Comments by "Feralz" (@missionpupa) on "Bite-sized Philosophy" channel.

  1. Jordan Petersen is my Youtube therapist.
    104
  2. Funny you say that, as most of what peterson communicates is from his own intuition instead of evidence or statistical data, I mean he knows these information, but he infers from them from his own reasoning, which basically muddles the data, it's like making an experiment based on another experiment, except it's in your head and not empirical.
    74
  3. You know you're a boss when they give you 2 mics.
    34
  4. I dont think you get what hes saying, thats exactly what it is.
    33
  5. Peterson just Roasted this guy so hard.
    22
  6. Youre one of those guys huh. Masturbating has been backed up by scientific evidence so many times. You know what happens to people who suppressed masturbation? They either become rapists, or join the church and fuck little boys. Read a fuckin book.
    19
  7. You all seem confused. The problem with everyone here in this comment chain is they like to put people in a box, oh hes not right, hes clearly left! Then a few days later, oh no hes clearly right! Who gives a shit. Peterson is not 1 dimensional, he has different views on different things, thats the reason youre all confused, hes not like you that squeezes in a box that society labeled for him.
    14
  8. The conversation will go like this: Peterson: this is how Iq is defined. Sam: ok cool. Peterson: cool. Sam: ok bye.
    13
  9. Learn to meditate, its how you train your mind to be still
    13
  10. looks like you need some software update.
    12
  11. @resvin singh men dont need standards when procreating, men use odds. Theyre not the one who gets pregnant and carries the baby for 9 months.
    11
  12. To be born a Man in the world is so overpowered you wouldnt even believe. People just complain about anything. I bet if you were born a female, you would complain about people not seeing your worth, that you too could be a CEO of a company and that you also can be ambitious instead of being portrayed as a work at home mom. Not to mention a victim of the majority of domestic violence. Stop whining about things. Men have it good, more than women and definitely more than dogs. Are you a self deprecating brain dead?
    10
  13.  @isidorocasanovas9300  you have 10 minutes? This may or may not change your life if you have 10 minutes to spare: https://youtu.be/oVzTnS_IONU
    10
  14. I can just imagine seeing a kid running out the street and the carers are stopping them using an umbrella.
    9
  15. Ever wonder why wallstreet doesnt create courses in investment education? Rather, they use nonsensical and opaque jargon to keep people away. When in fact, understanding how wallstreet operates is very easy if you did a little digging. People who were born to this world that are already ahead in financial power, will want to keep it that way for the rest of their progeny, at the rate theyre going, outsiders are almost impossible to catch up.
    8
  16. Not sure you understand what ironic means.
    6
  17. Destiny doesnt exist. What you are experiencing is your potential.
    6
  18. Enthios he killed one, and then 2 seconds later another one = serial killer. That logic. If we're doing that without any justification, then we might as well assume everyone in prison are serial criminals of the same crime.
    6
  19. @resvin singh I dont think you understand the dichotomy here. Men play the numbers game, women play the quality game. If we all behaved like women, no one would be having sex. So its a bit silly to say that men should think like women.
    6
  20. I can answer your confusion very easily. It's both alright, we live in the 21St century, science has told us over and over its not nature vs nurture people, it's nature and nurture. Gene expression is activated by environmental factors Ok. Now ask an actual question.
    4
  21.  @hondedtij6761  I just explained it in 2 paragraphs. If your mom scolds you that you have been playing on your phone too much and she looks back at you and you are actually on your phone is not ironic.
    4
  22. Andrew Malcolm would've been scarier if he was wearing a cape
    4
  23. I mean there was no such thing as emotional intelligence in the first place. It's like saying reddish blue or blackish white. And I don't think anyone made such claims. But make no mistake there is such a thing as eq or emotional quotient. And some will argue it's more.important than iq. Part of the eq is conscientiousness.
    3
  24. You couldn't be further from the truth nigga. That wasn't the moral of the story. Fear is not an object, its a concept. Saying I conquered the dragon because I was not scared, is not the same as saying: I conquered the dragon because I was brave. You don't want to put women in a pedestal because you're scared to face the dragon, is what Im saying.
    3
  25. Brace yourselves, the feminists are cuming.
    3
  26.  @residentevil999  Fuckin thank you. The first sign of intelligence in this comment chain, it only took a year for someone to know how to reason correctly to finally understand it. Now I can go on with my life and live in peace knowing that not everyone is completely retarded.
