Youtube comments of diehardcat (@diehardcat).

  1. Congrats India, from Vietnam!
    255
  2.  @noticedruid4985  Learn history before opening your mouth. Pol Pot was supported by the US, UK, China, Thailand, Singapore in the UN even AFTER Vietnam had already defeated it in Cambodia. The European socialist bloc didn't support it.
    157
  3. Thanks for your good work Camp. The world needs more people like you!
    78
  4. On one hand, I feel sorry for the mercenaries who wanted to go there to 'kill Russians' but never even had a chance to see one before they were obliterated without knowing what was coming! On the other hand, I feel really good because they've left the world in this fashion and for good after all the crimes they'd committed against people around the world. Once in their life, they had finally been at the receiving end of overwhelming firepower! Where else and how else could they get such poetic justice? And seriously? Had they really thought they could bully Russians on the battlefield as they'd done against people who have nothing besides small arms in other parts of the world?! LOL!
    78
  5. How can China do otherwise? Helping the US totally shut off trade with NK is like stabbing China herself. The NK refugees won't swim across the Pacific to flood the US. They will flood China. The US should get the fuck out of the region and let the Koreans talk it out themselves. That's the only solution, but no, because the US will never quit being an ass and cause troubles all over the world. It is the problem, not NK. You've been barking up the wrong tree all along.
    69
  6. NATO has never been a defensive alliance, even in the Cold War. It always has an offensive nature. Its whole purpose is to serve the US' geopolitical goals. You just can't achieve those goals by being defensive! At the start, its target was the USSR. It purposely antagonized the USSR by starting the arms race and pointing its most advanced weapons at her. In effect, forced her to waste a mountain of money and resources on weapons and in turn, justified even bigger mountains of war budget in the west! The Warsaw Pact was able to contain it with the cost of wearing down the USSR to the point of collapse, and NATO has been having free rein since then. It's been simply moving on to the next targets and China is certainly one of them. It's so obvious that the US just cannot maintain its hegemony when China is there, chugging along and surpassing it!
    65
  7. What a load of crap! There's no 'external communist aggression' in Vietnam or South East Asia. It was indigenous popular movements led by local communists. The Vietnamese people chose local communist leadership because it's the only hope for independence from France. The US didn't help their cause. China did. Helping indigenous people fighting EXTERNAL COLONIAL AGGRESSION is not aggression! You deliberately turn everything up side down. The US instead helped France, an EXTERNAL COLONIAL AGGRESSOR, reoccupying Vietnam. When France lost, the US jumped in directly and created the Republic of Vietnam (RVN or South Vietnam) which was despised by the people because it was created by an EXTERNAL IMPERIAL POWER and made up by the exact same traitors who served the French. Without the US, there would be no RVN. The US created it against the the will of the people so the US IS THE EXTERNAL AGGRESSION IMPERIALIST here. The US used its creation, the RVN, as a front for an invasion and occupation of South Vietnam. Despite all this, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) repeatedly asked and reminded the RVN to hold a general election to unify the country peacefully as stipulated in the Geneva Accords 1954. To answer the goodwill, the RVN started killing not only the communists but the people who supported them too in the South, so those people was forced to take up arms, and all hell broke lose. They were too much for the fake leaders and arm forces of the RVN to deal with so it was about to collapse and so the US had to bring its own troops in to 'defend' the fake country they created. That was in reality an US' invasion to keep its base called South Vietnam. The USSR and China only helped to expel the real EXTERNAL AGGRESSION which was the USA. They hadn't gotten involved in internal politics or military planning, strategy, had never brought troops in to kill people. The Vietnamese communists had every right to defend and unify their country, calling that 'invasion', 'aggression' sounds preposterous especially from the US which was the real EXTERNAL AGGRESSOR, INVADER in this story.
    59
  8.  @Tran5513  No, the paranoia against Vietnam is unjustified. The Cambodians should be paranoid about themselves!
    51
  9. you see the whole thing in front of your eyes and you're still saying what NK leaders say are propaganda. Perhaps you're the one who's brainwashed by US' propaganda.
    49
  10. It just can't! If you pay attention to history, the US makes itself 'great' by screwing the rest of the world, so minding its own business is the last thing it wanna do.
    49
  11. yeah the us should launch nukes at Russia and she will show you the proof.
    45
  12. US soldiers were brainwashed. Why did they have to swim half way around the world to fight communists?! That's the question they need to ask! They are still the aggressors either way.
    44
  13. If you know history, it’d be like after a short while, Europe must always come back and learn the painful and stupid lesson of invading Russia again and again. The last time France invaded Russia, it was the Russians who marched on the streets of Paris at the end. It was Russia who defeated the Nazis who ran over the French like little rats in just six weeks and they cowardly crawled on their knees and became their little biatches! And Macaroni has forgotten it already!
    36
  14. 'Growth' that never stops = cancer = death
    35
  15. As the west gets more and more desperate, it acts weirder and weirder...Do these people have a life?!
    34
  16. I don't see European football leagues putting a 'STOP WAR' sign on TV screen for the war in Donbas or Yemen in the last 7-8 years. I guess if it's their wars, they can go on forever. What a bunch of shameless criminal hypocrites! LOL!
    34
  17. If you're interested, please do a search for John Pilger's 'Year Zero', 'The Silent Death of Cambodia', or some other documentaries and articles of his about Cambodia such as 'The Long Secret Alliance: Uncle Sam and Pol Pot'. I remember in one of those, he did a thorough investigation of the western and asian supporters of Pol Pot. Among them, there was the UK. The original poster was right. The SAS trained the KR on sabotage, using of mine, ambush tactics...
    26
  18. ​ @mikethespike7579  So you don't know anything! There was a thing called the 'Sino-Soviet split' where China forced everybody to choose sides! There were only two countries and one movement, Albania, North Korea, and Pol Pot's KR chose China. The rest chose the USSR. Pol Pot was the leader of the Chinese faction in the KR, he purged all others who didn't want to join his side and so the KR turned 100% genocidal by 1973. China popped up Pol Pot, supported and armed him from the get-go to create an ally in Southeast Asia. So of course, the USSR wouldn't support a Chinese ally such as him! The USSR's weapons were for the Vietnamese!
    23
  19. The Vietnamese only supported the Khmer Rouge at the beginning when they were all fighting against the French. Back then the KR weren't a bunch of genocidal maniacs and there were two factions, Vietnamese and Chinese. Pol Pot was the leader of the Chinese faction and he had Chinese roots himself. With aggressive backing from China, he gradually purged all the cadres in the Vietnamese faction. By 1973, he had total control of the KR and turned them against Vietnam by attacking Vietnamese troops in Cambodia's jungle and robbing their supplies. So no, he had Chinese support, not Vietnam's.
    21
  20. People who say it's because of the climate and environment need to find a natural map and look at it. Vietnam back then as Dai Viet only comprised of the northern 1/3rd of Vietnam today. On the west direction of that portion, it had only expanded to about 2/3rd of today's map from the eastern coastline. So it's about only half of many southern, central and eastern Chinese provinces today. So the Mongols should have conquered Dai Viet regardless because it was too small. That's why they chose to attack Dai Viet before Southern Song. Second, but they weren't the factors at all! The climate of that part of Vietnam, Dai Viet back then, is identical to the adjacent Chinese provinces. It's subtropical. There were no jungle warfare as many have ignorantly imagined because no jungle from the Chinese border to the southern tip of the Red River Delta. The Mongols had already conquered all those Chinese provinces with the same climate and together they were many times bigger than Dai Viet. They also selected troops from there, so there's absolutely no problem here. AND in all three attempts to conquer Dai Viet, they always chose to attack in December and January so it's still cold and sometimes very cold. No heat nor tropical disease because it was neither hot when they attacked nor does Dai Viet have tropical climate! The terrain in the mountainous area of Dai Viet is nothing compare to those of Yunnan, (Dali kingdom back then), Sichuan and Tibet which the Mongols had already crossed and conquered before reaching Dai Viet. The whole Dai Viet back then, all rough and flat lands together, was many times smaller than the mountainous area of those places. The peaks are twice lower, and there's no permafrost areas. From the Chinese border near the Vietnamese city of Lang Son today, the Mongols needed to cross only 70 km of mountainous area to reach the Red River Delta. If they could cross thousands of kilometers of real harsh environment of China and Tibet, Dai Viet should be a cruise. It's really an insult to them if someone says the terrain in Dai Viet could be a hindrance. And so for the Mongols, it was indeed always a cruise in all three invasions from the Chinese border to the capital city of Thang Long (Hanoi today). Taking it also wasn’t a big problem. Holding onto it and running back home were. Some say Dai Viet won by employing guerilla warfare. This is nothing further from the truth. In all three invasions, it was always decided by big battles, and the two sides fought in big battles in large numbers most of the time. Guerilla warfare only happened when the Mongols were running home through the mountainous area in the first two invasions or marching in in the third invasion. So please make a video debunking all these myths. This series is not complete without talking about it.
    20
  21. The differences between these two cases are: 1. B-52s 2. Giap knew well that his troops had a very slim chance of taking over Khe Sanh without solving the B-52 problem. He couldn't solve that problem so he only used Khe Sanh as a diversion. He knew that the Americans had learnt from the French spectacularly embarrassing defeat in Dien Bien Phu so they would be very keen not to let that happen to them (Johnson had a scale model of Khe Sanh in his Oval Office). So if the NAV just assemble near the base and pretend to attack just like they did in Dien Bien Phu, they would attract all attentions there and in turn, cover for the real attacks in all major towns and cities in the South. You can look up the sizes of forces on both sides in those two battles and will see Khe Sanh was clearly a diversion because the NVA didn't commit enough troops to take over the base. 3. Both sides in the battle of Dien Bien Phu knew it was their last battle to win the war, so they brought all they had. France calculation was wrong so it lost. In Khe Sanh's case, taking over that base wouldn't mean much. The US' side still had about 1.5 million troops standing on its side, so it was pointless and stupid to risk a lot for nothing (the Americans later abandoned the base all by themselves). The attacks on all the major towns and cities in the South would make a much bigger bang and really cause panic and deal the death blow to the US' will and intention in Vietnam. 4. To have a better chance, you don't play the same trick twice, so taking Khe Sanh for real when ALL attentions was on it wouldn't be so smart. The similarities in these cases: Giap's calculation was dead on in both occasions.
    19
  22. Actually, the USSR and China didn't want a US' client state at their border. They weren't afraid of a democracy at their border. The US was the side that was afraid of democracy in Korea when it directed its puppets in the South to deny the general election and unilaterally created a new state because It knew Kim Il Sung would had won it. It happened just like in Vietnam. The US is the sole culprit behind the separation of those two countries. You cannot blame Russia or China helping the Koreans or Vietnamese who just tried to kick the Americans out.
    19
  23. How old are you?! You're probably a 3 year-old who's never learnt history.. Throughout history around the world, invaders often create local puppet regimes to legitimatize their aggression/invasion. So you cannot use the Saigon puppet regime as proof that Americans were not invaders.
    18
  24. ​ @oakspines7171 Fact: The US did support the KR by ordering Thailand to house them, sending aid to feed them, secretly arming them, holding Cambodia's seat at the UN for them for 13 years.
    17
  25. For nearly 100 years ruling over Hong Kong, Britain had always put Hong Kong under an asigned white governor from England. After handling it back to China, it suddenly worries about 'democracy'! Ain't white people have any shame?!
    15
  26. They love the US because the US has stopped robbing them while China is still doing it!
    15
  27. The terrain in the mountainous area of Dai Viet is nothing compare to those of Yunnan, (Dali kingdom back then), Sichuan and Tibet which the Mongols had already crossed before reaching Dai Viet. The whole Dai Viet back then, all rough and flat lands together, was many times smaller than the mountainous area of those places. The peaks are twice lower, and there're no permafrost areas. From the Chinese border near the Vietnamese city of Lang Son today, the Mongols needed to cross only 70 km of mountainous area to reach the Red River Delta. If they could cross thousands of kilometers of real harsh environment of China and Tibet, Dai Viet should be a cruise. It's really an insult to them if someone says Dai Viet terrain was somehow a problem. And so for the Mongols, it was indeed always a cruise in all three invasions from the Chinese border to the capital city of Thang Long (Hanoi today). Reaching and taking that capital city were never a problem for them. Staying and running back home were. All the major and decisive battles were fought on that flat land and rivers of the Red River Delta. So what’s the next excuse now? The number of Chinese who fled to Vietnam were small and negligible in every aspect, barely mentioned in any historical record. There was no Chinese general who fled China held any position in the resistance forces. They might have known the Mongols but the Viets had also known them through the first invasion when Song hadn't fallen yet. There were no fleeing Chinese then but Dai Viet had defeated them anyway. The Chinese have a very bad habit of claiming credit for every good thing happened on earth. But look, they couldn't hold off the Mongols when they were tens of times bigger in both number and territories than Dai Viet and the Mongols themselves at the beginning, so how could they in anyway help Dai Viet where the situation was reversed?! They had lost big time, that's why they ran remember?!
    15
  28.  @jerrell1169  The 'Hue Massacre' is another piece of cooked up BS of the Saigon regime and US. It's just like the white detergent powder that the US shamelessly presented in front of everybody at the UN as 'proof' of Saddam Hussein possessing WMD! Look for 'the myth of hue massacre' and learn.
    15
  29.  @SurnaturalM  Fact: Hun Sen and a bunch of others went to Vietnam and asked for help.
    14
  30. What really weird is European whites have a country in the Pacific.
    14
  31.  @JasonsDeathCurse  Ford is not the underdog when it buys experts from race car companies like Lola Cars and Shelby. It's actually a big corporation + 2 race car companies + supercarrierload of money against 1 race car company. Yes it's heavily lopsided in favor of Ford no doubt!
    14
  32.  @mikethespike7579  Do you know why the West was so quick to try Slobodan Milosevic and Saddam Hussein but not Pol Pot? Because Pol Pot was their ally!
    14
  33. The USSR lent big help to Vietnam too, but that's real help because it didn't ask for anything in return. China on the other hand, wanted Vietnam to become its vassal state, take Vietnam's sea and islands in return without disclosing it in the first place, so it's actually a scam, not a help.
    14
  34.  @darren561  The re-education camps were only for mid and high ranking officers of the Saigon regime's military, intelligence, administration apparatus. If the US faces the same situation, those traitors would have been shot! Those re-education camps only prove the communists were too lenient so what exactly is the fuss here?!
    13
  35. I appreciate your good will towards peace and cooperation around the world and idea of the US focusing on the well being of its citizens but that's not gonna happen until we pin point and eliminate the culprit which is US' imperialism. It has always been working 24/7 and spending ship load of money against all those goals!
    12
  36.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Vietnam supported Vietnamese faction in the KR which was not genocidal. Pol Pot led the Maoist faction in the KR and with China's aggressive backing, he purged all other factions and turned it into a genocidal machine by 1973. There was no love lost between Vietnam and the KR by that time.
    12
  37. The problem is only crooked Vietnamese would choose to serve the French/Americans. That's the dilemma that France & the US can't get out of.
    11
  38.  @sunshine7453  Actually they're not 'South Vietnamese leaders' because they have neither the support of the southerners nor control of the South.
    11
  39. Sunny Wu, how do you know that?! They paid you? The amazing thing here is people in the west don't get paid but they're still dutifully spreading anti-other countries propaganda! What part of my statement above shows that I'm spreading anti-American propaganda you imbecile?
    11
  40.  @wyattmcgee1  How do you know it violates the will of the people?! Are you Viet?! If it does, the people would have risen up just like when the French and Americans were there trying to install puppet governments. The people in Vietnam choose their leaders through their representatives, just like in the US but better because the VCP actually serves the common people, unlike the bourgeois 'democracy' in the west which only serve the rich! Over 2 millions have died world wide. The CAPITALIST US alone accounts for nearly a quarter of that number! Most of the rest is capitalist states. So much for the capitalist system that 'cares' about the will not to die of the people! LOL! What a farce and you're such a hopeless braindead tool for not seeing the obvious! LOL!
    11
  41. Let's face it. Everybody knows Australia has been the US' dog for a long time, not just because of recent events against China. It licked American boots and sent troops to Vietnam in the 1960s to mass murder the Vietnamese while Vietnam has done absolutely nothing wrong to it. It's been following the US in every one of its imperialist wars since then. When the US started picking on China in 2018, Australia immediately follows like it always do! It's so clear like night and day. If Australia really has its own 'independent way', that 'independent way' is just choosing to be US' dog! You just can't deny it.
    10
  42. Fact: China copies Vietnam's flag. China is the copycat. This Vietnam's national flag debuts in 1945. China's one debuts in 1949.
    10
  43.  @mikethespike7579  And Pol Pot was solely in China's camp and ally, the USSR had nothing to do with it.
    10
  44.  @joseywales339  Ho Chi Minh did agree to a democratic government and the US didn't. The government created in 1945 was a multiparty one followed by direct vote in 1946. The US knew for sure Ho Chi Minh would have won in a countrywide election in 1956 AGAIN so it intervened and stopped it from happening. The US was the anti-democratic force here. The US itself from day one until now is always a fake democracy. It's always ruled by the super rich so htf can it 'hope' to implement a democratic government in the South?! How can it promote 'democracy' by installing a dictator in the South?! How can it promote 'democracy' by denying general election in Vietnam?! It's just a so lame 3ss excuse that only 3 year old minds can accept!
    10
  45.  @lambertlum1087  If you have actually read Marx, you would have known that they're not a living contradiction because Marx said the change in quality only happens when quantity has accumulated enough to a certain point. Vietnam has never been a communist state nor has she ever claimed to be one because the VCP knows that the country hasn't accumulated enough to advance to the next stage. The official name of Vietnam is 'Socialist Republic of Vietnam'. The goal of the country now is reaching the socialist stage and in a socialist state, private and state enterprises can coexist, so there's no contradiction here! You're just repeating the west's propaganda that the evil communist countries living in contradiction but that's not true!
    10
  46.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Yes the US supported Pol Pot directly.
    10
  47. That's been going on since forever. When whites came to the America continent, they used local tribes to fight other local tribes and killed them too after the job's done. That's how they took over the continent. They used Bin Laden to fight the Soviets and then killed him. Used Saddam Hussein to fight Iran and then killed him. Used ISIS to fight Syrian government. Used NED in place of CIA today to train and support local groups to destabilize countries that don't wanna be US' dogs. It keeps going on and on. The blame is also on the local people who are stupid enough to side with them imperialist whiteys.
    9
  48.  @oakspines7171  They left because they had successfully stabilized Cambodia and the KR remnants were reduced to a pathetic mouse that posed no threat. That's the only reason. If the reason was economics, they would have left much sooner! Vietnam has always wanted international relations ever since they established the modern Vietnam in 1945. They approached the US first but it chose to support the colonialist French coming back and enslaving them AGAIN, so they turned to the USSR. It has always been the west and China who cause problems there. The Vietnamese just react.
    9
  49. Pol Pot had nothing to do with communism.
    9
  50. Everybody gets help from somebody in wars. The US got big help from France to kick Britain out in their Revolutionary War. China got big help from both the USSR and US to kick Japan out in the Sino-Japanese War. In fact, the USSR and US directly defeated Japan for China! The CCP also got help from the USSR in the Chinese Civil War. So you should go tell the US that Britain only lost the Revolutionary War to France, tell China that Japan only lost to the USSR and the US in the Sino-Japanese War, Kuomintang only lost to the USSR too?! LOL!
    9
  51.  @wyattmcgee1  Can you criticize the government in Vietnam? Yes. You say No because you're brainwashed into believing so. It's simply not the truth! Can you vote for parties other than the Communist Party? No, but for Vietnam's case, that's just a result of history, practical needs and the way of the system. It can't be used to prove the VCP 'tyrannical'! Saying one party system is automatically 'tyrannical' and two party system is automatically democratic is moronic! Are opposition newspapers allowed? No but that cannot be used to prove the government is 'tyrannical'. If the VCP serves the mass, why do you need 'opposition' newspapers? In that case, 'opposition' means going against the mass, i.e., undemocratic. If you support that kind of 'opposition', you're supporting tyranny here! In the capitalist system of the west, the ruling parties are inherently in the pocket of the capitalists, a tiny minority, undemocratic, that's why it needs opposition to protect the interests of the mass. More over, in Vietnam's case, she's already too busy dealing with constant barrage of fake news, slandering, propaganda from the capitalist west. That itself is a very big and stubborn opposition already so why does she need more from inside the country?! Have people been tortured by the government? Is religion persecuted in Vietnam? No. Again, you're just a brainwashed tool believing in fairy tales and ignore reality here. The US tortures people and so is tyrannical. Yes. And fact: Vietnam has more freedom of religion than the west.
    9
  52. Yep. Americans feel more comfortable playing games that nobody else play in their own little world so it's much easier to call themselves 'world champions'! LOL!
    9
  53. SWI, God is a product of stupidity of ancient people and fixated. Science is a product of intelligence that humans have achieved through the ages and always progress. They are two opposite ways of explaining the universe so they are mutually exclusive.
    9
  54. You know why the US Congress didn't give more aid as stipulated in the Paris Accord? Because they're so sure 1000% that it would be wasted like the hundreds billions before that. In the first place, the US had to bring in combat troops because the puppet Saigon's troops couldn't fight! So when American troops had to leave, the Saigon regime would certainly collapse in a short order with more money or not! Giving more aid could only make its death and American pain more agonizing! If Congress did give the aid like promised, you would have cried today too that why it had to waste more American tax money for a clearly lost cause! So a loss is a loss, get over it so you don't sound like a sore loser!
    8
  55.  @itslife1399  That's not actually 'public health' though. It's more like tiny elite health.
    8
  56.  @mikethespike7579  'Why then?' You've just proved my point that you like to argue with your imagination, not facts! You don't bother to search for facts! Nobody but you are trying to confuse people here. The US supported the Khmer Republic of Lon Nol is a fact , but its support of Pol Pot AFTER his crimes were exposed is also a fact! Those facts are not mutually exclusive! Your argument that the latter isn't true is only your imagination.
    8
  57.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  have I ever said Vietnam invading Cambodia to save Cambodians. So why are you arguing about that?!
    8
  58. To me, when using that term, 'collateral damage', they don't consider people in those parts of the world humans. It reveals their deep racist core. You can only use that casual term when you consider those people objects, like tables or chairs, not even animals.
    8
  59. test First, the French didn't think one day they would be kicked out of Vietnam so they built those 'beautiful buildings' and infrastructure for themselves to stay and exploit Vietnam. They didn't build anything for the Vietnamese. They robbed Vietnam blind for decades of natural resources and labor and you think those 'beautiful buildings' worth mentioning?! Under the French, 98% of Vietnamese were illiterate, so education and everything else were worse under them. If they did build things for Vietnam and educate her people, how could you say they treated them badly? You're contradicting yourself here!
    8
  60. BS!
    7
  61. What makes you think Vietnam forget that? Do you forget the USSR and US' help in the Sino-Japanese War, and Chinese Civil War?!
    7
  62.  @johnrhio2277  Now is the 21th century, so you should get over 20th century's cheap @$$ propaganda. The so called 'Hue Massacre' was a stupid propaganda story cooked up by the US and its puppet Saigon regime. Look for 'the Myth of the Hue Massacre' and learn.
    7
  63.  @BIZMVRK  No, the Khmer Rouge was mostly supported by China.
    7
  64.  @Loulovesspeed  You don't understand the point again! The point here isn't Ford did attempt or successfully acquire Ferrari. The point is Ferrari was in a financial crisis so they didn't have even a fraction of the super container ship load of money Ford had to put in R&D. You keep on telling the story but didn't understand it! Ford was the underdog only when it hadn't hired race car experts and race car companies to develop its cars. And it had failed as the underdog. It had never won against Ferrari when it was the underdog. Once it changed and hired TWO race car companies and experts, they had not only leveled the playing field, but turned Ferrari into the underdog. Yes, money was critical and the deciding factor to Ford's win here. With money, Ford had bought real race car companies and race experts to win when Ferrari was under a financial crisis. There's no glory or 'underdog triumphant victory against the odds' here. It's just a simple story of a rich spoiled brat who couldn't take 'NO' as an answer so he must have his petty revenge at all cost. He must have thought he won but he's still a big fat loser to me! LOL!
    7
  65.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  No, the US supported Pol Pot directly.
    7
  66.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  China support Pol Pot throughout before and after the genocide. The US supported him AFTER the genocide. Google this phrase 'US support Pol Pot UN'. Your blaming of Vietnam may made you feel better but can't change history!
    7
  67. ​ @MoeHamHead-bx7og  According to your books, all Pol Pot had wanted was to overthrow Sihanouk, but Vietnam didn't support it and so he hated Vietnam for that, so how t fcan you say Vietnam supported him?! Vietnam supported Sihanouk, not Pol Pot! You see? Apparently you don't understand your own books! Other part of your citing described a brief period of 1970 after Sihanouk was overthrown by the US. That was the only period when there was some cooperation between Vietnam and Pol Pot's KR. Vietnam did that because Lon Nol, after overthrowing of Sihanouk, had joined forces with the US and the Saigon regime to conduct large scale operations into VCs controlled areas in Cambodia. The Vietnamese fought back, seized territories, and and gave some of them back to the KR to free up their forces for other offensive missions in South Vietnam. If this is what you called 'supporting the KR', the US was the one who forced it! The US' overthrowing of Sihanouk, bombing and invasion of Cambodia in 1970s helped destabilize Cambodia and fill the rank of the KR and made them a formidable force which they weren't before. The relation between Vietnam and the KR turned bad quickly afterwards because Pol Pot had never trusted Vietnam. He wanted Vietnam's help but when they got close he was afraid of being controlled! So there were clashes soon after. He jailed remaining Vietnamese trained cadres and executed them all by 1973. So, Vietnam didn't support Pol Pot up until he started invading and killing Vietnamese after 1975 as you said. Anyway, the real evil here is the US' and China's support of the KR and Pol Pot AFTER THE GENOCIDE.
    7
  68. There is only one truth, and the Vietnamese version is the truth. The US version is just propaganda. And you haven't accurately conveyed the truth. The Geneva Accords in 1954 didn't divide Vietnam into two separate states. That's a lie! You're just repeating US propaganda. The Accords appointed the 17th parallel as a temporary 'demarcation line' to divide arms groups to end hostility and prepare the whole country for a general election coming up in two years. Both Vietnamese governments at the time, the State of Vietnam under Bao Dai and the Democratic Republic of Vietnam under Ho Chi Minh were against division (if there was an intention) of Vietnam, and claimed the whole of Vietnam so the Accords stipulated that general election would be held in 1956 in the whole country to peacefully unite THE GOVERNMENTS and choose the new leader for the entire country. Propaganda means misleading information or lies, so the North didn't use 'propaganda' as you said. On the other hand, the US did use it to confuse the urban population in the South. You are repeating the US' propaganda that the Geneva Accords divides Vietnam into separate states.
    7
  69. For starters, China's 'help' was a mean to coerce Vietnam to become its vassal state, so it's not purely a 'help'. Second, whatever China's help was, it's all taken back or destroyed by China through its treacherous actions and out right hostilities against Vietnam after it got into bed with the US in 1972. So, it's not Viets have forgot China's help, but there wasn't actually any help at all because China has done more harm than good to Vietnam at the end! China still owes Vietnam the islands it robbed from Vietnam in 1974 and 1988.
    7
  70. 'The North’s Revenge'?! The title itself sounds so stupid already! Do you really think North Vietnam alone could win a war against the US and South Vietnam so it can have a revenge for itself?! There's no war between North and South Vietnam but a war between the whole Vietnam against the US and its Saigon puppet regime. The puppet regime had never had popular support in the South, even among the non-communists. That's why the US could never win. They could only control the coastal cities and towns in the whole war. If there was a 'revenge', it should be Vietnam against the Saigon puppet regime. But that shouldn't be called 'revenge' either because the actions were so mild and lenient to be called a 'revenge'! They were only put under some detention camps to repent their crimes against their home country and people and were let to migrate to the US later! How can you honestly call that 'revenge'?! Only the brainwashed can say so!
    7
  71. Excuse me but the meaning of the word 'lose' is when you really want something but fail to get it. The US has never ever wanted peace so how can it 'loses' it?! It always wants confrontations, wars, instabilities around the world because it knows it can only thrive and maintain its hegemony on those conditions. SO naturally, it just couldn't and wouldn' stop when the USSR fell! On the contrary, that event has encouraged it to become even more aggressive. It only sees that as a tremendous opportunity to march on and break up Russia into ten pieces. One of its biggest dreams all along is to eat Russia so why should it stop and have peace?! There is nothing strange, illogical or hard to understand about the US' behavior here.
    7
  72. Rickk RockStar, Yep it's all CGI so the US should bring 'democracy' to Russia like right now right? WTF is it waiting for?!
    7
  73. Capitalism and socialism actually. The US has never been a 'democracy' and Vietnam has never been communist.
    6
  74. And we always grateful of the help the USSR brought not only to Vietnam but oppressed countries around the world.
    6
  75.  @Loulovesspeed , Of course Ferrari or Ford both can buy anything they want! You didn't get the point. The point is saying 'Ford was the underdog' is wrong. That's what the general American narrative is. The other guy said Ford is the 'heavy underdog', so I had to correct him. It's not the underdog anymore when it hired race car experts and companies to built its race cars and raced for it using Ford's super container ship load of money. Ferrari then actually became the underdog when it didn't have a small fraction of that kind of money. The company was even having a financial crisis that lead to the acquisition by Ford earlier.
    6
  76. This clown Zelensky is so delusional and funny. He really thinks the US dares to impose a no fly zone against Russia! LOL!
    6
  77. ​@Salva510, The French and American elites certainly saw it but they had to distort the truth and brainwash their respective population to support and die for their unjust war. They just couldn't have a war if they speak truth about it.
    6
  78. But Ukraine has lost its independence to choose sides since 2014 after the US spent $5 billion to stage a coup that overthrow a neutral government which is the choice of the Ukrainian people. Ukraine's foreign policy has practically been decided by the US since then.
    6
  79. Where did you get all that BS?! When did Vietnam invade those countries?!
    6
  80. ​ @mottscottison6943  You probably get your those two-bit BS from the Chinese propaganda machine. There were no skirmishes between Vietnam and Laos. Laos was on Vietnam's side in the fight against the murderous Khmer Rouge regime. As for Cambodia, the Khmer Rouge which was backed and encouraged by China, attacked Vietnam FIRST across the border and massacred Viet villagers there right after it took over Cambodia in Arpril 1975. For the next 3 years, all requests for talk from Vietnam had always been turned down by it. Hunsen, the Cambodian prime minister now and was a low level cadre of the Khmer Rouge at the time, fled to Vietnam in 1977 after he witnessed its barbarism against its own people, the Chinese and Vietnamese there, and asked for help. There's no other way around, Vietnam had to mount an offensive to depose the Khmer Rouge and stop the genocide in December 1978. The Khmer Rouge was deposed quickly but its remnants fled to the Thal-Cambodian border and hid there. Vietnam followed suit and tried to get them there but the US ordered Thailand to give them refuge inside its border. The US and China at that time were in bed against the Soviet Union. The US just recognized the Chinese mainland government as the sole government of China, severed diplomatic tie with Taiwan as a country and recognized 'one China policy' of China in January 1979, so they were very close. The US, still very much butt0hurt from its loss in the Vietnam War, found a chance to get back at Vietnam; China, also very butt0hurt because Vietnam didn't want to become its vassal state, decided to gang up against Vietnam to relieve their petty pain. That's why the US ordered its dog, Thailand, to house the Khmer Rouge. Diplomatically, China, the US and another US' dog, Singapore, had supported the seat of the Khmer Rouge at the UN for the next 10 years. Militarily, The US and China funded, fed, and armed the Khmer Rouge forces to continue to fight from Thailand. The UK's SAS provided training. Singapore acted as the middle man to transfer the weapons and money to them to hide its master's dirty deeds from the world. Without completely destroying Khmer Rouge forces, Vietnam forces couldn't go home because they might come back and every previous efforts and loss of lives would be wasted, so Vietnam had to cross the Thai-Cambodian border to wipe them out. So that's the reason Vietnam crossed that border. On its part, China tried to stab Vietnam in the back at its border with Vietnam in hope to scare Vietnam to pull out of Cambodia. It also tried to impress the US, its new evil friend with an evil act, and to prove that it's really on the US side against the USSR and Vietnam. Not only China failed to scare Vietnam, it also got 20,000 dead in just THREE WEEKS for attacking Vietnam. For comparison, the US lost 55,000 in its entire involvement in the Vietnam War which lasted 13 years! Not only China failed to 'teach' Vietnam a lesson, it also re-learn the same old lesson that it can't scare Vietnam and would pay a very heavy price if it tries to 'teach' Vietnam! So learn about what really happened. China-US was the sadistic evil force here. To have a chance to satisfy their petty grudges against Vietnam, they didn't give a f about the millions Cambodians died under the hand of the Khmer Rouge. Heck China didn't even give a f about the Chinese-Cambodians murdered by it and the 20,000 Chinese dead troops at the Viet border too! LOL!
    6
  81. Dung Nguyen, It's because the US had absolute advantage in firepower and mobility so it shouldn't lose that many men you idiot! The North lost 4/10 men by accidents and illnesses traveling through 1000 miles of jungle. It's actually very hard to find and kill NVAs and VCs. If you look it up, the total casualties (deaths and wounded) of both side (NVAs+VCs vs US + Saigon troops) are about the same which is amazing considering the absolute advantage the US side had. The number of deaths is greater on the NVAs + VCs' side because they didn't have good medical supports like the other side.
    6
  82. Everybody gets help from somebody. The US got big help from France in it independence war against Britain. China got big help from both the USSR and the US against the Japanese too. It's just a matter of common interests in international relations, one of the most basic things.
    6
  83. Branding is obviously a cheap shot, a low blow, character assassination when they can't win an argument or dispute the truth. It can only prove the attacked side must be right!
    6
  84. Ho Chi Minh had never said that the common people in France enjoyed liberty while the Vietnamese didn't. Soon after his arrival in France and saw for himself what exactly French society at the time looked like, he mocked that why the French rulers had never bothered to civilize France before trying to do exactly that in Vietnam as they claimed.
    6
  85. Of course, those systems are a threat because NATO cannot bomb you with impunity now, can it? You are not supposed to defend yourself like that. That's illegal! You should apologize and repent already! LMAO!
    6
  86. Kissinger's exact quote emphasizes the irony. That makes it brilliant, so please do not misquote him. It actually is: 'To be an enemy with the US is dangerous, but to be friend is fatal'.
    6
  87.  @darren561  If anybody who're 'just suspicious or suspected of supporting the South' was put in camps like you said, at least half of the South's population would have been in camps, so how could the South function?! How many camps must they build to house 11 millions people?! That definitely proves you're just full of 5h1t!
    6
  88.  @darren561  No, your 'reference' is useless because it doesn't say the re-education camps held 11 millions people in the South so you still can't prove that the new government put into camps anybody who was 'just suspicious or suspected of supporting the South' like you said, so you're still full of $h9t!
