Comments by "Wolfie Street" (@wolfiestreet6899) on "David Starkey Talks" channel.

  1. Fell to what, and because why?
    1
  2.  @EresirThe1st  Totally agree, the abolition of the family cannot be considered a success. It's the complete opposite.
    1
  3. Truly superb!!
    1
  4. Because they specifically do not teach PPE in state schools. They take us for the fools they educated us to be.
    1
  5.  @CS-cn6bh  Really? You think I haven't observed them these past few years? It is you that overestimates.
    1
  6.  @jwadaow  Wilfully.
    1
  7.  @chriscrew6541  How would you know? After all, you've never read the work.....
    1
  8. Such freedom comes from bravery. He who dares....
    1
  9. Oh do shut up. You're the fool here.
    1
  10. Musk is a businessman. The purchase of Twitter is a business acquisition like any other. It merely masquerades as philanthropy. Musks cult of personality and the success of the popularity of Tesla (demonstrated in its share price rather than actual sales) is a product of the brilliant visionary design and execution of an extraordinarily canny and successful social media PR campaign. Edward Berneys would be both astonished and proud. Thus to me the acquisition of Twitter by Musk is obvious. To believe in any other ideological or moral motivation is hopium. Musk is ultimately from the big club that we ain't in.
    1
  11. It seems it was more about a change of administration and absorbing England into the Norman empire (not that there was much of one). I believe England became the immediate centre rather than Normandy itself which may contribute to the eventual subsuming of the Normans.
    1
  12. @PrestonSartorius This guys thinks he knows stuff. If only you knew you're merely a repeater.
    1
  13. @PrestonSartorius Oh but I am. You say studied, I say indoctrinated. You speak on ancient matters with such certainty of which you cannot support. Repeater. And now an arrogant one at that.
    1
  14. @PrestonSartorius Ahhhhh, you've resorted to the 'consensus' argument. Yes, you're making your way through the plsybook in order I see. As predicted.
    1
  15. @PrestonSartorius By 'rational conversation' you mean you can't talk to people who challenge you.
    1
  16. Liberal democracy is an abomination.
    1
  17.  @1258-Eckhart  Indeed, while the civil service is supposed to be impartial, it is infact riddled in politically motivated appointments throught the SCS.
    1
  18. The behaviour and incompetence of the US administration is likely the product of placing ideology above philosophy and political science.
    1
  19.  @benny532017  Triggernometry interview, start at around 58 minutes.
    1
  20.  @costakeith9048  Rubbish. We are born with inalienable rights. Nor do I choose to be subjected to the tyranny of others subjective opinions and judgements. What a nasty controlling bigot you come across as.
    1
  21. Like what?
    1
  22.  @havana9139  How so?
    1
  23. The end game is to make all corporations, businesses and citizens dependent on the authority of the state.
    1
  24. Ambiguous comment.
    1
  25.  @neilsaunders9309  Good luck with that request!!
    1
  26. Oh it will.
    1
  27. Who can? Something cannot materialise from nothing, that's a logical and philosophical fallacy. Humans have invented nothing without the inspiration and resources of our environment. There is literally nothing new under the sun.
    1
  28.  @johnlong123long  But there was the electric telegraphy. You see?
    1
  29.  @johnlong123long  No I'm not. You claimed people can invent something from nothing. I've not deviated one bit from debating that assertion.
    1
  30.  @johnlong123long  You're coming across quite arrogant now John, which merely extends from your arrogant claim. Don't think you can come to a channel like this and be loose with words and not be called out. Retract your claim that humans can invent something from nothing.
    1
  31.  @johnlong123long  Then it would have been more accurate to state 'they can no longer invent'. So you're wrong on that as well John.
    1
  32.  @classicraceruk1337  I'm not disputing that. I'm disputing the claim that people can invent something from nothing. Internet: Not a tangible singular entity so not relevant to this. Clockwork radio = Birds. Car = Horse. Do keep up.
    1
  33.  @johnlong123long  Now it is you that is shifting the argument. Retract your claim that humans can invent something from nothing.
    1
  34.  @johnlong123long  Innovation is taking something and either amending it or finding a different use. For example, adding a motor to a bicycle or adding a sidecar to a motorcycle. The invention would be the introduction of the bicycle itself. However, the bicycle is essentially a framed apparatus with wheels. Clearly vehicles that incorporate such attributes were around long before bicycles were invented and upon which they borrowed. They were not invented 'from nothing'. Retract your claim John.
    1
  35.  @johnlong123long  This has nothing to do with protecting the CCP. Retract your claim John.
    1
  36.  @johnlong123long  I'm embarrassed for you. How dishonourable.
    1
  37.  @johnlong123long  John, you might need to consider that you have a behavioural or personality disorder. That's not meant as an insult. Take some time out and reflect on your conduct here.
    1
  38.  @johnlong123long  John, again look at your own conduct. Stones. Glasshouses.
    1
  39.  @classicraceruk1337  That's your opinion of which you're entitled. But it's not an argument.
    1
  40.  @classicraceruk1337  No, it's opinion. Wiki can't help you now.
    1
  41. Oh I think he does.
    1
  42.  @sebastianguerre6868  Peterson, is that you?
    1
  43.  @Threemore650  Nothing to do with IQ and innovation though. Irrelevant.
    1
  44.  @Threemore650  In what way do you believe your assertion makes mine redundant? What do you mean by 'intellectuals'? What do you believe the role of intellectuals in your paradigm?
    1
  45. What a pointless comment.
    1
  46. He is a 3rd wedge man for sure.
    1
  47. Oh look, someone trying to control speech....
    1
  48. Hahahahaha!! Wishful thinking.
    1
  49.  @costakeith9048  Not really. Material wealth can offer security and assurance, even if only the perception. One could argue that extreme material wealth is greedy and obscene, but who has the authority to define that threshold? Perhaps no mere mortal can....
    1
  50.  @costakeith9048  Aaaaaand that's where I get off. Good luck to you.
    1