Comments by "John D" (@johnd8892) on "Ed's Auto Reviews" channel.

  1. 16
  2. 16
  3. 11
  4. 9
  5. 8
  6. 8
  7. 6
  8. 6
  9. 5
  10. 5
  11. 5
  12. 5
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. G'day Ed. Some more information on the Australian connection. There was also a 1941 version of the Cadet shown in the linked vid. Not quite the Holden Cadet possible connection at 10:51, but the this 1941 car was how Holden came about as a reworking of this earlier 1941 small Chevrolet prototype as shown a bit later in this Holden Story.Made when some of the key people were alive to be interviewed : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOCILCfDo5A&t=1365s Sir Lawrence Hartnett being so upset that GM did not make use of the body that Holden body builders had developed for the car that he resigned. He points of the Holden rejected design was a more modern looking car and Holden had experience knowing how body parts could be designed to reduce production costs. I think the later more complicated Cadet was not used for the Holden due to its higher cost suspension complications. The Holden looks to have used a very similar engine as the Cadet. The Holden motor being a 132 cu in (2,171 cc) GMH '132' straight 6 cylinder. It developed 60 hp. Possibly less than the Cadet to cope with the lower octane fuel in the immediate post war Australia. This "grey motor", as it was called remained the only Holden motor from the November 1948 launch until the last use in the EJ until 1963. Developed over time to produce 75 hp with a tiny engine size increase, higher compression and revised camshaft. 60 horsepower may not seem much now but very competitive at the time especially in Australia. One key advantage was the early use of light unitary construction resulting in a car of just 1010 kg. Much better power to weight than many cars that almost always used a body on frame construction. This was marketed by Holden as an Aerobuilt body to emphasise it was the way of the future. A rocket ship car compared to the previous top selling in Australia, the Austin A40 with 1.2 litres and just 40 hp and only around 50 kg lighter for a smaller car. The Holden was rapidly the best selling car in Australia until the mid 1980s with many months of waiting before your car was delivered for quite a few years. With this level of sales, Holden became the GM division with the highest profit margin for many years. So much that GM was worried that they were being too dominant in the pre 1960 Australian market with an estimated 50% market share for their products. Another discussion here was that the small 1941 Chevrolet was also a test to compare a 2.2 litre four with a 2.2 litre six of the same horsepower. The six cylinder version was better in so many ways that it was the smart choice for Australian conditions for Holden.
    3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. Or more likely a 1941 Chevrolet prototype as I pointed to in a vid I pointed to earlier : G'day Ed. Some more information on the Australian connection. There was also a 1941 version of the Cadet shown in the linked vid. Not quite the Holden Cadet possible connection at 10:51, but the this 1941 car was how Holden came about as a reworking of this earlier 1941 small Chevrolet prototype as shown a bit later in this Holden Story.Made when some of the key people were alive to be interviewed : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOCILCfDo5A&t=1365s Sir Lawrence Hartnett being so upset that GM did not make use of the body that Holden body builders had developed for the car that he resigned. He points of the Holden rejected design was a more modern looking car and Holden had experience knowing how body parts could be designed to reduce production costs. I think the later more complicated Cadet was not used for the Holden due to its higher cost suspension complications. The Holden looks to have used a very similar engine as the Cadet. The Holden motor being a 132 cu in (2,171 cc) GMH '132' straight 6 cylinder. It developed 60 hp. Possibly less than the Cadet to cope with the lower octane fuel in the immediate post war Australia. This "grey motor", as it was called remained the only Holden motor from the November 1948 launch until the last use in the EJ until 1963. Developed over time to produce 75 hp with a tiny engine size increase, higher compression and revised camshaft. 60 horsepower may not seem much now but very competitive at the time especially in Australia. One key advantage was the early use of light unitary construction resulting in a car of just 1010 kg. Much better power to weight than many cars that almost always used a body on frame construction. This was marketed by Holden as an Aerobuilt body to emphasise it was the way of the future. A rocket ship car compared to the previous top selling in Australia, the Austin A40 with 1.2 litres and just 40 hp and only around 50 kg lighter for a smaller car. The Holden was rapidly the best selling car in Australia until the mid 1980s with many months of waiting before your car was delivered for quite a few years. With this level of sales, Holden became the GM division with the highest profit margin for many years. So much that GM was worried that they were being too dominant in the pre 1960 Australian market with an estimated 50% market share for their products. Another discussion here was that the small 1941 Chevrolet was also a test to compare a 2.2 litre four with a 2.2 litre six of the same horsepower. The six cylinder version was better in so many ways that it was the smart choice for Australian conditions for Holden.
    2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2