    6
  89. How did China stop Vietnam from being independent long ago? You're just a brainwashed tool. The US is the one that denied Vietnam's independence time after time. The Saigon regime is a US' product. You cannot jump in another country, create a fake country to defend it! That's such a lame excuse for a naked aggression and robbing that's why the US didn't get world's support and the fake country called 'South Vietnam' didn't get support from the Vietnamese. The South under the US and the puppet regime was a big ghetto and whoring slum, slaughter house. You're mistaken. That's why Americans and their dogs got kicked out of the country.
    5
  90.  @hylimm  The US and USSR helped the whole China, not just the nationalists. The US put an embargo on Japan and so made Japan divert it forces to start a war with it in 1941, dropped the A-bomb on Japan. The USSR defeated the Kwantung Army in Manchuria. They directly won the War in China's North East and thus helped China regain its territories there. Without them China wouldn't have the map today. The USSR also helped China build its industrial base, transferred technologies, sent economic aid. But at the end China got in bed with the US in 1972 and back-stabbed both the USSR and Vietnam. After that, China turned to the US for help building its economy too. Now, it also doesn't wanna listen to the US. Tell it to yourself, why do you Chinese forget all the help they gave you?!
    5
  91.  @jamesturner4478 , you whites should get out of Asia. That's more like it!
    5
  92. Second, Vietnam has always been buying a lot more from China than vice versa and much more than anybody else, so why does she have to buy everything from China?
    5
  93. Are you kidding me? You compare Russia to the Kiev regime, a US running dog? That sounds disrespectful! LOL!
    5
  94.  @lmyunxlee2005  You Chinese are just like Americans, full of yourself! What exactly make you think Vietnam can't beat the US with only the USSR's help?! And if you say so, I can also say that there's definitely no China today without the US and USSR because they had lent much bigger help to China in the Sino-Japanese War than the 'help' China sent to Vietnam!
    5
  95.  @lmyunxlee2005  And if 'helping' means you have the right to bully, dictate, and rob the one you 'help' later, it really isn't 'help' at all! It's a scam! China didn't clarify what its 'help' means at the beginning so it's its f king fault! If China did that, Vietnam wouldn't have accepted that 'help'
    5
  96.  @Jameschewingfoil  Not this video on top. Look for 'year zero the silent death of cambodia'.
    5
  97.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  At first they supported Nuon Chea because they thought he wasn't Pol Pot man and could replace Pol Pot!! But they were wrong! So you've just helped prove my point that Vietnam didn't support Pol Pot! Thanks!
    5
  98. ​ @MoeHamHead-bx7og  No the US directly supported Pol Pot's seat at the UN for 13 years! That's a fact. Google this phrase 'US support Pol Pot UN'. You're in denial! You're the one who needs to read!
    5
  99.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  In any case, Vietnam only supported part of the KR before the genocide, The US and China supported it even after the genocide. That's pure ev1l!
    5
  100.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  You didn't prove anything. I've been always acknowledge the fact that Vietnam supported the KR as a whole, but not Pol Pot. Vietnam had tried to replace Pol Pot before he committed the genocide. That's a fact!
    5
  101.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  You have a serious problem with reading comprehension and thinking logically here. Even the excerpts you brought up help confirming my points! One of them shows Vietnam and Pol Pot had conflicting ideas long before 1973, before the coup against Sihanouk in 1970. Vietnam didn't want to overthrow Sihanouk because he let Vietnamese troops station in Cambodia while Pol Pot wanted an armed struggle against him! At first, Pol Pot grudgingly accepted the Vietnamese idea, but he gradually purged the Vietnamese faction and turned against Vietnam. Vietnam in turn approached Nuon Chea thinking he might be an anti Pol Pot candidate to replace Pol Pol but as it turned out, he was hardcore pro-Pol Pot! So that made Pol Pot even angrier. So they had severed ties long before the war ended in 1975 as I've been saying.
    5
  102.  @InnerDness  It's THEIR country but you say it didn't matter what their main driving goal was! You speak like a true tyrant! What's wrong if THEIR country become communist?! What right does the US have to mass murder them to stop communism in THEIR OWN country?!
    5
  103. They kill their own people just so they can have something to blame on Russia. These scums are beyond evil.
    5
  104.  @Fort-Mill  5 year plan is from the USSR not China, you lame@ss Chin! Current Vietnam state established in 1945 when China did in 1949 so China copies Vietnam.
    5
  105.  @FloofyMinari  What's wrong with one party state?! How does multi party system work out for the millions of deaths from the pandemic?!
    5
  106.  @wyattmcgee1  But you have no problem using your one dimensional view and ignorance to judge Vietnam from half way around the world! What a hopeless hypocrite!
    5
  107. ​ @wyattmcgee1  Nope. you're just an in-denial right wingnut. The US government is definitely a tyrannical one with a long history of extreme violence against its citizens and the world at large!
    5
  108. ​ @karllarsen8797  The 11 dash line first appeared in 1935 under the Kuomintang rule, the CCP turns it into the 9 dash line, so it was originally a capitalist China's idea! But if you go deeper, this actually isn't a capitalist or communist problem but a Chinese problem because as tiny as Taiwan (Republic of China) is, it continues to have the same ridiculous claim like China's.
    5
  109. Well, it is because the US doesn't have any respect for any country's sovereignty so this would naturally come. Respect should go both ways unless one is a client state! The last time I check, China isn't a client state of the US so it's only fair for her to do the same thing right back to the US!
    5
  110.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  Yes, China definitely had hidden agenda when it 'helped' Vietnam in the war against the US. It wanted Vietnam to become its vassal state. When Vietnam refused, China got mad and used Pol Pot to get back at Vietnam. After he was deposed by Vietnam, China jumped in directly backstabbing Vietnam at the shared border and islands in the SCS. China also had got into bed with the US to support Pol Pot diplomatically at the UN, housed, fed, and armed remnants of the Khmer Rouge hiding in Thailand to fight for ten years. China has always been a local bully, land grabber, and a petty neighbor throughout history. It has never been noble like you've been taught! LOL!
    5
  111.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  You should stop trying to mix things up here. We're specifically talking about the war between Vietnam, the Khmer Rouge and China. You said Vietnam attacked China FIRST, and Vietnam wanted to take Laos and Cambodia for itself, so that's a lie and propaganda! Nobody, even China, has PROOF for that ridiculous accusation! The truth is the Khmer Rouge massacred Vietnamese, Cambodia, and even Chinese in Cambodia FIRST. They also crossed the border into Vietnam and massacred tens of thousands Viets too, so Vietnam had to respond and depose Pol Pot to stop all that. China wanted to rescue its tool so it attacked Vietnam. Vietnam and other independent sources have plenty of evidence supporting that story. You're the one who must open your eyes and ears here.
    5
  112. ​ @kitschchauvinismus_9394  According to you, China invaded Korea because there's a war in Korea; the US bombed ONE town in China killing a few people and a GUESS that it might invade China after Korea. In Vietnam/Cambodia's case, there were a genocide going on in Cambodia killing millions of Cambodians, hundreds thousands of Viets and Chinese. The Khmer Rouge had crossed over the border with Vietnam killing thousands of villagers for over 3 years 1975/78. It didn't kill just a few people like the US did to China! It had also actually invaded and occupied Viet territories. It wasn't just a GUESS like in China's case. And you actually think China has better justification?! LMAO!
    5
  113. Is India a sovereign state? The meaning of a sovereign state is to have an independent choice or stance on domestic and foreign policy alike, so why must India have to answer to the US and dance to its tune like a slave?! The vote at the UN should be the end of the story. It's very rude for the US to even mention it, let alone keep on questioning India and whining about it for months! I think India must have a stronger reaction to make the US understand!
    5
  114. That proves that the Chinese had a full understanding of the fact that they were actually helping themselves, because if North Korea or North Vietnam fold, China is completely surrounded to its very border!
    5
  115. Because the western gang has so many insidious intentions to hide and so many lies to tell, it's impossible for its speakers to talk straight.
    5
  116. This proves the US and the west actually have less freedom than some countries that they've been branding as having no freedom.
    5
  117. ​ @patriot-h3f  You've just proved that China like wars yourself because it's so ready to start a war just because it feels angry! See? People who really don't like wars just won't do that!
    5
  118.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  No, you've been saying as if it's all Vietnamese help but history shows China was the real sponsor of the KR!
    5
  119.  @darren561  No, you're just full of sh!1!
    5
  120. The USSR had also lent a BIG help in the war and in 2000, Russia also erased USD 9.5 BILLIONS of debt that Vietnam incurred under Soviet's time. Vietnam still owes Russia a lot but Russia has never bragged about it! The Chinese, on the other hand, got in bed with the US, back stabbed Vietnam in 1979 and 10 years after that, destroyed all the infrastructures they built during the war near the border, killed a lot of Viet civilians, so Vietnam now doesn't owe them anything. The insidious, petty, and boastful Chinese should stop bragging!
    4
  121.  @jvs333  There were the USSR's help too, why are you Chinese are just so full of yourself?! Why are you so certain that with only the USSR's help, Vietnam couldn't get out of it?! Vietnam kicked the Mongols out thrice on its own while China was conquered and put under their rule for nearly 100 years, so don't be full of it like that! The relationship between Vietnam and China back then was based on mutual interest and circumstance. China has 'the century of humiliation', Vietnam has its own too so they both help each other to kick the westerners out. China helped itself first and foremost and now you talk as it did it out of pure generosity! LOL! Why do you have to bring the US in?! Everybody has half a brain know how bad the US is and I've never said it's better, so why do you have to explain? Are you using another bully to justify your own bullying?! Right now, the US is the world bully and China is a local one. The local one attacks, kills and robs less but it's still doing it!
    4
  122. This's all good until China got into bed with the US in 1972 and stabbed Vietnam in the back after the war.
    4
  123.  @jetli740  And here are the reasons Vietnam's not buying. Vietnam always has very clear and good reasons, unlike China: 1. You must agree with me that the vast majority of Chinese hate Vietnam to the bone for no apparent reason right? So how can Viets entrust their lives to China?! 2. Because of that, even if the government chooses to buy, there's no guarantee the people are gonna take it, so the money's gonna be wasted. Are you ready to buy something knowing for sure that you're gonna throw them away the next day?! 3. If Vietnam buys Chinese vaccine, based on history, China will claim credit for 'saving Vietnam', 'without China, all Viets would have been wiped off the face of the earth', 'there's no Vietnam without Chinese vaccine', 'Vietnam must give China some territories as gratitude otherwise it is stabbing China in the back', blah, blah, blah... So if you were Vietnam, would you buy Chinese vaccine?! LOL!
    4
  124. Thank you very much! Excellent report!
    4
  125. Don't you have enough negative from western propaganda machine? If you want negative, go there, you have plenty and then some!
    4
  126. The west reps have to lie, spread groundless fake news so they need to act a lot to persuade the audience with emotion.
    4
  127.  @stevens1041  Neither does it like Laos!
    4
  128. If you wanna know China good or bad, you just need to look at its claims of the WHOLE South China Sea; it's past relationship with the US when both of them had strongly supported Pol Pot's seat at the UN for 10 long years after the Khmer Rouge was deposed by Vietnam; its aggression against Vietnam in a decade (1979-1989).
    4
  129.  @LocalDeepstateAgent  It doesn't count because 'South Vietnam' was a phony country created by the US against the will of Vietnamese people North and South! You don't barge into a sovereign country, create a puppet state and 'defend' it! It's lame! And imagine in the US' Civil War, some stronger country brings half a million troops in to mass murder Americans north and south using the excuse of backing the South. Would that be justifiable?!
    4
  130.  @SurnaturalM  There has been no communist country ever existed in this world. All of the countries you mentioned called themselves socialist and tried to practice socialism.
    4
  131. Forcing people to speak a language of government's choosing? Is the west still insisting the Kyiv regime isn't fascist?!
    4
  132.  @mikethespike7579  watch around the 38th minute.
    4
  133.  @dennisshaper4744 except there was no jungle in Dai Viet. See that name? This wasn’t the Vietnam War in the 1960s.
    4
  134.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  You've just proved my point that there was no love lost between Pol Pot and Vietnam even before 1975! And there's no proof that Vietnam armed Pol Pot in that paragraph!
    4
  135.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  I cited evident multiple times but you've been refusing to look at it!
    4
  136.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Still there's no evident that Vietnam armed Pol Pot. It's just cooperation!
    4
  137.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Vietnam didn't armed Pol Pot. China and the US did!
    4
  138.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  There's no mention of Vietnam arming Pol Pot in your book. Are you sure you know how to read?
    4
  139.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  There was a Vietnamese faction in the Khmer Rouge at the time. And Vietnam had tried to replace Pol Pot. So the cooperation was obviously for that purpose. How can you blame Vietnam for that?!
    4
  140.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  You originally said N Vietnam 'supported' Pol Pot, but your books clearly show that she supported Sihanouk all along, not Pol Pot, and you can't argue with it, so now you change the story by saying she 'controlled' him?!😆 If Vietnam 'controlled' him, ht fcould he purge all the Vietnamese trained cadres in the KR and attack VC' camps in Cambodia from 1972 onwards?!
    4
  141.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  You're making up story here! The KR was like a pathetic group of bandits before the coup because the Vietnamese didn't supported it! There was no popular resentment against Sihanouk in Cambodia despite heavy US propaganda inciting it. In fact, because of that, the US had to wait for his absence to act to ensure success! On the contrary, because there was popular support for him, when he endorsed the KR after the coup, many people had joined it and thus swelled the ranks under Pol Pot! Moreover, only one month after Lon Nol took power, he coordinated with the US' and Saigon regime's forces, let them enter Cambodia to conduct raids against the VCs. This created a popular resentment against him because no such thing had ever happened under Sihanouk. Pol Pot had only become the savor of the Cambodians after the coup, intense US bombing and invasion! The US was the one who brought him to power in Cambodia.
    4
  142. This is just mindlessly repeating stupid cheap ass Cold War propaganda. First, there was a system that had actually caused 2 million deaths from hunger in Vietnam, not just near death, and it was colonialism which is capitalism, not communism. The communists were the ones who saved the population from that famine caused by capitalism in 1945! Second, the Vietnamese communists party has been running Vietnam but that doesn't mean Vietnam has ever been living under communism. Those are two different things that doesn't necessarily/automatically go hand in hand. Even the Soviet Union in all of its 70 years plus of existence had ever claimed that it had reached and lived under communism! There's totally no private ownership of means of production under communism, but the land reform program in the 1950s in Vietnam had actually increased private ownership because it redistributed lands from a few local landlords, the French colonists, and the Catholic church who had been robbing the people blind for decades, to the mass! That's how the communists could get support from the vast majority of Vietnamese literately overnight to win against superpowers! The hardship after the Vietnam War was caused primarily by the coward total blockade, economic sanctions from the west. In another word, it was also caused by capitalism! Vietnam also was forced into two wars to defend herself against the Khmer Rouge and China backed by the US for a decade. She had to feed the Cambodian population after the disposal of the Pol Pot regime because the west also imposed sanction against Cambodia too for being liberated by Vietnam! Despite all that, there were NO deaths by hunger in Vietnam or Cambodia in that period. So if anything it could only proved the communists were actually really good at running the country! There are mass hunger and millions of homeless people right now in the US despite the fact that it's the 'richest country in the world' that has never faced any hardship whatsoever! So there is something really sick about capitalism that you need to talk about right there!
    4
  143.  @loganbagley7822  Just exactly how many Hmongs have you talked to?! 'countless' is a big stretch! You're clearly making up stories here. They are just a minority and half of them fought on the Vietnamese side. If they were killed, they were probably in some militia groups fighting alongside the US. North Vietnamese troops didn't go around mass murdering women and children like US soldiers because they didn't even have enough ammunition to kill Americans and they're simply not animals like US soldiers. So you cannot in any way equate them to evil of US troops. Yes, you're a ficking liar clear and simple. If there are atrocities committed by the North Viets, many historians should have known and they don't. The so-called Hue massacre was a propaganda ploy cooked up by the Saigon puppet regime and the US to drown out the news of the My Lai massacre when it broke out. Search for the 'The Myth of the Hue Massacre'.
    4
  144. The high death tolls in the pandemic have everything to do with the capitalist system. There's no Trump in England, France, Germany, Brazil, India,... but they all have very high death tolls. What do they have in common? CAPITALIST system that doesn't give a flying fk about the mass! Watch and learn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9NKe2OiNgA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tx2RFH-KoY8
    4
  145.  @wyattmcgee1  I have answered all your questions one by one above. I even repeated them so you can easily follow. Your stupidity ain't my problem!
    4
  146. In the tyrannical US, your right to live is always superseded by the police's right to shoot you dead! Who gives the US' police the right to shoot first and ask question later? It's the fkng US government!
    4
  147.  @wyattmcgee1  Whatever you are, you've been talking like a brainwashed McCarthyite wingnut! First, you accuse the Vietnamese government of being 'tyrannical' just because there's one ruling party in Vietnam. If so, the US government is already tyrannical because in reality the US's also ruled by only one party, the capitalist party. There is no real opposition party in the US. Those two 'parties' are just two branches of one capitalist party. And it's more 'tyrannical' because it only serves a tiny minority.
    4
  148. Second, you don't even know the history of extreme violence of the US government and you're so ready to point finger?! LOL! Here it is: https://www.zinnedproject.org/collection/massacres-us/ This's no way everything! Your last sentence, once more, shows you're a tyrannical wingnut! The imperialist US doesn't 'liberate' anybody, on the contrary, it's goal is to be the absolute ruler of the world and much of the world has been subjected to its tyranny, so feel grateful my a$$! That's exactly the Nazis felt when they 'liberate' countries around them! LOL!
    4
  149. The police execute over 1000 people a year because they're covered by the US government policy of shoot first ask question later. That alone isn't extreme violence to you?! https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/
    4
  150. It's all because of China's stupid 'nine-dash line' claim. It essentially robs not only Vietnam but other SEA countries of their respective EEZs.
    4
  151.  @purelica  When you're talking about cause, you should go to the root one. So, the cause isn't 'Vietnam has a 1000 years resenting China' but China has a 1000 year wanting to eat Vietnam alive. If China doesn't want to eat Vietnam alive, there wouldn't be no resentment.
    4
  152.  @Syn_1  Have you ever asked yourself why the freak the US kept 'sailing mostly in international waters' in the freaking Gulf of Tonkin very close to the coastline of North Vietnam for no apparent reason?!
    4
  153. When and how did Vietnam 'stab China in the back'?
    4
  154. ​ @straydog163  Every war China has is always 'defensive' (according to China of course)! On Vietnam case, China also says it's a 'defensive offensive' but I know for a fact, it wasn't 'defensive' at all! So it's very hard to believe what China says about the others.
    4
  155. t q, Why the fuck do you have to politicize everything? Fucking idiot!
    4
  156. ​ @kitschchauvinismus_9394  1. China has dispute with S Korea and Japan over islands and a rock in the East China Sea too, so why it didn't draw a similar like in the ECS if the SCS' line's purpose is really for claiming islands? 2. If the line in the SCS only means for those islands, not the WHOLE sea, why is it necessary AT ALL?! 3. Why does a line which only means to claim inhabitable islands in the middle of the SCS extend all the way to the coastline of all the relevant SEA countries?! 4. The line's meaning is not even clear among Chinese; China also has never officially and explicitly explained its meaning; some Chinese officials and scholars have clearly stated that the line mean China own the WHOLE sea, so you cannot say you 'all' know it's just about the islands!
    4
  157.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  No, you're anything but honest. In the Korean War, Chinese army only went home after both sides had reached an armistice and stopped the fight completely. In Cambodia's case, the Khmer Rouge didn't stop fighting. They fled over Thailand, regrouped and fought back from there because they had supports from the US, China and their dogs. When an agreement was reached to stop the fighting in 1989, Vietnam withdrew. It's not 'totally different'! Vietnam stayed only because China and the US prolonged the war, not because she wanted to. And Vietnam was there to fight the Khmer Rouge with agreement of the new Cambodia Hun Sen government. In fact, Hun Sen had actually run over the border asking Vietnam for help in the first place! So it's not an 'occupation' like the evil China has been slandering Vietnam.
    4
  158. Excellent!
    4
  159. ​ @ceezb5629  1. It's not his fault right? Because somebody else was the president. Have Lithuania and Latvia been shelling their respective Russian speaking populations for eight years now like Ukraine so why must Russia invade them too?! 2. You think he can stop the Russians with two week preparation? LOL! 3. You think he can stop the Russians with 1 bil. in aid?! LOL again! No, It's the US' war because it backed the coup in Ukraine in 2014 and has been running the anti Russia show in Ukraine since then, turning it into a pawn to antagonize Russia. Zelensky is just a loyal running dog. Now he becomes a pitiful abandoned running dog. Poor little stupid dog! LOL! I truly feel for him.
    4
  160. So this Australian says that if Australian journalists discover these crimes, nobody in the world should or could criticize or have his/her own opinion about the crimes?!
    4
  161. It has always been like that when the US' opponents return fire. They said the attack against a US warship in the Gulf of Tonkin was 'unprovoked' too, never mind that the US was like 8000 miles off its coast and about 30 miles off that of North Vietnam, AND it didn't actually happen at all!
    4
  162. Any well-informed person, let alone a historian, would know this war isn't akin to the Iraq War. Saying so only proves he's full of sh!t!
    4
  163.  @patriot-h3f  Actually, that wasn't a 'war between China and Vietnam', but it's another war of aggression of China against Vietnam following a long list of wars like that throughout history in every Chinese dynasty. Japan invades China once, but from the government down to the people, Chinese haven't forgot about that and you really distrust and hate Japan to the bone for that. So American media aside, you should understand that Vietnam has 10 more genuine and justifiable reasons to feel about China the exact same way you feel about Japan! We've been having that feeling for a very long time and before the existence of the US or its media and it keeps getting reinforced by Chinese aggression against us again and again! You Chinese are also under the influence of your media, propaganda and arrogance against Vietnam too. You're not immune to that!
    4
  164. ​ @HelloWorld-f5m  Look for the biography of Pol Pot on Wikipedia and read it. Pol Pot, not the Khmer Rouge, was the problem. He and Vietnam didn't like each other from the get go because he wanted an armed struggle against Sihanouk while Vietnam didn't. The Khmer communist party before Pol Pot was part of the Viet Minh in the fighting against the French. THAT WAS WHEN VIETNAM REALLY SUPPORTED IT. After the the French surrendered at Dien Bien Phu and had to leave, France and Vietnam signed the Geneva Accords in 1954 in which they agreed that Laos and Cambodia would remain neutral. Sihanouk became the leader of Cambodia. Vietnam couldn't violate the Accords, so that' was why she didn't support the Khmer Rouge's armed resistance against him. Following that, the Khmer communists were almost disbanded. That created a power vacuum that Pol Pot and his gangs who were Cambodians coming back from France gradually seized the leadership. He then asked for support from Vietnam to topple Sihanouk a few times but was refused every time. So there was no support for the KR from Vietnam here so that why he hated Vietnam so much. Then Sihanouk, although officially neutral, passively allowed the VCs to build their bases in east Cambodia when the war in Vietnam started brewing up, so Vietnam had more reason not to disturb the status quo. In fact, because of that reason, The Saigon regime had tried to assassinate Sihanouk but failed. So then the CIA supported Lon Nol to overthrow him in 1970. Right after that , Lon Non coordinated with the US and Saigon regime conducted a large scale operation into east Cambodia to destroy the VC bases. This action then brought the Khmer Rouge and Vietnam together, but still they weren't really allies and you cannot blame Vietnam for this because the US-backed Lon Nol's coup and US bombing of Cambodia caused it! But still, The Vietnamese had also refused to give arms to Pol Pot when asked. They chose to fight the Lon Nol, Saigon regime and the US forces by themselves and handed some of the territories deeper inside Cambodia over to the Khmer Rouge as buffer zone while they held onto the area bordering Vietnam. This friendliness, if you can call it that, didn't last long. By early 1972, relations between the Khmer Rouge and the Vietnamese were becoming strained and some violent clashes had broken out. So for the whole time, Vietnam had only really supported the KR in the early 1950s. After 1954, their relation was mostly cold. The Vietnamese had tried to brought them back into their fold when it relative warmed up in 1970 because there was still some Vietnamese trained cadres left, But in 1973, Pol Pot ordered the internment of them and executed them all later. The relation become ice cold afterwards, so you can't say Vietnam supported the KR up until 1975. In fact, Pol Pot was mad at Vietnam the whole time exactly because she didn't supported him in overthrowing Sihanouk! All your excerpts only show things happened in the relatively brief warm period of 1970. They aren't proof that Vietnam had supported the KR up until 1975. Also in the mid 1960s, following Mao, Pol Pot denounced Khrushchev and went to China to study their communist way and inspired by China's Cultural Revolution. That period gave him the idea of how to create his utopia later. He was incompatible with Vietnam in many way, and openly acted against Vietnam, so the idea of Vietnam supporting him is ludicrous Again do read his bio on Wikipedia to learn some history before openlng y0ur m0uth!.
    4
  165.  @samweirich5973 the climate and terrain also weren’t factors. If they were, the Mongols wouldn’t have successfully conquered China, Tibet Dali back then or half of the world for that matter! Why everybody thinks the Mongols suddenly became so fragile in Vietnam?!
    4
  166. SK is just a stupid dog of the US all along so what do you expect?
    4
  167. As a rule of thumb, whenever the west accuse somebody of something, they’re actually the one who are doing it.
    4
  168. It because the US's always thinking of invading countries.
    4
  169. your point is?!
    4
  170. Yeah, That shows American elite screwed its people big time on this because Vietnamese had no reason to hate or go against Americans in the first place so American shouldn't have shed one drop of blood for that war and get hated not only by Vietnamese but the world back then!
    3
  171. It's because the Viper has a V20 - 20 liter engine and cost twice as much. Anybody can make a lot of horsepower out of a V20 - 20 liter engine, but only Ferrari and Honda can make 120hp out of every liter of an NA engine! That's first-class engineering that the Viper can only dream of!
    3
  172.  @Ottovonostbahnhof  What 'anti-air Defence tasks'?! You can't even get your words straight so stop with you BS all ready.
    3
  173.  @blightfrog  300,000 were the total Chinese sent for the whole war. It's about equal to the total number of S. Korean troops sent to Vietnam and only a fraction of the total of 2.7 millions US troops. And Chinese strictly did labor works so why do you guys keep on bragging about it?! What do you really want?! The works China did in Vietnam were mostly at the border far from harm and none of them died in combat. In 1979, petty Deng Xiaoping ordered Chinese troops to stab Vietnam in the back while she was in Cambodia kicking little Pol Pot's @ss, and the petty Chinese destroyed everything they built at the border a long time ago so stop bragging already! Gosh! Why are you Chinese are so painfully petty and boastful?!
    3
  174.  @Ottovonostbahnhof  There's no Chinese died in combat in Vietnam because they're not allowed to participate in combat! There's no record of dead Chinese combat troops anywhere so stop making sh|t up already!
    3
  175.  @Ottovonostbahnhof  Where exactly did those 170000 Chinese stay in the war you cl0 wn?! They most definitely weren't in the front line fighting because unless they wore invisible cloth, ALL sides would have seen 170,000 of them everywhere! You simply cannot hide something like that at the front! Even New Zealand, or Thai troops who're at around a few thousands and did support roles were seen in Vietnam by ALL sides! Unless they're Superman, the deaths would have been in many tens of thousands, and double of that crippled if they really had involved in front line combat because everybody knows they suck! In only three weeks at Viet border, 25,000 of them had managed to die! So how can anybody believe China had lost only 4000 in 10 years of the Vietnam War AT THE FRONT FK LINE?! LOL! You see? China's lies are the most ridiculous! LOL!
    3
  176.  @Ottovonostbahnhof  ungrateful ones are the Chinese who turn against both the USSR and the US which directly defeated Japan so they could get their country back in one piece. What exactly has Vietnam done to make you say she's 'ungrateful'?
    3
  177. @Blind Frog There were 1000 Chinese buried in Vietnam for the whole course of the war, so I give it 1500 dead at most. 1500 isn't qualify for a drop in the bucket compare to the 3.4 Viets died in the war and you claim the credit for defeating the US?! LOL! Don't you Chinese have any shame?! As for material support, the USSR helped a lot too. If China didn't help, the USSR would probably fill all the gaps! But the Russians probably wouldn't brag that they defeated the US for Vietnam like you cl 0wns! LOL! Even if the USSR didn't fill the gaps, Vietnam would still have won! The Taliban didn't have any big powers' help but they still outlast the US, don't they? Vietnam beat the Mongols three times without external help while China was overrun by them, so don't be so full of yourselves like that!
    3
  178.  @blightfrog  The infrastructures China built in the war near the border were all destroyed or taken back to China in 1979 in the Chinese incursion. China backed the Khmer Rouge to attack and kill thousands of Viet villagers at the Viet-Cam border over the course of three years 1975-78, continued backing it in 10 years after it was deposed by Vietnam in 1978 causing great loss in both manpower an economy to Vietnam. China also ganged up with the US to diplomatically isolate and impose economic sanction on both Vietnam and liberated Cambodia causing great human suffering that Vietnam had to shoulder. China directly killed 10000 Viet civilians in the border incursion. China took Viet islands in 1974 and again in 1988. And those are not all! SO, whatever 'help' China brought during the war, it more than destroyed them all and robbed something more valuable back after the war. So now, Vietnam doesn't fk owe China anything. On the contrary, China owes Vietnam whatever it robbed and the tens of thousands of Viet civilians who died at the hand of the Khmer Rouge and China directly. So S T fU ALREADY about China's 'help'!
    3
  179.  @jvs333  Your guess won't count? And what exactly did Vietnam do to make you have that guess?! China isn't better than the US. You have forgot that China invaded and turned Vietnam into one of its province over two thousand years ago, forced the Viets to adopt Chinese culture to assimilate them. After getting kicked out in 939, China has been attacking Vietnam every chance it gets in every dynasty. The 1979 attack was only one of many other attacks throughout history and you also forgot China's attack on Viet islands in 1974 and 1988 too.
    3
  180.  @jvs333  Why did you just read what I said about 2000 years ago but not the rest?! Vietnam took Cambodian land in 1700s but hasn't attacked FIRST or took anything from it since. It happened only once in history and ended there! China hasn't stopped attacking or taking Vietnam's properties since before the first millennium until the very present day! Can you see the difference and pattern?! Do you know of another example like that in the world?! Believe me, this thing about China's love to pick on Vietnam and rob for the entire length of Vietnam's history is unparalleled in this world! No, 1979 is not a border dispute war. It was, in Deng Xiaoping's own word, was a war to 'teach the little naughty boy a lesson'. Have you known of any thing more ridiculous and barbaric than that? In order to 'teach a naughty boy', a Chinese leader was ready to burn 20000 men of his own in three weeks!
    3
  181.  @jvs333  And I'm not sure of why you brought the 'help' China gave Vietnam back then up! China helped so it can rob and tell Vietnam what to do now?! The USSR and the US helped China in the Sino-Japanese and Chinese Civil War too so why did China get in bed with the US against the USSR in the 70s, fought a border war with it and don't listen to the US' demands now?!
    3
  182. Last time I check, Vietnamese didn't swim half way round the world to start a war in the US. It's the other way around, so stop blaming the victim! The mass murderers are US presidents who just love to start wars around the world so their master, the Military Industrial Complex can get rich.
    3
  183. No matter how you try to BS, you can't change the fact that the US swam half way around the world to start a war with Vietnam so you're the fucking murderous imperialists.
    3
  184. No, it's Russia, the DPR, and LPR fighting for the survival of the Donbas region and Russian speaking people in Ukraine. This war started 8 years, not 2 months, ago. Russia had no intention to adsorb Ukraine, so how can Ukraine is 'fighting for its survival as a state'?! This is a proxy war because the US has been pulling strings in Kiev since 2014. It sponsored a coup in 2014 and replace a democratically elected government with its puppets and they started both a shooting war and a cultural war against their own Russian speaking citizens, then this happened. You just missed the first part of the story because the western MSM didn't spoon feed you that!
    3
  185.  @jamesturner4478  Oceania is only artificially created by whites when they came and robbed it from Asians so it doesn't mean squat to Asians. Do you have a pair of eyes? Look at the indigenous people, do they look more like South East Asians or whites. You know how to read maps? Look at the location. It's in the South East Asia region. If Australia is not in Asia why do your football teams compete in it as a common region?! It has never been yours and it never will be! You, not Asians, should get out and go back to Europe and stop disturbing the demographics of Asia if you have any self respect but I don't expect that from descendants of criminals! :v
    3
  186. So you're blaming one party over the other for 'fueling inequality' ignoring the elephant in the room which is the capitalist system which owns both parties and the root cause of all this. You're not doing anything meaningful here!
    3
  187.  @jetli740  That's only because you don't know how to read! Those are vaccines that Vietnam negotiated to buy, not donated numbers! So you still don't have any evidence that Vietnam 'stab china in the back'! I'm still waiting for it!
    3
  188. When you choose to attack a man as person instead of proving what he says is true or false. It can only prove you’re helpless in proving him wrong, and a petty hard headed fool.
    3
  189.  @winwin-gc4ru  First off, what was the date at which Vietnam invaded China and at what location?
    3
  190.  @winwin-gc4ru  1970s is not a date you |diot!
    3
  191.  @hieudotrung3439  no, what I said is based on historical records from both sides. Guerrilla warfare was barely mentioned. Most were big battles. You just can’t defeat any army with hundreds of thousands of troops in a few months with guerrilla warfare, let alone the Mongol one! That imagination is really s th pid!
    3
  192. You’re just repeating western propaganda!
    3
  193. Actually the west's propaganda machines have been brainwashing people there and much of the world to hate communism and call those countries 'communist countries' as an implied insult but in reality, there has never been a 'communist country' in the world, nor those countries claim to be one. They're just trying to build socialism. You definitely will never see a 'communist country' in your whole life time so just relax and enjoy the scene!
    3
  194.  @Narukami95  Stalin had good reasons too. The USSR was created in an extremely hostile environment. The west was united and applied maximum pressure against it on all fronts so if Trotsky had his way, the Soviet Union might have collapsed by the west's sabotage long before it could get anywhere.
    3
  195. <<Ukraine agrees to 30-day ceasefire>> Agrees with whom? Russia has never asked for a ceasefire so this doesn't mean anything at all.
    3
  196. Trump is a psycho who thinks he has a special charm that nobody can resist so of course he's mad when everybody rejected his stupid 'deals'
    3
  197.  @mikethespike7579  something’s wrong w your head!
    3
  198.  @mikethespike7579  Stop arguing about history with only your imagination!
    3
  199.  @mikethespike7579  Search for 'US support Pol Pot at UN'. Geez!
    3
  200.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Those were Chinese arms! Google 'China armed the Khmer rouge'. Vietnam just helped transporting them.
    3
  201.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  They listened to Vietnam at first because there was still a Vietnamese faction. Pol Pot had gradually and successfully purged them all by 1973. Pol Pot then openly turned against Vietnam. Pol Pot's faction was Maoists. How could Vietnamese communists who were Marxist-Leninists produced Maoists in the Khmer Rouge?!
