Comments by "TeeKay" (@teekay_1) on "" video.

@Uberragen21 Wikipedia is a good place to do a 10-minute education where you can then use the access you have in college to peer-reviewed work (which I miss). When I was getting my MS, I also would use MIT Journal and Harvard Business Review as sources, and those are acceptable as well.
12
@Uberragen21 I don't think that's completely true. When you're looking at hard science topics, it's a good way to bring you up to speed quickly and then you switch to peer-reviewed papers to find references that support your thesis.
4
@bill_clinton697 As I said, it's useful as an introduction to a topic. They have references and you can branch out from there. We have search engines, so it's not like you're locked into Wikipedia.
1
Here's the problem with these type of companies.... they start out as hacker projects, full of spirit and liberty. And then the guys at the top make a lot of money at it, despite it being a "non-profit". And then they rub elbows with the other rich people in Silicon Valley who are overwhelmingly rich and liberal, and they want to fit in, so you know what happens next... The way to fix this is to stop donating to it. Jimmy Wales will only be convinced when he can't pay for the servers any more and loses his fat salary associated with Wikipedia.
1