Comments by "DarkSideSixOfficial" (@DarkSideSixOfficial) on "The New York Times" channel.

  1. 214
  2. 158
  3. 126
  4. 105
  5. 74
  6. 69
  7. 42
  8. 31
  9. 30
  10. 27
  11. 24
  12. 22
  13. 20
  14. 14
  15. 14
  16. 12
  17. 10
  18. 10
  19. 9
  20. 9
  21. 8
  22. 7
  23. 7
  24. 7
  25. 7
  26. 6
  27. 6
  28. 6
  29. 6
  30. 6
  31. 6
  32. 6
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 5
  37. 5
  38. 5
  39. 5
  40. 5
  41. 5
  42. 5
  43. 5
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4
  51. 4
  52. 4
  53. 4
  54. 4
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 3
  61. 3
  62. 3
  63. 3
  64. 3
  65. 3
  66. 3
  67. 3
  68. 3
  69. 3
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. I'm not making excuses, i'm stating a fact. Guess what, when the good role models lose power, guess who is there to take it. Those who go through hard lives, with only violence as their asset. These rappers and what not display their violence as power through their music, and young kids follow, because they think it's a form of protection, when it's the exact opposite. Once they're in under the arms of these gangsters, it's hard for them to leave, as it's intense peer pressure, and a violent lock. Some fear leaving means death, or loss of protection, in most cases, that is high possibility. The thing you don't understand though, is that most of those kids are not "gangsters", and are out to get adrenaline. To rally with everyone else, because "everyone" is doing it. They're young and foolish, and probably have homework to do. Now to say they are violent, it's not always the case. But when the ones who hold the power convey violence as the answer, this is what you get. It''s like me calling all German's Nazi's, and if that were the case, than Germany wouldn't exist, they wouldn't have given up the way they did. But it's very similar, in the fact that a ton of young kids feel that being "gangster" is the only way to become strong, powerful, be a man. This is what happens when there is no real positive role model anymore. Obama, don't get me started. I'll wait till he's out of office and the facts come out till i tell you how much he's actually done, but that's a different story of 8 years facing total friction from the opposing party. Anyhow, these kids don't know what they're rioting for. Of course you can argue that all black are violent. But it's not the case. Before King died, there was no violence from African Americans at all. Before they were brought to build America, they weren't violent either. What your seeing is direct cause of those that put African Americans in a bad spot, and now with the only positive idol's gone, they have no one else to fall back on for a good example, and that is the problem plaguing a massive generation.
    2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. True, no country is perfect and without issues. It is also true African nations have many problems ranging from division of people, to extremists attack their people just like in the middle east. But his argument isn't 100% bizarre as it sounds. There are billions of billions of people in the world. It is fine to start at home, if they were to help their own, and then branch out to other countries to do the same, then you would have people at home helping, and people from abroad, also helping. The connection between those two things would be more powerful than only one going abroad, or one staying. If those helping at home and those from abroad were to collaborate in a sense, to do what they do, they would learn more, be more effective. Then, it ultimately goes two ways. Now, i can see the Ebola argument. Ebola is something people already have, you and me have it, we are born with it. It' only becomes dangerous when you get someone else's strand of it. The thing is, Ebola isn't that serious compared to other issues. If you look at the map of Ebola the "outbreak" is this very small region. Nigeria had actually completely got rid of Ebola cases on it's soil before America even got there to help them get rid of it. Africans can help themselves, as long as they work together, and work at home. Also having some abroad is also good, as they are able learn some things that they may not be able to at home, and bring the knowledge back, just like how many Americans, Europeans, and Latin Americans learn at home and travel Abroad, and at home, doing both broadens the spectrum of learning, and keeping an open mind on issues.
    1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. colourmegone Lol, giving up because you have nothing more valid to say? I see, you Americans were never one to admit defeat, or to accept the fact that change is a good thing. After all, that is the circle of life, it's ever changing. Deal with it. And if you think i'm wrong, just look at history. Any historian will tell you. Come the End of the First and Second World War, came the rise of a deep greed driven Economy. No nation gets where it does so fast without vast exploitation, and some presidents have been a big part of it, especially Bush. Oil is one example, and you can't even argue that, it's in history books, it's been recorded in the fabric of time. Bush was the peak of Oil exploitation that had been started long ago, when both Soviet Union and the US realized they both needed oil for their vast machines of war to wage against each other and have the upper hand, it was the need to be able to deliver a nuke anywhere, at any time, and have the ability to do so for the longest period of time. But those times have ended, or so it seems, many left and right wingers refuse to let go of those times, because it was a rush. A sort of excitement for them. But the only threat to the US, is isn't own corruption, and you can thank Obama for exposing most of it, even before he hit office he had received the most unprecedented amount of bigotry from the right wingers. They tried to impeach him for 8 straight years, spent countless ours and money to create those Government scandals you mention. That's one of the reasons Obama had to even shun his own Secret Service, he had men jump the fence more than any other president had ever experienced. It could get worse. Your denial things need to change, is simply an example of why they need to.
