Comments by "TeeKay" (@teekay_1) on "“Who Produced Oumuamua?” - The First Interstellar Object We’ve Ever Seen" video.

As someone who has wrested the mantle of being "The Science" from the guy who paid to have gain-of-function research (I beat him in hand to hand combat for the title), I will say that what they believe is irrelevant, since I am.... The Science
6
@jichaelmorgan3796 That's an excellent point. All A.I. cares about is data and it can very quickly spot falsified data. About 50% of all researchers will be out of a job.
5
@iananderson5972 It doesn't make you wonder at all. Anytime someone in The Science tells you that it's settled, or that no theory but this theirs be accepted, they are High Priests, not scientists.
4
@umaikakudo Sure. But that's like saying a computer program can help you commit fraud. Of course it can. it can do anything you want it to do.
3
You have to believe in The Science. All praise the power of The Science. We have faith in The Science, and we ask The Science to forgive us for our doubt and questioning The Science. In the holy name of The Science, amen
2
@willia3r "this guy isn’t replacing Neil DeGrasse Tyson, or even Bill Nye" Exactly. Nobody can make us laugh harder than those guys. They are the Martin & Lewis of the scientific world. Nobody can replace them.
2
@@Woanaz If he was a real scientist, he would have test tubes, Erlenmeyer flasks, and Bunsen burners with him. At all times.
2
@uncleg9783 We have proof that Alice Kramden went to the moon many times. Hard video proof, my friend.
2
@showstimer " most academics have things they work on that actually produce things" Things like more research grants from the federal government.
2
@umaikakudo Because you share the training data with others. Then they can duplicate your results. It's why you can't take climate scientists seriously. They generally won't show you the data because "it will be misused"
1