    3
  27. He clearly explained the definition of Iq is intelligence, and the definition of intelligence is the thing that mattered that has nothing to do with your personality. Great explanation of the statistical underpinnings as well.
    3
  28. Oversexualization? Darwin, evolution and biology would say otherwise. Sex is the only thing. If it wasnt for sex, nothing in your world really has any meaning. Not to mention, if it wasnt for being sexual, none of us would exist. stop being scared of the woman.
    2
  29. I don't think you understand. I can have the worst hangover and do an iq test, and I will be on 20% iq capacity, the score would be a lot different if I was sober. This is the analogy to your comment. I mean you can only read so many books, the more you read the less improvement you will have. But if you're an educated adult, this score should be somewhat consistent. If you can get a score of over 150 trust me it's not because you read. You can't get 2 people from there Street who has average iq and ask them to study for a year and suddenly become a genius (a genius in iq definition). That basically destroys your hypothesis.
    2
  30. The point was, clean your room, not clean your apartment. You start from your room, thats the whole point, its the closest extension of yourself.
    2
  31. Oh James, not everything is what it seems. You have much to learn.
    2
  32. Best people for relationship advice are pragmatists. They know all the shit that happens.
    2
  33. Aleksi K that is completely your interpretation. The books or movies are simply portraying the need to want something, and if something is to be wanted it had to have some value. It's your problem that you think it's the end-all. This motivation to reach for the stars is the main reason for our successful survival, don't confuse what peterson said by undermining it.
    2
  34.  @Alphaproximita  yes because its doing the right thing even when no one else is looking. Its what keeps society together, considering your actions impact others and not just act on selfish means.
    2
  35.  @iiiiiiiiiii5211  thanks for adding absolutely nothing to the conversation. take your own advice.
    2
  36. Josh Crews they're more dangerous because they're not self-aware. This makes them unpredictable.
    2
  37. @Bob smith, I dont know if youre stupid or what. I dont understand your comment. First of all, you cant defend yourself from something that you dont know. Thats the concept youre taking literal, but ofcourse, unless you want to be paranoid all day, but I dont recommend that. For example, if I see 2 guys, 1 holding a knife in plain sight, and there is another one just standing there. I will keep an eye on the guy holding a knife, therefore I will be blindsided by the guy that looks innocent. So, your brain takes these queues, otherwise if you suspect everything around you, then you will be in constant flight or flight mode that takes a serious impact on your health. I think all of this is over your head tbh.
    2
  38. Peterson can kill a woman with 1 punch, so unless he wants to be charged with murder, he needs to walk away.
    2
  39. Jordan is criticizing the current state of the humanities department specifically in Canada and in the U.S.A, so, I dont think you actually know his real opinion on the humanities (if done correctly), he mentioned learning humanities makes a person economically invaluable, that is why he has so much hatred for what it has become.
    2
  40. @AJ Wilson He wasnt talking about boxing. He was talking about how he was the clown and everyone was profiting from him.
    2
  41.  @alexr6068  wow that's great to hear dude. Meditation brings us back to the source, away from all the external demands. I dont think we are broken, were all just paying attention to the wrong things
    2
  42. Peter Sagan I think he needs a software upgrade more so, hes still running DOS, what a dodo.
    1
  43. VonGrav thats fine and everything, but consider petersons lectures as strong opinions rather than objective science. Youll thank me later.
    1
  44. lawl. Can you upgrade it to get an extra +2? a +17 int would be amazing. #CastAllDay
    1
  45.  @erickouhai9818  thinking is not science, reason is not even science. This is where you are confused.
    1
  46. Sjws are more likely low iq people and high on neuroticism.
    1
  47.  @plexpopper8763  Actually hes saying it to everyone. Because there are more creative people that would not be successful than there are ones that will be. So, he is helping more people Net Positive. Also Peterson is not saying you should stop being creative, I dont think any of you actually actually watched and understood the video.
    1
  48. You mean, you dont want to agree with it. There is no debate, you want to move forward, you need someone to push you forward, not a YES man or YES woman.
    1
  49. Aleksi K except my interpretation was correct. It was pretty clear. In the case that, you said things you didn't mean, then that's your problem.
    1
  50. Everything starts from the individual, thats also Karl Marx point of view
    1
  51.  @OZEEtube  and there's another one.