    1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. Comonsensaintsocomon First of all, ISIS and Al Nursa are not backed by the US. They are Iran's creation, it's been proven,, i've got a friend in Saudi Arabia who notified me their SF uncovered plans by ISIS including the Haji incident, and to attack Saudi Arabia. They also found tons of weapons, MG3's, and much more supplied by Iran. Secondly, Putin is alone with Assad, and Iran. everyone else see's the root of the problem, which is ISIS, and Al Nursa. Of course, we're not going to let any of them just do what they want. I like how Russia goes into Syria and everyone calls Putin a Hero. We've been fighting ISIS, Putin meanwhile is killing the FSA and the reason it's a big deal is because the FSA are the ones doing damage to ISIS, aside from the YPG who's efforts are also keeping ISIS weakened, with the help of US, Saudi, Jordan, Iraq, the UAE, UK, Canada, France, Germany, and sort of Yemen. The focus of the Middle Eastern and West Coalition is on ISIS and Al-Nursa, and Al Qaeda. Putin is only there to defend Assad. He's actively fighting the Civil War for the Syrians. The US are not doing that. FSA only received weapons, and not even that much, it's mainly food and rations, the most i heard they got supplied from the US, are 14 Trucks, not even armed. I'm talking civilian trucks by the way. So to claim the US is backing ISIS and all that BS, you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. It's the world that needs to put boots on the ground, not just the US, or Russia. It needs to be the world against Terrorist states. It needs to be a quick and devastating offensive that completely corners them into destruction, else ISIS is only going to grow. Putin being there isn't helping anything. He's just making room for ISIS to move further into Syria.
    1
  135. 1
  136. Comonsensaintsocomon  Miss information? I already told you, i got my information straight out of Saudi Arabia. A friend of mine has friends in Iran, no one likes the Iranian Regime. Iran's Government is screwing it's own people, all to obtain power. Lets say for an example, suppose you're right. Putin would then ally with Iran and Syria, and maybe even Afghanistan. Remember the Soviet Union got screwed last time it went to the middle east, so did the US. This isn't about power though. They're not there to claim territory or politics. You what happens if Russia and Iran ally? Iran get's a nuke. You know what happens if Iran get's a Nuke? The extreme right wing in Iran will find a way to either bomb who ever they hate with it, or, they'll sell a nuke to terrorists, and you can't even fathom what terrorists would do with nuke's. You want to know the sole cause of all this violence in the middle east? Soviet and US wars, all for power, and greed. It calmed down after the cold war, until Bush went it claiming they had WMD's. Where do you think they got WMD's from? I'm certain it wasn't a nuke. Chemical weapons are WMD's, which is why you hear stories of Vet's in Iraq preparing for a chemical attack. Which country had the biggest stockpile of Chemical Weapons in the world just a few years ago? Syria. So it's Syria's fault that their own civilians got gassed, maybe they should have agreed with the rest of the world to get rid of them long time ago. The US and about every other country in the world then forced Syria to get rid of them. It was that, or get bombed. The Civil war is now still pushing on. Now of course the situation with ISIS showed up. Where did they come from? ISIS branched off of Al-Qaeda, and Al-Qaeda denounced them because they were "too inhumane". A terrorist group, calling another group far too harsh to even exist, can you believe that? Sounds like extreme Right Wing Iranian morals. The Extremists in Iran's regime are so filled with hatred of Israel, Saudi Arabia, and everyone around them all they focus on is obtaining nuclear weapons. Most powerful nations have Nuke's, but you know what? no one ever threatens to use them. Only Russia has threatened to. The US had invented them, keeps them, but vowed never to use them again after World War 2 and the Cold War. Everyone else wants this power. North Korea, and Iran are much the same. Tyrants to the world. This is only in regards to their Governments. the Kim Dynasty of North Korea is just about as disgusting as Iran's Regime. They only want total power, and will attempt ending the world if they get it. So i'll ask you this, who is the bad guy really?  Also, China doesn't work with Russia or Iran. China is good friends with Pakistan, and is heading to Iraq, not Syria. China is a sovereign state like Canada, they don't like getting involved with the major parties, and do their own thing. This is good policy, as they don't get caught up in drama. If China begins fighting ISIS in Iraq, it's simply what i've been hoping for the world to be doing. Everyone needs to pitch in and defeat ISIS. Once we defeat them, then we can all just pressure Assad and the FSA to stop fighting and solve their Civil war in a diplomatic manner.
