Comments by "Marc Joly" (@emjizone) on "Russia Does Not Know How To Win" video.

6:31 That exception is not random at all. They received exceptional treatment because they attacked several foreign countries and because their expansionist and destructive policies posed a very special kind of threat to many others. Other similar cases in previous wars should be noted. It's almost a rule of how human society works.
4
1:39 What tells us this is russian artillery effect only ? Why this can't be mixed with rocket impact due to fire from helicopter, including ukrainian helicopters, for example ? I can't tell the difference right now, and I'd like to get an expert opinion on this. I'd love to write a computer program that automatically distinguishes between the different types of impact and counts them. Of course, only Russia can waste so many ammos in vain and so quickly. The others can't because they don't have so much. They don't have the luxury of depleting their stockpiles in vain and have no choice but be more efficient. So, even if Russia didn't do it alone, it's mostly Russian land art, for sure.
2
18:51 Oh yes, sympathy for the nazi in Ukraine still exists, but as you say by a very small minority, and clearly not in Zelenski's plans. In any case, it is impossible to promote Nazism and advocate for NATO integration at the same time. Too many NATO countries are constitutionally incompatible with having a Nazi ally and culturally allergic to Nazism, so they would oppose it at all costs, even if it meant quitting NATO! Russian propagandists should therefore make a choice between these two incompatible narratives instead of desperately using any silly excuse.
1
2:31 Yes, rather incompetent at aiming; but no, they don't shoot at "absolutely everything" and without trying to hit something. Looking carefully at the distribution of impacts on the ground, and assessing the gradient of its density, we can see that the road is the target, or perhaps something that was on it. Obviously, such a distribution suggests that they killed or wounded more field mice and rabbits than vehicle occupants, but their intention to hit more than just rodents is still somewhat apparent. At least they tried.
1
15:44 In fact, most of the killing in the Donbass region from 2014 to 2021 took place in 2014 and 2015, and did not kill pro-Russian Ukrainians only. It is fair to say that with a little real diplomacy and a lot more transparency in the electoral process, the killing would soon end. By bombing cities in Donbass, but also by forcibly recruiting Donbass inhabitants to sacrifice themselves in a Russian-Ukrainian war outside Donbass, Vladi Putin has succeeded in making even some pro-Russian Ukrainians hate him and change their mind about being Russia's peons. In Crimea, too. A proof of Crimea not being part of the Russian Federation after all is that general mobilisation is official there.
1
2:11 "time and money": typical USA units of measurement ;D Let's talk in more tangible terms about what makes the real economy, unrelated to the whims of financial speculators. It wasted life time*, valuable *materials and irreplaceable *energy resources*, no matter how much money was invented and printed.
1
10:18 This is probably Vadli Putin's biggest political blunder if he really hoped to dissuade Ukraine from joining NATO (which I don't think he cared about, having planned to make that country cease to exist politically anyway). All he had to do was to take the opportunity of the next presidential elections in Ukraine next year. Given what he has done, that option no longer exists. Now Ukrainians hate him more than ever, including many of those who admired him before that, will be extremely reluctant to work with Russia before a long and difficult process of reconciliation unless russian themselve get rid of him at least politically, and sees NATO countries as needed allies more than ever. In fact, Putin managed to convince NATO to accept Ukraine one day, while this organization wasn't really in favor of it.
1