    3
  202.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Stay on the topic. Have you acknowledged the fact that the US DIRECTLY supported Pol Pot AFTER his genocide?
    3
  203.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Vietnam sources say 1973, western sources say 1974, was when they started to have clashes: <<Even before the Vietnam War ended, the relationship between the Khmer Rouge—which was in the process of seizing power from a US-backed government headed by Lon Nol—and North Vietnam was strained. Clashes between Vietnamese communists and Khmer Rouge forces began as early as 1974, and the following year Pol Pot signed a treaty codifying the "friendship" between the Khmer Rouge and China.[39]>>
    3
  204.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Vietnamese forces fought Lon Nol's because the latter attacked the former first, per order from the US, not because Vietnam were friendly with Pol Pot!
    3
  205.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  No the force that destabilized Cambodia and the whole freaking Indochina for that matter and thus brought Pol Pot to power was the US with its interference and war in the region after the withdrawal of the French in 1954.
    3
  206.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Google 'US overthrow Sihanouk'. Jeez! Actually the US had tried to overthrow him twice! The first one was in 1959 but failed!
    3
  207. This guy Timothy Snyder is clearly a propagandist, not a historian because: 1. Just simply look at the titles of his books. They are simply propaganda, not history books. 2. He doesn't have the objectivity or honesty to be a historian. When Putin says 'Ukraine' isn't a real country', he just expresses his view of Ukraine in a historical context. That's just his view about a subject, not one of the reasons he attacks Ukraine, unlike the western colonialists who use the excuse that other people are barbarians and so as 'civilized people', they have the right and responsibility to take over their lands and rule over them. 3. Russians, Belorussians, and Ukrainians have the same root called Kievan Rus'; they can easily understand each other without a translator, and they all have been living there for over a thousand years, unlike the colonialists who sailed halfway around the world and conquered different peoples. 4. Putin isn't trying to subjugate Ukraine as the colonialists did. This war is a geopolitical war initiated by the US through its expansion of NATO all the way to the Russian border despite countless objections from Russia, deep meddling in Ukraine politics, overthrowing a democratically elected government and replacing it with a puppet one to further antagonize Russia. If the US didn't do that, none of this could have happened! The root cause is the US actions there. 5. Ukraine is under neo-colonial rule of the US, not Russia. Russia is only responding to that! 6. Russia and the Ukrainians living in the Donbas region have very legitimate grievances against the US and its puppet regime in Kiev here, but they're totally ignored by Snyder. He just makes up a fake reason to argue about instead, a straw man argument. So it's clear that he's a propagandist, not historian.
    3
  208. ​ @mottscottison6943  Vietnam didn't need the USSR's support to beat the Khmer Rouge. Cambodia isn't the US you |d]ot! Vietnam forces exterminated the Khmer Rouge's forces inside Cambodia in two weeks. They had stayed there for 10 years because China and the US had supported Pol Pot's seat in the UN for most of that time. If Vietnam left right away, China and the US would back Pol Pot to come back so everything would be wasted. I've said so in the previous post you br|ch head. The USSR dissolved in 1991, Vietnam had the withdrawal plan inplace in 1985, executed it immediately and finished the whole thing in 1989 when she was sure the new Cambodian government had become strong enough to stay in power and subdue the Khmer Rouge, so that was all done two years before the collapse of the USSR. No, the stupid Khmer Rouge was wrong the whole time, and you don't know $h1t! No, that's not a real cause. China didn't even care about 300,000 Chinese in Cambodia slaughtered by the genocidal Pol Pot's regime, or 20,000 young men it burnt at the border so why would it care about a few thousands Hmongs?! You have any brain in your skull? Vietnam didn't attack anybody for the USSR; China attacked Vietnam for the US, so China is a dog, not Vietnam. What did Vietnam do today that makes you say Vietnam is a US' dog? You're bar kin' nonsense like a dog here.
    3
  209. This news agency hires illiterate people? It's a fisheries resources surveillance ship, not a coast guard ship.
    3
  210.  @vascotank2143  The US supported the seat of Khmer Rouge in the UN, fed, and gave order to Thailand to sheltered it so that was a BIG and direct help. The Khmer Rouge started by itself and became popular because of US' backed coup of Sihanouk and bombing in Cambodia. The DRV were only friendly and helped it BEFORE it committed genocide in Cambodia. The US became friendly and helped it AFTER the genocide. That's why the US, not the DRV, is sick an evil.
    3
  211.  @timothygermann780  Britain only gave up SOME of its colonies where it knew it would have lost them any way, not because it has developed the capability to recognizes its wrongdoings! It's still holding on to many territories where the resistance is weak around the world as we speak! Russia just took Crimea back with a referendum held in Crimea. And it has been Russia's before Russia gave Ukraine the administrative control. Britain accepts Kosovo referendum but not Crimea's shows it's a two face thug so you can't preach!
    3
  212. Everywhere around the world, there are always some lowlifes who are so ready to sell their country and people for dirt cheap and many others who are beyond stupid that they're so easily deceived by the US and end up destroying their country, people, and their own livelihood!
    3
  213.  @lambertlum1087  Marxist economics has been used and taught by both capitalist and socialist governments around the world to balance and fix the flaws of capitalist system or building a socialist one, so it's not dead. Russia abandoning of socialist system only proves her socialist path was the better one because after the switch, from a second ranked economy, she fell to 11th. The country turned into a big mess. Life expectancy fell by nearly half! Most of what Russia has achieved was in the socialist period! China only allows private enterprise exist alongside state owned one and that's not out of Marxist line at all! She didn't abandon Marxist that's why she can lift hundreds of millions out of poverty while many capitalist countries that have the same starting point or even were ahead of her are still struggling! The economy keeps chugging along in the last 40 years despite many economic crises and downturn in the west and the its dependent world.
    3
  214. I forgot to add. In your wonderful paradise of 'rights', you don't even need to protest or drop hats on the street, just sleeping in your bed, inside your own fking house is enough to warrant a death sentence! Talking about the mother of all tyranny here! LOL! https://www.aclu.org/other/7-year-old-girl-accidentally-shot-swat-team
    3
  215. ​ @wyattmcgee1  And my view isn't one dimensional! There's a large movement inside the US decries government sponsored and protected police brutality.
    3
  216. yep, the fat blond one is a compulsive liar!
    3
  217. Brian is living in Thailand so he's obviously biased. Yes, Thailand does have a choice to be a US’ dog in the Vietnam War or not! If nobody submits to the US, there would be no US tyranny. Thailand is just as guilty as the US when it lets the latter use its territory as a base to bomb the sh"t out of its neighbors and sends its troops to Vietnam. If you just stand and watch a bully beat up his victim, you're already guilty let alone joining him and directly participating in the beating! Using Thai communists as an excuse is also lame! If one member of your family practices a religion that you don't like, you can't use that as an excuse to burn your neighbors' houses down and mass murder them because they are also practicing the same religion! You are denouncing the US while using the exact same lame excuse that it's been using to terrorize and destroy the world!
    3
  218.  @joek7031  No, the real issue of the SCS is China's ridiculous claim of the whole sea. If China didn't have that ridiculous claim, the US has no excuse to 'pivot to Asia'.
    3
  219.  @joek7031  No, if you say 'just as much', you're being ridiculous here. There's a big difference. Vietnam's claim doesn't include the parts of the sea that hug the coastline of its neighbors like China and that's only a response to China ridiculous claim. If Vietnam claims less, China will take more! That's the problem! China's ridiculous claim is STILL the root cause here.
    3
  220.  @purelica  I forgot to mention that China also hates Vietnam to the bone for not letting it eat Vietnam alive! It sounds ridiculous but it's true.
    3
  221. Vietnam looks more to the US because China keeps trying to rob Vietnam.
    3
  222. CNN didn't say 'the markets are full of everything but the people don't have the money to buy'. It said 'Even basic stuff isn't available for the people'. Do you understand what this clip is about now?
    3
  223. China never forgets she's the victim of Japan and western's aggression but now she starts acting like them! You can easily draw parallels between Japan in the past and China today. In the first half of 20th century, Japan became really strong after decades of successful economic development. Instead of helping and leading her neighbors to develop and progress like herself, she started grabbing territories left and right. China now is acting like that. After some decades of successful economic development, China also starts bullying her neighbors. She claims the WHOLE SCS as her private property! If I remember correctly, this claim is unprecedented anywhere in the world. No country has ever had such a ridiculous claim. They may claim this and that island but never a WHOLE sea! The basis of the claim is so ridiculous! It's essentially like this: the islands in the SCS appear in ancient Chinese literature, therefore the WHOLE SCS belongs to China! Even Japan in the 1930s couldn't be so ridiculous! There are other peoples probably living around that sea for tens of thousands of years, naming those islands and and fishing in that sea so why are they excluded?! If the basis of the claim is naming those islands in Chinese literature and fishing in that sea two thousand years ago, why does China not draw some other lines that encompass the WHOLE East China Sea and Yellow Sea too?! WHY?! Has China never named the islands in those seas and fished in them?! That ridiculous claim only appeared in 1947 by Chiang Kai-shek's government. At that time, China has just got over foreign domination but she already turned imperialistic and the easy targets are the weaker neighbors in the South so that's how this come about. As being communist, the CCP should have been against that ridiculous claim which was invented by those imperialistic minds of the capitalist Republic of China from day one, but no, it's just gone along and fully complicit in this criminal act! If China plays fair and makes peace with her neighbors, the western imperialists wouldn't have a chance! But no, she must shoot herself in the foot like Japan in the past. Back then many Asian countries, China included, looked up to Japan and wanted to be successful like her but Japan shot herself in the foot by attacking her neighbors and become the common enemy of East and South East Asia. China now is just imitating Japan while denouncing her actions in the past! LOL! The US and its western lackeys are a bunch of thugs who have been plundering and bullying Asia and other parts of the world for many centuries now and on the decline. This is the chance for not only China but the whole Asia to get back to its glory, but China's not helping. Instead of making peace with her neighbors, she bullies them and gives the westerners excuses to jump in and block her advancement! Imagine with the intelligence and work ethic of Asians, if South, East, and South East Asia unite, the westerners wouldn't stand a chance to pick on us, but no, China must stubbornly insist on something it can never occupy, a whole sea, and abandon other doable and good objectives!
    3
  224.  @chd0043  Yes, there were wars and skirmishes. China had border wars and skirmishes with many of its neighbors from the 1960s onwards. It attacked Vietnam three times in 1974, 1979, and 1988 separately on land and sea to rob islands. The war on Vietnam-China border actually last 10 years. It also had border wars with the Soviet Union, and India in the 1960s
    3
  225. Why do you say that? What makes you think Viets don't know?!
    3
  226. That's been going on since forever. When whites came to the America continent, they used local tribes to fight other local tribes and killed them too after the job's done. That's how they took over the continent. They used Bin Laden to fight the Soviets and then killed him. Used Saddam Hussein to fight Iran and then killed him. Used ISIS to fight Syrian government. Used NED in place of CIA today to train and support local groups to destabilize countries that don't wanna be US' dogs. It keeps going on and on. The blame is also on the local people who are stupid enough to side with them imperialist whiteys.
    3
  227.  @quintonliu1146  China actually helps itself because it didn't want another US' client state on its border. In fact, it was so eager to 'help' just because it didn't want to fight the US itself and died a lot like it did in North Korea! So it's not really neutral, not to mention many times China attacked trying to subjugate Vietnam in the entire length of Vietnam's history!
    3
  228.  @Auzzzie82  I know, I just use the words of the stupid person who starts this thread.
    3
  229.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  China isn't defender of the East. It got into bed with the US backstabbing Vietnam in the 1070s-80s. It had supported the genocidal regime of Pol Pot in the UN for 10 year after it was deposed by Vietnam.
    3
  230.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  No Vietnam didn't 'occupy' Cambodia. If you say so, China must have 'occupied' North Korea when it brought troops in to fight the Americans and S Koreans in the Korean War! And China actually had less good reasons to enter N Korea than Vietnam did to enter Cambodia! What bad blood between Vietnam and Cambodia has anything to do with the story being discussed here?!
    3
  231.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  So you actually think China had better excuse for invading Korea than Vietnam liberating Cambodia?! LOL!
    3
  232. He's really a comedian. No doubt! LOL!
    3
  233. What did Vietnam do to make you say 'Vietnam never learned what US did to them during Vietnam War'?! And why 'Vietnam will not be trusted after President hu zimin'?!
    3
  234.  @TheZevvy  much of Tibet is flat, yes, but it’s not like Mongolia because it’s a 5000 meter high plateau. It’s hard to even breathe there if you’re not the natives! On the south and east side of it, there are two of the highest mountain ranges in all of Asia and the world. The terrain and environment are definitely many times more challenging than Dai Viet. Dali kingdom (Yunnan, China today) and Sichuan, have much worse terrains than Dai Viet too but they had fallen anyway. For Laos (Khmer empire back then) and Myanmar (Pagan back then), the Mongols must cross real, deep jungles that spanned many hundreds or thousands kilometers to get to the flat land where large populations lived but Dai Viet wasn’t the case. The Mongols on the shortest route from the Chinese border only needed to cross about 70 km of mountainous area to reach the flat land of the Red River Delta, and another 70 km to reach the capital city of Thang Long or Hanoi today. They had never had problem reaching and taking that capital city. Holding onto it and escaping Dai Viet were the problems. But it’s not the climate or weather like you imagined. They always purposefully chose to attack Dai Viet in the dead of winter of December or January. And yes, Dai Viet, which was the 1/3rd northern part of Vietnam today does have winter because it’s in subtropical region like adjacent Chinese provinces. There’s no tropical climate, so there was no jungle, nor hot weather, nor tropical diseases, and the Mongol invading forces were always defeated and ran home before summer set in! There’s really no excuse! They had simply defeated in battles and lost the war. It’s as simple as that so get over it! It’s not like they had never defeated elsewhere on the planet!
    3
  235.  @shazmosushi  Yours is THE huge simplification. Vietnam has only been had one legitimate government, the DRV since 1945. The Saigon regime was a puppet created, backed and used by the US to intervene in Vietnam. The US only backed its puppet regime, not the South Vietnamese. They only went around massacred the South Vietnamese to keep its puppet afloat!
    3
  236. China could ask itself for that matter. It got its ass kicked more than France and the US combined!
    3
  237.  @amossutandi  What's wrong with your head? If Vietnam can be used by the US, it wouldn't have been kicked out of Vietnam in the 1970s! It's China's own arrogance creates conflicts with many of its neighbors. The US has nothing to do with it. It only capitalizes on China's stupidity.
    3
  238.  @huaninglyu7372  I have Chinese friends too. China is a very large country with many different peoples. The people in Guangxi, Guangdong and Viets have a lots in common. They may be closer to Viets in culture and origin than to Northern Chinese. Vietnamese and Cantonese speakers can easily recognize many words from each other. The pronunciations of those words are almost identical. Their looks sometimes are a lot like each other and distinctively different than Northern Chinese. The problem lies within the mentality of the majority of Chinese from the general population to the ruling elite. Through all generations and eras for the span of more than 1000 years, they still think Vietnam is a Chinese province. They can't get over it and expect Vietnam to kowtow to all their wills! They always like to say Viets have Han's blood but they always wants to take from Vietnam, if not the whole thing at once then bit by bit. They choose to treat Vietnam like a slave, not a brother or sister. That's the millennium long problem that destroys trust from Viets.
    3
  239. And these were the words coming out of the mouth of a Chinese leader in the highest office of China, Deng Xiaoping, to a US president, Jimmy Carter, when he visited the US in 1979, 'The little child is getting naughty, it's time he got spanked'. Do you happen to know if he's ever referred to any other country as a 'little child'?! He think he's not little? LOL! These are just a few examples of what I've been observing throughout the years about Chinese attitude towards Vietnam. I'm not an extremist, very much aware of not going down that road. I'm not quick to judge anything. My conclusion comes from years of observation and learning history. I don't watch or read western MSM about international matters unless it's for amusement purpose. With personal experiences of their lies against Vietnam and pretty much about anything else, I'm immune to the west's propaganda, so it cannot influence me in a million years. All of what I told you has come straight from the mouths of Chinese media, scholar, general population and the highest political leader. Western media has nothing to do with that.
    3
  240.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Vietnam didn't have enough weapons so how can it 'armed' the KR! Stop making up stvpid stories!
    3
  241.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  'Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge were supported for many years by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its chairman, Mao Zedong;[c] it is estimated that at least 90% of the foreign aid which the Khmer Rouge received came from China, including at least US$1 billion in interest-free economic and military aid in 1975 alone'
    3
  242.  @javierkucharskycortez4463 how did the Chinese won that war?
    3
  243.  @Nobumblegumforyou Fact: the climate and terrain of Dai Viet was way too easy compared to China for the Mongols
    3
  244. ‘Why is Russia not rich?’ Is that a problem? Why do you have to be rich? Are people in ‘rich’ countries really rich or are they just either fkg slaves or homeless? So what’s the point to be ‘rich’ like ‘rich’ countries?!
    3
  245. Selena Gomez, Yeah I know. The role of common people in the US is to serve and die for the rich's imperial wars.
    3
  246. It's so absolutely ridiculous in this day and age, a head of a country still can openly talking about annexation of another country, i.e. taking somebody else's house, like nothing!
    3
  247. If you wanna know if NATO is an offensive or a defensive alliance, just count how many countries have attacked its members and how many countries have been attacked by it and you will find the definite answer. Just look at its members. It is a gang created and controlled by former western colonialist powers to serve their neo-colonial agendas after their old colonial system collapsed after WWII. The western white race should have figured out and abandoned its barbaric dream of owning the whole world after the two WWs. But no! It must go on and start a new world domination scheme immediately and has kept on pushing it until we're all gonna die in a third WW! And yet, it shamelessly, racistly, and boastfully always calls itself the 'civilized world'.
    3
  248. Yalil Gonzalez The US quit so it lost, get over it!
    2
  249. Kristoff Taylovoski The US has 1000 times stronger firepower so there's nothing to brag about kill ratio plus win or lose is determined by whether the objective of the battle is achieved or not, not by kill ratio.
    2
  250.  @michmanusa Those surnames of Lý and Trần are Baiyue (Viet) surnames. Han Chinese conquered Baiyue lands south of the Yangtze 2200 years ago and call them theirs but the people and lands weren’t Chinese originally so stop claiming the whole world belongs to China!
    2
  251. The fact that they've kept on provoking Russia since the fall of the USSR until she has to respond but STILL maintain now that they are right shows Russia is absolutely in the right. The US and NATO are clearly just a band of arrogant thugs. I feel bad for Russia when she has to deal with these thugs all these years.
    2
  252.  @Ottovonostbahnhof  They died for China's purpose of controlling Vietnam. That may be a 'great course' for China but not Vietnam. You should thank Vietnam for putting up a good fight to stop the US in Vietnam. Otherwise, China would have lost millions pushing back the US like in the Korean War!
    2
  253.  @blightfrog  When did I say Vietnam didn't need assistant?!
    2
  254. This is like a band of bullies that finally meet their match. They only talk tough, push others forwards but non of them dare to step up and fight! LOL!
    2
  255.  @jvs333  No, the history of China adamantly and consistently trying at every chance and corner to attack and rob Vietnam is unparalleled in history of the world and it helps explain the events today! If history is irrelevant like you said, the whole world wouldn't bother to teach and learn it! In fact, learning history may predict the future! China is acting exactly like 2000 years ago and that's the problem! It just drew a line on the map of the SCS in 1935 and now says China has owned the entire SCS since ancient time! W tf?! LOL! Ancient time China doesn't even include anything south of the Yangtze River! That's how ridiculous China is and that's why the US can have the excuse to stick its nose in!
    2
  256.  @jvs333  Look up the definition of the word 'bias'. 'Bias' is prejudice in favor of or against something or somebody. I don't have prejudice against China! Whatever I present here are facts and logic that you can easily check up and understand!
    2
  257. I'm sorry but just listening to your first few sentences, I found your understanding of this matter is fundamentally wrong. First, the war after 1955 wasn't a 'proxy war'. According to dictionary, 'proxy war' means 'a war instigated by a major power which does not itself become involved'. The US directly involved in that war, commanded its side from 1955 to 1973. Second, the war wasn't between North and South Vietnam but between the US and Vietnam. Those were the two leading/deciding actors of the war. Without one or the other, there would be no war. On the US side, there were the US, its lackeys like Australia, South Korea, and the Saigon regime. On the Vietnam side there were the DRV and the NLF. Third, the Saigon regime was an illegitimate regime created by the US in 1955. It wasn't recognized by most of the people in the south, so you cannot referring to it as 'South Vietnam' because it didn't have the authority or legitimacy to represent the South. It's just a puppet propped up by the US to use as an excuse for its intervention/aggression in Vietnam. Without the US, there would be no RVN and no war!
    2
  258. China never forgets and always portraits herself as the victim of Japan and western's aggression but now she starts acting like them! You can easily draw parallels between Japan in the past and China today. In the first half of 20th century, Japan became really strong after decades of successful economic development. Instead of helping and leading her neighbors to develop and progress like herself, she started grabbing territories left and right. China now is acting like that. After some decades of successful economic development, China also starts bullying her neighbors. She claims the WHOLE SCS as her private property! If I remember correctly, this claim is unprecedented anywhere in the world. No country has ever had such a ridiculous claim. They may claim this and that island but never a WHOLE sea! The basis of the claim is so ridiculous! It's essentially like this: the islands in the SCS appear in ancient Chinese literature, therefore the WHOLE SCS belongs to China! Even Japan in the 1930s couldn't be so ridiculous! There are other peoples probably living around that sea for tens of thousands of years, naming those islands and and fishing in that sea so why are they excluded?! If the basis of the claim is naming those islands in Chinese literature and fishing in that sea two thousand years ago, why does China not draw some other lines that encompass the WHOLE East China Sea and Yellow Sea too?! WHY?! Has China never named the islands in those seas and fished in them?! That ridiculous claim only appeared in 1947 by Chiang Kai-shek's government. At that time, China has just got over foreign domination but she already turned imperialistic and the easy targets are the weaker neighbors in the South so that's how this come about. As being communist, the CCP should have been against that ridiculous claim which was invented by those imperialistic minds of the capitalist Republic of China from day one, but no, it's just gone along and fully complicit in this criminal act! If China plays fair and makes peace with her neighbors, the western imperialists wouldn't have a chance! But no, she must shoot herself in the foot like Japan in the past. Back then many Asian countries, China included, looked up to Japan and wanted to be successful like her but Japan shot herself in the foot by attacking her neighbors and become the common enemy of East and South East Asia. China now is just imitating Japan while denouncing her actions in the past! LOL! The US and its western lackeys are a bunch of thugs who have been plundering and bullying Asia and other parts of the world for many centuries now and on the decline. This is the chance for not only China but the whole Asia to get back to its glory, but China's not helping. Instead of making peace with her neighbors, she bullies them and gives the westerners excuses to jump in and block her advancement! Imagine with the intelligence and work ethic of Asians, if South, East, and South East Asia unite, the westerners wouldn't stand a chance to pick on us, but no, China must stubbornly insist on something it can never occupy, a whole sea, and abandon other doable and good objectives!
    2
  259. Ethan Clarke, <<Would I remind you that there were more than half a million Hmong people living here in the US?>> And what exactly is your point?
    2
  260. Well, China did exercise hegemony against her neighbors in history if you have studied history. It's not in the scale of the western colonialists/imperialists but she did bully, annex her neighbors. Asia isn't called China today not because she didn't want to exercise hegemony but because she failed to annex them all.
    2
  261. That's the total number of Chinese service men ever sent to Vietnam throughout the war. For the US, that number is 2.7 millions. At the highest point of the war, there were over 500,000 US troops on the ground, so China's number at a particular point in time would be around a few ten thousands, not the whole 350,000. A few tens of thousands number is about equal to the number of US' client states' troops sent to Vietnam concurrently but the Chinese only do logistic, no combat duties like US' soldiers and its running dogs S Korea's and Australia's.
    2
  262. The people who think they're automatically 'superior' just because of their skin color are actually the inferiors of the human race.
    2
  263. Mark Fischer, Yeah dream on! The US had dreamed of making South Vietnam a tool in the 60s. You've forgotten already?! How did that turn out? What a fucking tool! LOL!
    2
  264. China’s reasons for turning against the USSR is so lame! It’s clear that it couldn’t get rid of its imperialist tendencies was the real reason.
    2
  265. So according to this clown Victor Gao, the history of the South China Sea started in 1945? See how ridiculous the Chinese are?
    2
  266.  @jetli740  What did Vietnam do that you say 'it stab china in the back'?!
    2
  267.  Brandon Cen  If they hate Chinese, they have many good reasons to. On the contrary, Chinese hate Viets too, but they just don't have even one good reason! That's the difference.
    2
  268.  Brandon Cen  That's good for you but you're a very rare case! If you go onto any topic about Vietnam, doesn't have to be politic related, no matter US' or Chinese platform, you can easily see a very strong and blind hate from the absolute majority Chinese in there for Vietnam. 'Vietnam stabs China in the back' is one of the most common line, but when I ask when and how, nobody can give an answer, not even a lame one! That how much the majority of Chinese hate Vietnam. They don't even need a reason to hate! That's the reality.
    2
  269.  @jetli740  I do. You're the one who doesn't have a f vk ing clue what it's about. First off, not buying something from somebody can't be in anyway seen as 'stabbing somebody in the back'. If so, everybody is stabbing somebody in the back! Including China!
    2
  270. The British almost won the Vietnam War? Hahahahahahahahaha! That's exactly what the Chinese, Mongols, the French and Americans have thought when they're in Vietnam!
    2
  271. For average tools like you, yes. But for US' ruling elite, that's not a good idea because first, they still wanna make money off China and two, they still wanna spy on China. That's why Nixon had to come all the way to China in 1972 to establish ties with China in the first place.
    2
  272.  @sherf158  Learn history, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam established in 1945. The Peopple Republic of China established four years later. Both China and Vietnam communist parties established following the establishment of the Soviet Union so both copied Soviet Union. China didn't invent the communist party so you're the idiot.
    2
  273.  @winwin-gc4ru  No, I'm not blind. You are. China back stabbed Vietnam in 1979 when she's busy deposing the Khmer Rouge
    2
  274.  @cptkapitan5378  What's wrong with the Uyghurs? Oh wait! You're just a pitiful brainwashed tool parroting what's the CIA media fed you! LOL!
    2
  275.  @CokeNire  yes, that's exactly why I said so above.
    2
  276.  @BIZMVRK  There's no plot twist.
    2
  277. @ That's only ur imagination. History didn't happen that way.
    2
  278.  @hieudotrung3439  Just talking back like a 12-year-old won't help you. You don't even know the meaning of the word 'imagination'. Imagine is when you just make it all up in yr head. It's not based on facts, so there's nothing to back it up. That's what you've been doing. What I said is the truth because everybody can easily verify it by looking up actual historical records and geography/climate facts of North Vietnam where Dai Viet was.
    2
  279. Descendant of Dragon Cambodia under Beijing blessing invaded Vietnam and killed a lot of Vietnamese in Cambodia and border provinces first. Vietnam had asked for peace for two years without success so she fought back. You're the brainwashed one. The Chinese govt at that time attacked Vietnam in hope to save the murderous Khmer Rouge regime which also killed a lot of Chinese in Cambodia! I bet you're not taught about that!
    2
  280. What 'more' has Vietnam ever asked? When did Vietnam bite China?! It's the other way around. China has bit Vietnam many times after it gets into bed with the US in 1972.
    2
  281. Tell the US to follow Lithuania's footsteps ! Apparently, the US told its poodle to eat shit while it just stands on the sideline and watch! :v
    2
  282. Why is Ukraine so stupid? why doesn't it learn from Georgia?! The US is a coward giant who only loves to pick on helpless little kids. That's all it does throughout its history.
    2
  283.  @teefrankenstein4340  The deaths in the Vietnam War and Korean War are already near 10 millions. Since 1800s, the US has 392 military interventions around the world. Each might at least has tens of thousands deaths. Do your math and there would be some millions more. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/why-america-addicted-foreign-interventions-23582
    2
  284.  @Cormac131  Why don't you count the military ones?! Military deaths on both sides of Vietnam were over 1.35 millions, so the total is 3.35 millions. The Korean War deaths were 5 millions, so it's 8.35 millions or near 10 millions for both wars just like I said. https://www.history.com/topics/vietnam-war/vietnam-war-timeline#section_9 https://www.history.com/topics/korea/korean-war#section_5
    2
  285. Abrahamic religions are a human disease.
    2
  286.  @catmandu1957  Except nobody was spreading Stalinism. You're lame! You're using an imaginary thing in your head to justify US' real crimes. And the US wasn't spreading 'democracy' either because how can it spread what it never has?! The US from the start, has always been a dictatorship of the ultra rich.
    2
  287.  Flame Resistant Troll  Thanks for pointing that out. If people look it up, Ferrari'd been having a internal crisis since 1961. Ford's fan are talking about the 'racing experience' edge but Ferrari lost most of the leading members of his racing department at the end of 1961, so he's forced to promote a 26-year-old engineer Mauro Forghieri to head the racing division. Eugenio Dragoni was hired as the new team manager but he had been in the selling perfume business not long before that. Ferrari didn't even have money to replace old machinery resulting in the departure of some new members of the racing team. So if one look closely and objectively, Ferrari was the underdog here. A family racing team in financial and personnel crisis was up against one of the world's biggest corporations with a lot of extra money to spend and an a-h0le hell-bent on proving he's THE biggest a-h0le! LOL!
    2
  288. In order to push the US out of the region, China must not give it the reasons! Claiming the WHOLE freaking South China Sea and Kashmir certainly won't help! China must befriend those neighbors involved, not bully them? Aren't Manchuria, Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, and Tibet still not enough? Dividing those disputed regions equally is the lasting solution. Being stubborn about it only harms the more important strategic interest of kicking the US out of the neighborhood!
    2
  289.  @oldon5881  No, reality shows the US is the number 1 war opportunist in the world. Somehow it always finds opportunities wherever blood spills and destruction reigns. It was the USSR that pushed Hitler and his Nazi Army back to their den and destroyed them there. The US was just an opportunist that chose to wait on the sideline and only jumped in at the last minute when Nazis were clearly doomed to share the power vacuum that the USSR created. It found the golden opportunity to establish control over western Europe and has held on tight to it since then.
    2
  290. If you know the Cambodians and their history, there's no surprise. They have a long history of f kg themselves up real bad and blame their neighbors for it! They're not very bright but very delusional as a people. It's given that Pol Pot was a mad man but the scarier part is there were hundreds of thousands people followed him and executed his ldlotic plan to the letter! Back then, the Khmer Rouge had really believed that every one of them could easily defeat ten Vietnamese troops despite history and reality at the time!
    2
  291.  @richardjohnson8009  <<<Communism has killed many many millions>>> It's actually just in your brainwashed head!
    2
  292. Everybody interested in this matter should look for John Pilger's documentaries 'Year Zero' and 'Cambodia, The Betrayal' to have a clear understanding of it and see Pol Pot isn't the only evil behind this.
    2
  293.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Vietnamese troops fought against Lon Nol forces because as a client regime brought up by the US, Lon Nol coordinated with the Saigon regime's and US' forces and attacked the NLF and VPA of Vietnam. He also deported Vietnamese Cambodians and incited violence against them. It's not because they're Pol Pot's friends! Pol Pot didn't wanna be friend with Vietnam and Vietnam had tried to depose him too. You're a hardheaded ldlot!
    2
  294. “Putin Is Bluffing”. Really?! LMAO!
    2
  295. Russia has become hostile to Ukraine because, among other reasons, the Kyiv regime turned hostile against Russia and wanted to join NATO (after the US-backed coup in 2014), so if Finland and Sweden join NATO which means choosing to become hostile to Russia, they only create problems that aren't there in the first place for themselves, just like Ukraine! What happens to Ukraine only proves Sweden and Finland have made the right choice all along! They have always been smart, never submitted themselves to the US to become another running dog even in the Cold War. So, why do they suddenly become so stupid?! What do they eat over there these days? Joining NATO can only ensure their slavery under the US and, their becoming of targets for Russian nukes, their countries' total destruction once a war breaks out between NATO and Russia, at the least, because of their proximity to Russia! They'll become the US' frontline cannon fodders just like Ukraine right now! The US is always willing to sacrifice its 'allies' to annoy and wear down their opponents, but it can never protect them from the other side of the second largest ocean in the world!
    2
  296. I hope westerners will finally get it after listening to the answer from the Vietnamese that they were celebrating the freedom from foreign domination and their unification. You've been brainwashed by your ruler class that that war was about capitalism vs communism, but it really wasn't. The US couldn't say it wanted to dominate Vietnam, could it? So it must make up some lame excuse, such as, they intervened to stop communism that no one in Vietnam had ever asked them to! Even the Saigon regime themselves!
    2
  297.  @sand451  Look for 'Year Zero: The Silent Death of Cambodia' by John Pilger and you'll find out who fed, sheltered and armed the Kmer Rouge AFTER they were overthrown.
    2
  298. ​ @vascotank2143  Giving food and shelter for the Khmer Rouge to live and fight for another 10 years and backed it at the UN IS a tremendous help. You can't deny it with a lame excuse of 'humanitarian'! Since when the racist, genocidal, murderous government of US cares about civilians or humanitarian, especially in South East Asia?! It dropped half a million tons of bombs on Cambodia and directly killed hundreds of thousands Cambodians in the early 1970s. It put economic sanctions on Cambodia to starve the WHOLE population after Vietnam liberated it just to give Vietnam a hard time. The Khmer Rouge killed millions Cambodians and it continued to support it seats in the UN, not to mention millions of Vietnamese killed by its bombs and massacres. SO, it clearly never gives a fick about civilians, but only used them as a front to house and feed the Khmer Rouge. That's the real story. Yours is just stupid propaganda. Don't bring China in here to cover for US' crimes. We all agree that China helped Pol Pot, but it can't order and fund Thailand to shelter the Khmer Rouge, only the US can, because Thailand was a US' dog. As the host country, Thailand can easily screen the refugees and separate the Khmer Rouge's fighting forces from women and children and take away all the weapons, but it didn't, because the US wanted to feed and house the Khmer Rouge so they can fight Vietnam for it! The Khmer Rouge had no where else to go. BTW, the Khmer Rouge ambush tactics was trained by the SAS of the UK, not China.