    1
  137. 1
  138. ***** So i guess you didn't read it yourself then. "Referring to Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, Biden said, “They were so determined to take down Assad and essentially have a proxy Sunni-Shia war, what did they do? They poured hundreds of millions of dollars and tens, thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad—except that the people who were being supplied were al Nusra and al Qaeda and the extremist elements of jihadis coming from other parts of the world.” and "According to Biden’s narrative, only in the summer of 2014 did these countries realize that ISIS was a threat to them as well as to Assad, and shifted, joining in the US campaign of air strikes against ISIS targets in Syria. He gave as an example the position of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, suggesting that he had admitted the error of a permissive policy towards the extremists: “President Erdogan told me, he is an old friend, said you were right, we let too many people through, now we are trying to seal the border.” Which is great, i forgot to mention, Turkey also supplied ISIS, because the Turkish hate the Kurdish YPG and YPJ fighters. Thus, they allow ISIS to fight right along side their border, which there's even video footage from CNN Literally recording them LIVE, having a fire fight over some hills some 300 meters away. Biden also mentions Saudi Arabia, and the UAE's disputes between Syria as also being the cause of ISIS being so well fitted. But, if you hadn't realized, you're directly blaming the President for arming ISIS. Funny, because i've pretty sure the president only agree's or disagree's with decisions, and in the article it says they (Biden being Vice president and presumably his cabinet under command from the president) tried stopping who ever is below them, from supplying the rebels. Given the lack of communication between the YPG and YPJ, it only makes sense for them to stop the supplies from falling into the wrong hands, which it did. Thus, it's not Obama's fault for ISIS being where it is. It's a combination of micro-mismanagement by multiple parties, some for right reasons, being the US trying to help the Kurdish fight against ISIS in the first place, and some Arab nations trying to take advantage of the situation, and likely tried arming the FSA, but ended up arming ISIS instead. Now, i can easily blame Turkey and Saudi Arabia for this accident, given Saudi Arabia and Turkey some time ago actually arrested literally Hundreds, maybe even a thousand ISIS related individuals. Some even killed. However Turkey, is more of a cause, and it's surprising that Turkey is a NATO member, much less an Ally of most nations. their hate for the Kurdish keep ISIS strong. So back where we started. The Obama didn't purposely arm ISIS. It was a combination of micro-mismanagement by multiple parties. Your're story even with multiple sources i've now read on the matter, doesn't add up. I suggest you start educating yourself, because even though you like to pick and grab "credible facts", your story still isn't good enough of a lie, blaming one man for the entirety of ISIS. Your hate for one side of your political party is probably what keeps you so determined. Well it shouldn't, because if you haven't noticed, both Parties are pretty dumb, mainly because a majority of Americans can't really get a grasp on reality. Everyone's got a personal Agenda, everyone wants power, control, not to sustain, or improve the country. It's a disgrace.
    1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. Pickpocket The Government only does things the people vote for. No Americans in the Middle east? Yup, ISIS took our place cus that's what Americans voted for. Guns kill people? Well most Americans voted to restrict gun rights, and that's why most are stuck with 5 round mag's now. Those are just two examples, that it's not the president who runs the country, he deals with some of the more important stuff most everyday people can't do. Most everyday people are responsible for everything else. You got people complaining about Mexicans working harder than they could ever hope to, and claim they're stealing jobs, but yet you got Indians setting up huge communities, and staying off the radar, making profits from loopholes that every big corporation in America knows about. No one's voting against them, people just want the hard workers out of the country because it makes the lazy look bad. So they want to build a massive wall on the South Border. Why not build one on the North side too, because I've seen some Hard Working Canadians in the states too. Humor aside, I do hope Bernie Sanders get's elected. Not because I think he'll do anything for me, particularly. But because he brought up a large number of issues all other candidates REFUSED to talk about. Questions were asked, and all of them were brushed aside. They didn't want to answer Americans questions. They didn't want to serve the American people. Bernie, does. I suggest when he does get elected, you too should help for vote for issues that matter. It's time to stop spending 4-8 years resisting someone who already won office, and if you see an issue, vote on it. Make a deal about it, talk to your representative, and bring it up. This is how the system should be, not ranting on the internet about why a Muslim president from Africa got elected as president. But rather, vote about the 2nd amendment, and how 75+ Americans don't know that Guns are not an issue when it comes to shootings, but a mental health issue, that needs to be addressed. Even veterans suffer from mental issues.
    1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1