Comments by "TeeKay" (@teekay_1) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1.  @Moronoxy  The so-called border crisis is manufactured. The Democrat strategy is that they're generally starting to lose voters except in solid blue cities, so the intent of opening the borders is to bring in new voters they assume will vote Democrat. The system isn't broken, the system has worked quite well, except that Biden opened the border.
    1
  2. Garland is getting nervous at this point, anyway.
    1
  3. Where did all the money go that nobody ever collected? That's how Bill Clinton "balanced" the budget in the 1990's. It was an accounting trick. He took the Social Security Trust fund and lumped it in with general revenue.
    1
  4. Don't the Democrats have anything better to do? Don't they have a country to continue ruining?
    1
  5. Billions of dollars for Ukraine, while buying a box of cereal and milk is $12. Yeah, that's on Biden.
    1
  6. Nads never comes off as particular smart in the head, but he wears trousers in a way that no other man can.
    1
  7. The real traitor is Traitor Joe.
    1
  8.  @stevek8288  Steve, where did he go to school for immunology?. And he doesn't need money to be re-elected. You're living in an alternate reality.
    1
  9. He should change his name from Judy Garland to Ida Know.
    1
  10.  frogger2513  Voting is not a right I am intrigued by your theories and would like to subscribe to your newsletter
    1
  11.  Saturday8pm  You're a funny little man. The world must look much different from way down there.
    1
  12.  @whosthat3677  Well, you're not old enough to vote yet, but no doubt when are old enough, you'll vote early and often.
    1
  13.  @robertdysonn  But we also need to have standards of who can be the leader of this country Let me ask you a serious question, and I don't mean for it to be insulting. Did you study civics at any point in your schooling? The U.S. Constitution states that the president must: * Be a natural-born citizen of the United States * Be at least 35 years old * Have been a resident of the United States for 14 years > There are no other qualifications< It's concerning that you probably know a lot about gender ideology, you understand the 1618 project in detail, Critical Race Theory is something you strongly believe in, you believe Sweden is a perfect socialist paradise, but somehow an understand of how our country works has escaped you. You believe that a Podunk local court has the authority to determine eligibility for a person for the Presidency. If that were true, wouldn't every political party go down to the local Justice of the Peace and have the other guy's party be declared an insurrectionist making them ineligible? You seem to admire that kind of system, which make appear as a kid who never went to school. And that's probably terribly unfair to you. Probably.
    1
  14.  @cliff5043  "The judge DID rule the Trump committed insurrection" A local judge has no authority over the president.
    1
  15. @@Tvidsable The left whines constantly. If we paid attention to them, we'd never get any work done.
    1
  16.  @cliff5043  "For me, upholding the Constitution comes before any political party loyalty" And yet you know nothing about the our constitution works. Which is definitely weird.
    1
  17.  @robertdysonn  "The judge here, in Colorado found him guilty of participating in the insurrection" Actually she didn't. But even if she had, it was meaningless. These are the things that people tell you to help you cope with the inevitable election of a Republican president. You do realize that Biden isn't in charge of anything right? Even his bowels aren't under his control.
    1
  18.  @shawnm3941  In fact, the FBI explicitly said it wasn't an insurrection.
    1
  19.  @cliff5043  You've consistently said you're a firm believer in the constitution then you have no idea what's actually in it. You had no idea the constitution laid out the eligibility requirements for the presidency (which you admitted), and then you believe a local judge ruling from the bench could determine, without evidence, that Trump was an insurrectionist. You cannot say you are a constitutionalist and then have no idea what is in the constitution. Or rather you're allowed to say it, but it has no meaning. You might as well say "I believe and have faith in science", which is a meaningless phrase, and marks you as someone who hasn't the faintest idea of what science is.
    1
  20.  @cliff5043  But he was president when the crazy left claims he was fomenting insurrection. Something which the FBI said 3 years ago was not true.
    1
  21. Maybe Democrats will claim he actually won in 2020, they just decided to fortify the election and put someone else in his place.
    1
  22. Democrats are nervous about Pam Bondi because they know what Garland did to Trump.
    1
  23.  @bobbobbinson1841  No department has ever had their budget lowered by any president ever.
    1
  24.  @hal7ter  An ER doctor, so not a scientist, not a statistician, it's the woman who puts stitches in your hand after you have an accident with a steak knife. Great job from the Democrats. Maybe next time, they'll bring a person who works at the sewage plant to explain the dangers of bacteria to our food supply.
    1
  25.  @kennethpriestman4255  Sometimes I disappear. You sound like genie.
    1
  26.  @engletinaknickerbocker5380  So you need to be an attorney to determine if someone who commits murder with a gun should be prosecuted? Interesting. Do you also need a biologist to tell if someone is a woman? Do you need a police officer to tell you if driving on the wrong side of the road is wrong? Do you need to be a philatelist to determine the postage you put on an envelope is correct? How do people get through their day without being able to tell right from wrong? Apparently there are people out there where life is a constant mystery on everything from crossing the street to mailing a letter to the whether we should punish people who commit murder.