    1
  52.  @VimiksMC  saying im wrong doesnt make me wrong, at least have a point when you call someone out. I made my argument above, I welcome any retorts, that is if you actually have any.
    1
  53.  @VimiksMC  You seem to have a problem with comprehension. refer to my previous comment. If you actually have no argument against what I just said, you really shouldnt pretend you do and just stop talking. This is your last opportunity to prove me wrong or are you here to get the last word because youre dumb?
    1
  54.  @prgrssion  I will, once you prove me my logic was faulty.
    1
  55.  @prgrssion  Read the comment chain. Somehow you found a way to find a reason to talk to me but not read what actually has been said before you do? that's very interesting. I gave multiple examples if you just use your eyes. I dont have a special definition of irony, google irony and any of those definitions work, the problem is not that people cant define irony, is that they dont understand whats actually ironic.
    1
  56.  @prgrssion  Another useless comment. If you have something useful to say, I would gladly listen, so far you've said nothing, if you didnt understand what I said previously, ask away. Why dont you ask me something meaningful instead of badgering around? Do you need me to clarify something for you that you dont understand? I just dont like sounding like a broken record, I have repeated myself numerous times and if you didnt get my example the 2nd time, I cant help you.
    1
  57.  @rishikeshwagh  Because they cant stand that I'm right about something so simple.
    1
  58.  @saitsaiti5873  Nice insult. Let me know when you come up with an actual argument.
    1
  59.  @juliebee7415  5th from the top. You could at least read the comment chain of you're gonna reply to a 10 month old comment. The least you can do.
    1
  60.  @juliebee7415  I have a total of 12 comments in this chain, and if you can't find my 2 paragraphs then I doubt you will even understand what I said. Jesus Christ.
    1
  61.  @tommybro5313  Why would I feel stupid when people dont even understand basic logic. I feel embrarassed though, to know that most people couldnt even understand a basic concept.
    1
  62.  @tommybro5313  You're a moron, there's really nothing else to say.
    1
  63.  @leomillett8553  I wont even spend the time reading that big block of text with no paragraphs. pretty sure youre an idiot.
    1
  64.  @senthilvelan544  lol what
    1
  65. One is woke, the other one is pumping psychidelics in his brain thinking twisting his thoughts might mean something.
    1
  66. Pffftt. You had to ruin it by introducing your own delusions.
    1
  67. Because you already confirm abandonment before it happens, therefore you will act in a way that it's already true, therefore, push them away from you before it brings more pain. It's a glitch in the brain, but I think awareness is key.
    1
  68. @Myles Franco, incorrect deduction. Saying "im a man of my word" doesnt meant that I guarantee what I say. That is ridiculous, as that would be synonymous to saying "I never lie". Saying I'm a man of my word can be more accurately described as, I am committed to the promises I declare I am committed to. What that reflects is a person who cares about his integrity. Now, just because hes committed to something doesnt mean its guaranteed to happen, but it just means his integrity is at stake, which is something he values. Now, I can sense a rat from a mile away, but if they utter words like "im a man of my word" it only raises more suspicion, and it would be very obvious to spot even for a normal person, because they will seem very defensive to utter such big words. Hence, you will notice, it is a phrase that you will most likely hear from someone who is reliable rather than someone conniving.
    1
  69. Also, predators, act like predators, the idea is to hide yourself from view until the moment of pounce (much like a lion), now a predator acting like a prey would be someone who sticks out like a sore thumb. A predator uses stealth and the shadows. If what you call "fact" is something that has no justification whatsoever, then I recommend you dont throw that word around like its your old underwear.
    1
  70. Josh Crews I don't know what kind of male friends you have buddy, but I suggest you get new ones, or maybe you are simply projecting your own imperfection? If one is strong, he promotes it, advertises it, that's how evolution has worked for millions of years. It's straight forward and it's full proof. the ones who can't be strong are forced to use a different strategy because they can't compete with the strong, and that strategy is the one you are describing. And perceptive women can see past that strategy, it is very suspicious to start with, sure some men use it, but that's only because they have no other means. That's why nice guys finish last, not nice guys get a shoulder to cry on. Dang, I should be your therapist.
    1
  71. Josh Crews I'm only throwing jabs because I don't have much patience for stupidity. I said strong men advertise themselves. I suggest you read some Darwin, or even just understand how evolutionary traits work. You thought I was talking literal motivated advertisement. A lion doesn't go: look at my paws, look at my teeth how sharp they are. Or maybe a peacock going look at my feathers check me out. Or a tiger going, look at my stripes, they're cool. When I say advertise it means their phenotypic expression is perceived by his own species and in particular the opposite sex as something that is of good quality, meaning they don't have to try, they just have to be who they are you dumb shit. Way to misinterpret what I said again.