    2
  299. ​ @お握り-z2x  The people whose died in those containers weren't 'fleeing'. They went to western Europe to joint the lucrative drug trade over there (because capitalist countries tolerate drug trade) and would go back to Vietnam in a few months filthy rich! They owned houses and lands in Vietnam and got a lot of money to pay for their illegal trips to Europe so they're not poor. They just wanted to make quick and large sums of cash. They died because of western capitalism and their greedy capitalist thinking, not by socialism. You can only lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink! Vietnam cannot build socialism in a vacuum, by herself. The US had done everything it could to destroy the socialist bloc, and put a total economic sanction on Vietnam for 20 years. When it lifted it in 1995, the socialist bloc had long gone and Vietnam was forced to change in order to trade with a new world that's totally controlled by the US, as once condition. So the change was forced by capitalism, not that they lied to the people, so blame capitalism. And if Vietnam isn't socialist anymore, why are you still Bltchg?!!! The US too can't take care of its own citizens and yet it always has so much abundant money to build mass killing machines and starts senseless wars to 'bring freedom and democracy' to every corner of the world by mass murdering people. You should have problems with that! Vietnam has not yet been able to take care of all of her citizens because she's wasted 20 years in wars with western capitalist nut jobs and was put under 20 years of inhuman economic sanction by western capitalist nut jobs after that. And in fact, she's still recovering from the damages done by western capitalist nut jobs as we speak! A few days ago, they just found a made in the good ol USA 750lb bomb laying in the ground in the middle of Hanoi, still waiting to explode and mass murder people even after 45 years. So, if you have a brain, you should have problems with western capitalist nut jobs, not with Vietnam. Look up 'Operation Passage to Freedom'. It was an CIA-direct operation to lure Roman Catholics in the North to the South to create a political base for Ngo Dinh Diem because the southerners didn't even know who the fob he was at that point! Yes, they're mostly brainwashed Catholics who thought the white men were their real brothers because they all worship Jesus. They were traitors who supported the French so of course they fled south with the French! What's the problem here?! The Geneva Accords allows free movements in two years awaiting general election. It doesn't force anybody to move if they don't want to. So the communists in the south have every right to stay because the south is their home! Diem only made up, exaggerated stories to justify his mass murder of communists in the south. The people killed in the Land Reform in the north were landlords who mistreated, murdered peasants under French rule. They served the French and commit crimes against the population, so many of them deserved it. They would face much worse fate if they were in France during its revolution! The communists was too lenient! The DRV's government didn't condone it. It did intervened and stopped the killing and that's why it's still widely supported. Not only Diem had no good reasons to killed communists in the south, but in fact, he totally owed his president chair to the communists. If they didn't kicked the French out, the Americans had no reasons and couldn't bring him back to take Bao Dai's chair when he's still backed by the French! What a ficking ingrate! Unlike Ho Chi Minh, he had no support in the south among the population or even among his own subordinates. They were just scared of his brutal tactics and waited for a chance to kill him! That's why it only took them two days to overthrow, and execute him and his brother like two stray dogs! The Vietnamese has made their easy and proper choice between a clueless psychotic dictator and a man who led them to independence. It's a no brainer. Only tools with no brain like you would see otherwise or question it!
    2
  300.  @loganbagley7822  You're definitely a liar because there's no consistency in your story. So is it 'dozens', 'hundreds', or 'countless'? There are big differences between those words! What is your day job? How do you have time to hear stories from 'countless' minority people living scatteredly in a big country like the US? It's not as if they are living altogether in a camp so you can go around listening to their stories right?! LOL! Yes you are clearly trying to justify US' actions in Vietnam here by equating their evilness to the other side's which are all H0r$e$hlt. No. Apparently you're not listening to me.
    2
  301. What do you expect?! They give him a medal?!
    2
  302. Talking about 'rights' and tyranny, you have 'rights' to be executed by the government on the spot with a drop of a hat! LOL! You're a complete idiot!
    2
  303.  @wyattmcgee1  Nope! There's a difference! I did that to expose your hypocrisy!
    2
  304.  @ea-kb6vm  You should learn to read first!
    2
  305.  @ea-kb6vm  Yes, you're clearly illiterate .
    2
  306.  @ea-kb6vm  No, you're the illiterate idiot here.
    2
  307.  @akouafray8616  Of her territories. China has been trying to eat Vietnam alive many times for over 2000 years?! When failed in the land, China's been trying to eat Viet sea and islands now. You don't know that?
    2
  308.  @skaithey  No, they're not exactly the same.
    2
  309. Remember the white helmets in Syria providing 'evidence' of Assad's chemical attacks, or the detergent powder presented in front of the UN and the whole world by the US as 'evidence' of Saddam Hussein's WMD? Or were you just born yesterday?!
    2
  310. 'Điều mà tôi quan tâm không phải là chính phủ này có được nhân dân hậu thuẫn hay không, mà là liệu cái quân đội gọi là 'giải phóng quân' có được dân hậu thuẫn hay không.' Làm lãnh đạo tối cao của một đất nước mà có thể thốt ra một cậu như vậy! Câu nói này của Nhu rất ngờ u! Nó cho thấy bản chất độc tài, ngạo mạn, và ngờ u xuẩncủa Diệm Nhu, cho nên kết quả thảm khốc là điều không thể tránh khỏi.
    2
  311. This thing is so wrong from the get go. It's just the US's Cold War's propaganda repeated. It actually was: Imperialism vs Independence Capitalism vs Communism USA and its client states vs Vietnam and its allies
    2
  312.  @abbotthard95  You know how to search? There're plenty of countries invaded by China in the 20th century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_wars_and_battles#Modern_China
    2
  313. ​ @straydog163  China has invaded and tried to annex Vietnam many times throughout history in every dynasty. The recent attacks are just new episode in current time.
    2
  314.  @PumpkinEater-dm1xx  Can you give everybody proof that they're 'rejecting' it and 'beg' their enemy for help?
    2
  315. So when they raise fund in capitalist countries, it doesn't come from 'hardworking taxpayers money'? You're lame! BTW, normal people in Vietnamese hardly pay any tax like those in so called 'democracies'. Taxes from Vietnam mostly come from businesses, privates' and states'. So the businesses and government in Vietnam actually serve the people. The reverse is true in capitalist countries.
    2
  316. Trump continued cutting taxes for the rich, fed the ultra rich MIC with record amount of your hard earned tax money! Couldn't bring jobs home. Left you die en masse in the pandemic...and you still believe he worked for you?! What a brainwashed tool! LOL!
    2
  317. The US' two parties are under the CCP's thumb here, They've been helping China advance so fast in the last 4 decades and won't ever ship jobs back to the US, so you should worry about that! LOL!
    2
  318. There was no jungle where the Mongols fought the Vietnamese.
    2
  319. You have evidence or it's just in your head?! But if that's true, why does China always try to rob Vietnam, its flesh and blood??
    2
  320.  @yellowbhee7850 I Of course I know. A Nim Wit not dimwit nor nitwit is most definitely you! LOL!
    2
  321.  @cavscout888  350,000 is the total Chinese sent to Vietnam throughout the course of the war, not at one time. It's like the US sent a total of 2.7 millions to Vietnam throughout the war. At the highest point, the US had over 500,000 troops at the same time. So the Chinese might had about a few ten thousands at a time, not the whole 350,000. Those few ten thousands was about equal to the number of US' client states' troops but they only served support roles in fighting or building stuffs, not in combat. China would keep records and brag about it like they've been bragging about material support if they did send combat troops. The US must have known about it! Your friend's uncle must have been seeing things or lying! Your hear-say is totally BS!
    2
  322.  @leogogo7041  You're just making up story here! What exactly was Chinese strategy that Vietnam used in the war?!
    2
  323.  @bunnyhill2024  Funny how you've learnt Chinese but that doesn't make you any smarter than a d 0g! Vietnam successfully deposed China's little chihuahua, Pol Pot, and China couldn't do ANYTHING about it but you say Vietnam failed? What a m0ron! LOL!
    2
  324.  @bunnyhill2024  And why does s h. | t keep coming out of your mouth whenever you open it?! No, your st.u p|d comments make China look bad here.
    2
  325.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  China drew the ridiculous 9 dash line that claims the whole SCS. Is that 'defending' the East?! NO! China is THE robber and dividing force in the East here.
    2
  326.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  The USSR won Vietnam trust because it didn't stab Vietnam in the back. Vietnam chose to rely on the USSR because its help had no condition, unlike China's. Vietnam had to depose Pol Pot because he had been attacking Viets across the border for 3 years from 1975-78. China held its petty grudge against Vietnam and also backed Pol Pot so it attacked Vietnam in 1979. It was an evil act that shows the true face of China. Petty and insidious. That's why not only Vietnam, but no neighbors would trust China.
    2
  327. ​ @kitschchauvinismus_9394  China has never officially announced whether that line is meant only for those islands or the whole SCS but Chinese officials have implied or asserted that it's meant for the WHOLE SCS. China has been teaching school children to believe it's Chinese property, so apparently China is using 'salami tactics' here. Even China knows that if it goes all out at once, it would be totally illegal and undo-able so it's trying to eat it bit by bit. But it can't never fool the world! No, the line in the SCS was first drawn in 1935 when China was much weaker than Japan, so drawing a similar line in the East China Sea would mean China asking for a smackdown from Japan. That's why it didn't do that. China always think it can pick on its southern neighbors that's why it drew that line. If Japan and Russia is situated at Vietnam and the Philippines' locations, China would never dare to draw it! LOL! Throughout history, China has a reputation of cowering against stronger countries but loving to pick on weaker ones while thinking it's the center of the universe! LOL! That's the despicable nature of China. Instead of fighting the northern countries when attacked, China chose to build long and big walls to hide. At the exact same time, it turned around and picked on weaker kingdoms south of the Yangtze, expanding west and south. It would never dare to pick on Japan even when being attacked by Japan! Russia took a big chunk of China, stopped China from eating Mongolia, but China only knew to cower and gave it all up, and turned around trying to act tough in front of its southern and western neighbors! In recent history and up until now, it has been continuing on that same path, trying to bully even more countries in the south by claiming the whole SCS. Those islands may have unclear owners but they certainly don't belong to China because they have never appeared on official Chinese map until 1947! You just can't argue about this because China is clearly in the wrong and the source of problems in East Asia right now!
    2
  328.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  No, China invaded N Korea because it didn't want the US to take the whole Korea. The US might invade China after N Korea is just a guess! Nobody could know that for sure! The US invaded N Korea because it invaded S Korea. What exactly is the excuse for it to invade China?! So that's a lame reason!
    2
  329.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  Just tell me what exactly your 'evidence' of Vietnam attacked China FIRST is right here right now.
    2
  330.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  2. When you say China had good reason for an offensive inside Korea because the US bombed ONE Chinese town and killed a few people but say Vietnam had no good reason for an offensive inside Cambodia after the Khmer Rouge had invaded, occupied many towns across its border with Vietnam killing tens of thousands Viets for three years, you have just proved you're a shameless hypocrite!
    2
  331.  CCP PARTY USA (Crony Capitalist Pigs Party)   The Lon Nol regime was a product of the CIA and you say the Khmer Rouge (a Maoist faction) was also a product of CIA! So that means the CIA created the Khmer Rouge who wasn't US' friendly to overthrow Lon Nol who was US' friendly?! What a t00|! You say the Khmer Rouge rose up because of US' bombing and so it also was against the US. That means the CIA created a faction whose purpose was to fight against the US?! If you say China was friendly to Cambodians royals whom the Khmer Rouge was against, it must have attacked the Khmer Rouge on behalf of the royals but in reality it attacked Vietnam who deposed the Khmer Rouge! Why so stupid?! Also If China was on the side of the Cambodia royals, it shouldn't have been allied with the Khmer Rouge because it was against the royals. China should have attacked the Khmer Rouge on the royals' behalf when the Khmer Rouge rose up against the royals, right? But no! China only attacked Vietnam AFTER Vietnam deposed the Khmer Rouge! That means China has always been allied with it, not with anybody else all along! China with its incurable arrogance thought it could 'teach' Vietnam a lesson but that remains only a thought! In reality, it got a bloody head and learnt the same old lesson from Vietnam again! You can't 'teach' anybody a lesson when you lose 20,000 men in three weeks! LOL!
    2
  332. Of course, Ukraine is free to choose a side but after the violent coup in 2014, it was put under the dictatorship of the Nazis backed by the US, so it's no longer free, is it?! Since then, the US has been decided the course of Ukraine through the Nazis, so it's the US choice, not the Ukrainians' anymore.
    2
  333. Ha ha! Whiteys are always trying to put China into submission and then wonder why they're hated in China!
    2
  334. The Mongols beat and wiped China off the map in a naval battle, so you cannot say they weren't good at that! There was no naval battle in the Mongol's Japan campaign. Essentially, their fleet was wiped out by a storm!
    2
  335. ​ @ThatAirplaneGuy2000  The draft didn't start until December 1969, over 4 years into the war, and many went for 2, 3 tours, so there were plenty of brainwashed tools did believe the idiotic propaganda line of 'I'll fight the commies there so I don't have to fight them on the street of San Francisco'. There're still plenty of them now believe the war was necessary too, so you just don't need and can't deny at least the majority was brainwashed! Even many of the draftees believe they did something good too because they just plain stupid and brainwashed! The atrocities was the rule, not the exception. Back then, the US was just like the Nazis on occupied lands. If some of them got killed, their rule was to take it on the population. From the higher up, they pressured the officers with a certain number of enemy killed, so the officers forced the foot soldiers to kill indiscriminately to meet those numbers. The presidents knew it but it was what they wanted to do too because that was their way. They wanted to terrorize the population into submission. They are the mother of ALL terrorism.
    2
  336. The thing with this 'history' is it's one sided! The stories always sound like fantasy, propaganda produced at the time and were repeated today. If you know the whole story, see the big picture of the war, this fantasy stories and propaganda would never add up. The Korean troops alone numbered 350000, plus 550000 US troops, plus Saigon regime's 1.2 million conventional and local forces troops, and they all could kill the VCs like rats, but somehow for 3 years, they hadn't finished 250000 VCs in the South, and lead to the Tet Offensive that saw them brazenly attacking all the towns and cities! The only thing that makes sense is they must've had the ability to spawn from death like in video games. These kinds of stupid childish propaganda stories had made the people at the time become frustrated and angry because they felt they were fooled by the war party to the point that they had to take it to the street to end the war.
    2
  337.  @akouafray8616  What exactly is the reason that makes you say 'Vietnam dances more to the tunes of the US'?!
    2
  338. Are you kidding me?! The US has been spending billions working 24/7 to create chaos around the world to screw everybody including its own people and you ask them to help cool things down?! LOL!
    2
  339.  @chl6731  'taught' or 'boss' can only be used when you have control over others. China has no control over Vietnam. Vietnam kicked China back to China in 1979 and only left Cambodia when the Viet friendly Cambodian government could stand on itself in 1989, so China couldn't 'teach' Vietnam anything and couldn't boss Vietnam around to leave Cambodia before Vietnam wanted. China couldn't teach Vietnam when it lost 20000 men in three weeks! Vietnam taught China the same old lesson not-to-cross-the-border here!
    2
  340.  @mcgKW  Do you have a brain? That's not lying! You do realize that we're talking about lying here, right?
    2
  341.  @shockwave2291  How exactly did Vietnam sided with the USSR in USSR-China's border conflict?!
    2
  342.  @iohannesdiogenes5766  No, it's the racist whitey's defamation of him.
    2
  343. So even in 1919, Korea was divided in to North and South? That's why there was a 'South Korea's declaration of independence'? But now S Korea indeed needs to have a declaration of independence from the US already!
    2
  344. Except that old drunk uncle has never existed. It's only a product of the west's propaganda machine! Westerners are thoroughly brainwashed but they always think the others are! LOL!
    2
  345. These retaliation moves from China actually have nothing to do with your independence from the US or not. You are just making lame excuses and vilely trying to change the subject here! When you start making hostile moves against China, independently or not, you should have expected retaliation, right? That's just a no brainier! The US has even been putting economic sanctions on countries that did nothing wrong to them for nearly a century now so why do you expect China just sit there quietly and take your blows?! The arrogance of the white men are really boundless! LOL!
    2
  346. And btw, Australia is the parasite which's been sucking on China's titties for decades now. Be careful when you're pointing fingers! LOL!
    2
  347. Starting a fly route to the US 'is trying so hard to be the new American puppet'. You're such a fucking lame hater!
    2
  348. Remember China's ridiculous claim of the SCS gives the US excuse. Thank you China!
    2
  349. Communism aims to build a classless society where there's no more exploitation. It's the best society humans can get so if they call "Communist China", it's actually a compliment. Why are you so triggered?! LOL!
    2
  350. The US, the pot, is calling the kettle, Europe, black, so what’s the big deal here?! In fact the US has always been the biggest force against democracy in the world, so JD Vance accusing Europe of suppressing democracy in Romania is so shameless and absurd. The immigrant problem in Europe today is caused by…US’ endless wars in the middle east and now they blame Europe for accepting the refugees?!
    2
  351. The EU is so stupid. Even Finland and Sweden have also turned stupid recently. What have they been eating these days!
    2
  352. Westerners are thoroughly brainwashed. When the US invaded Vietnam unprovoked and killed millions and practically destroyed the country, it's not an invasion but just 'helping the south'. When Vietnam liberated and saved Cambodia from the murderous Pol Pot regime that had already killed two millions Cambodians as a response to the Khmer Rouge's incursions into Vietnam border towns in three years that killed tens of thousands Vietnamese, it was 'invasion'! LOL!
    2
  353.  @csking6377  Nah, you're just full of it! You can claim the moon now and it doesn't mean anything until you can actually control it! China has never had control over the WHOLE SCS in history, so your claim has never meant squat to the world! What exactly are the SEA countries that weren't formed 100 years ago?! The 11 line first appeared in 1935, not 100 years before that in any Chinese map. Did China ever present that line in front of the world back then? So how do you know there was no objection?! SEA countries have been challenging China's ridiculous claim ever since it was officially presented and insisted on, not only after 1982.
    2
  354. The first invasion of the Mongols against Dai Viet happened before their successful conquest of China but they failed too, so it’s not about the generals, or the drive for conquest,…Heck, they invaded Dai Viet three times and were preparing for the forth and you say they had no drive?! There’s no jungle in Dai Viet, get over it. The Mongols had conquered half the known world back then. There was nothing they hadn’t seen! Terrains, climate,…warfare tactics. They knew them better than anybody else.
    2
  355.  @amossutandi  If that's true, you must have some evidence to back it up but you just say it without a shred of evidence, so that stupid notion is only a product of your stupid head. It's not the reality.
    2
  356.  @huaninglyu7372  If that's the case, maybe it's because you guys have never had an occasion to talk about Vietnam. Or maybe there's a change in the younger generation. I really hope that the latter is the case but also really doubt it because it has never happened in the last 1000 years! As for media, I've seen a footage from Chinese TV on youtube talking about Chinese attacked on Viets at the Paracel and Spratly islands in 1974 and 1988 adamantly claiming Viets were the aggressors while the footage showed a Chinese gunboat mowed down about 20 unarmed or lightly armed Viet Navy's engineers on a small and half submerged islet. And the TV host said it with full of joy that the Chinese took those islands from Viets. It's easy to tell they're full of hate.
    2
  357.  @huaninglyu7372  About the general population. I've been to many forums about China and Vietnam for years, sometimes not politic related, like in the comment sections of Viet MVs on bilibili. The hate is strong. Chinese call Viets 'monkeys' and no one there has problem with that. I guess that's a standard among Chinese. There're many Chinese haters in Vietnam but they don't refer to Chinese as subhuman, so it's safe to say the degree of hate is actually stronger in China and Chinese think like the Nazis that they're so high above other people.
    2
  358.  @Anonymous------  You forgot the part where China had attacked, annexed Vietnam and turned it into a Chinese province for 1000 years. After Vietnam kicked China out and regained independence in 939 CE, China constantly attacked and tried to subjugate Vietnam again in every subsequent dynasty. Vietnam has never actively wanted to have bad relationship with China or anybody else. China's constant threat and attitude against Vietnam cause the bad blood. So it's not the fault of people born after 1945. For the most recent episode, It's China's own fault when got in bed with the US against its own friends, the USSR and Vietnam, and its insistence on the ridiculous claim of the WHOLE SCS!
    2
  359.  @ornchao2561  Yes, you are stupid because you wander off topic bending over backward trying to prove Vietnam is the ultimate bad guy and forgot what you've said! You've said, 'To conclude this who is the most backstaber here of course is Vietnam' in your first comment. That was your words and now you say: 'Im not claiming Vietnam is bad'. Stupid people just can't remember what they say! Can they? LOL!
    2
  360.  @leogogo7041  Lê Duẩn taught the stupid dwarf Deng Xiaoping a lesson at the border, so he's pretty successful to me! LOL!
    2
  361.  @ornchao2561  You can't never know that, so you're THE id|ot. You said you're a Cantonese living in Cambodia so you should thank Vietnam because if Vietnam had come late, you would have never been born to b|t ch about Vietnam at all! LOL!
    2
  362.  @chowwh308  No, i'm not influenced by western MSM at all! We've been living next to China for millenniums remember?! Why do we need western MSM to tell us about China?! LOL! On the contrary, you are being influenced by Chinese propaganda's narrative that China is good! You shouldn't worry about our leaders. Chinese leaders are the backstabbers, they are the ones who ganged up with the US to backstab Vietnam in the 70s and 80s. They ordered troops to rob Vietnam's territories, so I don't need western MSM to know China is bad! Throughout history, China always tries to eat Vietnam alive, if not at once then bit by bit. China's doing it right now as we speak!
    2
  363.  @leogogo7041  BTW, your 'logic' are all over the place here so according to you, you must be a Vietnamese! I hope you have a brain to understand the level of your stupidity! LMAO!
    2
  364.  @vinhlong7347  If the KR was recognized by most of the UN, The US-China gang wouldn't have to replace it with a coalition in 1981. That coalition was the one that lasted until 1990 at the UN, not the KR. Nothing last forever, especially Cambodia!
    2
  365.  @leaderindia2192  China has tried so hard to invade and occupy Vietnam a dozen times for the last 1000 years but failed and had to run back to China with tail between its legs every time so don't make me laugh! LOL! The midget Deng Xiaoping only dared to have a very limited objective in 1979 because even he knew China would pay a heavy price if it stayed in Vietnam! And you think China can occupy Vietnam?! LMAO! The US is actually protecting the South East Asian countries from China's robbing of their sea and islands right now. Without the US, China would have already taken everything. China doesn't protect East Asia but it's been robbing East and South East Asia for the last 2000 years!
    2
  366. What exactly is the reason to 'mourn the Queen' for everybody? Do you mourn your appendix which doesn't serve any purpose in your body whatsoever after you cut it off?! A constitutional monarchy for a country is even more useless than the appendix for your body because it keeps sucking the people's blood but they can't get rid of it! It's like an organ but acts like a parasite in your body! It's also worse than an absolute monarchy because although also not elected, the king or queen and royal family in an absolute monarchy actually have obligation to work and serve the country and take responsibility for real!
    2
  367.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  No, you've been saying as if it's all Vietnamese help but history shows China was the real sponsor of the KR!
    2
  368.  @HelloWorld-f5m  I'm sorry I was to reply to the other guy, @MoeHamHead-bx7og, above but mistakenly clicked on your comment. He said the Vietnamese had been supporting the KR all along up until after 1975 when the KR started invading and massacring civilians in Vietnam when in fact, they only had a brief period of cooperation in 1970 after Sihanouk was overthrown by the US. The relation went bad as early as 1972 when the Pol Pot's KR started attacking the VCs in Cambodia and executed all Vietnamese trained cadres in 1973.
    2
  369. You're saying as if the problem is all Zelensky, but have you asked yourself if Trump really want peace, why didn't he just go ahead and cut all the aid including Starllink for good? Why does he only 'pause' it?! That will only embolden Zelensky, won't it? Don't tell me Starllink is a private business because obviously if the US government doesn't want it, no private business can do business or help anybody. Remember the sanctions on Russia?!
    2
  370.  @greenjack5694  Those are unspeakably hideous crimes the US committed in Vietnam. What else can they be?!
    2
  371.  @darren561  Wtf is wrong with your head?! Half of the South was under US and Saigon regime control so of course half of the South were suspicious or suspected of supporting the regime. According to the US and Saigon regime, the communists had no support in the South so who did the southerners support?! So you say the Saigon regime didn't have the support of even half of the population in the South?!
    2
  372.  @darren561  NO, the reference proves that the communists didn't put anybody who're 'just suspicious or suspected of supporting the South' in camps like you said. Because if they did, there would be at least 11 millions people in the camps, so you're the buffoon here!
    2
  373. ​ @darren561  I was just giving an estimate following simple logic. If you disagree that the Saigon regime had the support (or assuming support) of half of the South, just give a different number. Remember your number must include all the suspected supporters, not just the proven ones! The South at the time had around 22 millions, so how many millions were supporters and suspected supporters of the Saigon regime? If it wasn't half, was it a quarter or 1/8 or 1/16 or there was none?! The actual number in the camps was only around 300,000! That number wouldn't be enough to include all people who directly served under the old regime at mid and high level! That means they didn't even round up all those hardcore traitors so how t f could they put in camps random people who were just suspected like you've been b@ll s*itting?! You're STILL full if xh!t!
    2
  374.  @darren561  The 300,000 number is the official number from Vietnam. Western analysts give different estimates from 500,000 to 1 million. I only use the official number from Vietnam because the west always tries so hard to smear governments who are not its dogs. But even if I use the highest estimate which is 1 million from western sources, it still can't account for ALL the people who directly served under the US and Saigon regime at mid and high level let alone random 'suspected' people like you've been bhll$h!ting!
    2
  375.  @darren561  I don't need to read anything unless it gives a high enough number of people in camps that can make your claim sound reasonable! Come back when you can find a source that says there were 10 millions people in camp otherwise don't bother because you can't prove $h!t!!! The 'reference' you gave didn't even have a number, so it's totally useless! I don't need to cite any source here. You're the one who must prove that the communists did put in camps a large enough number that can possibly include all of the random 'suspected' people who hadn't even served the US and Saigon regime like you said! Right now your claim sounds ridiculous because even at the highest estimate from western sources, the number is still too small to include anybody else beside the proven hardcore traitors!
    2
  376.  @aaronbaldwin2380  So? China's been trying to rob Vietnam for over 2000 years, so China makes those robbers look like SAINTS! lol!
    2
  377. NATO countries have been sending sh!tloads of weapons to Ukraine but the US has the audacity to tell China not to do the same to Russia (not that Russia would ever need Chinese weapons). This is just another example of the US' uncontrollable arrogance which has been causing misery for many countries in the world for more than a century now. The newest victim is Ukraine. If the US didn't arrogantly expand NATO towards Russia, meddle in Ukraine's politics, and overthrow a democratically elected government there, none of this would have happened.
    2
  378. Why didn't they condemn the Ukrainian Nazi government when it shells the Donbas region in the last 8 years? Why must the world stand with those shameless hypocrites?!
    2
  379. They're in the same trench with the Nazis in Ukraine, aren't they? So what do you expect?
    2
  380.  @fun_ghoul  By 'in the same trench' I mean they're all taught to hate Russia and anything associates with it to the bone so banning Russia and anything associates with it is just a normal thing they've been doing. You miss the point.
    2
  381. It was China who forgot what the west did to it and got into bed with the US backstabbing Vietnam and the USSR in the 1970-80s.
    2
  382.  @CountScarlioni  You sound like an ldlot!
    2
  383. Why China and Vietnam Have Fallen Out? You've asked the wrong question. It's never been good in the first place so you can hardly describe it as 'have fallen out'. Reason? China has always been trying to eat Vietnam alive since the third century BC until...right now as we speak. Just look at China's 10 dash line that claims the WHOLE freaking South China Sea! People who don't really know history between the two countries have been mistakenly thinking that they were very close in the First and Second Indochina Wars but they're really ain't! Because even when China was still very weak relatively compare to the US and USSR, and needed to help Vietnam to kick westerners out of Indochina for its own good, it has never forgotten to come up with schemes and plans to rule over Vietnam and eat her alive! By sending aid, China expected North Vietnam to follow it around in every move like an obedient dog and against the USSR who had helped China a lot and was also helping Vietnam at the time! When Vietnam refused to be a dog, an ingrate against the USSR like China, it got really mad and plotted its revenge right away! China also didn't want a unified Vietnam. For China, a divided Vietnam like North/South Korea was an ideal scenario because a unified independent Vietnam wouldn't have any reason to listen to China! When it saw the unification was inevitable, it attacked and seized the last half of the Paracel Islands in 1974 just to be sure. China had also backed Pol Pot to build a Chinese faction inside the Khmer Rouge since 1970. They grew strong with China's aid and purged all the Vietnamese faction and started attacking and killing Vietnamese troops in Cambodia in 1973 and started invading Vietnam's territories, ki ling thousands of people inside Vietnam's border right after it completely controlled Cambodia in 1975.
    2
  384.  @DavyRo  Calm down! If you don't see the sarcasm when I said 'I feel sorry', it's not my fault! LOL!
    2
  385. How did she know that was a Russian missile? Obviously, she just knew it by looking at the fireball. She has special power! LMAO!
    2
  386. Youth Member, If you really worry about wars and human sufferings, You should worry about US' imperial wars that's killed tens of millions and destroyed many countries around the world since after WWII, not what you IMAGINE NK would do if the US leaves the Korean peninsula. That's just cheap propaganda that the US govt. uses to brainwash idiots like you. I've heard more than enough already.
    2
  387. Him Adri, This's so simple. If you don't understand it, you're the moron, not me, moron!
    2
  388. Why are precision weapons needed to destroy a tiny remnant of Ukrainian forces in the Azovstal steel plant?! They are only dead meat waiting to be cooked! This guy as always is only spreading stupid propaganda to fool stupid people.
    2
  389. The US ganged up with China to put down the USSR in the 1970s too. So they don't like communists but still they can gang up with one to put down another.
    2
  390.  @tictactoe101  Chinese ego is the highest here! They always think Vietnamese are either Chinese or copies everything from China!
    2
  391. FYI, all the lands south of the Yangtze River wasn't Chinese until Qin Shi Huang and subsequent Chinese dynasties conquered them all. Hong Kong was part of the Nan Yue Kingdom which completely fell to the Han dynasty of China around 98 BC, so China took it from other people around 2000 years ago. It has not always been part of China for 5000 years like you said!
    2
  392. thx very much for sharing this priceless footage!
    1
  393. You guys look high AF! LOL!
    1
  394. so why does the US have to act like NK can nuke it?
    1
  395. But, but,...another butt hurt american's trying to twisted again! You wanted to have S Vietnam as another outpost of the empire but got kicked out, that means you've lost, so get over it!
    1
  396. why? because you can't argue with it? :v
    1
  397. When you try so hard to prove that you win something after a loss, it only reinforces the opposite notion that it was really a loss!
    1
  398. Are you fking kidding?! You call those fender flairs and humongous wing 'stealthy'?!
    1
  399. Chris Fix, Doesn't air still get in your way?
    1
  400. Angie, but the thing is the US thinks of itself as a god who has the exclusive right to rule the world. It sets the rules for the whole world, not itself, to follow. The god just does as she pleases!
    1
  401. @blahblahblah8541 Nothing is brave about carpet bombing from 30000 feet. Any pussy can do that, unless you think pussy = brave.
    1
  402.  @jurakbarni3330  So not only the UK has the authority to preach about 'democracy' but also 'human rights'?! You're such a brainwashed clown! LOL!
    1
  403.  @nes129  Yes, we can and that's the law in any civilized society. A murderous convict doesn't have even full basic citizen rights let alone the moral authority to preach anything even after he/she has served the sentence and won't commit crimes anymore. The UK is much worse than a murderous convict. It has never served any sentence, atoned for its crimes around the world in the past and present. It continues to follow the US to commit crimes in the Middle East, so it has never had and will never have the moral authority to preach anything to anybody. It's so hypocritical and laughable when it shamelessly goes on and preach 'human rights'.
    1
  404. ​ @YourLocalMairaaboo  Yes, it's so relevant because according to the white men, they care about 'democracy' and 'human rights' under China's rule but they didn't care about them at all when HK was under their rule. China hasn't breach anything because she just acts against white men's plot to intervene in her internal affairs.
    1
  405.  @YourLocalMairaaboo  What did China do that make you think it breaches any treaty? Only a few governments from hypocritical imperialist western countries and some idiots who got brainwashed by them 'care', not everyone. You've got it backwards. Britain invaded and occupied Hongkong and China only took it back. China was so nice to give Britain a peaceful handover option with some agreements to save Britain's face. You should spend time worry about billions victims of western imperialism around the world who's been suffering under their tyranny for 500 years now and shouldn't worry about somebody ALLEGEDLY broke a treaty with them!
    1
  406. The US always tells people what to do because frankly people are stupid. After Colin Powell had gone in front of the UN lying through his teeth and presenting false evidence to invade Iraq and the farce was exposed afterwards, at least all countries which are not the US' lackeys should have walked out of the room whenever a US' rep steps in front of the podium until the US promises to change its way and stops lying in front of everybody anymore. But nobody did that so of course the US is emboldened and would keep lecturing. People are still seriously listening to it, do they? BTW, China has never been in a position like the US, so you can't compare to it here. No countries in the world except the US and some western European countries tell other what to do, not just China. So are you trying to say China somehow China is better just because of that? That's lame!
    1
  407.  @旅人途见  They do brag a lot about 'helping Vietnam'. That's how the foreigners know. They just don't mention the part when they got into bed with the US and stabbed Vietnam and the USSR in the back! Yes, Viets are totally justified in this story. Using 'national interests' to justify robbing and stabbing other countries in the back is lame and morally unacceptable. It's just like you rob and kill using the excuse of being hungry. You're morally corrupt. Since when does speaking the truth mean I'm 'glass-hearted'?! You're totally missing the point!
    1
  408.  @旅人途见  Just read the comments section here and every internet forum that mentions this war you could find and you'll see how boastful the Chinese are. Vietnam is 100% just here. She was just defending herself through and through. China, on the other hand, was the shameless turncoat that joined the US backstabbing both the USSR and Vietnam just for some stinking bones from the US which was the common enemy of the whole communist bloc.
    1
  409.  @旅人途见  China had been very boastful about it until it got kicked out of Vietnam in 1979. Because of that debacle and its evil actions of helping Pol Pot and getting into bed with the US against Vietnam, China wanted to bury it for good and hide that part of history from the general population. But among the academic circle and a a part of the population that has concerns about history, they are still very boastful about it! It's in the Chinese boastful DNA!
    1
  410.  @旅人途见  1. What makes you think this vid isn't from a Chinese?! 2. Even if the Chinese 'rarely mention it' today like you said, they're still very boastful about it whenever they mention it. So that doesn't change anything! No, Vietnam 100% was just in in that war against China and Pol Pot back then. She was just defending herself. China, on the other hand, just acted like the imperialist it has always been throughout history.
    1
  411. The ones who moved their factories out of the US are the American capitalists, so it doesn't make sense when he blame that on other countries!
    1
  412. It's really stupid when you don't like somebody's comments, he/she must be a democrat to you. He specifically said the US' problems were caused by other countries' unfair trade with the US so although he denied blaming other countries, clearly, he did blame them all the same. Capitalism is buy low and sell high to get the largest profit margin you can so when the American capitalists move their factories out of the US in order to do exactly that, why is that any government's fault?! Unless Trump's a socialist, he can bitch about that, but he's not, so he's lame. Free trade means buyer and seller freely buy and sell on their own free will. Americans have been buying more from other countries because US' goods are 10 times more expensive than let say...China's. Other countries don't forbid their citizens from buying US' goods! They don't buy because many different reasons like US' goods are too expensive to them, or in the case of Japan, not as good as theirs. So when Trump tries forcing people from other countries buy US' goods that they don't want, pressuring Japan to open more car factories in the US against their will and hurt their profits, that's forced trade and robbing, not free trade!
