Comments by "DarkSideSixOfficial" (@DarkSideSixOfficial) on "VICE News"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
they were caught on tape were they? Why not post that tape then, or a source? Also, i've searched in great detail through all of Wikileaks reveals regarding Clinton, and believe me, there was nothing in there about hiring anyone, aside from their infighting and deception against Sanders. Believe me, i'm as American as they come, and i'm not dumb enough to believe either western Propaganda, or the competition thereof. Also, Obama said BLM protests are a good thing, not riots. He didn't speak of the riots, except for when he went national to tell riots to stop damaging their fellow Americans property and well being, but that wasn't even related to just BLM at that point. Regarding BLM, the only thing i've seen in the media about the group, are cook outs with police force and other American groups who were supposed to counter protest them, but ended up joining in on the cook out... There's not mass violence or "terrorism" as so many people claim. So clearly, you can't differentiate from Western Propaganda, because your spreading a whole heck of a lot of it. I don't wait mainstream media. I watch VICE for specific tid bits of info, but that's it. It ends there with me doing extensive research on everything else.
2
-
***** With one yellow cake they would do what? As apposed to North Korea, who has always claimed to have nukes, why not invade them then? Why was Iraq singled out? Under the basis that specific nations can obtain WMD's, what makes it right to militarily prevent one from gaining access to them, but verbally scold another from trying to do so? Just as the same goes for, if the US were truly dedicated to it's cause of making the world a better place by ousting dictators, wouldn't they have already gotten rid of them all? Or, is it just mere politics? Of course, it's obvious it's the latter. Take Libya for example, the mass people were told by media he was quote, "a ruthless dictator". Yet NATO went in and ended up bombing the Great Man-made River, which was Libya's water supply that many depended on for survival, it was basically a pipeline that transported water to 90% of Libyans. No one knew what Libya was like before 2011, unless they did extensive research or lived there. There were no refugee's from Libya in other countries. People wanted to move to Libya. But, after 2011? It went from a vague, "Ruthless dictator", to a torn apart country plagued by ever growing presence of ISIL terror group sympathizers due to the power vacuum, yet again, another Iraq, and what could have been Syria. And for a nation, the US, to lead the most powerful military bloc that possibly existed, incapable of stabilizing a country after taking out it's leadership? IT's better off minding it's own damned business... But it doesn't, because they know exactly what they're doing. One word. Capital.
2
-
2
-
LeonNугало Even Muslims don't condemn? No, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Jordan, the UAE Israel and Syria would not being fighting ISIS if that were the case. The only reason it's not going so well, is because the Political system is broken. Every country has their own Agenda's. Hence why Russia is defending Assad, while others want him out of office for killing so many of his people, even civilians during the beginnings of the civil war. ISIS's goal is the make the world hate Islam. That's why they exist. Even Al Qaeda has denounced ISIS because of their overly barbaric ways. That's saying something. where do ISIS get their power? Oil. Oil means money, and with the politics I mentioned before, money makes the gears grind. You can do anything as long as you have money or Oil, and that's the sad part about it. Someone is spending billions on Oil provided by ISIS. Where I live, Muslims and all other religions have lived in peace. No problems here for years. Of course until 9/11. That's when people started getting scared because the US made all Muslims look bad. Then, years later ISIS broke off from Al Qaeda, and claimed they were the new and original Muslim, and anyone else besides them die if they don't follow their rules. This is when millions start saying that all Muslims are bad simply because some group in the middle east says so. This is ISIS's goal, and it's working. They want to the world to Fear Muslims so it makes It easier for them to cause terror. It's worked. The lack of action by the UN and all nations to form a large Coalition and wipe ISIS out of the Middle East and Boko Haram out of North Africa is all the same reason they're able to do so much damage in the Western and Free worlds.