    1
  72. Josh Crews it's pretty obvious that everyone here thinks you're an idiot. You can pretend you're smart but that only works to stupid people. Intelligence shows when you've talked long enough to a person, and I find none of it in you, you just try to brush of things you don't understand and you revert back to what you only know, it is ignorant behaviour at its finest. Saying inefficient communicator is so retarded, it's like you just randomly pluck out words and hope they make sense. If you mean ineffective like the other chap said, that's only because my effectiveness is dulled down by the incoming perception of stupidity that is about to encode it (that means you).
    1
  73. Josh Crews I wish I could talk to people and they just get it right away, but I don't have that luxury when talking to you. Maybe the fact that I told you you didn't understand what I said and how you misinterpreted me would give you a clue on why I had to draw it for you in crayons in hopes that you will actually be on the same page. It's like a dog hating the sound of the vacuum cleaner, when he brings dirt inside the house all the time. You are a walking contradiction my friend. I am getting less and less amused, and I am left wondering now why I talk to such idiots. Also, an inefficient is a dumb adjective to use with communicator. Learn to use words properly. You don't just add 2 things and expect them to work in every given context. You should be thankful that I spend the time explaining things to you. One of the most important maxims in writing: consider your audience. You are one dumb motherfcker.
    1
  74. Josh Crews you talk like we haven't had this conversation before. You made a statistical claim with no justification that men act like prey. When I for one, was not gonna bullshit my way in an argument like you did, so I gave you an actual example from an evolutionary perspective that the traits of weak men who pretend to be prey (if they do survive) then it will be a very small part of the gene pool, why? Because those fiendish men who procreate don't have very successful offspring's because as you said, they let out their true self (that's a bad thing for all parties involved). And I talked about women evolving to be very good observers and mate selectors, but you find it hard to understand in that little brain of yours how women can truly tell if a guy is legit or not more often than they can't. E-v-o-l-u-t-i-o-n, read a fuckin book, if fiendish men pervaded society then we wouldn't be as successful as a species that we are. Incase you didn't know, it's the women, who decides which genes are gonna be pushed to the front of the species. I'm now starting to suspect that you are on of those men or at least think it's your tendency, which explains why you defend it so much. You probably still don't understand any thing I say, but don't worry I don't expect much from you. In fact I think you should pay me, for free education. I just realised that I learned nothing from you this whole time. It's a one way streak, life is not fair. Next word that comes out of me you'll have to pay for. Adios.
    1
  75. Matthew Duddy you need more than a questionnaire to really get reliable information, asking people their opinion and giving them a tick box is nothing more than a survey question. It works on certain studies but barely the more complex ones. This is where it stops being science because your statistics are now contaminated with opinions or at best, perceived truths. How might you pose the question: do you think you're more intelligent than other people? And actually find out if it's true unless you test their iq and the person they're referring to. You can't make nonsense inferences for these. You need solid evidence. That is why you will notice that the really good studies involve tricking the subjects on the real intention of the study, and usually involves real scenarios not pen and paper. Now, operating on a study like that, and with at least 1000 people or more in different states (for sample diversity) is frigging expensive.
    1
  76. "you were implying that everyone who acts harmless is in fact the opposite which is deterministic" The fuck have you been smoking? You have a severe case of bad logic. I never implied any causation, I wasnt even talking about the harmless people acting like prey in itself, what i was talking about how they are not the prevalent trait to attract women. And since when did we start talking about determinism? are you fuckin high? Why are you introducing a topic that doesnt need to be introduced, I mean youre already having a hard time conceptualizing what im saying as it stands. Godamn, youre dumber than the other guy. First of all, I couldnt stress enough how often i use the word "MOST" or "MORE OFTEN" throughout my statements. I am very cautious of how I use my wording especially when I generalize, but guess what. Its one thing to understand what I'm saying, its another if you can't get past the language barrier. Didnt know you 2 were sucking each others dick while im gone, its especially sad that you make assumptions without me being able to defend my statement, tells me a lot about people. I might call you names, but ill never sink that low. I hope it was fun for you kids. Youre both retarded hows that. The conversation between you two is nothing but an exchange of words to make you feel better about yourselves. I find that amusing. bunch of low lifes. P.S. Go back and study psychology again, or at least go to a different university, because I dont think you are educated enough on the matter, when you cant even understand how to create a study for a simple hypothesis and you think all you need is a questionnaire. A questionnaire works if youre asking someone if they take vitamins, if they finished tertiary education, what their blood type is, or whether there is someone in their family that has been diagnosed with a mental illness. That is the limitation of that study. Whatever you think you studied in school, its not science kiddo. I recommend you do your re-do course.
