Comments by "TeeKay" (@teekay_1) on "Election Postmortem... || Peter Zeihan" video.

@lucasvandermeulen4163 The easy one is that anyone who studied the polls knew Kamala was going to lose. In fact, during the course of the election, Trump was never actually behind in the polls
7
@Zacatl1 Doctor Doctor, we found another TDS patient for you.
3
@brokenaura23 You're funny in a way you don't intend.
2
@brokenaura23 Sonny boy, people lift lines from me. The people have spoken. Find a better candidate next time. Get over the election like an adult.
2
@brokenaura23 It was clever enough to make you go away. And please don't go away angry.... just.....
2
@brokenaura23 It was, or else you wouldn't be yammering back at me. I get it your ego is bruised, but you're in a hole right now. You're just not good at the internet (clearly)
2
@chipcook5346 And the CIA as well.
2
@hookflash699 If he predicts it annually for the next 1,000 years, there's a good chance he'll be right.
2
@jaimepatena7372 Neither. Peter is a bit of a huckster, and politicians by their nature are hucksters. It comes with the territory.
2
@friedrichjunzt He does it because it drives the crazy democrats into a froth and then they make mistakes.
2
@lucasvandermeulen4163 He really wasn't. That was probably on polls you saw on the news. Those polls are generally commissioned by news shows or political parties to create a buzz in the narrative for who is ahead. But if you followed the two most accurate polls over the course of multiple elections (Rasmussen & AtlasIntel), Trump was always largely in control of the race.
1
@lucasvandermeulen4163 No seriously. Trump was never behind in the two most accurate polls.
1
@lucasvandermeulen4163 I mean he was always on track to win the election with the EC Once it was clear he was going to win all of the swing states (about 5 days before the election), a popular vote victory was all but assured. This is what the accurate polling was telling us (AtlasIntel & Rasmussen).
1
@Luckboy28 Someone in the NSA told him that, but US intelligence agencies have been invaded by DEI and so they should call themselves "the keystone cops"
1
@JS-rz5gx I still think bitcoin is going to zero at some point At some point in the future everything goes to zero. Entropy and all that
1
Only someone completely uninformed thought Harris was going to win. Peter you are uninformed about elections. Saying Texas is a purple state is just plain ignorant (in the dictionary sense). If you followed Rasmussen, he predicted the election to a T so there's no excuse for being that ignorant. On the plus side for you, we see today that the shadow government that's actually the Biden government is doing their best to start WW 3. And it's funny that your tell for being angry is your voice you get squeaky and you have forced laughter. Sadly for the war mongers, the party of the Bushes, the Cheneys, the Romneys, the Pompeos is dead dead dead. Your whining about Trump "failing" is silly. Biden was failing before he was elected. That's a fact.
1
@Matthew-p2h Because it's like watching a drunk walk down the street. You never know if he'll run into a lamp post or wander into traffic. Terrific entertainment.
1
@Matthew-p2h The hobby of watching Peter be wrong continuously and triggering his sycophants is fairly entertaining.
1
@Matthew-p2h Matthew what are you rattling on about? When you're in a hole, the best strategy is to stop digging.
1
He is very angry that Trump was elected. You can tell by his forced laughter and squeaky voice when he talks about Trump. It's pretty funny once you notice it.
1
@kentuckyfried9499 Not sure he's right a lot. His "China is failing because of falling birthrates" prophesy is clearly wrong, but he set the bar so far out (10 years) that he can say that it's 7 years away. And by that time he'll have retired and live on an island somewhere.
1
@LanceFulton Peter is very clearly an apologist for the three letter intelligence agencies.
1