Comments by "TeeKay" (@teekay_1) on "This Climate Graph has a Nasty Secret" video.

@altrag Because we took the science seriously and did something about it. Nah, you're changing history. Acid Rain and Climate Change are two completely different things. We were never in danger of creating an ice age, much as we're not in danger of boiling the planet. We simply don't have the data to prove anything about the climate because we've only recently gotten good data. We're looking at a climate that's been around for 7 billion years and we're using 50-70 year of verifiable data to make conclusions about it.
3
@Christian-yz1qu Surface temperatures have not risen in the past 10 years.
3
@macraghnaill3553 So.... how do we know the 30s/40s/50s in this century won't be a cooling period. Answer: We don't because the climate models simply don't work.
3
@Christian-yz1qu If that record is 100 years long, then it's difficult to argue that this is something unique; we don't have accurate temperature readings for more than 100 years. And even that's a stretch. We have no idea of where trends begin what's normal variation and what's not. What we do know is that no climate model is accurate enough to distinguish between noise and trend. Heck these climate models can't tell us what next year will be like. And the excuse "you're confusing weather with data" applies to every single claim of "hottest summer" . And as someone who follows climate change, surely you're aware of the latest peer reviewed paper that finds no link between CO2 and temperature rise.
3
@JCAtkeson3 Oh, it was the journalists fault that scientists were predicting the next ice age. Got it.
3
@Ruktiet NASA redefined it back in 2012 (or so) the average weather over 10 years, one supposes to push a political agenda.
2
As has been pointed out by Dr. Koonin, none of the climate models work. If given a known set of temperatures at a point in time even from just 50 years ago, none of them will show the correct temperatures for the present day. Which should actually be quite easy if we're going to use these models to project rising temperatures. And the real problem with Net Zero is recent peer-reviewed studies cannot show a link between CO2 and temperature rise. So if as a civilization we spend hundreds of trillions of dollars trying to get to Net Zero and it turns out it has no affect on climate, then where do we go from there? To be taken seriously, these scientists need to make a hypothesis that says "if we reduce CO2 by 'x', then temperatures will moderate by 'y'". If they refuse to do this, it's a strong indictment of climate science itself.
1
@altrag "> We simply don't have the data to prove anything about the climate That is strictly false" That is absolutely true. Tell you what... this is an easy one. Can we predict what the temperature will be (within 5 degrees) 20 years from now? How about 100 years from now? How about a 1000 years from now? Not a trend, but temperature. If not, then it's junk science.
1
@ricladouceur6202 Do you mean universities Purdue Indiana State University Notre Dame Ohio State Penn State University of Texas at Austin The list goes on and on. What school did you go to?
1
@chrispark9343 Untrue. Search for "The ice age that never happened". And the belief was such that in 2004 a disaster movie called "The Day After Tomorrow" was made which showed... you guessed it. Global freezing. So please stop the "no scientists ever predicted that". Yes. Yes they did!
1
@calvinfowler6872 If you're being honest with yourself, you'll admit that in the 70's and beyond there was fear of a new ice age. You can verify that with a simple search.
1
@andrezcabara2774 Even today, people are saying melting icecaps will make the sea rise. But the same people are buying seafront property on Nantucket. So there's a lot of BS'ers around on global warming.
1
@andrezcabara2774 Search for "Florida Map Shows Where State Will Become Underwater From Sea Level Rise" or the more generic "florida will be underwater from global warming" Many scientists are claiming this. You're a smart guy, so you know you can't post URLs in the comments except links to other youtube videos. It would have been faster for you to type it into a search engine rather than argue on Youtube.
1
@altrag Otherwise you just look like a whacko shouting randomly at a crowd Wow. The lack of self-awareness here......
1
@Christian-yz1qu I can't post the DOI url, the best I can do is give you the title: "Climatic consequences of the process of saturation of radiation absorption in gases" Jan Kubicki, Krzysztof Kopczyński, Jarosław Młyńczak This is a relatively new paper, just published March 2024
1
@WilliamStaples-sw6vg The dust bowl didn't make it hot. Being hot created the dust bowl.
1
@WilliamStaples-sw6vg Is that speculation or have they demonstrated it with experimental data? If so, can you share a link to the data?
1