    1
  413. 'Fight to the death!' Really?! 🤣 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNhSdWwSPcw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oNRmDfZgAA
    1
  414. Too many lame excuses for the lame ARVN
    1
  415.  @Chris815  Russia was imperialist in Tsar time. That was over a century ago, not right now. What hole have you just crawled out from?! No, you are blaming Russia for the US' fault and having everything on its head right now. Who would attack western Europe or the US?! So wtf is NATO for beside creating wars and tensions as history has shown?
    1
  416. Actually N Korea has better reason for censorship than the US because it has only one mouth while the west has ten thousand mouths. That's not exactly a fair fight in the information war so it just shuts those western mouths up in the country for good. The US, on the other hand, has the biggest propaganda network (called news outlets) in world history that covers the entire planet but it's still so afraid of one Russian outlet in the country! So pathetic! LOL!
    1
  417. What exactly is the feel of a 'communist country'?!
    1
  418. The west didn't cry 'cultural genocide' when it and its dogs are doing it as always.
    1
  419.  @1969cmp  So the criminals are 'investigating' themselves now. You clowns are funny! LOL!
    1
  420.  @1969cmp  The criminal Australian government sent them there to participate in a criminal war. So now it's just the head of the gang investigating its subordinates, hence, it's just a f$cking joke!
    1
  421.  @1969cmp  The US didn't provide PROOF of Bin Laden involvement in the 9/11 attack to the UN or the Taliban. The UN did not approve US war of aggression against Afghanistan. The US has been making up fairy tales to invade defenseless countries and mass murder people for more than a century now. Afghanistan is just another victim like Iraq. The US' reasons for being there is just as lame and ridiculous and criminal like Iraq. Bin Laden has been dead for nearly 10 years now so what are you still doing there?! And most importantly, all of the above has nothing to do with Australia! So of course, Australia is a f$cking criminal because it's been killing people that has done absolutely nothing wrong to it.
    1
  422. If this is army against people, whose false is it. This guy's funny! How can you blame Russia for Ukraine's stupid action?! LOL!
    1
  423. để làm gì?!
    1
  424. BS!
    1
  425.  @vopy48  What EXACTLY are the 'horrific living conditions many specially minority ethnic group people are forced to live'?! LOL! It's just in your head. You're just making up stories to justify their own plain stupid choice! The ones who chose to side with the French and Americans against the very peoples whom they've been living with for thousands of years are nothing else but plain old stupid. That's just a fact! Since when does stating a plain fact mean racist?! The Hmongs fought on both sides just like the rest of other peoples living in Indochina in the war. They're not an exception. They didn't choose to side with the whiteys as a whole race and I've never said they're all stupid so how can that be racist?!
    1
  426.  @keithschneidly3922  Well, my attitude towards whiteys aren't based on their skin color but justifiably by what they've been doing throughout history and so it can't be call 'racist' at all!
    1
  427.  @keithschneidly3922  When did I claim 'all white people are the same'?! Stop hallucinating! Stop your personal attacks. It only makes you look like a fool who just loves to go for the low blow because he has no arguments!
    1
  428.  @belluh-1huey102  People mistakenly think that 350,000 was the number of Chinese service men present on the ground in Vietnam at the same time. That's not true. That number represents the total Chinese service men ever sent to Vietnam for the whole course of the war (about 10 years). The number served at one particular point in time might only be about one tenth of that!
    1
  429. What should dems say?! Both parties are just two branches of the capitalist party and they both have been imposing sanctions, embargoes on countless nations to keep the world tight under the claws of the evil empire since forever.
    1
  430.  @iczerone2000  You don't know any real history. The US and USSR had decidedly defeated Japan for China in WWII! Without them, there would be no China like it is today! They gave help in materials, financial, weaponry, and directly involved militarily to defeat Japanese forces in China for China. Those are facts! Without the USSR, how could China defeat the Kwantung Army of Japan in Manchuria? They gave China Manchuria so how can you say they took it?! The US gave grants and loans value in billions dollars today so China could buy modern weapons to fight the Japanese. US' bombing raids of Japanese positions in China helped it tremendously too so how can you say they never helped?! What an ingrate!
    1
  431.  @iczerone2000  Go back to school and learn to read.
    1
  432. TheSushiraw Ozil is purer German than those African players are 'pure French'. Just look at them! LOL!
    1
  433. Saying the mainland Chinese’s aspiration is to be ruled by a government like Singaporean is very insulting to them and it shows he doesn’t know sh3t about the Chinese! LMAO!
    1
  434. These ridiculous 'sanctions' only show how helpless, petty and childish the west is. LOL!
    1
  435. @PremiumPeckage, 'Agreed on both sides' my ass. So how do you explain hundreds of thousands of casuaties, $700 billions down the drain and americunt society were shaken to the core if you won every battle against a 3rd world country that couldn't even produce their own weapons?! It's totally bullshit if you won every battle and couldn't get political support! That kind of bullshit only proves you're a bunch of sore losers!
    1
  436.  @PumpkinEater-dm1xx  If you wanna nitpick, the US is also State Capitalism because in Liberal Capitalism, the government won't foot the bills to built or rescue big businesses when they failed. State capitalism in Vietnam uses its revenue for the mass so it's socialism.
    1
  437. 3 bil. USD for 30 drones. That means 100 mil. for one! The Americans are comedians or they think Indians are morons?!
    1
  438. China did that for its own good but now you're talking as if it's all a high and mighty noble favor with nothing gained in return! China only helped itself because it didn't want another US client state propped up right at its border! Not because it cares about other countries! The Chinese and Americans are at it right now but you're very much the same, full of yourselves! The US could make a move on North Korea because North Korea STARTED a shooting war into South Korea in the first place. North Korea put itself into the villain role and so the US had all the support, from the UN, its allies, to its people. In Vietnam's case, the US was always the aggressor. It had already been wrong when it put troops in South Vietnam. There's no support from the UN, its big allies, only the minions. The whole world was against it! The American people also didn't like it at all. They burned the US to demand US troops out of South Vietnam so how tf could it mount an invasion into North Vietnam?! Heck! they couldn't even control South Vietnam at all! They only had the cities! The fact is the US has failed even to invade half of Vietnam, so how tf could it invade the other half and win?! Are you following the news? Have the US invaded and won Afghanistan yet after over 20 years?! And the Taliban has no outside help!
    1
  439. @North Korea Is Best Korea No, Ukraine invaded two independent republics. Russia legally helped those republics to beat back that invasion based on a security pack signed among them. She didn't invade Ukraine. The US, on the other hand, invaded Iraq based on a made-up excuse pulled straight out from its @$$! Those two stories are not even close!
    1
  440. @North Korea Is Best Korea, 'which weren't recognised as republics by any other nation in the world'. You're the ignorant one here because it doesn't matter if anybody recognizes them or not! Kosovo also wasn't recognized by the world but that didn't stop NATO from bombing the sh!t out of Yugoslavia! And the Serbs didn't even need to mass murder the Albanians in Kosovo like the Ukrainians had done to the Russians living in Donbas for the last 8 years!
    1
  441.  @vinhnguyen-ms3kx  Fact, history shows Vietnam did successfully helped Cambodia! There’s something really wrr ong with your head!
    1
  442. @David Siitherism Yes, It is. You robbers have no rights to say it isn't because it rightly belong to Asians, not Europeans.
    1
  443. What's up with the 'USA is the first and the best on everything' slogan that you keep chanting despite all the things that's been happening?! You should actually check history and facts before saying the US is the first and the best on those things. You have lost our credit when you keep chanting false propaganda!
    1
  444. Don't test too much. 'More tests => more cases, and more cases makes you look bad'-Trump.
    1
  445. This is as old as human history itself. There's 'no honor among thieves'. Now the thieves are fighting among each other for the cost of their failed operation! The US used Ukraine to 'strategically defeat Russia' (in their own words) to steal its natural resources and maintain US hegemony. That's why it has thrown in hundreds of billions stinking dollars. You think it did that out of love for Ukraine or 'freedom and democracy'?! 😆 The money didn't start flowing in in Feb 2022 when Russia finally reacted. It has started long before in 2014 when the US pumped 5 billions USD into Ukraine to orchestrate the coup to remove Viktor Yanukovych or even before that! Now the US has figured out that not only it can't defeat Russia this way, but it will also accelerate its own decline and thus help China roaring pass it even sooner. So this has to stop! But it can't just let it go like that! It will try to bully Ukraine into paying for its own freaking destruction! Not a single word for a million dead Ukrainians who were stupid enough to fight and die for their stupid dream of being 'rich' like the west! Why didn't Zelensky ask the US to pay for those deaths?! They were fooled by the US and now they're dead! How much that's gonna be?!
    1
  446. Actually, the US has never had democracy to begin with.
    1
  447. China never forgets she's the victim of Japan and western's aggression but now she starts acting like them! You can easily draw parallels between Japan in the past and China today. In the first half of 20th century, Japan became really strong after decades of successful economic development. Instead of helping and leading its neighbors to develop and progress like herself, she started grabbing territories left and right. China now is acting like that. After some decades of successful economic development, China also starts bullying her neighbors. She claims the WHOLE SCS as her private property! If I remember correctly, this claim is unprecedented any where in the world. No country has ever had such a ridiculous claim like that. They may claim this and that island but never a WHOLE sea! The basis of the claim is so ridiculous! It's essentially like this: the islands in the SCS appear in ancient Chinese literature, therefore the WHOLE SCS belongs to China! Even Japan in the 1930s couldn't be so ridiculous! There are other peoples probably living around that sea for tens of thousands of years, naming those islands and and fishing in that sea so why are they excluded?! If the basis of the claim is naming those islands in Chinese literature and fishing in that sea two thousand years ago, why does China not draw some other lines that encompass the WHOLE East China Sea and Yellow Sea too?! WHY?! Has China never named the islands in those seas and fished in them?! That ridiculous claim only appeared in 1947 by Chiang Kai-shek's government. At that time, China has just got over foreign domination and she already turned imperialistic and the easy targets are the weaker neighbors in the South. As being communist, the CCP should have been against that ridiculous claim which was invented by those imperialistic minds of the capitalist Republic of China from day one, but no, it's just gone along and fully complicit in this criminal act! If China plays fair and makes peace with her neighbors, the western imperialists wouldn't have a chance! But no, she must shoot herself in the foot like Japan in the past. Back then many Asian countries, China included, looked up to Japan and wanted to be successful like her but Japan shot herself in the foot by attacking her neighbors and become the common enemy of East and South East Asia. China now is just imitating Japan while denouncing her actions in the past! LOL! The US and its western lackeys are a bunch of thugs who have been plundering and bullying Asia and other parts of the world for many centuries now and on the decline. This is the chance for not only China but the whole Asia to get back to its glory, but China's not helping. Instead of making peace with her neighbors, she bullies them and gives the westerners excuses to jump in and block her advancement! Imagine with the intelligence and work ethic of Asians, if South, East, and South East Asia unite, the westerners wouldn't stand a chance to pick on us, but no, China must stubbornly insist on something it can never occupy, a whole sea, and abandon other doable and good objectives!
    1
  448.  @This_tub  You can't call unification of a country by a domestic force 'invasion'. If so the Union has invaded the South in the American Civil War, you fucking idiot! The CIA created South Vietnam and the puppet regime started killing oppositions from 1955. When they moved on killing the communists in the South, the War started. People in the South rose up and the puppet regime was on the verge of collape, then the US started bringing its troops in invading the South. The North then jumped in kicking US' ass. Nobody could/would kick them ass if they didn't invade Vietnam.
    1
  449. Stop apologizing for Musk. He's just a man, not god. Even god does and says stupid things. He's really good at manipulating people but also obviously is an egoistic nut case. After the success in his electric car business, he thinks he's god now and starts to comment on everything and many if not most are stupid to the point that his girl friend has to tell him to shut up, so this is just another one of his stupid moments, so chill. He doesn't need you tools to apologize for him.
    1
  450. @XxJimmyHeartbreakxX, Wow! Can't believe you're THAT stupid. You took it literately! You're the shitbag!
    1
  451. @Thedarkcountry Look above this you dumb ass, we're talking about the Vietnam war.
    1
  452. You're so contradicting yourself here. If China's meddling in HK's self rule, how can Falun Gong freely operate in HK?! You also mention HK people behave civilly because of the hefty fines! So it's not because under the 'benevolent' British colonial rule that somehow they become more civilized like you're trying to imply. It's because the hefty fines! And so, clearly in order to make people become civilized like in HK, there must be hefty fines (harsh punishment) for even petty things like spitting! It's like you are denouncing one government for tightly controlling its citizens while applauding another for doing the exact same thing! LOL! You sound petty.
    1
  453. The US is a violent inclined society from its government to people. Those two poll result are just an accurate reflection of that.
    1
  454. The US knew the longer it stretches this out, the more it would lose so it just changes strategy. bad cop Biden didn't work out so now enters the good cop. Obviously Trump is just employing the approach of the good cop which is trying to fool Russia with sweet words, deal maker skill, fake sympathy. He's pretending he didn't hear Russia saying 'no cease fire' hoping Russia may forget that and PAUSE AGAIN so the Kiev regime can recuperate and fight AGAIN just like they have fooled Russia so many times before. I hope this time Russia will finally wise up and really stick to its goals and won't be fooled AGAIN! Have you been fooled enough?!
    1
  455. Many people here're talking as if these NK guys are brainwashed and NK is at fault! Have you ever thought that may be, just may be you're brainwashed too? How can NK be at fault when the US intervened in its business, has been occupying half of the country, wouldn't sign a peace treaty, conducting war games at its door steps, putting a crippling sanction on it for more than half a century,...?
    1
  456.  Dragon Slayer  Fox's new doesn't try to defend the US from foreign propaganda, it's the propaganda.
    1
  457.  @sherf158  No, you should take your own advice. Google it first before opening your ignorant mouth!
    1
  458.  @tcgb311  No, you're the complete idiot here because you don't know what he means after reading all the posts and his replies.
    1
  459. There's nothing great about his speech because he totally missed the point!
    1
  460. Duh! Everybody knows it's a money pit and doesn't even work! LOL!
    1
  461. Let me get this straight. The last time I check, Putin didn't want to stop selling oil to the US. It was Biden who refused to buy Russian oil, so HTF it is Putin's fault?! What kind of fk twisted logic is that?! LMAO!
    1
  462. Of course Trump is mad because he's an egomaniac who just can't stand being rejected. He either thinks he's God or has some kind of special charm that nobody can resist so he can easily sweet talk or bully anybody into submission. Who the heel is Zelensky or Putin to reject his rediculous 'deals'?!
    1
  463. This guy is so good at repeating the propaganda he was fed! :)
    1
  464. When and how exactly did Vietnam bite China? You're brainwashed. It's the other way around!
    1
  465. These sanctions are like a joke compared to the Nazis' onslaught in WWII so they can't do anything. They can only prove that the west is lame and helpless so it just stabs itself in the chest and hopes that would hurt Russia! LMAO!
    1
  466.  @realmaozhedong  <<will you store and hide your valuable assets right beside a robber's den?? do you think usa really is that stupid??>> He probably won't but we're talking about the US here. Don't you know that arrogance can make you blind and stupid and the US is so full of it?
    1
  467. The US no doubt is the biggest warmonger this world has ever seen, but funny how China also has its own hubris and shot itself in the foot here. By claiming the WHOLE SCS, China has effectively given the warmonger the perfect excuse to meddle in the region. As bad as the US is, China still totally deserves it!
    1
  468. However big China's 'help' was, it's all gone when China got in bed with the US in 1972 and back stabbed Vietnam for the next 18 years! China is actually owes Vietnam for back stabbing her!
    1
  469.  @CokeNire  Yes, you're right, and exactly because the Cambodians have a long history of f kg themselves up, they should be paranoid about themselves, not Vietnam!
    1
  470.  @stevens1041  Neither does it like Laos. Cambodia has an underlying mental disease. Pol Pot is just a symptom. Hating all its shared border neighbors is another.
    1
  471.  @epic6434  And where is it?
    1
  472. What ‘peace talks’?!
    1
  473. China shoots herself in the foot by insisting on her aggressive territorial claims against her neighbors. The greed has consumed her just like the US. The whole vast swathes of land below the Yangtze River weren't China's originally. It belonged to peoples who aren't Han Chinese. After conquering it, Han Chinese moved in and assimilated everybody and adsorbed the whole region. Manchuria, part of Mongolia, Xinjiang, Tibet, and Yunnan, all very big areas also were consumed by China. That's how China becomes that big today but still she doesn't satisfy! She continues her quest to expand even more southward by claiming the whole SCS! In colonial time, western European powers grabbed lands left, right and around the world, even attacked China herself and forced her to concede territories. China has justifiably been crying foul over their thuggish behaviors since then but she in turn, has been behaving in much the same way! The ridiculous eleven dash line in the SCS is one example in recent history. It only appeared in 1947 under Chiang kai shek, right after WWII when China also claimed to be a victim of Japanese aggression! Before that, the southern most point of China has always been Hainan island. China shamelessly only recognizes aggression committed against her, not by her! China just loves to play victims but unabashedly ignore her victims! If she wants to fight against the US' aggression, she must have her neighbors' supports, but her aggressive territorial claims certainly won't help! She stubbornly just won't recognize her own aggression against her neighbors! She's actually giving the US a very good excuse to intervene in the region therefore shooting herself in the foot!
    1
  474. Thanks China for calling it out. The US is indeed a mass human rights violator.
    1
  475. Since when the US has the so-called 'democracy' to fail?!
    1
  476.  @hieudotrung3439  But that’s only your imagination and your imagination doesn’t count. Go learn some actual history.
    1
  477.  @hieuphanthanh5959 the Americans won or lost in Vietnam has nothing to do with what I said. You’re another j Eliot!
    1
  478.  @hieuphanthanh5959  both or you need to learn to read!
    1
  479. ​ @陈陳-t5c  What exactly is the part of my statements not true? What exactly makes you think Mao was sincere?! LOL! You could only know that if you were Mao himself! But the imperialist thinking has been engrained in the Chinese mind for millennia, so I have a BIG doubt about Chinese sincerity in any era. The only thing you can be sure about China is its humongous greed! Mao helped because of his experience with the Korean War. He just didn't want another US' client state at China's border. If the US invaded N Vietnam, China had to bring in some millions combat troops and would have spent and died A LOT MORE. So that's why he 'helped', not because he cared about Vietnam more than the USSR! Russia erased 8 billions USD that Vietnam owed her during Soviet time with nothing attached. Now that's 'help'. You're talking as if the Chinese single handedly defeat the US for Vietnam! LOL! You see? You Chanks are just full of yourselves! That's the problem! Vietnam lost millions in the war but here you are bragging about 1000 dead Chinese! LOL! One single US' dog, S Korea, already had 5 times more dead and more than twice injured than you Chanks! S Korea had over 300,000 participated too but all in combat operations. So you Chanks were even below S Korea in the level of importance in term of human resources! In term of financial 'help', the US had spent 1 trillions in today dollar but here you are bragging about China's $20 billions! And whatever China 'helped', not only did it took all back, it also took from Vietnam much more when it destroyed them all in the decade long war at the border in 1979, by its support of Pol Pot in his war against Vietnam, its robbing of Vietnam's islands, its economic and diplomatic isolation of Vietnam and Cambodia one decade after 1978. So actually, China owes a lot from Vietnam, not the other way around! Vietnam had a very bad experience when Chinese got involved in the battle of Dien Bien Phu and the following Geneva Conference in 1954, so she didn't allow them to do so in the war with the US. The only thing Chinese WERE ALLOWED to do in that war were building and maintaining infrastructures at the areas near the border and defending them. They were forbidden to participate in any ground combat and air defense deep inside Vietnam, so many of your numbers and stories about combat are fake or exaggerated!
    1
  480. ​ @陈陳-t5c  The evidence is in the long history. China has never been sincere throughout its history with Vietnam and other weaker countries. Its only desire toward Vietnam is eating her alive so Mao is not likely an exception. Again, nobody knows for sure because you're not Mao himself. Do you know how to read?!
    1
  481. China behavior toward Vietnam is much worse than that of the USSR toward China. China robbed Vietnam islands in 1974, 1988, and attacked Vietnam on land in 1979 and 10 years after that, Ganged up with the US to isolate Vietnam in that period.
    1
  482.  @陈陳-t5c  Learn to read! First, that $20 billion was to save China from much more deaths and financial loss if the US invaded N Vietnam. It's not because China has good will toward Vietnam! If it does, it wouldn't have robbed Vietnam of her islands, attacked her for 10 years at the border, supported Pol Pot who invaded and massacred Viets! Second, China destroyed all of the infrastructure it built during the Vietnam War when it invaded Vietnam in 1979, robbed islands from Vietnam, supported Pol Pot to attacked Vietnam, got into bed with the US and continued to support him after he was deposed by Vietnam and isolate Vietnam and the non-Pol Pot Cambodia, so China did much more damage to Vietnam than it 'helped', so you should s tf u about China's 'help'!
    1
  483.  @陈陳-t5c  The USSR and the US lent big help to China in the Sino Japanese War and WWII, much more than China ever helped Vietnam because they directly and literately defeat Japan for China, but China in the end turned against both of them so China is the ingrate, the white-eyed wolf here! Why must you betray your two dads?!
    1
  484.  @陈陳-t5c  The US didn't dare to cross the 17th parallel because it couldn't even successfully invade and control half of S Vietnam, so h tf could it go north? It's not because it was afraid of Mao Zedong or Zhou Enlai. You see? You Chanks are just full of yourself! That's the problem!
    1
  485.  @陈陳-t5c  Apparently, you're brainwashed by your Chin government! The correct sentence was 'Where there is a Palmyra palm, it is the land of Cambodia'. It was said by the Khmer Rouge when it invaded Vietnam in the 1970s. You're the brainwashed one who doesn't know what China did back then here! Chanks are the shameless people who do not know of their aggressive behavior here! It was the Khmer Rouge who was encouraged by China invaded and occupied some Viet territories in the first place so Vietnam mounted an offensive to depose it and save Cambodia from a genocide! Does China teach you about that genocide in Cambodia which killed, among the victims, 300,000 Chinese, and it not only was ignored but supported by China? LOL! Vietnam did not invade Laos. It was Viet troops and Laotian troops mopped up remnants of the Khmer Rouge who fled into Laos. Vietnam did not invade Thailand. She conducted raids on Khmer Rouge camps inside Thai border. This was the US' and China's fault because they backed the Khmer Rouge and ordered Thailand to house it inside its border! What is wrong with Vietnam if others attack her?! Why are you Chanks so ridiculous?!
    1
  486.  @陈陳-t5c  After 'a century of humiliation' by the west, China just turns around, bullies, and robs its neighbors here. That's the reality that you brainwashed t0000l can't see here! Vietnam didn't try to invade any country to take territories like China had been trying hard to smear her. It was China who's been invading and robbing its neighbors all along! Nope, Viets hate China because of its insatiable greed and evil. And you Chanks just hate Vietnam because she, for millennia, has stopped China's expansion into SE Asia again and again! She's always been the toughest nut in the south that China can't never crack!
    1
  487. Pol Pot was just a mad idiot. He had nothing to do with communism. Capitalism killed exponentially more.
    1
  488. 1. Pol Pot had nothing to do with communism. He's just a mad ldiot! 2. Capitalism kl lled exponentially more.
    1
  489.  @BIZMVRK  No, Vietnam only supported the Marxist-Leninist faction of the KR, but there was also a Maoist faction which was led by Pol Pot and backed by China. He took power and turned the KR into a hardcore genocidal machine and started attacking Vietnamese troops in Cambodia in 1973, in effect declared war on Vietnam, so he had no support from Vietnam in taking over Cambodia in 1975. He's all a Chinese tool.
    1
  490.  @BIZMVRK  The KR was only supported by Vietnam before Pol Pot took over.
    1
  491.  @BIZMVRK  China was the real sponsor of the KR!
    1
  492.  @RjM777  Why 'in retrospect'?!
    1
  493.  @RjM777  Nobody said Venezuela or Cambodia under Pol Pot was practicing communism except western propaganda outlets!
    1
  494.  @RjM777  You cannot name them yourself and blame them for that. That's lame!
    1
  495.  @RjM777  Nobody but western propaganda outlets said they were practicing communism.
    1
  496.  @RjM777  Nobody said that except western propaganda outlets!
    1
  497.  @RjM777  Not 'everyone', only western propaganda outlets.
    1
  498.  @RjM777  Not 'everyone'!
    1
  499.  @RjM777  Only western pro paganda outlets said they were practicing communism!
    1
  500. Actually there was even a stronger anti-American alliance before until China got into bed with the US and backstab the USSR!
    1
  501. How can there be good relation between Vietnam and China when the latter has always been trying to eat the former alive for the last 2000 years and right now as we speak?!
    1
  502. Lee Camp, you lose all your credibility when you denounce US' imperialism while promoting and praising China's imperialism! You're so hypocritical just like the west!
    1
  503.  @kovnqwer  Real communist system is real democratic system. It's ruled by the majority. The so-called 'democratic system' the US employed is a scam. It's actually dictatorship of an extremely small number, the ultra rich.
    1
  504.  @NautyCat  Yep, that's the standard response among brainwashed tools (who don't know much beside the propaganda they've been fed since birth) when they run out of arguments.
    1
  505.  @taiwanstillisntacountry  So that's supposed to make China a 'good' country and the claims legitimate? No, it only proves the opposite.
    1
  506.  @RaymondLi604  Said the one who can't come up with ANY argument at all! You just proved that you Chinese are so lame! LOL!
    1
  507.  @ysw8291  No, there are NO similar claims among SEA countries. You are shamelessly making up story trying to pull others down to Chinese thuggish level here. Nobody claims the WHOLE sea up to the coastlines of their neighbors as China does.
    1
  508.  @ysw8291  You've just proved my point that China in fact is really really BAD! It's not western propaganda! Because you Chinese keep reiterating again and again again that backing a genocidal regime like Pol Pol's is 'right'! It proves that China is incapable of telling right from wrong just like the west whom it likes to condemn and lecture! China in fact is just like the US because both think they can never do wrong even when they've obviously done some horrendous things. The US thinks it's just fine and dandy when it dropped two atomic bombs that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians in Japan. China also thinks it's very fine and dandy when it helped a genocidal regime to mass murder some two millions people including Chinese!
    1
  509.  @ysw8291  Many people did die when China used forces to seize islands from its neighbors repeatedly. China also killed its neighbors' fishermen while they fished in the SCS.
    1
  510.  @ysw8291  Did you just tell me that good or bad is only relative? It depends on whom you talk to? There is actually no right or wrong? It's only a matter of perspective? So people can murder all they want without consequences in China because China recognizes and practices what you said that there's actually no good or bad, right or wrong, or you just BS me here while China can lock or shoot people up all it wants even if the person says he/she did nothing wrong? It's only a matter of perspective?! LOL! Thank you for helping me prove the thuggish nature of you Chinese though!
    1
  511.  @emanuelneagu14  No, replying to a comment without understand the context like you just did is plain stupid. Look at the title of the clip on top. It said 'the US' narrative about a 'bad China' collapses'. So they try to convince people that China isn't bad! My original comment was a response to that. I let people judge on their own. If there are really no good or bad countries like you said, why must you bother to correct me?! Why tf does China need to build a whole network of channels across platforms trying to disprove what the west says about it?! China's vigorous response to western accusations and your response to my comment have proven that indeed there are good and bad countries! And China is desperately trying to prove it's the good one if not the best! LOL! You're using a fallacy called 'generalization' here. It's the same as saying There are no good or bad people! Do you actually believe that? You're either too stupid to know better or you're intentionally trying to BS your way through here. If what you said is true, why tf did China establish a social credit system to reward good people and punish bad ones? If you say so, a judge in any court must have the same level of moral conscience as the criminals he is judging! And why tf must societies bother to have very complex judiciary systems to sort out the innocents, the not so bad and the worst criminals to give them freedom or proper punishments?! Countries are the same. If one is generally doesn't hurt or rob others, they are good, otherwise, it's bad. Depends on the scale and scope, it can be judged further. China's aiding of the Pol Pot regime which mass murdered over two millions people including its own expat Chinese is not only bad, but pure evil because no other has done the same! No decent human being or country can support a genocidal regime let alone supported it to mass murder their own kind!
    1
  512.  @elizabethcheung4006  if you wanna preach about 'whataboutism', tell that to this channel because it's practicing that in this very clip above! As a matter of fact, preach that to yourself too! Did I say anything about the US being good? So why tf did you mention its war history when responding to me?! I know why! You're actually the one who practicing 'whataboutism' here! You can't argue any of my points so you brought the US in trying to prove China is good because the US is bad!
    1
  513.  @elizabethcheung4006  you're practicing 'whataboutism' yet again here! LOL!
    1
  514. Literately the number is in millions not hundred thousands!
    1
  515. That's a VERY stupid question! :v
    1
  516. Nope! Not gonna happen. Bojo’s gonna say he forgot to press the record button that day.
    1
  517. Yep, she's definitely just spreading Russian propaganda too if you ask him. LOL!
    1
  518. China always hates Japan to the bone so the latter has no choice. There’s nothing illogical here.
    1
  519. Can you understand the logic of the 'pause' on supplying weapon? So Trump says he will resume the flow of weapons if Zelensky agrees to peace? But if he agrees to peace why does he need the flow of weapons for?!
    1
  520. "If it's just items that are replaceable, just let them take what they need to take"! Fkg unbelievable!!! LOL! It's just so easy for a clown who sits there on his high horse in the comfort of his house to lecture people to just let criminals take whatever they want from them, isn't it?! The level of stupidity here is really deep! First, who's gonna replace those lost items if he listens to you? You the clown?! Second, those robbers don't have any 'need' to take anybody's property but the owner has every right and need to secure his life and livelihood here. If he just let them take everything they 'need', at best, he could have to close his business soon. At worst, his life could have ended right there and then anyway. Third, nobody knows for sure if the robbers would've or wouldn't have shot him dead after jumping the counter to rob stuff on the shelves so who's gonna resurrect him if he ends up dead because of listening to you? You the clown again?! Everybody knows cops who are armed to their teeth, in numbers, wouldn't have taken that chance. They would have shot them dead the very moment they fail to comply but here you are expecting an outnumbered civilian with only a small knife in his hand to go easy on these criminals?!
    1
  521.  @janusjones6519  Nah, the US couldn't even control half of the South. Its home was burning because of the antiwar movement, so how could it mount an invasion to the North?! US troops in Vietnam didn't wanna fight, the draftees at home burnt draft cards, so who t f were gonna fight in the supposed invasion?! You Chanks are just so full of yourselves! LOL!
    1
  522. ​ @janusjones6519  Using Korea to speculate about Vietnam is really stupid! So what about Afghanistan?! Did the Taliban need Chinese help to wear down the US and outlast it? Didn't the US absolutely control the air in Afghanistan, a lot more so than in Vietnam?! LOL! And Korea and Vietnam War are very different. First, N Korea directly crossed the 38th parallel and attacked the South in the first place so the US could argue that N Korea started the war and was the aggressor so it could obtain the UN's mandate and went all in. In Vietnam's case, N Vietnam didn't cross the 17th parallel and start an all out war against the Saigon regime in the first place, so the US' involvement didn't have a UN's mandate. US troops had illegally entered S Vietnam, it's hard to push it any further Second, even if the US ignored all the laws, it still couldn't invade the North from the beginning or any other period. Because, in Korea's case, the Seoul regime had successfully established control over the whole South Korea before the war, so when the US went north later, it didn't have to worry about the rear. In Vietnam's case, throughout the war, the US and Saigon regime could only control the cities and big towns in the South, the rest was either in the hand of the NLF or heavily contested, so how could it go north with its rear widely exposed?! N Korea was beat back because it got its rear exposed at Inchon, do you know about that? AND, Not only the Saigon regime couldn't gain control over the rural area, but it also really weak. If the US wasn't there right by its side, it wouldn't have any control anywhere! It was about to collapse all by itself in 1964 if US' forces didn't jump in to hold it up with both hands! The whole time being present there, the US was trying to keep it afloat and pacify the South but couldn't succeed, so how could it go anywhere else?! In another word, the US didn't even successfully invade S Vietnam, how t f could it invade the North?! You think you're smarter than the US' elite who ran the show at the time?! You think they didn't think about that or wanted to lose on purpose?! LOL!
    1
  523.  @janusjones6519  Why are you Chanks always boastful like that? LOL!
    1
  524.  @allenliang9084  Stop boasting. The US couldn't cross the 17th parallel because it didn't even successfully invade half of South Vietnam with twice the number of troops that was used in the Korean War, so how could it invade the North?
    1
  525.  @allenliang9084  No, you're the one who's completely ignorant of one of the most basic warfare principles which is you cannot expose your rear or flank to your enemy. This basic principle has been well known since ancient time! US' forces just can't go north when they can only control 2/5 of the South and facing 250,000 NLF's troops that they just cannot eradicate there. They can go north in the Korean War because they had completely pacified South Korea. There was nothing like the NLF in South Korea. In fact, North Korea was beat back because it let its rear exposed to only 40,000 US' troops at Inchon.
    1
  526.  @allenliang9084  ROTFLMAO! So you've been learning your history from quora and wikipedia! No wonder why you're so hopeless! Apparently you still haven't grown a brain to understand the concept of 兩頭受敌 yet! Come back only when you have!
    1
  527.  @fanisgelis9980  Ford makes daily driving cars but it has a gargantuan amount of money to buy race car companies and experts to build race cars and race for them so what's the big deal here?!
    1
  528.  @Loulovesspeed  You are using a fallacy called 'bandwagon fallacy'. You just believe something is true because other people also believe it, not because you yourself have the relevant facts, evident and logic to support it! Using your dim reasoning, the world must be flat in ancient time because everybody in that time believe it was! LOL! Don't you have a brain of your own? Why do you have to depend on the belief of 'countless others' to support your point?! That proves you are just brainwashed into believing something that you yourself can't prove! Did you read their Le Mans history? If so, why don't you use it to prove Ford was the underdog? You're a Ferrari hater because you said I'm a Ford hater. And that was another fallacy (Ad Hominem) that you used. When you lose the argument, you turn and attack me personally! Why must I be a Ford hater while you're not a Ferrari hater?! You're so lame! LOL! When you don't have any decent facts, evidence, and logic to support your view of Ford being the underdog but keep on saying so to glorify Ford, you're definitely an @$$ kisser of Ford and a Ferrari hater. You are the one with all the B.S, no facts, evidence and logic here.
    1
  529.  @user-gu1hl2kx2k  That is irrelevant to this story. Because somebody said he insult Ford II so somebody has to correct it if he didn't. You can't use the fact of him insulting Lamborghini (while Lamborghini was his employee) to prove that he did insult Ford!
    1
  530. ​ @Loulovesspeed  No you THE @$$ kisser here, not me you s0b! LOL!
    1
  531.  @Loulovesspeed  Don't tell me you read when it's so clear that you don't know how to! LOL!
