Comments by "Marc Joly" (@emjizone) on "Science of Bob Lazar's UFO Explored" video.

  1. 10:38 I suspect that the guy chose element 115 because no one can have it at home and do experiments with it to prove that this story is bullshit. But unfortunately for him, the 115 element has been synthesized in labs on earth since 2003 so many of its properties are now measured on top of being speculated. One very interesting property to not understand at all how this reactor can fuel a vehicle is that the half-life of this element is between 16 and 220 ms (depending on isotopes). 😂 This mean you can't keep it as a fuel because it would have decayed before you can use it. And if you don't want it to decay, you'll have to use another much better source of energy to constantly re-create it. And good luck with the radiations.
    2
  2. 8:03 Aaaaall right… there are thing to say about "wireless" tech, too, then. 😅 If you think that the "wireless" tech you use at home work without wire, you are mistaken. Let's have a look inside: https://youtu.be/gV3ieuU7G8Y?t=53 Yes, there is a big coil. And what is a coil? You see it: several turns or loops of... wire! You start to get it: "Wireless" basically consist in using the invisible interaction between… wires. Yeah, sorry guys. This is what happen when you open the black boxes of magicians. Now try to apply that to the flying saucer we are talking about, if you still can.
    1
  3. 4:17 "Unaffected by Gravity": 😄😄😄 like saying "unaffected by space and time". Gravity can be balanced by opposing effects, but it's not like it can be made non-existent.
    1
  4. 20:22 The most famous equation of all space-time , then. :p
    1
  5. 18:51 @Jake Broe , what do you mean by reciprocal "cancelation" of objects of equal mass ? What does "canceling an object" means for you ? (not in the context of cancel culture, of course 😆) You know that Isaac Newton's model is only valid by approximation and by neglecting many well-known phenomena, right? Actually, gravity isn't an actual force, but if considered relatively to an arbitrarily chosen reference. Objects simply free fall following the curve of the universe, and their mass curve it. In your example, the gravitational effet would cancel only on a plane separating to half-spaces. You would still get the tidal force of the objects, with gravity field different from what you would get without those two objects.
    1
  6. 5:00 Well... from a geometric and mechanic point of view, this omicron and delta configuration thing is already problematic. If these three devices generate thrust, there is no need to dedicate one to horizontal confidence and two to gravity compensation: you could simply adjust the angle of all three at the same time to perfectly control horizontal and vertical momentum. This would even give you much better stability, because you could align the center of mass of the vehicle aligned with the mechanical torque resulting from the thrust. This last, more reasonable solution would degrade less energy (heat less, radiate less). And if they do not generate trust but some kind of supernatural massless displacement, then… you shouldn't need to align three rather than only two of them to go faster. But at this point, we are talking about magic, out of the most fundamental accepted laws of the universe, so science is of no help anymore to "understand" it.
    1
  7. 15:01 @Jake Broe, you are right, but the issue here is not the chances to create this element. The issue is its spontaneous decay over time. You can always theorize about the natural creation of this element in grandiose cosmic events, but it still decays so quickly that no civilization can mine it for practical uses.
    1
  8. 8:50 "not subject to inertia": "negate all the gravitational effects and forces in the universe": this mean death. 😅😱 You heart can't pump fluids without inertia, duh ! If your tissues no longer have mass and the forces of the universe are all negated, there is nothing that hold your parts together. Okay, let's say it only affects the gravity field, locally. And let's leave all the other interactions unchanged, because you don't want the device and its content to simply disintegrate.
    1