Comments by "TeeKay" (@teekay_1) on "'Let's Say A President Leads A Mostly Peaceful Protest': Neil Gorsuch Grills Lawyer In Immunity Case" video.

@grey5751 the motivations of some of its participants are directly recorded But then, as Trump was saying protest peacefully, he doesn't really control that someone got violent. So yes, Trump's motivation is directly recorded. "Protest peacefully".
7
@christopherkenyon7112 he was protesting and attempting to delay legislative action being done by Congress And he was doing within the framework of the constitution. Unlike the Democrat representative who just pulled the fire alarm who did it unlawfully.
6
@ABD-pc3jf Yes, and Milley will be prosecuted for that once Trump is elected.
5
@doresearchstopwhining There was no attempted coup, so your remarks show you as a simpleton.
5
@Jose-gj8hv North Korean and Russia both allow people to vote. Do you even understand that we're not a Democracy? In fact, there have only been a handful of democracies in history.
4
@grey5751 Nice try Francine, but Trump never suggested using bleach. Find the video clip and prove me wrong.
3
@RobinDale50 Actually the president has the right to declassify any document provided it hasn't been specially singled out by congress.
3
@doresearchstopwhining Blame Jack Smith. That's how trump is being charged.
2
@Article94 Well, there was no murder so there's that angle. There was no treason (obviously you have no idea what treason is), and there was no assassination, so the big question is "Do you just make sh*tuff up?"
2
@grey5751 From poltifact: No, Trump didn’t tell Americans infected with the coronavirus to drink bleach Joe Biden said President Donald Trump told Americans that drinking bleach could help combat the coronavirus, but that’s not correct. Trump did not explicitly recommend ingesting a disinfectant like bleach. But he did express interest in exploring whether disinfectants could be applied to the site of a coronavirus infection inside the body, such as the lungs
2
@RickMcGuire-bl2vs No way, Jose!
2
@doresearchstopwhining Actually Michael Dreeben did that.
1
@doresearchstopwhining What do you think this is all about anyways? Lawfare to stop Trump from winning the presidency. That's common knowledge. All the prosecutors worked with the white house to coordinate what they were doing (which is documented, BTW).
1
@Article94 He actually did. And yes the DOJ attorney was trying to walk a fine line to avoid Obama getting prosecuted for droning American citizens and killing them without a trial. His time will come.
1
@grey5751 Which president said his uncle was eaten by cannibals?
1
@enesschiyenge3981 Obama didn't commit any such act, so why drag his name into this lunacy? Because Obama is the one running the current administration and is responsible for the lawfare from Garland
1
Michael Dreeben is tying himself into knots to avoid admitting that this is selective prosecution to stop Trump from beating Biden this fall.
1
@drd7678 You're "whataboutism" in this scenario equals to the thinking of a toddler Translation : I don't like that comparison, because it completely refutes my point that Trump is being selectively prosecuted by the administration because they know he'll beat Biden. P.S. It's "Your", not "You're" You're means "You are". So what you actually said was "You are "whataboutism" in this scenario". You're welcome, and you don't have to pay me, just make a donation to the charity of your choice.
1
@RickMcGuire-bl2vs No. No way, Jose' .
1
@softwaredeveloper6791 Except false electors is an emotional term. Alternate electors is the actual term and they have been used throughout US history, so it completely knocks out the underpinning of your point. As to hyperbole in politics, the Democrats do that far more than Republicans as has been more than adequately demonstrated over the years.
1