    1
  532. ​ Follow Your Dearms  But before that they weren't Chinese territories, weren't they? China robbed them from other people, didn't it? So why does China still not satisfy?! Why does it still wanna rob more to create needless tension with its neighbors?! How exactly did China 'manage' the SCS 'hundreds of years ago'?! You're so funny! The 11 dash line first appeared in the 1940s, not ''hundreds of years ago'! Those Southeast Asian people have always been living around the SCS for millennia and you just said China was the first to discover it hundreds of years ago! You see? You Chinese are so ridiculous and full of yourself. That's why you are a big problem in Asia!
    1
  533. Generally, Europeans are more sophisticated than Americans to me, so it's strange that they've been content to be under the US' thumb since after WWII. First, it was western Europe and the rest after the fall of the USSR. Anybody who has a brain to observe can easily see that the US' game is to keep the rest of the world, including its so-called 'allies', down, so it can stay on top forever. Even Hastings Ismay, a NATO's Secretary General, has openly said that the purpose of NATO was 'to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down'! If Europe and Russia work together and build their respective economies up, they would have surpassed the US for a long time, but NO! Europe must choose to play the role of a loyal dog to the US to antagonize Russia and sabotage its own economy in the process! Heck, Germany can't even build a pipeline with Russia without asking permission from the US! Really? WTF is going on with the Germans?! The US has learned from WWI and II that wars and tensions around the world are always beneficial to it! The two largest oceans in the world would completely shield it from any harm. No war can spill over, no refugees to take care of no matter what! So it continues its way of destroying the world and letting somebody else suffer and take care of the problems later. Europe has been complicit in the US' criminal acts in the middle east and north Africa, but only the US could rip the rewards. Europe is left with a flood of refugees from those areas, waves of revenge bombings, and watching its own culture crumble. But still, it seems to be happy as ever as a US tool! Unbelievable!
    1
  534.  @oldon5881  No, that's just your imagination cultivated by being brainwashed by western propaganda. There's no way Hitler could have won. He had dug his own hole when he decided to invade the USSR. History shows the US just played around on the sideline most of the war. It only joined the fight when it was all clear to everybody that Germany's end was inevitable, so its role is negligible, not decisive like you imagine. The US helped but the USSR could have won it all by herself.
    1
  535. @Fred Freddy What exactly is Putin's 'grave error'? I think the US worshiping Ukrainians have made a grave mistake here. They turn their country into a pawn for the US' geopolitical game and ruin it!
    1
  536. Sir, that saying 'a guilty mind is never at ease' can only apply to people with conscience. The US and its western gang never have a tiny bit of it! How can they have a guilty mind when they don't think they've done anything wrong in the first place?!
    1
  537. If you know the Cambodians and their history, there's no surprise!
    1
  538.  @SurnaturalM  Only br4inwashed tools call those countries 'communist'
    1
  539. Americans have been brainwashed since birth that their country is way way above the rest of the world and their military invincible. It can even beat aliens and save the world ten times a year so what do you expect?! I think 1 in 3 is actually too low considering the arrogance of Americans.
    1
  540. What's new? The US has always been arrogant and childish since forever, not today.
    1
  541. If Russia moves troops on its side of the border with Ukraine is considered 'aggression', what would the who re house call its action of moving its troops thousands of miles away from its border and near Russian border?! The arrogance of the US might not have a parallel in history.
    1
  542.  @mikethespike7579  Reread my post.
    1
  543.  @mikethespike7579  reread my post
    1
  544.  @mikethespike7579  Do you know why they put Milosevic of Serbia and Saddam Hussein on trial so quickly? Because they were the real enemies of the US and the West. They didn't put Pol Pot on trial because he was their ally.
    1
  545. @ I suspected but now I’m sure y0u have mental deficiency so it’s best that we stop here.
    1
  546.  @mikethespike7579  you have mental deficiency
    1
  547.  @mikethespike7579  You have mental deficiency
    1
  548.  @mikethespike7579  search for 'US supported pol pot at UN' and find out! Why are you so stvpld?!
    1
  549.  @daveedmunds5533  He's a legend. There's no such genuine independent investigative journalist like that anymore. Nowadays it's all propaganda.
    1
  550. How does that guy know Russia is struggling in Ukraine? By watching western propaganda called news? LOL!
    1
  551. There's no significant about this story. Henry Ford II was a spoiled brat who couldn't take 'no' for an answer. How can Enzo Ferrari said 'no' to the emperor? So the spoiled brat used money he inherited from his dad to enlist real race car company like Lola Cars and real race engineers/drivers like Shelby and Miles to build and race cars for him because even he knows after trying that Ford alone could never win races against Ferrari! So in the end, what did he try to prove? He had a lot of money which could buy anything? Or are he and his car company better than Ferrari's? He couldn't buy Ferrari so his money could buy many things but still not anything. For racing, he and his company can never be better than Ferrari, period, because Ford ALONE has STILL never won a single race against Ferrari! He 'won' by the works of others OUTSIDE of his company. He was still selling cheap cars for normal folks and Ferrari has still been selling street legal race cars for rich people. He could never change that!
    1
  552. Spot on!
    1
  553. The title makes it sound like there is a media war between the US and Russia. There’s no such a war because the west has always had almost total control over the media. There’s no contest here. Russia knows that so it has always been focusing on the war on the ground where it can make a difference and it sure is making big difference.
    1
  554.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Vietnam supported the KR before Pol Pot took control and turned it into a genocidal machine!
    1
  555.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  No Vietnam stopped supported the KR after they had become 1000% China's tool under Pol Pot's leadership and started attacking Vietnamese forces and robbed their supplies in Cambodia in 1973. Why would they continued supporting them then?!
    1
  556.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  The fact remains that Vietnam only supported the KR before the genocide was uncovered. China and the US, on the other hand, supported it even AFTER that! They are true evil!
    1
  557.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Apparently you don't know how to read! 😆You've just proved my point that there was no love lost between Pol Pot and Vietnam! And there's no proof that Vietnam armed Pol Pot in that paragraph!
    1
  558.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  I cited evident but you're refusing to read it. Google this, 'US support Pol Pot UN'. You're in denial!
    1
  559.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  No Vietnam didn't armed Pol Pot. Pot Pot hated Vietnam and Vietnam knew it and had tried to replace him as you've proved it with your own word! China armed Pol Pot.
    1
  560.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Books are useless when you don't know to read apparently!
    1
  561.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Vietnam didn't armed Pol Pot. Pot Pot hated Vietnam and Vietnam knew it and had tried to replace him as you've proved it with your book! China was the one who armed Pol Pot!
    1
  562.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Watch the documentary 'Year Zero: The Silent Death of Cambodia' by John Pilger. He had investigated and found out how the west and China armed and trained Pol Pot's force after genocide was uncovered!
    1
  563.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Still there's no evidence in your book that Vietnam armed Pol Pot! Apparently you don't know how to read!
    1
  564.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Top google search result shows AI answers which are fact based! If you say they're not true, your book is also useless!
    1
  565.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Top google search result is fact based. UR an in-denial knucklehead!
    1
  566.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Top google search result is fact based. Knuckleh4ad!
    1
  567.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  'Hue massacre' was a propaganda hit piece made up by the Saigon regime and the US. But don't stray away. Losers tend to do that when they lose an argument. My point is the US supported Pol Pot AFTER the genocide. Have you acknowledged that yet?
    1
  568.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  'Hue Massacre' was a propaganda hit piece. The mass graves were people who died from American bombs!
    1
  569.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  BTW, losers tend to stray away from the topic when they lose an argument. So stay on the topic! Have you acknowledged the fact that the US DIRECTLY supported Pol Pot AFTER his genocide?
    1
  570.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Watch the documentary 'Year Zero: The Silent Death of Cambodia' by John Pilger. He conducted an investigation about the west and China's arming and training of Pol Pot's force.
    1
  571.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  You're the one who's been making things up. Vietnamese sources say 1973, Western sources say 1974, was when the Khmer Rouge turned against Vietnam OPENLY, attacking Vietnamese troops stationed in Cambodia. <<A major point of departure between the Khmer Rouge faction and the Vietnam-aligned Communist Party of Kampuchea, which has favored more classical Marxism–Leninist ideology, was the Khmer Rouge's embrace of a nationalistic form of Maoism, one of the few major communist parties to do so in the wake of the Sino-Soviet split.[38] This served as the basis for the Khmer Rouge's agrarian policies. Even before the Vietnam War ended, the relationship between the Khmer Rouge—which was in the process of seizing power from a US-backed government headed by Lon Nol—and North Vietnam was strained. Clashes between Vietnamese communists and Khmer Rouge forces began as early as 1974, and the following year Pol Pot signed a treaty codifying the "friendship" between the Khmer Rouge and China.[39]>>
    1
  572.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  China, not Vietnam, supported Pol Pot because Vietnam and Pol Pot weren't on friendly terms and Vietnam didn't have enough to fight the US herself that she got help from China too! So ht f did she support Pol Pot?! <<Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge were supported for many years by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its chairman, Mao Zedong; it is estimated that at least 90% of the foreign aid which the Khmer Rouge received came from China, including at least US$1 billion in interest-free economic and military aid in 1975 alone.>>
    1
  573.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Pol Pot couldn't overthrow Sihanouk all by himself, he needed Vietnam's help to be successful, so he asked Vietnam for help, not permission! Y0u're so la@me!
    1
  574.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  google US overthrow Sihanouk! jeez!
    1
  575. @StalkingRainbow After 58000 dead and some hundred thousands wounded, you just realized it was pointless? That's pure stupidity right there! And you consider a war win or lose just by looking at the number of casualties? That again is very stupid!
    1
  576. Brainwashed tools! LOL!
    1
  577. Bùn cười thật! Tiêu chí chọn tỏng thóng của 3 que cọng hành là giỏi tiếng Anh! Vậy không tụt quần đu càng mới là lạ! 🤣
    1
  578. Rất giá trị. Nó cho thấy tại sao 2 anh em Diệm có kết cục như vậy! Lãnh đạo một nước mà bảo đ cần dân ủng hộ hay không! 😂😂😂
    1
  579.  @jlrva3864  Those are just two phenomena/events that you apparently, absolutely have no clues about the causes. You automatically blame it on the communists because you’re brainwashed!
    1
  580.  @jlrva3864  1. They were 90% traitors who served the French for the whole time they had been there and their family. The fact that the communists didn't execute them all for their crimes against the country proves they were too nice! The rest of the people who left was fooled by the US 'propaganda'. You yourself is also fooled by the US propaganda, talking like the communists had no support! If they have no popular support, how can they defeat the French, and Americans?! 2. 90% of them were the same people mentioned above and their next generation! They went South in 1954-55 and the US used them as the core support for the Saigon puppet regime that it created in 1955! They were the brainwashed hardcore anti communist. They was so afraid of paying for their crimes against the communists and the country that's how they ran out of the country that way.
    1
  581.  @jlrva3864  1. They were 90% traitors who served the French for the whole time they had been there and their family. The fact that the communists didn't execute them all for their crimes against the country proves they were too nice! The rest of the people who left was fooled by the US 'propaganda'. You yourself is also fooled by the US propaganda, talking like the communists had no support! If they have no popular support, how can they defeat the French, and Americans?!
    1
  582. 2. 90% of them were the same people mentioned above and their next generation! They went South in 1954-55 and the US used them as the core support for the Saigon puppet regime that it created in 1955! They were the brainwashed hardcore anti communist. They was so afraid of paying for their crimes against the communists and the country that's how they ran out of the country that way.
    1
  583.  @kelvinw.1384  Funny you didn't mention the part where Ukraine has been killing Russians living in the eastern part of the country for eight years before Russia intervenes. If Poland does that, she would meet the same fate as Ukraine. It doesn't matter if she's a NATO member or not!
    1
  584.  @thornil2231  That's what I meant. How can the Russians 'colonize' their original territory of Kievan Rus' which includes Ukraine now?! They have always been living there for over a thousand years. Is he really that stupid that he doesn't actually know the meaning of the word or deliberately and dishonestly just spreading nonsensical propaganda?
    1
  585. Thank you too, Mr. Attwood but it's hard for me to hear you with that mike.
    1
  586.  @johnwelson7024  The US brought troops from halfway around the world and bombed the shit out of those countries killing millions and it's not to be blamed?! Democracy and Communism are abstract, nonphysical concepts. And they're not even conflicting! They cannot bomb any country. The US can. The US has no right to bomb the shit out of countries in the name of 'democracy' or by a vague, self-proclaimed good vs bad justification! That's wrong! There's no international law allowing that, so it's squarely its fault! Not to mention the US is objectively neither democratic nor good to begin with! The majority of Korea and Vietnam, both north and south, had never invited the US in to divide and destroy their countries. The US just barged in creating two puppet governments to invite itself in. The US denied nationwide general elections for the people to decide in both of those countries so it was against democracy not for! How exactly did China and Russia help the military take democracy away in Myanmar?! Did they interfere in Myanmar's internal affairs like the west has been doing?
    1
  587.  @johnwelson7024  How exactly did 'China and Russia help put Military power in control of Mynama' and how exactly was 'Russia trying to put in puppet Government in Ukraine too' You're just talking $h!t here! No, the US invited itself into Vietnam. There's no proof that anybody in Vietnam at the time had ever invited the US military in, even its puppet government in Saigon. The US had bombed the shit out of the country and burnt the countryside to the ground. There were millions of people who either served in the Saigon government or military, so what do you expect?! China is another story. You can't even get the story of Myanmar and Vietnam straight but now start bringing in China too?
    1
  588.  @max25i67  That's just what you say! Reality is the other way around! Communism was born out of capitalism because of capitalism's inherently undemocratic nature. You 'haven't reached that stage yet'?! What a complete t00l! LMAO! Capitalism ALWAYS is a dictatorship because naturally the ultra-rich class who controls the economy and owns everything also holds political power. You can never have the same political power as your owner! In a capitalist country like the US, the bank owns your @$$, your government @$$, and the media. Have you ever seen the ultra-rich people have to walk the street protesting to have their way?! Because if they want anything, all they need to do is tell their servants from the government down to you, do it or they will spank your @$$! LOL! For instance, if they want a war, the government and media will work their ass off to make it happen, and YOU will have to die for it! On the other hand, if the common people want to stop a war, they must have to walk the street, turn the country upside down, get shot to death, then they just may have a tiny chance!
    1
  589.  @johnwelson7024  You have proof of that or you've heard it from somewhere or you just pulled it straight out of your @$$? LMAO!
    1
  590. If the Russian leadership stops and listen to any 'proposal' from the west again (especially after the very recent Merkel's admission that she indeed did fool Putin with Minsk I and II so the west could have time to arm Ukraine to screw Russia), Russia would be so well deserved to be screwed by the west and I wouldn't have any sympathy at all for her. You just can't be so naïve and stupid time and time like that and expect sympathy.
    1
  591. Yeah right! Look for the video ‘South Korea is over’
    1
  592.  @YumboYakYak  South Korea is still over despite of not being under economic sanctions. That’s the problem here. You can’t compare a country under economic sanctions with another which isn’t. That’s a really s.t.u,p.l.d and dishonest comparison!
    1
  593.  @YourLocalMairaaboo  According to the white men, the agreement you said is about preserving 'democracy' and 'human rights' so 'disrespect the agreement' means disrespect 'democracy' and 'human rights'. Why are you so dumb?!
    1
  594.  @veganwolf2024  Sure, but why did the US and its running dogs in the western world create those 'extremists' in the first place?!
    1
  595. Because they're born and raised in an arrogant culture.
    1
  596. The jungle only exists in your head, not Dai Viet back then. And so the Mongols did successfully utilize their horses and arrows at first but were routed at the end anyway.
    1
  597. @Nico-x2t4t there’s no jungle where the Mongols fought Dai Viet. The two sides fought mostly in large battles in large numbers in the Red River Delta where most of about 4.5 millions Viets lived. There’s no jungle from there to the Chinese border ever because the climate of that region isn’t tropical. Jungle only exists in tropical climate.
    1
  598. Well, if you know history, you should know that the USSR had helped China a lot before, during and after WWII. For instance, they had spilled a lot of blood and singlehandedly defeated the Japanese Kwantung Army and handed the whole freaking Manchuria back to China. Russia and China had even been ideological comrades, but China got into bed with the supposedly common imperialist enemy, the US, and backstabbed its comrade anyway just for some freaking cheap dollars and recognitions. Today in China, from top leaders down to the common people, they don't see anything wrong with that. In fact, Deng Xiaoping is revered in China precisely for that treacherous move. They only see that as common international politics, not betrayal. There's nothing snaky about it. They would say there's no friend nor enemy, only interests if you ask them. Heck, they even blame the Russians for their backstabbing of Russia. So what should stop Russia today to do the same?! Why shouldn't Russia let China taste its own medicine?! I say if the US give Russia a good enough deal, she should go for it. The question here is not if Russia should gang up with the US against China but what the US is ready to pay for that.
    1
  599. Who would invade Ukraine so it must join NATO?! It's clear as day that after the coup in 2014, the US has been running Ukraine, trying to absorb it and using it as a pawn to antagonize Russia at the expense of the Ukrainian people and country. So it's up to the Ukrainians to take back their country from the Neo Nazis and US' puppets and stay neutral for their own good. Why do they have to sacrifice themselves and their country for the US' geopolitical game?!
    1
  600. The the Mongols always chose to attack in December or January, in the dead of winter of Dai Viet, and always defeated before summer set in. There’s absolutely no high temperature or humidity excuse here. And yes, Dai Viet had winter because it was in the same climate zone of Southern China which is subtropical. Tropical climate is only something in your head!
    1
  601.  @Taromango-x9f  But it's not anything that you can call 'hot'. Hanoi's temperature ranges during each month in a year are about the same as Nanning and Guangzhou, two of the adjacent China's provinces' capital cities. And all of those places are not hotter than the Middle East. The Mongols did successfully conquer a lot hotter and larger region like the Middle East and the whole China, so why must the winter temperatures in Hanoi suddenly become the reason for their failure in Dai Viet?!
    1
  602. 'If you don't align with them politically you have no business with them'. Isn't that what the US has been doing for a very long time, so what's wrong with that?!
    1
  603.  @terrum-c7s  Before Geneva conventions, robbing something doesn't belong to you is right and legal?! What a farce you are!
    1
  604. ​ @timothygermann780  Yes, there were atrocities and ethnic cleansing happened in Kosovo but NOT the way you think! They're committed by the KLA, a terrorist organization recognized even by the US, but the US supported it anyway because it wanted to break up Yugoslavia completely. Terrorists who serve US' purposes are always the good terrorists! That again, show the west is a two faced thug that has absolutely no credibility to preach others about law! https://www.newstatesman.com/europe/2008/08/pilger-kosovo-war-nato-serbs Crimea has always been the home base of Russian Black Sea Fleet, so Russian forces have always been there. You cannot call them 'invading forces' when they has always been there since Tsarist time! On the other hand, the US did establish a first-ever base in Kosovo in 1999 called Camp Bondsteel, so the US is actually the one that added forces to Kosovo, not Russia to Crimea! The facts above show they're completely different circumstances but opposite to the way you think! Crimea has good reason to separate from Ukraine, but not Kosovo from Yugoslavia.
    1
  605. How exactly can joining NATO help achieve 'freedom and prosperity? What h0rse!t is that?! Which invasion isn't bruuuuuutal?! LOL! What war isn't 'crude'?! The modern war machine of the US is the crudest one. Remember it just bombed the sh!t out of Iraq for 6 weeks before sending in any ground troops? There were 10000 civilians who died as a result of that 'shock and awe' campaign alone! The Iraqi civilians didn't have a chance to escape through humanitarian corridors like in this war. According to the US' own estimate, there are about 1 million deaths in the 'war on terror' that the US initiated as revenge for 3000 deaths in the NY twin towers. In comparison, the US' puppet regime in Kiev have killed 14,000 mostly Russians in the Donbas region, but did Russia just bomb the sh!t out of Kiev yet?! That alone proves she is having the utmost restraint. The destruction of cities in Ukraine is the fault of the Kiev regime because it chooses to hide behind civilians and engage Russian troops in those cities to avoid casualties. Russia has been too nice to accept that challenge with her ground troops fighting block by block. If it were for the US, it would just have carpet-bombed the whole thing and gotten over with already. Now that is 'crude'.
    1
  606. Why?!
    1
  607. The US should find the cure for its stupid racism before trying to fix other countries' problems and preaching about human rights.
    1
  608. They thought it would be quick the first two times and they could always rob food from the locals as usual so they brought only enough. But all the locals had left their villages and cities with their food and burnt down everything else following the government order. Learning the lesson well, they carefully prepared for the third time but the fleet carrying food and supplies was attacked by Dai Viet, so the troops either got drowned or dispersed and those food and supplies never reached their destination.
    1
  609. One of the guys says Russia should negotiate instead of choosing war. FYI, she did try and was ignored by the US. If you wanna be better than the MSM at least try to get all the facts straight! He also says he would fight back if attacked, so he should have agreed with Russia in this one. Russia just did the same. She just fought back against NATO expansion. If NATO completes its absorption of Ukraine, Russia can't react fast enough in case of a hot war with NATO. This is called 'preemptive strike'. And NO, Ukraine doesn't have a free choice to join NATO or not because its government was hijacked by the US in 2014. All Russia friendly factions in the country were purged. The current one is a US' puppet.
    1
  610.  @peacelife  You're talking as if the Vietnamese can be easily controlled and kept silent! You just can't control the Vietnamese by BS or coercion! Just ask China, France or the US! Who has been disappeared specifically? It was under the rule of the capitalist France, US and their puppet regimes that people who talked back disappeared. You got it backward and are such a brainwashed tool!
    1
  611.  @wyattmcgee1  How is it 'tyrannical'?
    1
  612.  @gti500  Of course, she is courting China these days because China has a lot of money these days! Thailand is like a whore who would go after any alpha male at the moment. That’s her choice, her way of life, so nobody should say ‘she has no choice’. China wouldn’t bomb her if she chooses otherwise but she STILL goes after China so Brian was so lame when he said Thailand had to join the US’ camp in the Vietnam War because she was afraid of being bombed by the US!
    1
  613.  @pax6833  Unfeakingbelievable! Your reply is proof that stupidity has no limits! If the US wasn't looking for a war, why the freak did it keep sailing just off the coast and inside the feaking Gulf of North Vietnam?!
    1
  614.  @pax6833  How old are you really?!
    1
  615. If the US brings everyone home, who's gonna spy on China?! US diplomatic missions around the world have been infamous for being dens of spys.
    1
  616. I have a scanner that shows 0 volume of air flow by the MAF sensor, so does that mean the sensor is bad?
    1
  617. That's also true with China. China had got into bed with the US against the USSR in the 1970s to serve its self interests too.
    1
  618.  @kongdingyou6723  China was the ungrateful one when it got in bed with the US against the USSR in the Cold War. Vietnam has never sided with the US against China.
    1
  619.  @jrbb1837  When and how?!
    1
  620.  @jrbb1837  Google doesn't say when and how 'Vietnam sided with USSR against China'. So you actually don't know when and how?
    1
  621. It's just the same good old white supremacist, colonialist mentality. White people think they own the world. Chinese have a similar mentality to a lesser extent. The white race is the global bully while China is the local one.
    1
  622.  @waasar  This war didn't start a week ago. It started 8 years ago when the Kiev regime (a puppet of the US) started shelling cities in Russian-speaking Donbas. Since then, around 14000 people in that region of Ukraine have died as a result. The US not only didn't have any outrage or condemn its puppet regime but continued its full support. Now it suddenly jumps up and down with indignation when Russia starts shooting back! LOL! China didn't oppose the Kiev regime's unjustifiable actions back then, so of course, she cannot oppose justifiable Russia's actions now. That's only fair! The US didn't oppose the Kiev regime's unjustifiable actions back then, but strongly opposes justifiable Russia's actions now! That makes it a shameless hypocrite! What makes the US think it can coerce China to become a shameless hypocrite like itself?! On top of that, everybody who's not a twelve-year-old or an idiot knows the US has been starting wars around the world just to make some bucks so it is the last country on earth that can tell others when to condemn or be outraged! In fact, when the US condemns or is outraged at a country, you know that that country must have done something right! LOL!
    1
  623. I love a cute boxy car with round headlights like that. Don't care if it can smoke Godzilla or not! :)
    1
  624. @raymondxiwei, So you say the world should blame Vietnam because China kidnap Viet fishermen for ransom, killed them, harass and take or destroy their properties, harass and damage equipment of Viet ship operating well inside Viet Exclusive Economic Zone?
    1
  625.  @Nobody10115  So, what were you patrolling for there?! What info were you trying to collect?! If you provoke people all the time, that makes it OK?!
    1
  626. Actually, the US also started the First Indochina War because France didn’t really want another war after WWII. It simply couldn’t afford it. Only with US’s encouragement and backing politically, financially, and militarily, they had decided to go back. Near the end of that war, the US had paid 85% of the bills for it. French troops were wearing US uniforms even! In reality, the French were just mercenaries hired by the US for its geopolitical gamble in Vietnam.
    1
  627. You don’t get it? It’s because not only the Russian soldiers won’t die, they can multiply at will on the spot that why they can use human wave tactic at every turn and increase in number at the same time.
    1
  628. So now I know where this comes from! It's the same old white man racism. If you don't wanna get kicked in the face, maybe you shouldn't signup to be a stuntman in any martial arts series or movie. But no, it's white men having white privilege, so they signed up to be stuntmen in a martial arts series, but they didn't wanna get kicked in the face, especially by an Asian. That's, of course, very 'disrespectful'! And Lee was supposed to be 'unprofessional' when it was the white men who refused to do their job which was getting kicked in the face for a living as stuntmen! LOL! Then Tarantino, as a fellow white man, can easily feel the pain so he sees the need to depict Bruce Lee as a cocky, disrespectful @sshole in his movie! But in the end, he can only project himself into Lee's character. You can only see Tarantino in that character! It's the kind of man who tells everybody to 'go suck a d! ck' when they disagree with him. The kind of man who thinks it's necessary to assassinate another man's character after he's long dead! And yes, that's very respectful according to his white man standard!
    1
  629. Show me the source that says the 'Vietnamese have invited the Americans back' or what exactly did the Vietnamese do that you consider as inviting US to come back and protect Vietnam from China?!
    1
  630.  @snapdragon9300  Vietnam has trade relations with everybody in the world and let navies from ALL sides to visit its ports. US' and western ships also visited China's ports and China has also participated in RIMPAC before tension flares up between them too, so what you said is in no way, shape, or from can be interpreted as Vietnam are 'inviting the US back to counter China's threat'. In fact, Vietnam has published white paper that clearly states that it won't side with any side in order to fight any side, so you're lame!
    1
  631.  @notxarbsenoj9231  Saying both sides committed atrocities to pull the NVA/VC down to the US' level is so lame and absolutely false! So the French resistance and the Nazis are the same because supposedly both sides committed atrocities in WWII?! The truth is NVA/VC's can't commit violence against the population because that's like killing themselves! They ARE the population! HTF can they fight the US if they commit atrocities against themselves. Do you have even half a brain?! The US, on the other hand, is foreign invader/aggressor that is hated by the population. The population actively fight against it so it has to resort to atrocities to terrorize the population into submission exactly like they did to the American natives. War doesn't automatically or necessarily mean there must be atrocities committed by both sides. It depends on the nature of the war and the participants! You're the one who is lying because you're saying the NVA/VC committed atrocities but provide no proof whatsoever!
    1
  632. ​ @notxarbsenoj9231  It must be over for you because you don't make any fking sense here! If you can say both sides in the US war against Vietnam are evil then why can't I not compare WWII to that war?! What exactly is the reason I can't do that?! The French resistance fought against the Nazis for the same reason the NVA/VC fought against the US. That is independence and territorial integrity. The Nazis invaded France for the same reason the US invaded Vietnam. That is world domination! So why tf can't I not compare them two. Even if the cases are different, I can still make comparison as long as it make sense. You can point out exactly where I'm wrong but you can't order me not to compare!
    1
  633. First, The irony is on the US. They piratically committed genocide in Vietnam to prevent the communists takeover, but now they wanna hug them. On the contrary, the communists always wants to have a good relationship with the US from the get go when they established the new Vietnam in 1945. Second, you're talking as if Vietnam wants US protection from China like the Saigon puppet regime. Vietnam just wants good relationship with everybody in cluding their old enemies like China and the US. Aparently you've never learnt any lesson from history. Vietnam has been fighting China for the last 2000 years. Nobody in this world knows how to defend themselves against China like Vietnam. So no, they don't need US protection and the US can't protect anybody. Remember the Saigon regime and Kissinger? He once said, 'it may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal.'
    1
  634. Even if Russia decides to gang up with the US against China, it's only fair because China had done the exact same thing against Russia and the whole socialist bloc, and so helped bringing them down. China is the undisputed turncoat of the 20th century. Today the Chinese still think that's the right thing to do. They will sell out their friends again as long as the price is right. That's why they always worry about somebody doing the same thing to them.
    1
  635. @Linn-1269If you don't believe me, ask a Chinese about if he/she thinks about China's ganging up with the US against the USSR and the socialist bloc as a whole in the Cold War as a betrayal, they would say NO. They would say in international relations, there are really no friends or foes, only interests. How could they betray someone if they have no friends? Those were just necessary moves to advance their self interests, so that's all what matters to them. If they have to make that choice again, they'll do it again in a heartbeat. Deng Xiaoping is revered in China for that act. The Chinese thinking is very close if not identical to western imperialists.
    1
  636. Why does Jesus isn't a 'self-proclaimed' 'son of God' but Hong Xiuquan is a 'self-proclaimed' 'brother of Jesus'?! LOL!
    1
  637. Yeah, your sources! LOL! Do you know that the US media said Saddam possessed WMD with 'hard evidence' but they've still been looking for it for nearly 20 years now?! Do you know that 'the US' 'intelligence community' predicted that the US' withdrawal would create a 'civil war' that would last 6 months to 1 year but Kabul was fell today, after like...a week? LOL!
    1
  638. ​ @VT-mw2zb  Oh so that's your real source! LOL! No wonder! The author is a descendant of people who fled Saigon before it fell and so definitely was indoctrinated with hating-the-communists religion since very little! She clearly had a malicious intent in writing the book and she's supposed to be a good source of impartial and reliable information? LOL! Nice try but you're so lame! She has even worse credibility than the NY Times, sorry!
    1
  639.  @VT-mw2zb  No, I'm just a diehard supporter of TRUTH so I like to trigger bwtthurt losers like you.
    1
  640.  @qimengzhang2836  Stupid! LOL! You need my source for what?! I didn't give any statement that needs to be backed up like him.
    1
  641. ​ @skaithey  , that's call-half truth, so it's still a lie.
    1
  642.  @MrBudha888  No, I don't forget anything but you have just shamelessly made up a lame @$$ story to defend an indefensible act. ASEAN fishermen now cannot even fish in the SCS without Chinese forces' harassment and attack, let lone using those Chinese occupied islands! You're so hilarious! No trade ship has been blocked by US' Navy ships in the SCS so you cannot say that the US is there for a blockade. Not only China militarizes those islands, but she had used military forces to attack and rob them from her neighbors many decades before Obama even became US' president. Don't worry about the western MSN, you should have your head examed and learn about history before opening your mouth! Those bellicose behaviors and China's ridiculous and stupid 9-dash line claim have drawn the US and its gang in. China has shot herself in the foot just like Japan did at the beginning of the 20th century and 1930s. You only have your greed and selfishness to blame here.
    1
  643.  @MrBudha888  China drew the stupid dotted line that encompasses the WHOLE SCS in the1930s, robbed many islets from Vietnam in 1974 and again in 1988. Robbed some more from the Philippines in 1994 and again 2012, and then Obama announce that Pivot to Asia policy in the same year. So you're the brainwashed who got it backward. China robbed first and then the self appointed world police came later, not the other way around! Find a five year old who knows how to read, read this and explain the order of actions again if you still don't understand!
    1
  644.  @Christian-ty5vn  Every time he cornered and was about to wipe out a large pocket of the US' backed terrorists, he suddenly had to use 'chemical weapons' and 'on civilians' under the watchful eyes of the world especially the west! So either the people who believe in those stories are or he is really stupid! What do you think is the case?! I'll give you a hint! Assad doesn't have chemical weapons and those lame stories are proven fake news. Do you know that the US has been producing fake news to rally support from its stupid population for its imperialist wars since 1889. And here is another hint. Americans from the president down has been rampantly using fake news to attack each other for trivial domestic matters, so what makes you think they are truthful when it comes to their enemies abroad in wars?! There's no doubt that people who still believe in the west's lame war propaganda stories must be beyond stupid! LOL!
    1
  645. This is just the same as Wankel engine with reversed shapes of the housing and rotor. The apex seal is still there to cause problems and the peanut shape of the rotor is probably not as efficient as the guitar pick shape.
    1
  646. When did Vietnam start war against China you tool?!
    1
  647.  @balckston  What does jbiden have anything to do with what we talk here you t0ol?!
    1
  648. So you on ly eat p!g food? :v
    1
  649. So only Singapore can have the right to transfer power from an authoritarian father (Lee Kwan Yew) to an authoritarian son (Lee Hsien Loong), but nobody else?! Talking like a true running dog of the hypocritical west as it is! LMAO! If Cambodia was also a running dog of the west like Singapore. This wouldn't be a problem, would it?
    1
  650.  @NOBSUS5150  No, that’s just stupid western propaganda, not history.
    1
  651.  @NOBSUS5150  That's propaganda, not history.
    1
  652. @ you read the pact itself, not the propaganda about it.
    1
  653.  @NOBSUS5150 there was a pact but you’re repeating the propaganda about it, not the pact itself
    1
  654.  @NOBSUS5150  so what’s wrong with that?
    1
  655.  @NOBSUS5150 If nothing's wrong why must you keep bltching?!
    1
  656.  @NOBSUS5150  If nothing's wrong, why are you still b:tching?!
    1
  657.  @paulD1984  @bugmanaussie8862, the west always think exactly like you two every time they decide to invade Russia but the results are always the same!
    1
  658. @bugmanaussie8862 The west thought exactly like you two every time they decided to invade Russia!
    1
  659. @ Yes the west thought exactly like you two and look at what happened in the end? 😆
    1
  660. The jungle only exists in your head, not Dai Viet.
    1
  661.  @robvision3888  OK so Lt. Dan is your source of info in life?! No wonder!😂You need to ask John McCain though because he was actually shot down over Hanoi and imprisoned for a few years there so he'd know. Hanoi was where the Mongols fought the Viets, not where Lt. Dan was. He had never got a chance to go anywhere near Hanoi before or after losing both his legs so he wouldn't know. Here's a hint, Vietnam is a 1000 mile long country with different climate regions.
    1
  662. Either the people in the US and the rest of the world join forces to bring the US imperialism down or it will bring the whole world down to extinction.
    1
  663. You were talking about ‘no more free protection by the US’ for Europe but protection from whom? When was the last time Europe was attacked by outsiders?! NATO wasn’t for protection of Europe. It was created to attack Russia yet again should an opportunity arise. Now the US can no longer foot the bill, so they want Europe pay more for it because they all want a piece of Russia.