2
-
2
-
Smokey Le Bear Apparently, you think everyone is ISIS. There are a large number of groups in Syria. IS, FSA, YPG, YPG, Assad Regime, Russian Military Advisers, and PMC's consisting of many nationalities, including Chinese PMC's working with the YPG, and YPJ. It's a massive mess. the good guys are the FSA, YPG/YPJ, and PMC's. ISIS is everyone's enemy, FSA is only interested in fighting the Regime and ISIS, the Regime is fighting ISIS, FSA, YPG/YPJ, and all PMC's. It's not fun. So... Yeah, who they were with was the FSA. Abu Hadi was a great man, i can tell. Unfortunately, without him, it is very possible the groups views can turn for the worse, without the pride and good moral of Abu Hadi, they could lose sight of reality. But i don't see the FSA joining ISIS after they constantly fight them when they can to make sure they can win their battle, not the battle of the evil caliphate.
2
-
2
-
+Serena Elisa You know, after a deep down investigation into all the candidates running for the US presidency, this is my conclusion. Trump is a brilliant man, he really is. But his policies are that of a small mind. Not only that, but he almost always speaks before he thinks. Not good because we have too much of that. We need critical thinkers who can calculate the outcome of their actions before they make a move.
Hilary... not a good character. She simply doesn't have the qualities of a leader. She also resigned as secretary of defense under Obama.
Speaking of Obama, he hinted towards Bernie in the beginning of it all. Now about Bernie. This is the interesting one. He is liked by everyone. Yet, hated by them at the same time. Everyone agree's he's honest, and yet, the only dirt they can find on him to put against him, is the claim that his version of Socialism, is the same as dated Russian socialism back when Lenin was leader. They literally try to relate Bernie, to Lenin, and point to famine as the outcome. Bizarre isn't it? When i look at Bernie's record, you can see, in video footage, the man never lies. In fact, he talked about every issue that the US went through over the years... He was correct about every one of them to date. This, is someone we need to lead the country. He is no fool.
Conclusion, Bernie wins in my view. He has all the characters of a good leader. He is honest, well spoken, and does not screw around on the campaign trail. He doesn't mock or make fun of others, and he only talks about issues we face as a nation. He hasn't mentioned a foreign policy plan yet, which is actually quite key, as Foreign policy isn't just something you can toss in the air, respectively foreign policy is the most sensitive part of being a world leader today. In contrast, Trump has already destroyed in reputation globally, and most of the US's most important allies have all had something to say about how Trump carries himself. Bernie on the other hand, does it right. Hilary and the rest of the candidates, honestly come off as clueless to the world around them, and all sound like they're only in it for their Agenda's and not America's. This is what i've obtained so far throughout this campaign. Everyone has their opinions. But this has all been looked into well.
2
-
2
-
Serena Elisa Free college? you mean taking existing taxes and using them to pay for more important things? Also, i'm not a bloody millennial, i own my own business, and never went to college, because honestly, at current, there's no point in it. There's so many skill specific jobs out there that no one can even do because everyone's going to college, and learning something they come out not using. They get degree's and can't use them. Education, does need reform.
Free Healthcare? No such thing, except for in Canada, which means living expenses are higher. There's no problem with that if you don't have a problem getting a good income flow. Obama did a good compromise despite everyone hating it for no reason, and then when one republican almost dies, but gets saved by Obamacare because he could afford it, he instantly changes his mind about it. Crazy right?
I don't think Bernie is advocating Free Health Care, i heard him say "affordable" health care. Keeping Obama's current plan and possibly polishing it to make sure if works better would be key.
Now about fundraisers, sure. very candidate does it, i would believe, as their expenses has to be covered somehow, and yes, Democrats do need support.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This isn't the desert. Your forgetting who the masters of jungle warfare are, and Chad has that advantage. Some places there of course are desert, but Boko Haram doesn't have the advantage there either. They've already been pushed out of most of Northern Nigeria into a forest, and both countries know exactly where they are. If females in Syria can consistently keep ISIS out of an entire city to the point of retreating, Chad and Nigeria are more than capable. Also, Cameroon is sort of involved, but not as heavily. None the less, you say they have no will? Well when they burn down towns, kill the males, and take the females with them for sex, it's a whole new story. At first Nigeria didn't do anything about it, and that's why Chad go involved, because Nigeria was just sitting down and taking it. Chad realized what it had to do, and thy're going to do well. Just wait and see. Boko Haram is going to demolished soon.
