moved better his foot speed was far superior as was his defence. Tyson had no problems going 12 rounds he showed that against Tony Tucker and razor Ruddock
    1