Comments by "DarkSideSixOfficial" (@DarkSideSixOfficial) on "The Wall Street Journal" channel.

So you mean the very thing we've been pretending to be fighting against with China, were now implementing right here in the Land of the Free? Lol
20
I looked at his resume and that's all i need to know i'm voting for the man. Only a fool would ignore a vote for this man.
6
shadow_world You sound like a Daesh commercial. Nice job advertising for Daesh. Funny thing is, were aloud to have that opinion in the USA too. I can not like my government, but they won't kill me for it like some other countries would. Here, i'm aloud to have my opinion heard, and help improve the country. Perhaps you wouldn't be so upset if you could do the same.
4
Oh look, an uneducated troll in its natural habitat. Hey DefCon, maybe if you fully understood step by step what happened in the Middle East, you wouldn't be so damn stupid as to call that Hero a fool for fighting with the YPG, and stating the U.S. Directly funded Daesh. They grew to power because of influence, and massive territorial looting, that includes over running massive amounts of Iraq Military and taking all of their gear and supplies.
3
You're right about the embarrassment for Obama, one of his biggest failures of this time. Though the Russian Federation could afford to put boots on the ground in full force, part of the issue with the U.S. Was wanting to bring the troops home before the mission objective was even accomplished. This is where the U.S. Screwed up by requesting to get the heck out of the Middle East. It was one of the biggest military flukes of the 21st century. But Russia is going in and cleaning things up, but I kinda feel bad that the Russians and NATO can't find common ground between helping Syrians and making sure Assad is out of office and a new, fully Syrian national becomes leader. One that won't continue the civil war.
1
Ansar al-salami Obama is no fool, he's simply slow on some military actions. However, i believe you're wrong. Russia isn't foolish either, Putin understands that history repeats itself, and is hell bent on preventing another retreat, especially from Syria, which is one of Russia's only main ally. His base there is being built to it's fullest potential, and when finished, he plans on being fully integrated into Syria militarily. He's also planned on fully defending any attacks against said base, or the aircraft flying in, and out of it. Russia used to be the US's ally, that includes supporting it during it's civil war. and during World War 2. NATO was not meant to fight Russia, it was created to stop the USSR and create broader Democratic support. People can join NATO at will. Funnily enough, if Russia wanted to join NATO, it could, all it has to do is meet the requirements. However, yes, like any logistical organization with military backing, if required, NATO would defend itself against any attack, from Russia or any other country that attacks it's members. But it's false to say NATO directly challenges Russia, when in fact that is a blatant lie.
1
Ansar al-salami NATO exists to ensure that any members who wish to join it are safe guarded by all the members, in case of attack. They are no means a first strike force, unless it's something like Daesh, in which case they band together to cripple the vital infrastructure of said terror groups. NATO also does peace work, but i don't know too much about that part. However, Russia does have it's issues. I doubt the no fly zone will allow Daesh access to their base, as Russia has thousands of marines in the area. Putin does have his wrong's. But i think his aggressive action against Daesh by using ground forces was a correct one, even though it may be helping Assad, i don't really see another alternative yet, given Daesh own more than half of Syria now. But the only way to take out Daesh is total wipe out. You can't do that with only airplanes, they'll just move around. Russia is getting better. Putin is a mixed bag of nuts. Putin is the male version of Hilary Clinton. I don't like him, but his actions are slick. However, i believe Russia's own military ego will be it's downfall.
1
Ansar al-salami Well, the lack of Russia's success in Syria is due to them targeting Opposition Syrian forces. AKA, the Syrian backed fighters who Assad fired on during protests. During a UN summit, they agreed on a ceasefire in Syrian (not including Daesh), and there were Syrian Opposition representative there who Russia didn't agree with, and stated they see them as terrorists. Which is sad, because they should be seen as another combatant force, not Terrorists.
1
shadow_world Daesh were not born from the CIA, or the US. However, there are people who have stepped behind them in the past and have thought up supporting them because of political interests, such as John McCaine, but Daesh themselves gained their power through their declaration of a new Caliphate, the ultimate Caliphate. Such so that the Taliban, an actual US creation, even hate Daesh. So does Al Qaeda. Daesh got their weapons from Iraqi forces who ran for their lives in the face of them. They retreated, allowing them to get weapons, and even at one point, access to the Mosul Dam. And yes, i'm pretty sure at some point they seized supplies from the US directly, or by over running US backed rebels, AKA, the Peshmerga and YPG/YPJ Kurdish Warriors. But Daesh is NOT made by the US. Stop saying that shit, it's not true at all.
1
shadow_world You're right. There are some people like George Bush, who not all Americans agree with. Bombing all of Iraq simply because they took out a few buildings and military installation, was uncalled for, we had precise ammunition, but instead he bombarded the hell out of the country. Second, the war on drugs, which is the most stupid thing that has ever happened to the world. But this country is not full of bad people. There are more good than bad.
1
+Veronika Mars dead wrong. ISIS wasn't even its own branch until after the U.S. Left. When everyone in the U.S. Voted foolishly to bring their kids home as if it was some Boy Scout mission. Soldiers came home, not long after ISIL or, Daesh... Became a splinter group of Al Qaeda. When this happened, Daesh made a massive push around Iraq, pushing back Iraqi forces and taking their gear, that of which was US gear. Iraqi's were seen and reported internationally, fleeing from Daesh's advances, up until they captured the Mosul dam, which then at that point, the entire U.S. Population realized they fucked up pulling out. After pushing them from Mosul, they pushed to Syria, an already crumbling nation in civil war. Daesh is less a U.S. Creation though, as it's now more of a pawn of Erdogan, Turkey's President, to help weaken and destroy the Kurdish population outside of Turkey. Thus why they are defying the U.S. In every way to help fight Daesh themselves, and instead, fight Kurds at every way
1
+Veronika Mars your not wrong about the Syrian situation, Turkey has now become a clear picture of the entire situation in that region. However the U.S. Does not back Daesh. Daesh got its power from Turkey late in the war, but they first obtain their strength by first declaring a new global caliphate to bring in people. Then they stormed Iraq, a country that had been back by the U.S., however with the U.S. Having withdrawn without having really helped the already crumbling Iraqi army at its brink of collapse, it was easy for Daesh to grab what ever supplies the Iraqi's had. Daesh pushed all the way to Mosul before the U.S. Sent in advisors. The Peshmerga and YPG/YPJ(Kurds), were the rebels the U.S. Are backing, which helped in retaking the Mosul Dam and preventing a civil and environmental catastrophe. The YPG and Peshmerga are also helped by Russia and coalition members where possible, but mostly coordinated via. U.S. Special forces. Turkey, does not help. Turkey has helped Daesh.
1
+MrKratosYT Al Qaeda condemned Daesh's expansion and barbaric indiscriminate killings. Daesh is not Al Qaeda, but that the same time, they did come from said group. They broke off, and are much, much more extreme, with their own set of rules and ways of doing things.
1