    1
  77. @Josh Crews, "It's very apparent that he has not taken college level statistics, or quantitative literacy for that matter." I know youre saying that, but I need you to explain to me exactly where I failed on that. Or are you just using my own comments against me? Im listening, I want to hear you talk about statistics and tell me where I was wrong, because i know you are ignorant in any kind of analysis. Im waiting. Yea let that roll off your back, thats because you are oblivious to your level of stupidity and you like to perpetuate your self denial. That is why, you will always be mediocre, you turn your face when truth confronts you.
    1
  78. Yea, youre done huh, after talking that shit when im not here. How convenient for you. So, you just talk shit and run away. thats cute.
    1
  79. Josh Crews I think you should be more concerned about yourself than you should over me. I mean that. Oh someone used a couple of cuss words on the internet, let me assume more unjustified bullshit (my impersonation of you). Is this what your arguments are reduced to now? Ad hominem? I was hoping to see that shit talker earlier when I wasn't here, it's very hard to defend my arguments if I'm not even there you know that? or did all your brain cells die out.
    1
  80. Josh Crews oh strike that's strike 2 for you mister. Did you google amygdala, and that's what you came up with? Human emotions are very important but when I meant your brain cells are gone and you were talking from the amygdala, I meant you were incapable of reason. Amygdala itself doesn't exclusively control emotions but what it controls are primitive instincts, kinda like the last 2 replies you conjured up, is this getting to you? We're just starting to have fun and your brain shut down already(whatever is left of it at least). I'm waiting for your next creative response, this time I challenge you to make it more personal than the next. Saying I'm angry is weak, try harder.
    1
  81. Josh Crews first of all, knowing the parts of the brain, does not necessarily mean you understand it you dimwitt, and you clearly don't. yea that's right, you don't know shit about the brain so stop pretending you do.youre basically just taking what I say and using it as your own, ive noticed that about you.If you need to say something next time, just say it, don't hide it behind pretentiousness. You make a lot of claims like I'm acting irrationally, but I don't think you know how to converse or debate properly. If you claim something like I'm acting irrationally, you need to follow it with a reason - yada yada yada. The game is not about stating how you feel, it's about making a point numbnuts. I don't hear any of that from you. It's like talking to a lamp post. The way you talk I could akin to: I like cake. I like bananas. I hate spicy things. Derp derp derp. So fuckin what right? I'm usually a nice guy, and generally enjoy talking to people who makes sense and know things about the world. But I have a secret, I'm allergic to idiots. So forgive me, it can't be helped.
    1
  82. Josh Crews you keep things short, not because you're concise, it's because your communication reflects the dullness of your mind. You don't even make sense 95% of the time. Because you don't know how to express yourself, it's like you live in your own little world. No one's asking you for a dissertation, but let's be honest you can't even complete a meaningful statement. You keep harping about short and simple, but your words have no quality, it doesn't make a chimpanzee smart just because he can say a few words. I'm getting suspicious now that you seem to reprehend reading or thinking(not that I'm surprised). Snivelling worm IRL, that's your 3rd strike. Your amygdala is acting up again, I wouldn't dare assume anything about you in real life, because I know it's pretty fuckin stupid to make that sort of assumption on a YouTube comment section, the only reason I'll do that is if um getting verbally destroyed (kinda like you are now), so I'll resort to ad hominems (notice I mentioned this word a second time now and you still don't know what it means. However, what I can tell about you on the internet is your stupidity, youve demonstrated that often enough.
    1
  83. Josh Crews fuck youre dumb. Just read what you just said. Are you crying? Jesus, it's just a conversation and you're getting all emotional. Is this the point where you talk about your feelings and how I've hurt them? You are now just resorting to feelings, man did I break you that bad? Grow the fuck up, take my advice and thanks for wasting my time, and that would be the last second you wasted. Now time to do things that actually make sense. I need to get back those brain cells that died talking to you.
