Comments by "Marc Joly" (@emjizone) on "Russia is Trying to Provoke NATO" video.

0:27 This 3D model suggest a trajectory that is physically impossible. You cannot get this trajectory together with this enveloppe unless the air is much denser or the plane has nearly no mass. Journalism: teaching made with much more cash than expertise.
2
24:39 I only spotted five, with doubts. A longer analysis might allow me to spot more, still with doubts, but only with care and not before they can technically arrest or shoot me, of course.
1
20:00 USA's "Republican" party is no more than Putin's personal party in the USA. 😒 Congrats americans, you've won the cold war, but in spite of Disney and CNN you are set to lose the political war now, totally defeated by this one weapon: demagogy .
1
1:46 Pilots explain that this is not fuel dumping but rather fuel injection. When performed, fuel dumping drop fuel from the tip of the wings, far from the motors' exhaust. Fuel injection from the motors is typically used to increase thrust. It seems that it have been used here to achieve the desired short turn radius in spite of the speed, with the intention to maximise turbulences on the drone. The pilot performing that have probably experienced an uncomfortable acceleration.
1
@XxBloggs It burns more or less depending on temperature and pressure and mix. Depending on motor regime and relative air speed. The fuel dumping I have seen elsewhere does not spray fuel or smoke in such a wide cone, but rather as a narrow stream. I don't know the specifics of each plane. One of my sources is Denys Davydov. Maybe you should contact him to discuss this issue among aviation experts (that I am not) and get to the bottom of it in order to come back to the public with the most complete, coherent and definitive explanation possible. I take good note of your objection and hope to learn more about that.
1