Comments by "DarkSideSixOfficial" (@DarkSideSixOfficial) on "The Southern Storm Offensive: The Battle for Syria's South (Part 2)" video.

+Zedek Not sure if you understand the fact that Assad fired first when he killed hundreds of people in a peaceful protest, and THEN started using snipers to shoot fleeing woman and children in empty streets. There's countless videos of Syrian regime snipers firing at even babies in the street, one man speeding in and saving it's life.
4
ND7652 Doesn't change the fact that the FSA are the good guys, they don't want to spread their beliefs anywhere else. They agree to let International agencies in after the conflict, Assad doesn't let agents in to find out if someone used chemical weapons at first, he stalls their request, meanwhile the FSA was fully willing to let them come inspect. What does that say? That was long ago, of course they didn't use the missile strike because there wasn't enough evidence, and the situation was all sorts of screwed up to even tell who used the weapons. The FSA are well prepared for a new Syria, even without Sharia law, the fact that they accept international help after the war, makes the situation less hostile. It means their willing to cooperate, and perhaps they can live in a peaceful Syria with no Sharia Law. The Muslim Brotherhood is unknown at the moment. No one is sure who they are, what they are, well we know, is that extremist religious groups are bad, and the FSA are not interested in anything other than a Syria at peace.
3
Smokey Le Bear Apparently, you think everyone is ISIS. There are a large number of groups in Syria. IS, FSA, YPG, YPG, Assad Regime, Russian Military Advisers, and PMC's consisting of many nationalities, including Chinese PMC's working with the YPG, and YPJ. It's a massive mess. the good guys are the FSA, YPG/YPJ, and PMC's. ISIS is everyone's enemy, FSA is only interested in fighting the Regime and ISIS, the Regime is fighting ISIS, FSA, YPG/YPJ, and all PMC's. It's not fun. So... Yeah, who they were with was the FSA. Abu Hadi was a great man, i can tell. Unfortunately, without him, it is very possible the groups views can turn for the worse, without the pride and good moral of Abu Hadi, they could lose sight of reality. But i don't see the FSA joining ISIS after they constantly fight them when they can to make sure they can win their battle, not the battle of the evil caliphate.
2
Smokey Le Bear I don't care about the United States, this video is about FSA vs. Assad, not ISIS, and who backs them. Sure, the US would support the FSA in the respect of common interest. The FSA already stated they want international help when the war is don'e and i'm pretty certain that's going to involve the United Nations, or NATO, which ever, likely to have a US representative in there somewhere, no one cares though, kid.
2
Smokey Le Bear It is worse, yes. It's probably going to get much worse till it get's better. As is the way with most wars.
2
+adam channel With a bright future like that of Abu Hadi explained, that drive for a good peaceful life without Assad will continue to drive them to free their country of a fascist leader who would rather shoot his people over a peaceful protest than reason with them. He has a Stalin like attitude, and it won't last long.
1
unknown123012 Not a single group of people on this planet has avoided committing heinous acts, so that's a pointless statement. But if you look at where Abu Hadi was trying to get with his people, it sounded much like a nation at peace. Now of course that'd be hard. He knew that in order to achieve such a thing, his nation would need International help. He would let the world in after the war. However, even though they were winning, his death is a loss. The dream of peace can easily be lost by hatred as a result of his death. This is where the Heinous acts can be born.
1
ND7652 The Death of a traitor? That's like saying if the US elected Trump, Trump suddenly turns the country into a Nazi stature, The people fight back to obtain a government run by it's people, not a corrupt group of elected people. Your now calling those fighting for a righteous reason, traitors? This is how i see it. The Government turns Corrupt. The people fight back. Some in fear, either flee the country by the millions, which is what we're seeing now, and some stay loyal to teh corrupt government. Some fight back. Now it's obvious in any country, there are thugs and gangsters, mafia even, militants, extremist groups. Gangs and extremist groups are ISIS. FSA and YPG are freedom fighters. Assad forces are the Corrupt government forces. In a civil war like that, you can't call those fighting for peace traitors. They don't want war anymore, but Assad started it. So they're forced to fight to end it. They're not going to leave, it's their country, how the hell can you call them traitors? ISIS are the traitors. They're born from gangs extremists. They found strength in a war torn nation. They're living in Syria fighting the Regime, and the FSA. It's three way war, and out of all the factions, the FSA are far from traitors.
1
Smokey Le Bear Nice commenting Tim Horton's every 10 seconds. Yes, it's Horton's not "Hortons", grammar counts. Secondly, VICE already did. They got access to ISIS as well. A German journalist also got lone access to ISIS city, Raqqa, and got to interview some people, all of which, claimed they would take on the entire world at once, and still win... Interesting prospect, considering they're getting their asses destroyed by Woman and Warplanes. However the FSA is not this way. Abu Hadi, seen in the video if you cared to pay attention, has no extreme views, other than survival. Of course, his leadership and bravery got him killed. Now of course, you can't see the difference from ISIS and a little girl walking out of a mosque, your uneducated, biased, and closed minded idiocy probably blames everything ISIS does on the entire Islamic ethnicity. You think you see it all but figuratively speaking, your damned eye's aren't even open, you fool. If anyone needs to go anywhere to get informed about what the hell is going on, it's you.
1
Naked Acres No. The FSA don't want Sharia Law.
1
adam channel You would know right? Did any of them in the video mention things about Al-Qaeda? If they were, they probably would have killed the Journalists. The extremists don't care, they'll voice their opinions. These FSA fighters are clearly not Extremists. They're the few that have good hearts. It' be like me calling everyone in the South of the United States, KKK members.
1
Zedek I took note to the comment as a whole. You can't single out "in an event" after stating that one of the fighters is claiming "self defense", during the war (event), however, i'm certain he was implying that their resistance to the regime, IS their self defense. Don't you see? Assad having fired into the crowds at first, kicking off the war (event), thus the reaction from the FSA, being the people defending themselves from Government abuse.
1
Zedek Sigh, what i mean, is that he will continue to use self defense in his speech throughout the war. Why? Because Assad started it first. I didn't say (or mean to say) you meant to imply Assad is the good or bad in this case, i'm simply saying, that Abu Hadi knows Assad started the war, so therefore, even though he's attacking, self defense, could mean he's defending his people in a large scale. He may be doing this one attack, but on a larger scale, it's an attack in a war that's been years long, meaning this Offensive can actually count, as a self defensive move, weather it be in defense of positions behind him, or defense of literal people in his command, the country he fights for. In a war, certain things can take on different meanings.
1