    1
  27.  @engletinaknickerbocker5380  I don't need a professional entertainer to do anything. I'm simply making fun of people who need a lawyer to determine if killing someone is a prosecutable offense. The fact that you seem to agree her puts you in that special 1%. Maybe Kennedy is a pool shark at night in his off time Perhaps he's an alien from outer space, or the person who invented penicillin. When you have wobbly or non-existent judgement, almost anything seem possible.
    1
  28.  @engletinaknickerbocker5380  " So who is on the hot seat deciding whether killing someone is a prosecutable matter?" Is this a quiz? or you don't even know? Generally an elected district attorney does that. Interesting fact, you don't need to be an attorney to be a district attorney. But that's not the question being asked is it? It's about common sense. If a guy came up and shot your child, would you say "hmm, I need to check with an attorney to see if this person should be prosecuted, or whether this is considered okay". If that's how your thought processes work, then the world must be a giant puzzle to you.
    1
  29.  @Knards  law-abiding citizens do as much if not more killing as "criminals" If you take the criminal element out of gun violence statistics, US gun crime is essentially nothing. The bulk of gun crimes are committed by black and Hispanic men age 25-40. That's why liberals dance around this issue.
    1
  30. "intersectionality" is a silly concept for the LH side of the bell curve.
    1
  31.  @umbraimperium4106  Plato was several hundred years before Christ appeared on earth
    1
  32.  @umbraimperium4106  He did, but he didn't refer to him as Jesus. Even John the Baptist didn't recognize Jesus at first.
    1
  33. Liberals, ironically, will be the death of the public schools as the first choice for teaching children. Private schools which are more accountable will be the first choice, with public schools the 2nd or 3rd choice, and only for kids with disabilities, and children who have behavioral problems. Congratulations teacher's unions, SJW schoolboards and the Democrats, you've freed your members from actually having to teach.
    1
  34.  @celiaflinn7737  What the country needs is a new approach.
    1
  35.  @voodoochild1806  That's nice.
    1
  36. The employees know that Lina and her merry band of incompetents have no idea what they're doing.
    1
  37. Cohen can't form a complete english sentence.
    1
  38.  @jefferydixson527  So you've made the case for shortening the time for unemployment insurance. Because by your own admission, if they didn't get money for staying at home, they'd take a job that's available.
    1
  39. This is not just dereliction of duty by Democrats, it's part of the plan to bring in illegals to tip all the red states to blue by overwhelming them with illegals.
    1
  40.  @smkh2890  Well, the other part of this is when Trump was impeached a 2nd time after January 6th, one of the charges against him was insurrection and the senate found him not guilty of the charge. So in fact, congress has effectively said Trump is not guilty of insurrection. If you think about it, Democrat played themselves with the charge of insurrection during impeachment.
    1
  41.  @smkh2890  Yes, but it does point to a problem with presidential elections today. If there were actual fraud in a presidential election, let's say political parties colluded with industry, and tech giant to shift an election to someone they preferred, and there was actual evidence. What happens next? How do you challenge a presidential election? Frankly, if you're a judge sitting in a courtroom in Georgia, what do you even do at that point?
    1
  42.  @smkh2890  That's merely an allegation. Similar to Trump alleging the election was stolen. No charges brought, FBI saying there was no sedition in their report. So no matter how you slice it, this line of attack was always bound to fail. I suspect this attack was meant to be closer to the actual election, but Democrats thought they had Trump again so they attacked about 3 months too soon. They're like Wiley Coyote.
    1
  43.  @captainkelley2339  Do you? Swalwell was trying to say because she supported Trump that she had no credibility. Although I get your point. If you knew someone voted for Biden you'd have to put them on the mentally unstable side. And they probably slept with a Chinese spy as well. If he wanted to harm her credibility, then he would have had to establish that she knew nothing about the southern border.
    1
  44.  @randibgood  Oh? Did the FBI release that report? And what secrets did he share with Bang-Bang? Has he apologized for his indiscretion with a Chinese spy?
    1
  45.  @captainkelley2339  There actually was no cause of death established except it was a stroke. You're just MSU to defend the compromised congressman.
    1
  46.  @captainkelley2339  You must be a captain in the freedonian navy with your inability to use the internet to search the internet. You're spending more time defending the compromised congressman than just searching
    1
  47.  @mike-xn1qj  Swalwell isn't smart enough to be evil, he's just stupid and plodding. That's why the Chinese compromised him so easily.
    1
  48.  @melissamessmer6544  Because he wants to pretend that the border is secure, that children are well taken care of and that Joe isn't 100% demented.
    1
  49.  @melissamessmer6544  If when you say "big" you mean "confused", then you're closer tor the mark.
    1
  50.  @randibgood  There is no document that said he did nothing wrong. He was sleeping with Bang-Bang, the chinese spy.
    1