    1
  84. When did he talk religion? Not sure if you watched the video but he was talking about a story of destiny.
    1
  85. He didnt just think of this now, he already knows all the answers to these questions before it was even asked. Maybe thats why youre confused.
    1
  86.  @KabooM1067  hes teaching you how not to fail at life.
    1
  87. Because its not about what people want, its about what they do.
    1
  88. Jordan Peterson is my spiritual Dad.
    1
  89. 1:03 literally me doing an assignment: why are we here? Just to suffer?
    1
  90.  @Duckyyy-0.0  I would like to respond to your argument, but you dont really have one. Ad hominems just dont work the same way. Try again.
    1
  91.  @MeanderingMentor  I very much doubt that. Research has always shown otherwise for a very simple fact, men are statistically stronger than men which means they can overpower women so easily. Show me this study that you speak of and not just some bs you read on a blog.
    1
  92.  @MeanderingMentor  oh wow I ask you for a link to a study and you gave me youtube link. Im talking about meta analysis on multiple studies on such a ridiculous claims as you just made. If I said dragons are real, im not gonna ask you to do your own research on it, well simply because you wont find it, which means you could be looking for months and you just wasted your time. The onus is on you, youre the one claiming contrary to the current knowledge. Im talking about meta analysis, not one study from a small town or YouTube clips. Show me a damn journal article.
    1
  93.  @MeanderingMentor  lol youre a joke. Ive looked at the literature and men easily outnumber women. Youre the one claiming something and your evidence is "look it up". Just shut up, if youre gonna start some conspiracy learn to back it up with evidence. You have a backwards view of how the world works. If im claiming the dinosaurs dont exist I am gonna have evidence for that. Otherwise youre just a time wasting troll. I think you should challenge your own assumptions on believing everything you hear on youtube as an actual statistical fact. Read actual studies and get off youtube.
    1
  94.  @MeanderingMentor  I asked you for a meta study, you must be getting really confused now. If I looked up a paper for cellphone causing cancer I will find probably dozens if not hundreds of them. In fact, if I looked up vaccine and autism correlation, I will find 1 study but not repeatable. Also if I looked up microwaving food to be detrimental to your health I will find a lot of those too. The fact that you gave me a YouTube link shows me you havent really done any digging yourself. You watched 1 video on YouTube and suddenly. You think your special. Kids these days I swear. Ill give you an advice: dont believe everything you read on the internet. ive wasted enough time on you. Adios and stay in school.
    1
  95.  Rick O'Shay  Sorry, I dont watch garbage documentaries.
    1
  96.  Rick O'Shay  Dumb doco's watched by dumb people. end of story.
    1
  97.  Maverick1  You havent done any research if you think men are risk averse you dummy. Your premise is misinformed, and you have no clue about natural selection and dont understand that risk taking is exactly the men that are attractive to women and is what pushed the species forward. We are curious and are willing to take a chance, we hunted big predators because men werent scared. I cant say the same thing to you soyboy, you sound like a scared little kid who was hurt at a young age and trying to hide the pain.
    1
  98.  Maverick1  The fact that you think women like men who play it safe makes no sense. No man in the history of the world accomplished anything great because they were afraid of risk. Women are risk averse, thats the dichotomy, you have this thing completely backwards. You could not be more wrong than you are now.
    1
  99.  Maverick1  i can tell youre trying to make a point. Youre just not getting to it.
    1
  100. @Tyler T lol wtf are you crying about
    1
  101.  @Delimon007  you made that choice so why complain about it.
    1
  102.  @Delimon007  yes men are less risk averse than women. This is not an opinion. This is not a poll. Its simple biology. Go read a book.
    1
  103.  @matthewcuriel991  Thats not what he said, why are you paraphrasing?
    1
  104.  @eldontyrell4361  whats the most represented ethnicity in oxford then? gender aside.
    1
  105. Good thing science doesnt care about that as much as most people do. I think the attention hes getting would definitely lead to more clicks than it wouldve had. You dont see a good paper and not use it because it contains his name, but you do increase the chances of people searching your name more than it doesnt, as if someone already knows your name they are probably interested in petersons work in the first place. does this make sense.
    1
  106.  @MrWongWey  Kids are little scientists, let them experiment. if it means you will get a bruise or 2, thats OK
    1
  107. The irony is, most people clicked more instead.
    1
  108. He mentions its the stories themselves that are relevant
    1