2
-
2
-
This is why the world needs to create a coalition and take out Al Qaeda and ISIS before it's too late. Oh wait, we can't because the US and Russia continue to block everyone else from solving shit with their stupid ass proxy wars since the end of World War 2. It's sad really. The US and Russia should work together to stop the extremists, and then afterwards, find a diplomatic solution for Syria. They're just going to draw out this conflict. The US just recently supplied the FSA again, and Russia is bombing them. Meanwhile ISIS, Al Qaeda, and the Taliban are starting to draw up plans for Territorial gains.
Gosh, you know what, when i think of NATO and the UN, and Russia, China, European Union, India, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, they've all got these big armies, military spending beyond that of any civilizations ever to exist. Yet they sit and argue over stupid shit. They sit around, complain about world problems, and genocide, but don't turn a single penny on real issues. They throw supplies into a war torn region with 6 different rebels fighting, and expect the supplies to reach the good guys, that of which, are probably barley holding on to leadership. IF you has me, the "World" leaders are doing it ALL wrong. All of them. I swear, if i were the President of the UN, shit would get done.
2
-
+LXWKEY Neither do the oil companies, the people who run the show? They're just in it for money. No one goes in thinking about benefiting the the people of a country, it's all profits. Sure, a lot of things use oil, but if they cared, would they have all those oil spills, disasters, and neglected safety of geography? No. They don't give a damn. So Mother Nature is the only one who can fight back, as no one really is fighting back. Those that are have to small of a voice for anyone to care. So in a sense, Mother Nature does care. About Earth. Because Earth sustains us. But were abusing the fuck out of it. Hell, were looking for new planets, why? So we can contact them? Learn their language, technology for the most superior weapons mankind has ever laid eye's on? We could be fixing Earth. but nah. They got better things to do, right? I know, it's deep. But still, this comment will just be glanced at, there will be people who agree/disagree, and it'll vanish. Then no one cares, as usual.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
christopher verdugo I would love to see the solid evidence of that claim. Though i don't doubt it would have been covered up because of the sensitivity of drones hitting civilians, much less a wedding. But the fact of the matter is, if there wasn't a wedding, and Awlaki was actively supporting a terror organization, that already voids his access to a fair trial. He had all his rights before he boarded a plane for the Islamic State. He had all the time in the world not to fight with such a barbaric group, and he had the rights every other American had... until he started threatening those rights, with Sharia law, and extremism. I'm pretty damn sure that in the Islamic State, you don't get access to a "fair trial", so in his current position, i think that it's fair he got a missile instead, in fact, it's probably what he wanted, seeing as he went the lengths to leave our soil which guaranteed him unalienable rights, and into a near lawless organization.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
***** Ukraine was NOT the first to start shelling. Ukraine was winning by using ground forces and Special Forces. Then the Russians started handing the DNR armor and Artillery, along with the limited mortars and automatic grenade launchers the DNR already had. The DNR used Artillery and Mortars to counter Ukraine's progress. There's reports and even posted information from Active Russian soldiers who had posted on social media clearly helping the DNR via. over the border Artillery support, and night crossing with Armored vehicles.
I'm not lying to myself. Ukraine had to defend itself, and it did exactly that. You could blame Great Britain for carpet bombing Germany and it's civilians during World War 2 in order to strike fear into Hitler, but you'd be speaking German if that didn't happen. Now of course, the Ukrainian leader would be right to step down and let the political system fix his screw ups, but the point is that it's still called the Ukraine, and not the Donetsk Republic, or some splinter nation under the Russian Federation. And as i said earlier, war is war. Ukraine doesn't have the means to deliver super accurate bombs that can only kill the rebels while avoiding the civilians their positioned so close to. When you think about it, maybe the DNR rebels should have thought of another place to put up a fight rather than risking it's own towns population because it just wants the world to view it's enemy as the bad guys for trying to defend themselves.
And yes, Riot police have the right, and all means to protect themselves when being attacked. Peaceful protests are the ONLY kind of protests. Otherwise it's just an armed conflict between the law enforcement. However, like in any protest in the Modern 21st century... You have one or a few people with their own Agenda's within said protest that could easily turn a peaceful protest into a violent clash and send a country into a deteriorating situation.
2
-
2