    1
  664. There will be no real peace between China and Vietnam because China thinks the WHOLE SCS belongs to it! Heck! There has been no real peace between them for the last 2200 years because of China's obsession with expansionism and conquest of Vietnam. This is just a short period of temporary peace/truce like many others in history. There will be war again when China again finds some lame excuses to attack and seize something from Vietnam again like they always do!
    1
  665. The US is a thug who's just loved to trample on other countries' sovereignty for over a century now and it is preaching about respecting sovereignty! That's hilarious! And what about Russian sovereignty?! If Ukraine has the right to join a gang whose whole purpose is to antagonize Russia at best; or start WWIII at worst, Russia must also have the right to preempt that, mustn't it? And Russia didn't even start this war! Ukraine did! What about the sovereignty of the two republics in the Donbas region? Why didn't Kiev respect the sovereignty of those countries?! Russia doesn't attack Ukraine to annex it. It is an offensive against Ukraine's violence against Donbas, so that's totally justifiable.
    1
  666.  @sdpoukus8395 ừ làm lãnh đạo một đất nước mà đ care có được dân ủng hộ hay không thì đúng là rất xàm rồi. Bị bén bỏ là chuyện dĩ nhiên!
    1
  667. There's no argument the US is evil but China's own evil creates conflicts with most of its neighbor so the US has a chance to stick its nose in.
    1
  668. Peter's gonna get banned soon at this rate.
    1
  669. This is tragically stupid. Western Ukrainians dream to become rich by being a dog of the US attacking and killing their own compatriots in the east, betraying their own brothers Belarus and Russia. Now when its brothers fight back, the west only sends in weapons to continue the killing and lets them suffer economically!
    1
  670.  @diegoaespitia  The normal people have a say when they vote for their representatives. The communist party in Vietnam do represent the common people that's why Vietnam is among the least affected by Covid-19. The wastes and unrepresentative are those ruling parties in the west because they only serve the rich, the rest is free to die en masse!
    1
  671.  @tanyalim5411  The clowns are the leaders in those so called 'democracies' in the west. They spend billions dollars of people hard earned money in wasteful election campaign but only serve the rich. They let the rich ship all the jobs of common people to China so the rich can rip higher profit. For all they care, the common citizens of their countries can be drown in poverty or die en masse in the pandemic!
    1
  672.  @tanyalim5411  LOL! You've been talking about that for over 200 years but nothing changes. The two parties still always serve the rich and you clowns are only slaves who keep on imagining you have a say! LOL! So what's the point of...talking?! Zero Zip Zilch Nada!
    1
  673. Fkg old weasel! Jackson asked him one simple question, not the other guy. HTF does the other guy know why he didn't tweet about the deaths of the ethnic Russians in Donbas?!
    1
  674. Did you or your family commit any crime in China? If not, why is this a matter at all?!
    1
  675. If the US has 'democracy', there wouldn't be no Vietnam War. You're brainwashed by the system. The MIC is runs the show from behind! It's the real boss, not the people. It orders the US government to create wars to feed them. About the antiwar movement: in order to have a big enough anti war movement to stop a war, there must be enough casualties. There must be a lot of coffins coming home, and in turn there would be a draft! At the high of the Vietnam War, there were 700-800 coffins and 6 times of that wounded coming home a week to fuel the anti war movement red hot. So the root cause was always the hard fight of the Viets. There were anti war protests sprung up in the US right at the start of the Iraq War, but it died down very quickly because there weren't enough coffins coming home and so there was no draft and so nobody cared!
    1
  676. Not only does the US watch the fire from across the river after causing it, but it also pretends to care about the burning house and people while blaming others and continuing to put fuel to the fire! That's a better picture of what has happened.
    1
  677. When was the last time Russia invade Germany without being attacked first by Germany?! You're so lame!
    1
  678. That's proof that Vietnam is the only country that has always been there in the first place before all of the others. The others only get there recently to occupy them.
    1
  679.  @ChiefCabioch  1. It's not an insult when I'm just stating a fact. Whether you like it or not, other NATO members are still just the US' running dogs. It is just a simple fact! How old are you? You must be a twelve year old or a very stupid and ignorant person to think other NATO countries have a say. Watch and learn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sq_q7WsiCWs 2. Ukraine has lost its sovereignty and has been practically run by the US since 2014 after it spent $5 billion dollars to stage a coup overthrowing a legitimate government. So no, it doesn't have sovereign decisions. And that is just another fact!
    1
  680.  @yellowbhee7850  You can't answer my questions so you're THE Nim Wit not dimwit nor nitwit! LOL!
    1
  681. LMAO! How old is this guy? He doesn't know that a bully would never pick on somebody his size?! Poor Ukrainians! How could you end up with this clown as your 'president' is beyond me! LOL!
    1
  682. This actually is nothing new. It's been going on for the length of the US' history. Just because those rights were written or 'guaranteed', it doesn't mean they would honor them! The opposite of what they say is often true! In the words of George Carlin, people in the US have no rights, only temporary privileges which can be taken away anytime by the establishment, especially when you need them most! LOL! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9-R8T1SuG4
    1
  683. Good riddance for China!
    1
  684. I wanna see a bicycle vs the GT-R
    1
  685. The US and China deserve each other. They got in bed together in the 1970s and tried to isolate and put down the USSR and Vietnam but now are slapping and trying to put down one another! Karma is really a b!.tch! LOL!
    1
  686.  @VT-mw2zb  In 1963, HCM was 73 year old and not really in good health. He has never held or accepted the party chief chair too so how was there a 'power struggle' like you're imagining?! The party chief don't decide everything but through majority rule in the politburo. The power then is divided between the party chief, the prime minister, the president and the head of congress. They didn't work for money too, but with a single goal of kicking the US out, so what did they struggle for?!
    1
  687.  @maximme  If there was 'Chinese PLA died to support VietNam independence and freedom', they must have names and China must have record of that! Show it! Let me sum things up this way so you can easily understand. China helped Vietnam in the war with the US. China got in bed with the US in 1972 to turn against the USSR and Vietnam. China backed the Khmer Rouge to attack Vietnam from 1975 to 1978, had continued to help it politically and diplomatically for 10 years after it was deposed by Vietnam. China robbed islands from Vietnam in 1974 and again in 1988. Vietnam still has not done anything actively against China. And Vietnam is the ingrates?! The USSR also helped China too! But at the end China slept with the US and betrayed it! You are THE nation of ingrates!
    1
  688.  @cavscout888 , How old are you?! Anybody can claim to be somebody, so when you try to associate a person with a specific ideology, you must know about both that person and that ideology. Pol Pot or Mussolini just simply claimed to be a socialist because it was very popular back then. That didn't mean they were! They're just simply sick men who have their own twisted understanding about it! It just likes cults from some big religions. They claim to worship the same god but they don't practice the same things or even doing the exact opposite! Grow up and go to school before going around comment on things you don't know!
    1
  689.  @VT-mw2zb  You're mixing up things here. We are talking about your alleged internal 'power struggle' between top leaders in the politburo, not the shutting down of a group of spies in the general population by the government! They are two different things. Stop making stuff up as you go here! Do you have any evidence of VNG 'sat on the sidelines during the 1968 Offensive'?! Even the US didn't know that! LOL!
    1
  690.  @VT-mw2zb  What? I said stop making up stories, didn't I?! LOL!
    1
  691.  @cavscout888  What part of my statements makes you say I use Chinese sources?
    1
  692. However big China's 'help' was, it's all gone when China got in bed with the US in 1972 and back stabbed Vietnam for the next 18 years!
    1
  693. No, Ukraine is clearly and in fact a pawn on the geopolitical chessboard of the US. It's not just what Putin thinks!
    1
  694. Whoever keeps saying North VN vs South VN are obviously a brainwashed tool and hasn't learned anything! The whole Vietnam favored Ho Chi Minh. Even Eisenhower acknowledged that if nationwide election held, 80% of voters would had voted for HCM. So, the US barged in, created the RVN from the State of Vietnam which had been a French product. Both of those puppet state had no popular support in the South that's why they were so fragile and could have never stood on their own! The repressive and brutal government was the one that had no popular support so it had to resort to terror. That was the RVN. Too brutal to the point it was toppled by its own military under the approval of its master, the US, and people in the South! You're just full of $h!t!
    1
  695.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  China has never owned those islands in history so it's not 'historical problems'! It's the problems existing right now as we speak. And it's not 'mainly islands', it's the whole SCS! No country in the whole history of the world has ever had a ridiculous claim like that! Yes, everybody has reasons, but China's are beyond ridiculous! That's the problem. China probably named the islands in the East China Sea and Yellow Sea even earlier than those in the SCS, but why it didn't draw a line reaching out thousands of miles encompassing those seas too?! While at it, why didn't China also draw a line around the Moon, claim it and all the space between because Chinese also named the Moon and have been looking at it since long before it could draw a map?! LMAO! Vietnam had existed as an independent kingdom long before China annexed it over 2000 years ago, so why does your history only start after China's annexation?! On top of that, the southern part of Vietnam has never been part of China, so how can China have any right over its sea and islands?! See? The problem with you Chinese is you are always full of yourselves, even more so than the westerners!
    1
  696.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  Chinese governments hide facts and brainwash its people that China is noble is a fact! It's not just my belief. If China didn't want chaos in southeastern Asia, it wouldn't have supported the genocidal Pol Pot regime when it started killing Chinese, Vietnamese, Cambodians after 1975 in Cambodia. It wouldn't have helped house, feed, and arm the Khmer Rouge to fight for another 10 years after it was removed by Vietnam. It wouldn't have attacked Vietnam in 1979 at the border and continued the war for 10 years there, robbed Vietnam and Philippines of their islands. If China didn't want chaos in SE Asia, it wouldn't have drawn the 9 dash line intending to rob SEA countries of all their sea and islands. The people you know are all brainwashed like you so it wouldn't change anything here. Vietnam didn't invade Cambodia. She liberated Cambodia from the genocidal Pol Pot regime. It was an offensive against the Khmer Rouge after its troops had entered Viet territories and massacred thousands of Viets several times for 3 years. China is the very source of chaos in SE Asia. The details are the most important thing. They determine who's right and wrong. Only brainwashed people don't care and don't wanna talk about the details.
    1
  697.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  When you wholeheartedly believe in something that's totally not true, you're obviously brainwashed! That's you. For example, you said, <<so the soviet helped viet to attack some of the south east Asia and caused some trouble beside our borders, and China fear this would let the Soviets invade us and the south will be attacked so a war between us broke out>>. That isn't just a 'different point of view' but a total lie from the Chinese govt! You really believe that so you're clearly brainwashed!
    1
  698.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  If that's really happened, China must have detailed records of the incidents and plenty of eyewitnesses, victims. It doesn't! Vietnam has all of those for the Khmer Rouge's attacks against Vietnam. So your grand father’s brother was knowingly spreading propaganda or he's just repeating propaganda, or you're making up stories here! Before China attacked Vietnam in 1979, Vietnam was very busy dealing with the Khmer Rouge in the South. All of the experienced units had been busy fighting the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia since 12/1978, so why must Vietnam attack China to open a second front on her back?! The truth is China has made up stories, lame excuses to attack Vietnam hoping to scare Vietnam to withdraw from Cambodia and rescue its tool, the Khmer Rouge. China's made up story is really silly and stupid because it doesn't make any f k sense! Only brainwashed tools can believe it! LOL!
    1
  699. ​ @kitschchauvinismus_9394  It's a lie and propaganda because there is NO PROOF WHATSOEVER to support it! Do your grandpa have PROOF?! Where EXACTLY are the locations inside China and that Vietnam attacked before 1979?! What are the dates of those incidents?! How exactly did they happen? How many Chinese were killed?! You, your grandpa and China have none of those! On the other hand, Vietnam has plenty of records, evidence, eyewitnesses, victims of attacks across the border done by the Khmer Rouge in the span of three years 1975-78! You're lying RIGHT NOW! You can't be tired of giving me evidence because you haven't give me ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL! Your grandpa's words are propaganda, not evidence. You cannot use hearsay as EVIDENCE!
    1
  700.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  Tell that to yourself! You're the one who're not open to info from other sources other than yourself here! You have it backward! How can you be more open to info when you have a wall whose exact purpose is to block info?! LOL! You're being ridiculous here! LOL!
    1
  701.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  You said Vietnam attacked China first and I said the opposite, so both cannot be true at the same time! Can you understand that simple logic?! You don't have ANY EVIDENCE to back up your claim that Vietnam attacked China first, but you still believe it wholeheartedly, so you must be brainwashed by your government. If the truth really matters to you, you can't accept the folly that both you and I are right!
    1
  702.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  No, there's no evidence of Vietnam attacked China FIRST before 1979 on google. Stop lying.
    1
  703.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  Why are you Chanks always full of yourselves like that?! LMAO!
    1
  704.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  And you don't know how to read! 1. A war broke out inside Korea can't be a justification for a Chinese invasion.
    1
  705.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  So China could help N Korea but Vietnam couldn't help the Cambodian side who was against Pol Pot?! When China helps one side in Korea, it is help, but when Vietnam helps one side in Cambodia, it is invasion and aggression?! Can you see why the words coming out of you double standard hypocrite Chanky mouths won't worth anything now?
    1
  706.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  NO! The US China's support of Pol Pot to fight from Thailand in 10 years is the reason Vietnam had to stay in Cambodia for 10 years! You're the one who got it backward! If China and the US didn't support Pol Pot, his forces would have been all dead or surrendered shortly, so there would be no reason for Vietnam to stay. NO! Vietnam didn't withdraw because of China! We withdrew because we finally defeated the Khmer Rouge and the new Cambodian government could stand on itself. China started attacking Vietnam in 1979 and had continued doing so for 10 years afterward and Vietnam didn't withdraw from Cambodia until her objective had reached in 1989! So China could do nothing to help its murderous Khmer Rouge tools here! They're completely wiped out in Cambodia!
    1
  707.  @kitschchauvinismus_9394  And stop telling me I can keep my opinion. Who t f are you to have the authority to tell people they can or cannot keep their opinions?! And it's not my opinion. It's the truth of this war! What you've been telling is China's stupid propaganda! If you have a brain, you should have seen the holes in it! LOL!
    1
  708. For the idiots who say she k.i.l.led her own countrymen by doing this remember the US government was the one who sent them there to die, not her!
    1
  709.  @Users_291w  Of course that's the US' way of diplomacy but a bully only has that kind of confidence when everybody's afraid of him. Unfortunately, most countries in the world, big ones included, are too timid in front of it, so in effect, give it more confidence in exercising its self imagined authority!
    1
  710. Castiel The Archangel Learn to read first if you want to comment. When did I say you cannot get better if you practice?!
    1
  711. Castiel The Archangel It's OK if you can't dispute my point. You don't need to imagine things to argue about! The fact remains that Americans prefer to play their own sports in their own little world so it's much easier to be 'world champions' and that's how they always think they're more special than the rest of the world! That's the truth that you can't deny!
    1
  712. Are you kidding me? If the US isn't going around overthrowing governments in Latin America or polluting the whole country and just leave, that's lucky for you already! You shouldn't ask for anything else. Be careful what you ask for.
    1
  713. Putin 'overreact'? So this guy doesn't understand anything that Kim has just said! LOL!
    1
  714. And the US just goes on preaching about 'rule-based' international relations! The cold-blooded killer somehow just loves to preach about moral conduct! LMAO! Its shamelessness is just mind-boggling, way beyond absurd.
    1
  715. Zelensky is a comedian so what do you expect?!
    1
  716. Alex Martin, Western major news agencies have already tried. Do a search!
    1
  717. You're number is meaningless and lame. They don't take into account the MAJORITY of poor 'democracies' in Latin Americas, Africa, Asia, and Eastern Europe. Nations of the world also don't have the same starting point. Western European countries have been robbing the world blind for centuries so they have all the money in the world to develop. That has nothing do do with 'democracy' but in fact goes against it!
    1
  718. Not only that, they have not stopped their crimes against humanity since then. Remember Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and many other small countries that were victim of their aggression? Many African nations are still paying colonial tax to France!
    1
  719. Forcing people to pay for protection money like gangsters! Last time I check, without Americun 'protection', Germany was the strongest country in Europe militarily and economically, so why does she need Americun 'protection'? It's obviously the US stations there to contain Germany and Germany has to pay for that! So comical!
    1
  720.  @mastermirror3888  Excuse me but when and how did China 'crushed Vietnam' and how does that can counter the USSR?! LOL!
    1
  721. Why didn't he go to Donbas where the real fighting is going on and his desperate troops really need encouragement?
    1
  722. What if you've never been born? That's the proper question you need to ask! With all the money and killing machines the US had, if there was a tiny chance of winning, it would have happened! But it didn't, so that means there was no f v king chance! So why keeps asking the stupid question?!
    1
  723.  @ThatAirplaneGuy2000  , Yes, they were. Not only they've got brainwashed back then, when they were just fresh out of high school, but they are still now because they keeps asking stupid questions like why the Vietnamese kept on fighting back then! Vietnam or Vietnamese, communist or not, then and now, in no way, shape or form, could be a threat to the US but US soldiers or what not, young and old, were brainwashed into thinking they were an extremely dangerous to the point Americans needed to swim half way around the world to kill them! Not everybody got brainwashed back then, like Clinton, Bush Jr., Trump, or Muhammad Ali and a lot of others will do anything to avoid going there. 'Just follow orders' is a very lame excuse. You're a human with developed brain to know right from wrong. If your leader tell you to rape a child, will you just follow the order? After WWII, many Nazis did use the 'just follow orders' excuse at the Nuremberg trials and it wouldn't cut it and they were hung anyway, so just save it!
    1
  724.  @ThatAirplaneGuy2000  A troll personally attacks people without any proper logic and fact based arguments. That's you. You've got it backwards. What is your so called 'in depth' research?! Notice that you can't dispute even one of my arguments and have to cowardly resort to personal attack despite of all of your 'in depth' research? LOL!
    1
  725. The Russians have repeatedly been saying that they have no interest in western Ukraine. The Poles have been repeatedly saying that they want that part of the country 'back', so obviously they're preparing to do exactly that when the Kiev regime and military inevitably fall. This is what happens when the west worshiping Ukrainians sell their soul to the Great Devil. They will eventually lose the western part of the country to the Poles and the eastern one to the Russians and their country disappears.
    1
  726. Vấn đề của 3 que cộng hòa nằm ngay chỗ đó! Tỏng thóng chỉ giỏi tiếng Anh (bồi) chứ ngoài ra không được cái trò trống gì cả. Làm tổng thống thì cần chọn người giỏi toàn diện về chính trị ngoại giao quân sự,... chứ ngoại ngữ thì đã có thông ngôn nó lo, giống như Mỹ vậy! Nhưng 3 que cộng hòa với đầu óc nô lệ me tây lại chọn một thèng thông ngôn làm tổng thống! Không tụt quần đu càng chạy mới là lạ! 😀
    1
  727. Vấn đề của 3 que cộng hòa nằm ngay chỗ đó! Tỏng thóng chỉ giỏi tiếng Anh (bồi) chứ ngoài ra không được cái trò trống gì cả. Không tụt quần đu càng chạy mới là lạ!
    1
  728. Is Trump playing dumb or really dumb?!
    1
  729. I heard on the news that when China says Canada has no right to criticize China for human rights violation because it has a genocidal past against the indigenous people, Canada says it has the 'Truth Commission' on that issue and recognizes its crimes therefore it's still better and so it has the right to preach. This is wrong because a criminal is always a criminal regardless of whether he recognizes his crime or not! And once a criminal, Canada is not fit to be a judge! That's how civilized world works. Not to mention its accusations against China are phony.
    1
  730. No. those weren't missiles or missiles using washer machine chips. They were actually washing machines raining down on Ukraine.
    1
  731. Reconquest is more like it!
    1
  732. Actually China has always been trying to force its way on Vietnam for over two millenniums and say Vietnam copied China.
    1
  733. So how does that Mahathir guy have the authority or final say about this matter?! You just need to look at China s nine dash line and it's so obvious who's stirring up troubles in the SCS!
    1
  734. They thought they would never got kicked out so they built those things to serve themselves and exploit Vietnam. Under their rule, 98% of Vietnamese were illiterate and wouldn't live past 40 years old. So I'm not sure if you can count any of those as positive things they did. Whatever they bult is nothing compare to what they had robbed Vietnam for many decades.
    1
  735. It's not a 'duel'. It's a slaughter. There's no contest or challenge here. The cats are simply sitting ducks.
    1
  736. The Vietnamese version of the war is the truth. The American one is just stupid propaganda.
    1
  737. test
    1
  738.  @Dimon.Vietnam  That museum was originally named 'US and Puppet regime's War Crimes Museum'. But later when Vietnam reestablished relations with the US, they changed it to 'War Remnants Museum'. As you've seen, it's mostly about showing US' and Saigon regime's war crimes, not the whole picture of the war. That's why there's no mention of the USSR. The US' diplomats in pictures there were the ones at the forefront of working to reestablish relations and cooperating to solve the war's aftereffects.
    1
  739. 'Why Putin wants Ukraine?' This question/title is really stupid.
    1
  740.  @匚尺丂乇-k3v  Because raising a question about an issue that doesn't exist is really stupid! Putin doesn't want Ukraine so why ask that stupid question?! LOL!
    1
  741.  @mcgKW  What does China government do to their people too?
    1
  742.  @mcgKW  Give me an example.
    1
  743.  @mcgKW  If they lie as much as the US/UK, you can find their lies in any language. You're so lame!
    1
  744.  @mcgKW  So when you go to court accusing somebody of a crime. The defendant (not you, the accuser) must find evidence to prove him guilty for you?! That his responsibility, not yours?! LOL! What an idiot!
    1
  745. CORRECTION: No words in the Geneva Conference stipulated that Vietnam was to be divided into two states with two different ideologies or regimes. On the contrary, it clearly stated that the demarcation line at the 17th parallel was only temporary. It only served the purpose of dividing opposing forces to end hostility and for the French civilians and military to withdraw back to France. It could not be interpreted as a political division and the country must hold general election in 1956 to establish her official government of the whole Vietnam.
    1
  746.  @testla3383  No one said what?
    1
  747. If you're really interest in history and honestly want to tell it as it is, you should not keep on repeating the US' propaganda about the Geneva Accords of 1954. Please read the documents yourself. Nowhere in those documents stipulates and nobody talks about the division of Vietnam into two separate states. Both Vietnamese governments at that time, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the French puppet State of Vietnam claim the whole Vietnam and oppose any division. In fact, the Accords specifically say that 'the military demarcation line is provisional and should not in any way be interpreted as constituting a political or territorial boundary.' So you're completely wrong when you said the division into two separate states was a result on the Accords.
    1
  748. There has never been a 'communist country' in the world nor has the government any of those countries you mentioned claimed theirs a 'communist country'. Most on your list are led by a communist party, and that doesn't make them a 'communist country' by default. Those governments only claim to built a socialist country. They're still building it and never say when would they have it! North Korea has a different ideology, not communism. The fact that you keep mentioning about them as 'communist countries' under a negative light, something below you, shows that you are also brainwashed and grown under another mind control regime, a capitalist one. So, you are not any freer than any of those in China. You said that they are taught to hate Japan and the West but as a matter of fact, westerners also are taught to hate China, communism, and look down on the rest of the world. To be fair, China is petty when it keeps teaching its children to hate Japan that much, but it has some very good reasons to hate the West because of history and what's been going on ever since. The West is ridiculously unreasonable when it keeps teaching its children like you to hate a ghost call 'communism' when that thing has never been materialized anywhere on earth and no once has ever claimed they have something like that!
    1
  749. China really deserves the US.
    1
  750. This is not the truth about Ho Chi Minh but westerners' skewed view and propaganda about him.
    1
  751.  @iohannesdiogenes5766  Brainwashed tool moment
    1
  752. Yep, China's claim of the WHOLE SCS isn't 'selfish' at all! Thanks for the amusement! LOL! The US is the global bully and China is the local one. There's no doubt about that. And please don't delete my comment. Just prove me wrong instead!
    1
  753. China is the snake.
    1
  754. The relevant countries surrounding the SCS obviously are not gonna join China's call for collective condemnation of the US' 'marinetime bullying' because they are also bullied by China in that sea. Anyone who wanna know what 'marinetime bullying' looks like can look up China's claim of the SCS.
    1
  755. It's not an irony at all. It was the imperialist US which wanted a foothold in Vietnam so it cried 'communism' and used it as a pretext for its actions there. All Vietnam wanted was independence. Whatever works economically would be fine.
    1
  756. ​ Teli Apikotoa  You're so lame. When did I forbid you to choose your friends? When did I ask you to back off? In fact, I'd love to see you stay firmly at your master's (the US) boot and continue to antagonize China but instead, Australia now stops and just whine about why China treat it so bad and DO NOTHING! You talk about doing something to stop China because she's like Hitler? DO SOMETHING then. Don't just sit there and whine! LOL! Oh! I forgot, you're just a puppet. You only move when your master, the US starts pulling the string! And you've got it backwards. Since after WWII, the US has been the new Hitler. It actually worse than Hitler because Hitler only invaded and mass murdered regional countries, the US has been doing it GLOBALLY and you have no problem licking its boot. You are the new Hitler's boot licker. You're never gonna fight against it like you're hallucinating! LOL!
    1
  757.  Teli Apikotoa  Lame are the ones who chose to pick on China FIRST and then cry a river when she cut the trade, and beg her to come back! Lame are the ones who bit the Chinese hands that feed them, like Australia, a country depends on trade with China for GDP's growth. Lame are the ones who cry wolf about imaginary Chinese concentration camps but blindly follow the US anywhere in the world to commit crimes against humanity! I can talk about your lameness all day! LOL! I'll take your dumb rhetoric seriously when you totally cut trade with China and stop begging her to buy your stuff, and top being a US' loyal dog! LOL! What an empty, brainwashed tool!
    1
  758.  Teli Apikotoa  So if you can't dispute what a person said, he/she should leave the country? Who the fart are you? and what a lame and shameless twst you are when you're keep on preaching about freedom and democracy! LOL!
    1
  759. ​ Teli Apikotoa  I've been putting my money where my mouth is and you should do the same. I don't bltch about China and then turn around begging China to buy my stuff like Australian politicians!
    1
  760.  Teli Apikotoa  The loser here is the one who don't know how to read, a brainwashed tool who can't argue with facts and when losing an argument keeps asking the other side to leave the country. That's you! Why don't you care to ask tens of millions victims of the US around the world but blindly and unconditionally keep on licking its boots everywhere it goes?! LOL! Why didn't white Europeans stay in Europe in the 15th century?! Why did they have to move to Asia if Europe was better?! I'll leave when all white people in Australia go back to Europe. You people are so hopelessly hypocritical! LOL!
    1
  761. ​ Teli Apikotoa  Why are you so sure everybody in Australia thinks like you. People like you can be the traitors too because you love to lick American boots and act against the trade interest of your own country. When you choose the lesser evil, you're still evil and so you have no moral authority to preach moral! Not to mention you are actually siding with the worst evil of our current time, the US. China at best is only a regional bully while the US is indisputably the world's sole bully and mas murderer since after WWII. IF you love fairness like you've been boasting, you can't in anyway saying the US is the 'lesser evil'. Such a lame twst! LOL!
    1
  762.  Teli Apikotoa  You are the naïve one that got brainwashed by western propaganda here. The west is always the unfair side. It's has never cried unfair when it robbed the world blind for centuries but when the East rises again through trade, not wars and robbing, it cries foul! The west boast 'free trade' but when it can't compete with cheap labor and efficiency from China (created by capitalist economic system), it whines 'unfair'. That's evil right there. White people are always full of themselves. That's the problem.
    1
  763.  Teli Apikotoa  'The CCP should hire you mate' is your best argument now?! LOL! Can you grow half a brain to see how lame you are yet?! When did China ask you to accept its system?! China just want you to stop bltching about its internal affairs like it would never bltch about what you do inside your house among yourselves. Why is that so hard to understand?! You've only been chanting empty slogans and stupid rhetoric here. That's all! The western capitalist system is the most tyrannical system that's been plundering and mass murdering the whole world for the last 500 years, causes two world wars and countless imperialist wars against defenseless countries to rob their resources. So whatever China's system is, it's still a saint compare to yours! Just look at world history of the last 500 years, the west is always the side that choose wars because you are essentially thugs who don't have the capability to earn a honest living.
    1
  764.  Teli Apikotoa  I'm living with convictions. What you think is your 'conviction' is actually a pile of h0$zeshlt! I'll leave when all the white men leave Asia and return this country to the aboriginals. Who the t are you to ask me to leave?!
    1
  765. China never forgets she's the victim of Japan and western's aggression but now she starts acting like them! You can easily draw parallels between Japan in the past and China today. In the first half of 20th century, Japan became really strong after decades of successful economic development. Instead of helping and leading its neighbors to develop and progress like herself, she started grabbing territories left and right. China now is acting like that. After some decades of successful economic development, China also starts bullying her neighbors. She claims the WHOLE SCS as her private property! If I remember correctly, this claim is unprecedented any where in the world. No country has ever had such a ridiculous claim like that. They may claim this and that island but never a WHOLE sea! The basis of the claim is so ridiculous! It's essentially like this: the islands in the SCS appear in ancient Chinese literature, therefore the WHOLE SCS belongs to China! Even Japan in the 1930s couldn't be so ridiculous! There are other peoples probably living around that sea for tens of thousands of years, naming those islands and and fishing in that sea so why are they excluded?! If the basis of the claim is naming those islands in Chinese literature and fishing in that sea two thousand years ago, why does China not draw some other lines that encompass the WHOLE East China Sea and Yellow Sea too?! WHY?! Has China never named the islands in those seas and fished in them?! That ridiculous claim only appeared in 1947 by Chiang Kai-shek's government. At that time, China has just got over foreign domination and she already turned imperialistic and the easy targets are the weaker neighbors in the South. As being communist, the CCP should have been against that ridiculous claim which was invented by those imperialistic minds of the capitalist Republic of China from day one, but no, it's just gone along and fully complicit in this criminal act! If China plays fair and makes peace with her neighbors, the western imperialists wouldn't have a chance! But no, she must shoot herself in the foot like Japan in the past. Back then many Asian countries, China included, looked up to Japan and wanted to be successful like her but Japan shot herself in the foot by attacking her neighbors and become the common enemy of East and South East Asia. China now is just imitating Japan while denouncing her actions in the past! LOL! The US and its western lackeys are a bunch of thugs who have been plundering and bullying Asia and other parts of the world for many centuries now and on the decline. This is the chance for not only China but the whole Asia to get back to its glory, but China's not helping. Instead of making peace with her neighbors, she bullies them and gives the westerners excuses to jump in and block her advancement! Imagine with the intelligence and work ethic of Asians, if South, East, and South East Asia unite, the westerners wouldn't stand a chance to pick on us, but no, China must stubbornly insist on something it can never occupy, a whole sea, and abandon other doable and good objectives!
    1
  766.  @damagejackal10  Why Deng's book is automatically true but another person's account is automatically false?! The title of the book proves he's so full of himself so I don't think he's a good source to get info from. Vietnam's army, the PAVN, was created in 1944 and had fought fought the French for 3 years (1946-1949) before the CCP defeated the Kuomintang and had control of the whole mainland China. The PAVN also participated in Chinese Civil War across the border on the side of the PLA too so how can he say he 'built' it?!
    1
  767. The problem with Starmer and all the people sitting there clapping for him is they think Iraq and Afghanistan are ‘wars’.
    1
  768. History will record this is the first war won by washing machine’s chips. Nobody knew they were so dangerous and Russia had endless supply of them!
    1
  769. Well, first, in any war, it's not the opposing sides who find it hard to reconciliate, but the traitors! The UK established relations with the US right after the American Revolution and has become a close ally ever since but how can Benedict Arnold hug the revolutionists?! Second, you don't know but there're also hugging between the RVN's soldiers and the NLF, NVA's right after end of the war, decades before any hugging with US soldiers happens. In fact, many of the former RVN's soldiers and low ranking officers had volunteered to fight alongside the unified Vietnamese Army against the Khmer Rouge in 1978. The ones who can never find reconciliation from both the US and RVN sides are the heavily brainwashed and ridiculous who served in the upper echelon and so had much higher stakes in the war. They had lost hard to find status and lots of money so they can never get over it! It's all personal and has nothing to do with ideologies.
    1
  770.  @philipmccarthy4975  Well, first, in any war, it's not the opposing sides who find it hard to reconciliate, but the traitors! The UK established relations with the US right after the American Revolution and has become a close ally ever since but how can Benedict Arnold hug the revolutionists?! Second, you don't know but there're also hugging between the RVN's soldiers and the NLF, NVA's right after end of the war, decades before any hugging with US soldiers happens. In fact, many of the former RVN's soldiers and low ranking officers had volunteered to fight alongside the unified Vietnamese Army against the Khmer Rouge in 1978. The ones who can never find reconciliation from both the US and RVN sides are the heavily brainwashed and ridiculous who served in the upper echelon and so had much higher stakes in the war. They had lost hard to find status and lots of money so they can never get over it! It's all personal and has nothing to do with ideologies.
    1
  771. Forcing people to accept the west position and narrative with punishment? Isn't that the definition of fascism?
    1
  772. Lost a war but never lost a battle. That's the most stupid thing I ever heard! Only the most stupid people can swallow that kiind of shit!
    1
  773. The traitor d0gs can’t be considered Vietnamese, so you can’t say there’s a division.
    1
  774. They don't represent the locals. You're talking about the trashy people who had lived off the Americans during the war. If the Vietnamese really cared about money that much they wouldn't have kicked them out.
    1
  775. So this guy Anotol Lieven doesn't believe this war is a proxy war?
    1
  776. It’ll be good if China didn’t get into bed with the US and backstab the USSR. There’s a BIG snake within this bunch!
    1
  777. ​ @МногоХочешьНаглыйГугл  Except China did. China is very much like the US. They're both greedy irrational imperialists. What is 'rational' when China demanded to be the leader of the socialist bloc in the Cold War and then got into bed with the US and backed the terrorists in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union, and backed Pol Pot in his genocide and tried to saved him afterwards after he was deposed by Vietnam, attacked India, the Soviet Union and Vietnam?!
    1
  778.  @МногоХочешьНаглыйГугл  Except China did.
    1
  779. @ What 'rational' when China ganged up with the US and backstabbed the USSR?!
    1
  780. It SUCKS big time if you’re an US ally ain’t it? You die for the empire and they give you ‘outdated’ weapons to fight the bear! LMAO!
    1
  781. Do you speak their language? So how tfmust they speak English?!
    1
  782. China wanted to sleep with the US so it made an excuse but it just sounds awkward! LOL!
    1
  783.  @shirleyp8543  When did I say either one of them really communist? You know how to read?
    1
  784.  @shirleyp8543  That isn't triggered. I'm just annoyed at stupid people trying to be smart like you.
