Comments by "TeeKay" (@teekay_1) on "Joe and Matt Walsh Disagree Over Gay Marriage" video.

@woodlandgangsta3931 Saying that the purpose of marriage is to have framework for raising children doesn't make a theocracy. That's simply a fact. If the argument is "well, great, gay people should be allowed to have the financial advantages of marriage". Go to the Justice of the peace and have a civil union. How you make the leap to "OMG! Theocracy!" is weird. It's actually a non sequitur to what Matt is saying
4
@Gamesso1slOo0l Freedom is an outcome of responsibility. It doesn't exist in a vacuum.
1
@woodlandgangsta3931 There's so much nuttiness in your comment that it verges on being incoherent. Have an even greater day.
1
If you're not going to have kids (assuming you're not in your 60's and having a 2nd marriage as a result of spousal death or divorce) then why bother to get married? It's just like friends with benefits at that point.
1
@jjbird8809 Well, marriage as an institution and union between men and women doesn't depend on God to define it, it depends on the practical definition of a union between men and women to facilitate the creation of children and prepare them to be productive members of society.
1
@sazarrazas9806 Agreed. Joe is arguing for Civil Unions, not marriage.
1
@SpongeGod-YawehPants There was nothing authoritarian about it. Unless you're one of those people who think that rules about things you don't like makes an authoritarian society.
1