    1
  785.  @shirleyp8543  Relax! Gosh, Why are you so triggered? Being called 'communist', in fact, isn't an insult at all! It's just like somebody calls the US 'capitalist US'. If he feels the need to ask that question, he's really overreact, or 'triggered'. It's not mocking. He's really triggered! For my case, your 'sharing' annoyed me because it's too stupid. It's the same as saying, 'a cow walks on its four legs'! So it really deserved a response. I only tried to trigger you with my response and sure as h3ll, you're really triggered a f! LOL! Sorry about that!
    1
  786.  @shirleyp8543  Still triggered? Knock yourself out OK? LMAO!
    1
  787. This is funny! Does whatever country which that reporter comes from guarantee UNCONDITIONALLY that it won't invade a neighbor who joins a military alliance that is openly hostile towards it?! The arrogance of the west is so abhorrent!
    1
  788. No. He's genuinely stupid. Just because he's good at conning stupid people doesn't mean he's smart at other things. This is not the first time he makes stupid comment. Even his girlfriend knows this and told him to shut up. Stop worshiping him. He's not a god.
    1
  789.  @ЙцукенгшщзхФывапролджэ-ш6г  Ther's no logic in your stupid comment.
    1
  790. The Ukros are so overdosed with 'game changer' that the game will end soon.
    1
  791. What do you expect? The west has been spreading fake news everyday, why won't it do the same in times of war?! Especially against Russia. This is old news. You don't have proof that the Russian side does the same so don't bring your belief into reporting news.
    1
  792. Of course, those clowns don't actually run the show. They are just bought and paid for frontmen, puppets who take orders from the real rulers behind the scene and take blame from the public so it thinks it has the power.
    1
  793. China is just like the US. In fact China did get into bed with the US, the common enemy of the socialist bloc, backstabbing the USSR and Vietnam, its supposedly comrades! And is still really proud about that too! Although China itself is also a US victim! So you should worry about China, not Vietnam!
    1
  794. The USSR was the second-largest economy back then and now just look at how capitalism which supposedly liberates innovation (according to him) has brought to Russia and its former republics in the Union. Didn't you see capitalism has turned Ukraine into a beggar now?!
    1
  795. If China doesn't have that ridiculous claim of the WHOLE SCS, how can the US have an excuse to persuade those SEA nations to surround China?! It's China's fault. You don't know anything about 'cause and effect'?!
    1
  796.  @zhugeliang3905  Yes China and ASEAN have a lot in common but China just wanna rob them. Tell me about it!
    1
  797.  @csking6377  There's nothing complex here. It's simply Chinese insatiable greed. What exactly is the part of Chinese records that can give justification for the 9 dash line?! Unless the records show the same exact line with China's neighbors' stamps of approval. It's just a BIG ridiculous Chinese stretch.
    1
  798.  @csking6377  While at it, why didn't China draw a line around the moon, claim it and all the space between because Chinese has been looking at it since early periods?! LOL! If that isn't arbitrary I don't know what is. In fact, that line IS the definition of arbitrary because OFFICIALLY, it has no exact coordinates!
    1
  799.  @csking6377  Anybody can stick a stick anywhere, it doesn't automatically mean you own that place just by doing it! Why are you so lame?! So, right now if I come and stick a stick on your land, it automatically becomes mine?! LOL!
    1
  800.  @csking6377  So, according to you, Vietnam only popped up on the face of the earth after it REGAINED independence in 1945 from the French? Before that, no country or people has ever existed there, lived and fished in the SCS?! If you say so, China must've also been existed since the 14th century when it regained independence from the Mongols right?! Is China teaching that in school? LOL!
    1
  801.  Teli Apikotoa  Criminals don't have the moral high ground to preach anybody anything. The criminal Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan wars that Australia, a loyal US' dog, participates aren't ancient at all. You're a brainwashed clown. The British was the evil empire in the past and US today. If you've been their faithful dog, you have no credibility accusing anybody of being evil!
    1
  802. Actually, China had continued the war with Vietnam for 10 years, not one month. It just did it from the other side of the border and at some strategic points on the border to avoid heavy casualties and backlash. Get your facts straight. And China had also ganged up with the US to isolate and sabotage Vietnam’s economy in that 10 years. China had also ganged up with the US , which was supposedly the capitalist enemy, against its supposedly socialist comrade, the Soviet Union and contributed greatly to its collapse. China is actually worse than the US because it’s the turncoat of the 20th century. If the US is the warmonger, China is its attack dog! China secretly admires the US and always want to wage wars against its neighbors because it’s always an imperialist and expansionist at heart. Learn some history for a change! It just doesn’t dare to do that in modern time because there’s an even bigger imperialist in the scene constantly watching!
    1
  803. Lee Camp, you lose all your credibility when you denounce US' imperialism while promoting and praising China's imperialism! You're so hypocritical just like the west!
    1
  804. ​ @huaninglyu7372  About books, google this phrase: 'China Contributed Substantially to Vietnam War Victory wilson center' and read the interview of the Chinese historian author and you'll see he's pretty much confirmed my conclusion about Chinese attitude towards Vietnam.
    1
  805.  @ornchao2561  In this China-Vietnam story, Vietnam definitely IS the good guy. This video clip doesn't concern Vietnam-Cambodia relation so you're way off topic. Nevertheless, YES, Vietnam did take Cambodian land but that had happened only once for the whole 1000 years of history of Vietnam after regaining independence from China. On the other hand, China has never stopped trying to take Vietnam throughout history, if not all at once then bit by bit. And you should remember that the area of land Vietnam took in the last 1000 years is tiny and insignificant compare to what China took in the same period. So if you say Vietnam is bad because of that, China is undeniably much worse. It's very hard for Vietnam to defend herself from China's onslaught if she doesn't have the southern part today because China keeps growing bigger and bigger over that period. On the contrary, China has no excuse to take those lands. It's just pure greed! And be careful what you wish for! In history, when China wasn't even this big, it had expanded up to the central part of Vietnam today. If Vietnam didn't kicked it out over 1000 years ago and stopped the flood, there might be no Cambodia today whatsoever because when China takes, it just doesn't stop in the middle like Vietnam did. And China just hates Vietnam for stopping it so it always likes to back those Cambodian factions who are stupid like you to get back at Vietnam. Therefore, you're just a Chinese tool. And if you gang up with China to take down Vietnam, you're actually trying to destroy the very force that can protect you from the Chinese onslaught! So, don't be stupid!
    1
  806.  @Anonymous------  Are you really that stupid? Vietnam has many names throughout history so it only makes sense to use the current name because it would be much easier for everybody to understand, right?
    1
  807.  @ornchao2561  So you say if Vietnam has ever invaded another country in history, It can't say China invades Vietnam when it does? What t f is that?! If so, you can't say Vietnam invaded Champa either because Champa had invaded Vietnam in history too! Vietnam has influence over Laos and Cambodia but she doesn't claim Laos and Cambodia's territories NOW! China still does against Vietnam so why did you say 'To conclude this who is the most backstaber here of course is Vietnam', not China? Stupid?
    1
  808.  @klytouch7515  What makes you say 'Vietnam helps America defeat China'?! The other way around is true though!
    1
  809.  @ornchao2561  So you say if you've done something wrong in the past, you can't be called a victim when somebody wrong you today? If so, Cambodia can't be a victim either because it had also invaded Dai Viet (Vietnam), and Champa too in history long before Vietnam took its land in the 1700s, So you should shut up about Cambodia being a victim already! If you say so, Cambodia itself was a little China too! LOL!
    1
  810.  @ornchao2561  Yes, you just said Vietnam 'are not a victim because Vietnam are little China' in your previous reply. Just take a look you idiot!
    1
  811.  @ornchao2561  It didn't take the land because it couldn't, not because it didn't wanna take it you idiot! China and the Mongols themselves couldn't take Dai Viet, so what makes you think the Khmer could! LOL! Look at the map of the Khmer empire! It took a lot of land from other peoples, much more than Vietnam ever took from Cambodia.
    1
  812.  @klytouch7515  I didn't ask for your babbling. I just ask you to give a direct answer to this question: What makes you say 'Vietnam helps America defeat China'?! if you don't even have half a brain to answer a simple question like that, your words are worth as much as crap! LOL!
    1
  813.  @leogogo7041  The ranking in term of being viewed as an opponent and attitude towards a particular country and its people are two different things. I've been talking about the latter. Do Chinese call the peoples of those countries in your ranking 'monkeys'? Do Chinese leaders call those countries 'little children' in formal meeting with another country's leader? The degree of disdain must be through the roof to make them lose their heads like that. So no, it isn't ridiculous. It's only because you're stv p|d.
    1
  814.  @leogogo7041  It's different. I have never heard a Viet individual call Chinese dogs or pigs anywhere, but I've been to many places and and see Chinese calling Viets 'monkeys' like a standard reference. They just use the word and everybody knows who they refer to everywhere! That means it is widespread, not just a small part of netizens.
    1
  815.  @ornchao2561  When did I say I wanna convince you, an |d1ot?! LOL!
    1
  816.  @ornchao2561  Vietnam's history started 1000 years before being annexed by Han. Vietnam regained independence in 939 CE, not 15th century, you id. iot! Why are you trying to teach Vietnam's history to me?! It has no relevant to the topic here. You're just wandering all over the place. I'll summarize your points here. Read and get over with already: 1. You said Vietnam isn't a victim because Vietnam took Cambodian land right? If so, Cambodia can't also be a victim because it had attacked Vietnam even before that trying to annex Vietnam but failed. Cambodia was still the one who drew the first blood so it's STILL wrong here. It just lost at the end so stop talking as if it's a poor innocent victim. 2. You're talking as if China's protecting Cambodia from Vietnam. Totally wrong! China has never given a cr. .ap about Cambodia. It didn't even care about 300,000 Chinese murdered by Pol Pot, or 20,000 Chinese died at its border with Vietnam, so what makes you think it would give a f about Cambodia?! LOL! China attacked Vietnam because it was butthurt from being rejected. Because it's a sore loser! That's all. If Cambodia was situated right next to China like North Vietnam, it would have been disappeared. The opposite is true, Vietnam has been protecting the Chinese onslaught down the Indochina peninsula since 1000 CE. In fact, Vietnam has saved Cambodia from a China's backed regime! You wouldn't have a chance to sit here and b |tch about Vietnam if she didn't cross the border to save you from China's tools! Right?
    1
  817.  @leogogo7041  Vietnam has won even before China fired the first shot! Deng Xiaoping essentially ordered his troops to blow up, destroy, take things near the border and run back as fast as they could like bandits to avoid deaths but still managed to get 20,000 killed! LOL! Do you know that's THE record of invading troops killed in three weeks in Vietnam?!
    1
  818.  @leogogo7041  Who call you Chanks '$|c k m@n of Asia'?! Isn't it the 'modest' Japanese? LOL! What a tool!
    1
  819.  @leogogo7041  Did you just say mass murderers and mass r2apists are 'modest' people?! LOL! China's forgot about Nanjing?
    1
  820.  @leogogo7041  You got slapped so hard you're hallucinating now?! LMAO?! Poor Chank! LOL!
    1
  821.  @chowwh308  You're having it backwards. You're the one who refused to accept the reality that China is insatiably greedy, petty, and full of itself here. LOL!
    1
  822.  @ornchao2561  You said, <<Khmer rouge were in 2 sides one with China one with Vietnam. They also slaughter both Chinese Vietnamese and Cham.>> But Vietnam deposed it when it started murdering Chinese and everybody else while China continued to support it! Why did China support a regime that mass murder Chinese?! You see? China is so fkn' evil so if I'm anti China, I'm anti evil! It's a good thing! You, on the other hand, like to kiss the evil's @ss, so yu are the subhuman here!
    1
  823.  @ornchao2561  Stop saying Viets has Han origin you |d1ot! They have different roots and their DNAs are different.
    1
  824.  @leaderindia2192  You're spewing such a big load of horse$h|t!. Give me the source that say when and where Vietnam invaded Guangxi. Vietnam has details records of the Khmer Rouge's incursions into Viet territories, If Vietnam did it, China must have records but it doesn't! China's backstabbing of Vietnam in 1979 was an aggression from the very beginning. That's why it doesn't like talk about it like other wars!
    1
  825.  @leaderindia2192  'Hanoi's gate opened' 'eating breakfast'! LOL! You Chanks are so hilarious! Chinese troops could only advance around 25 km into Vietnam territories but already suffered heavy casualties. 25km deep is nowhere near Hanoi! In only three weeks China suffered 25,000 dead. That's the record of invading troops die in three weeks in Vietnam. Even the petty dwarf Deng Xiaoping knew China would suffer heavy casualties so that's why he ordered his troops to run home fast to avoid death but at the end he couldn't avoid that! LOL!
    1
  826. ​ @ornchao2561  The Khmer Rouge was only recognized by the US, China and a few other US' dogs like Singapore and Thailand, not the whole UN. That's why it was replaced by a coalition in 1981. Yes, everybody knew about what happened inside Cambodia after Vietnam liberated it. It's only because the US and China ganged up trying to isolate Vietnam to satisfy their petty grudges!
    1
  827.  @ornchao2561  NO, eventually Hunsen, a Vietnam friendly leader, still run Cambodia. That's not what the US and China wanted. The US just leads a part of the UN, not everybody. Getting advice and love a person are two different things. And love and don't love have nothing to do with the fact that Yew was a US running dog!
    1
  828. ​ @ornchao2561  'Invade' is what China did at its border with Vietnam. Nobody in Vietnam had wanted Chinese troops to set foot on Viet soil. China turned a good situation into a bad one! On the other hand, Cambodians came across the border asking for help. Viet troops was welcome in Cambodia by the people. Cambodian troops fought alongside Vietnam against the Khmer Rouge. Vietnam turned hell back to life. That's definitely liberation! Why are you so $t up|d?!
    1
  829.  @leaderindia2192  No, China deaths was around 25000 according to neutral sources. Nobody can believe a word coming out of China's mouth because China is a compulsive liar! No neighbor likes or believes China! That says a lot! LOL! China says its attack against Vietnam in 1979 was 'defensive'. A BIG lie. Nobody else says so except China. China itself doesn't have any evidence to back it up! China says it has never been an aggressor state throughout its long history! A BIG shameless f kg lie! LOL! China says it owns the WHOLE SCS since ancient time. Another thievish shameless BIG lie! China is the one who can't admit failure. Its attack against Vietnam only brought a lot of deaths upon itself. An extremely stupid move. It couldn't scare Vietnam to pull out of Cambodia! Those 25,000 deaths were for NOTHING! LMAO! Those stupid soldiers just died for Deng Xiaoping stupid mistake!
    1
  830.  @ornchao2561  What gold on what dead body? You're so f kg hilarious! LOL! No I 've never said 'Cambodia betrayed Vietnam to China 2 day ago' you \d!ot!
    1
  831. @言行一致 English
    1
  832. It's simple. For anyone who has a half a brain, when you are attacked aggressively, you defend yourself aggressively. Western imperialism has been blaming the victims for its own bellicose behaviors for centuries now.
    1
  833. FYI, the war didn't start on Feb of last year. It started in 2014 when the Kiev puppet regime's military began shelling the Russians in the Donbas region.
    1
  834. They call them 'stealth' fighters for a reason. When a real war comes with a real adversary that can shoot back, they would put on the stealth mode and nobody's gonna find them!
    1
  835.  @Samoasoa  Of course, nobody would think of using nukes. Just get ready to do so though! But I also don't think Russia would need S-500. She's only using old stock on the ground right now, so S-300, or S-400 if needed, would be quite sufficient. Using them can also demonstrate the effectiveness of those systems. It's an advertising opportunity for them, and she should get plenty of orders if they're proven good!
    1
  836. The west has never failed to amaze me with its arrogrance! It makes Russia its enemy in the first place by sanctioning her and stealing her money but still expecting kindness from Russia in return! LMAO!
    1
  837. @BillKiernan, of course anyone would use it, like a guy uses a machine gun to kill another guy so he doesn't have to fight with bare hands but there is nothing brave about that, nothing to brag about because anyone can do that, even a 10-year-old can.
    1
  838. The climate in North Vietnam is almost identical to that of adjacent Chinese provinces so climate reason is among the lamest!
    1
  839. ​ @MoeHamHead-bx7og  No, the US supported Pol Pot because Sihanouk was just a figurehead with no teeth! Google 'US support Pol Pot at UN'. The US and China insisted that the KR must hold the seat at the UN for Cambodia! The US used Lon Nol to overthrow Sihanouk in1970! If he stood alone, nobody would support him. He had no army to fight Vietnam while Pol Pot did! That's the point! The US and China only used him for political reason because they couldn't support Pol Pot alone after the world had discovered his genocide!
    1
  840.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  No China armed and trained the KR that's why it turned genocidal!
    1
  841.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  China supported Pol Pot. Vietnam couldn't even have enough to fight the US that she received supports from the USSR and China. Search this: '...Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge were supported for many years by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its chairman, Mao Zedong;[c] it is estimated that at least 90% of the foreign aid which the Khmer Rouge received came from China, including at least US$1 billion in interest-free economic and military aid in 1975 alone....'
    1
  842.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  How old are you? You want me to teach you how to search for the source these days?!
    1
  843.  @MoeHamHead-bx7og  Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge were supported for many years by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its chairman, Mao Zedong;[c] it is estimated that at least 90% of the foreign aid which the Khmer Rouge received came from China, including at least US$1 billion in interest-free economic and military aid in 1975 alone'
    1
  844. The hypocritical thuggish west has never failed to impress me! Just as I think it has reached a new low in one day, it immediately breaks that record the very next day! It just loves to preach about 'rule based', but what exactly is the rule or law gives them the right to do this?!
    1
  845. Nazis fighting alongside Al Qaida and ISIS? If you think about it, there's nothing strange there because they're all products of US interventions, backed by the US, pawns on the US geopolitical chessboard.
    1
  846. Why is it a big deal if Russia sides with the US against China?! Why is back stabbing an exclusive right of China?! If you ask the Chinese today about their backstabbing of the USSR and Vietnam in the 70s and 80s, they're all proud of that. They all think that was a brilliant and necessary move by Deng Xiaoping to get China out of proverty. They all are gonna say that's only international politics. There's no permanent friend nor enemy, just self interest. And now they're shamelessly talking about friendship with Russia? 😂 The US and China do have one thing in common. They're both shameless imperialist. The US is the global bully while China is a regional one. You have no credibility if you denouncing one while praising the other. In reality you're the exact same thing as western mainstream media.
    1
  847. I think you’re too optimistic about 100 years ‘alliance’ between Russia and China because they both secretly love the US and hate each other. They only get together because both are recently mistreated by the US. They’re only convenient friends. China did get into bed with the US, the evil kingpin of world capitalist imperialists and backstab the USSR, which was supposedly China’s communist comrade in arms, just for some stinking dollars. And that happened only 50 years ago.
    1
  848. And China took advantage of the war situation in Vietnam to violently seized the rest of Hoang Sa from Vietnam in 1974. After the war, China got into bed with the same US backstabbing Vietnam. It encouraged Pol Pot to attack Vietnam. When she responded, China attacked her at the northern border trying to rescue him. Together with the same evll US, China supplied and trained Pol Pot’s troops to fight on from Thailand, lobbied ASEAN to isolate Vietnam to stop her from recovering from the war and developing economically while continuing to attack Vietnam over the border and supporting Pol Pot at the UN for another 10 years. In 1988, China violently gunned down 68 Vietnamese logistics troops to seize an island they were standing on in Truong Sa. China is not far behind the US in committing crimes against Vietnam. This is crocodile tears.
    1
  849. Russia is way more ahead of other powers than I thought. While others are only starting to build a concept for a robot army, Russia has already had a superhero army who can fight and win with only shovels in service!
    1
  850. That's a 'tank'?! LOL!
    1
  851. Why does India need the SU-57? Simple, because US weapons programs are scams. Don't be scammed!
    1
  852. what?! You're really expecting a $50,000 has equal performance numbers with a $150,000 car?! LOL!
    1
  853.  @greenjack5694  What about My Lai?
    1
  854.  @darren561  Where is the 'unless...' part of my sentence you fk'n sl3@zeball?!
    1
  855. ​ @nhanliu9695  No, that link is propaganda, not fact! The facts show there's no evidence of massacre: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi51d3ooKnyAhVJo54KHQwTDy0QFnoECAMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmsuweb.montclair.edu%2F~furrg%2FVietnam%2Fhuemyth%2Fmythofhuemassacre.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0bIsRXf5Q8AC53O7IOzF7m
    1
  856. ​ @nhanliu9695  It's called Geneva Accords, not treaty you !diot! You can't even get the name right let alone know what it's about! The root cause of the war is the fvkin' US of A as usual. It installed the Diem's puppet regime which in turn, refused a nationwide election stipulated in the accords, so the US and its Saigon puppet regime were the side that violated the Accords. Diem then moved on to kill the Vietminh's members who mostly consisted of communists in the South. And that's what started the war in the south. The US killed Diem because he messed up its plan and started bombing the North and brought combat troops in. So it started the war with Vietnam itself. The Saigon regime couldn't have ever established control on the South. It could only control about half of it despite direct US' involvement so in order to wrestle more control at the signing of the Paris Accords to have a better position after that, it started intensifying the fight right before the signing. The NLF responded and the fighting just continued on. So again, it was the Saigon regime who violated the 1973 Paris Accords too. You're full of stv.pid propaganda! Read my comments above about re-education camps. They only prove the communists were too lenient, otherwise, none of those human trash who served the French and Americans can b!tch back at them from half way around the world! You should really need to go to school and learn to speak and write properly first, then learn history from reputable sources before going around spreading st up id nonsense!
    1
  857.  @javierkucharskycortez4463  How did the Chinese won that war? The Sino-Vietnamese War was totally different than the Ukro-Russian War today. China is an imperialist at heart. I has been attacking and annexing all of its neighbors.
    1
  858.  @Auzzzie82  China broke up many many times during that 5000 years, do you know about that?!
    1
  859. If it wasn't for the US and USSR, China would still be r@.ped by the Japanese now so don't Chinese leaders forget that! LOL! No USSR and US, NO China!
    1
  860. Even when the Soviet Union was around, it has never been defensive. Being defensive from what? Who's gonna attack western Europe?! It was created to put military pressure on the USSR at the very least. In fact, right after WWII, Winston Churchill had come up with a plan with Nazi Germany to attack the Red Army in the very same year, less than two months to be exact after the Nazis just surrendered!
    1
  861. @ How's what?!
    1
  862. Jungle warfare exists only in your head because there were no jungles in Dai Viet
    1
  863. So this's click bait. You still don't know who needs who.
    1
  864. It's not strange at all! It's because China starts acting like Japan in the 1930s.
    1
  865. Craftingphil, Do you notice that the western colonialist countries only worry about 'democracy' AFTER they got kicked out of their colonies? When they were there, they robbed the lands clean and enslaved the indigenous people without a slightest remorse! In fact, they didn't even consider those people humans! Each colonies were ruled by a white man assigned from the west! They never find anything wrong with that! They only cry wolf when those colonies were returned to the rightful owners!
    1
  866. Craftingphil, if you have a brain, you should know that 'freedom' or 'democracy' are just new and lame excuses for new attempts to intervene and rob those lands yet again. In the past, they used the excuse of 'liberating' or 'reclaiming' the 'Holy Land' to rob that land and all those lands along the way. In colonial time, they used the excuse of bringing Christianity and civilization to all corners of the world, again, to rob. In our time, the slogans for robbing are 'freedom' and 'democracy'. There's one thing in common then and now. All those places are much worse off after the west's 'noble' crusades. There's no good ending when the west start saying they care about someplace! If you don't know history, you can still at least remember Iraq, Libya, or Syria, right? So from now on, you should shut the crap about 'freedom' or 'democracy'. Whatever they have right now, it's a million times better than when the west had its way! Moreover, are you sure the west really have that thing call 'democracy' or 'freedom' there?
    1
  867. This must be built using stolen technologies.
    1
  868.  @fun_ghoul  Yes, it might be clear as mud for stupid people! Oh so you know NATO is actually behind all this? That's really smart, right? LMAO!
    1
  869. This shows the Russians are too lenient and patient. The US would have carpet-bombed the plant 10 times over for much less. So when the US accuses Russia of a 'war crime', it sounds really stupid!
    1
  870. Only NATO troops on the ground? More reason for Russia to take everything east of the Dnipro River.
    1
  871. With the same mouth, this clown is talking about building peace and bragging about giving deadly weapons to Ukraine at the same time! Unbelievable! One of the reasons Russia chose war exactly because the US was arming Ukraine like no tomorrow. War didn't broke out under his term doesn't mean he didn't have a hand in it. It will continue too under his watch this time because this ceasefire crap he came up with is a non-starter for Russia. They have already reiterated 10000 times that this time, they won't ever accept a temporary ceasefire for Ukraine to rearm and fight them again.
    1
  872. @ you’re such an l dl0t!
    1
  873. They probably came to Saudi Arabia, threw a coke party in the hotel for 9.5 hours (Zelensky secretly slipped in too, that’s why he also flew to Saudi Arabia), and that’s it because they’re now proposing the same shlte ‘ceasefire’ idea that they’ve been talking about for months and the Russians have already and repeatedly said it’s a non-starter. They clearly have no respect for the Russians and take them for some fools. 😅 They have a good reason though because they’ve been fooling the Russians for so many times. If the Russians let it happen to them again, they deserve no sympathy.
    1
  874. What news? The US has been spending all its time fabricating lies when it's not busy making wars since forever.
    1
  875. The CIA and its lackeys in S.Korea is probably paying these N. Korean defectors to do this nonsense to create tension on the peninsula so the US can get its $5 billions extortion money from S. Korea. Those defectors can hardly feed themselves in S. Korea so how can they come up with the money for these acts regularly?
    1
  876.  @wooflessdelta  Don't you have a pair of eyes and ears and listen to know what's in the packages sent with the balloons? The kind of balloon that they use isn't for free. The kind of air pump for that kind of balloon isn't cheap and free. Thousands of dollars and other stuff isn't free. They may be free only if they're given by the CIA and its dogs in S. Korea.
    1
  877. China never forgets she's the victim of Japan and western's aggression but now she starts acting like them! You can easily draw parallels between Japan in the past and China today. In the first half of 20th century, Japan became really strong after decades of successful economic development. Instead of helping and leading its neighbors to develop and progress like herself, she started grabbing territories left and right. China now is acting like that. After some decades of successful economic development, China also starts bullying her neighbors. She claims the WHOLE SCS as her private property! If I remember correctly, this claim is unprecedented any where in the world. No country has ever had such a ridiculous claim like that. They may claim this and that island but never a WHOLE sea! The basis of the claim is so ridiculous! It's essentially like this: the islands in the SCS appear in ancient Chinese literature, therefore the WHOLE SCS belongs to China! Even Japan in the 1930s couldn't be so ridiculous! There are other peoples probably living around that sea for tens of thousands of years, naming those islands and and fishing in that sea so why are they excluded?! If the basis of the claim is naming those islands in Chinese literature and fishing in that sea two thousand years ago, why does China not draw some other lines that encompass the WHOLE East China Sea and Yellow Sea too?! WHY?! Has China never named the islands in those seas and fished in them?! That ridiculous claim only appeared in 1947 by Chiang Kai-shek's government. At that time, China has just got over foreign domination and she already turned imperialistic and the easy targets are the weaker neighbors in the South. As being communist, the CCP should have been against that ridiculous claim which was invented by those imperialistic minds of the capitalist Republic of China from day one, but no, it's just gone along and fully complicit in this criminal act! If China plays fair and makes peace with her neighbors, the western imperialists wouldn't have a chance! But no, she must shoot herself in the foot like Japan in the past. Back then many Asian countries, China included, looked up to Japan and wanted to be successful like her but Japan shot herself in the foot by attacking her neighbors and become the common enemy of East and South East Asia. China now is just imitating Japan while denouncing her actions in the past! LOL! The US and its western lackeys are a bunch of thugs who have been plundering and bullying Asia and other parts of the world for many centuries now and on the decline. This is the chance for not only China but the whole Asia to get back to its glory, but China's not helping. Instead of making peace with her neighbors, she bullies them and gives the westerners excuses to jump in and block her advancement! Imagine with the intelligence and work ethic of Asians, if South, East, and South East Asia unite, the westerners wouldn't stand a chance to pick on us, but no, China must stubbornly insist on something it can never occupy, a whole sea, and abandon other doable and good objectives!
    1
  878.  Dark Clouds  I don't think they have any chance to do damage against the Russians anyway. Russia uses those hypersonic toys just because she's been waiting and itching to test them on real targets and live enemy troops in a real war and make a statement. Too bad for these stupid clowns who just didn't know they gave Russia a perfect chance to use her toys and were the chosen guinea pigs! LOL!
    1
  879. Yes Russia and China had been comrades and golden friends forever before after WWII until China got into bed with the US backstabbing Russia in the Cold War.
    1
  880. Scott Ritter is old but has figured it out yet. This whole NATO creation, its expansion, Ukraine project, hostility towards Russia,... thing was created and orchestrated by the US since forever to serve their world domination dream and he's talking as if it's all EU's idea and problem! The US led the EU into this game! But now they know they've lost so they want out and try to blame the EU and Ukraine for it! It's just the good ol' 'no honor among thieves' thing. Trump was chosen by the deep state to pull the US out of this mess created by themselves because he's very good at talking sh|t to confuse everybody while the true intention is to salvage whatever they can such as recuperating their lost! It has always been like this for decades. The next president always berates the former for wars and call for peace but they all have their own war to push for and they will all just talk sh|t! Scott Ritter is also so ignorant and naïve when he thinks the deep state is just the minions who run Washington bureaucracy and so they can be fired!
    1
  881. Rainforest exists only in the central and southern parts of Vietnam, not the north part which was Dai Viet back then. Have you heard the clip?! There was no mentioning of rainforest blocking the Mongols, both sides always fought on the flat land of the Red River Delta until the Mongols lost and ran home.
    1
  882. Yes, 'brothers' until China got into bed with the US and backstabbed the USSR! 😆
    1
  883. modernwarrior24, Why NK have never made threat to let say,...Mexico?! Have you ever wondered out of more than 200 countries in the world, NK just like to make threats towards the US? May be if the US stops conducting war games with its dogs aiming at NK and get the fuck out of there then NK would stop threatening it. The US had nuked the country that invaded it. NK's just making threat, so it's more reasonable already. Think about it! Don't act as if the whole world is your private properties then nobody would threaten you.
    1
  884. BS is bullshit. Obviously, he's among the fake opposition created by they establishment to fool the mass.
    1
  885. How is the USSR worse than we're told?! Your statement is very conflicting? If it was far better htf could it be worse?!
    1
  886.  @l.w.paradis2108  Nah. You still don't make sense. All the 'worse' things you just said are actually not worse than what we've been told. And as you say yourself, we've been told that the communists are mindless animals so what can be worse than that?!
    1
  887.  @l.w.paradis2108  That's not just my way but the reasonable and logical way. We're been told the communists are blood-thirsty monsters that kills a hundred millions of their own for no apparent reason. What you've brought up can't be seen as anything remotely 'worse' than that so you're simply wrong.
    1
  888.  @l.w.paradis2108  There's zero correlation between your replies and my question. You still can't prove the USSR is actually worse than what described by the west. And no, the west repeats the same propaganda all over the world that the communists are bloodthirsty monsters hellbent on genocide and destruction. You're probably from another planet.
    1
  889. What say you?! 'The French attitude toward the Vietnamese was harsh'. Talking about 'the pot calls the kettle black'! Your ridiculous hypocrisy makes me laugh my ass off! Hahahahahaha! So when you brought your troops in to occupy a sovereign country, re-armed previous occupiers and colonists to kill local people, that's not harsh at all? The arrogance of whiteys are indeed boundless!
    1
  890. And these fake news stories show what kind of people the west is supporting in Ukraine, a bunch of shameless thugs like their masters in the west!
    1
  891.  @hf..7271  China is using Cam to backstab Vietnam again, so how can you call that 'acknowledge their past mistake'?!
    1
  892.  @hf..7271  China is using Cam to bakstab Vietnam again so they've never changed!
    1
  893.  @hf..7271  No, China has never acknowledged its past mistake. It always consider its backstabbing of Vietnam at the border in 1979 while Vietnam was busy putting down Pol Pot regime was a brilliant move! It continues using Cambodia today to backstab Vietnam yet again!
    1
  894.  @Maplin-Ma  Yes it depends if you're a Han Chinese or a different people. If you're the former, your nature is of a thug so you'll be so proud of looting and kidnaping so it will be a big accomplishment. If you're a decent human being, it's an embarrassment and epic fail.
    1
  895. What do you expect? He's a paid actor.
    1
  896.  @dontquestionmyname5490 stop making up stories already!
    1
  897.  @Rippinkitten18  Calling China like that is actually a complement because communism is the most advance system in history. Why do you have problem with that?!
    1
  898.  @qedeshah  Of course, it does. But the reason the US bothers trying to persuade Vietnam because it had successfully ganged up with China against the USSR and Vietnam in the 70s and 80s.
    1
  899.  @iviwemajola3167  Yes, even if they burn the city down like they did in HK and elsewhere. That's what the west's been advocating.
    1
  900. China is the snake that has been biting Vietnam for the last 2000 years.
    1
  901.  @guangxidavidliu  China is the snake that bit the USSR and Vietnam
    1
  902. And btw, don't like your own post. It can only make you look stupid! LMAO!
    1
  903.  @bobjohnson9342  Hong Kongers are actually different from people from those cities of China on your list. They speak a different language, and even have a different look! The whole Southern China today was actually conquered by China 2000 years ago and peoples there weren't Chinese!
    1
  904.  @garyleow70  You don't need to tell me how big Nan Yue was. I taught you the history lesson remember?! What's your point when you say 'Nan Yue was established by Zhao Tuo after the collapse of Qin dynasty'?! It can't change the fact that THE WHOLE southern China today (HK Included) belonged to different peoples before it was conquered by Qin Shi Huang, and so HK has not 'always been part of China for 5000 years' like you imagine! You got that now?!
    1
  905.  imus twin  No, they're not hans. Even the hans at the time called them baiyue which is non-han you idiot!
    1
  906.  imus twin  What exactly is your point if the peking man theory is true? Are the Chinese entitled to own the whole Asia because of it?!
    1
  907.  imus twin  I cannot be 'wrong again' like you said because I've never been wrong here! So you're the |diot!
    1
  908. @imus twin Yes, they speak a different language because unless you try to learn it for a while, you won't understand $h!t! So you the /diot again here!
    1
  909. Alright, we've finally found Saddam Hussein's WMD in Ukraine! Who would have thought! Come on, US! That excuse would be more believable than just flatly denying it, right?
    1
  910. Even our Dear Great Leader Donald Trump has called it the 'Chinese virus' so what can you expect from random morons on the streets?!
    1
  911. Ahh! Kissinger and China! The good old days when China betrayed its own ideological comrades, the USSR and Vietnam, and got into bed with the US against them. Back then, what did China think would happen when the US finishes with the USSR? China and the US would get married and live happily ever after? LOL! You two faced thugs really deserve each other!
    1
  912.  @marctemura2017  Oh so now Russians' racism was the reason China get into bed with the US which is the mother of all racism on earth?! LMAO! And you think Chinese themselves are not racist? You're s0 lame!
    1