Youtube comments of DarkSideSixOfficial (@DarkSideSixOfficial).

  1. 319
  2. 299
  3. 283
  4. 277
  5. 271
  6. 270
  7. 254
  8. 241
  9. 234
  10. 221
  11. 218
  12. 215
  13. 214
  14. 214
  15. 205
  16. 205
  17. 201
  18. 189
  19. 187
  20. 179
  21. 173
  22. 167
  23. 163
  24. 158
  25. 126
  26. 123
  27. 123
  28. 120
  29. 109
  30. 105
  31. 103
  32. 103
  33. 102
  34. 100
  35. 99
  36. 99
  37. 98
  38. 96
  39. 92
  40. 82
  41. 80
  42. 77
  43. 75
  44. 74
  45. 74
  46. 70
  47. 69
  48. 69
  49. 69
  50. 66
  51. 66
  52. 66
  53. 64
  54. 61
  55. 60
  56. 60
  57. 60
  58. 56
  59. 55
  60. 55
  61. 54
  62. 53
  63. 53
  64. 52
  65. 52
  66. 51
  67. 51
  68. 49
  69. 49
  70. 48
  71. 48
  72. 47
  73. 46
  74. 46
  75. 45
  76. 45
  77. 45
  78. 44
  79. 44
  80. 43
  81. 43
  82. 42
  83. 42
  84. 42
  85. 41
  86. 41
  87. 39
  88. 39
  89. 39
  90. 38
  91. 38
  92. 38
  93. 37
  94. 37
  95. 36
  96. 36
  97. 35
  98. 35
  99. 35
  100. 35
  101. 35
  102. 34
  103. 34
  104. 33
  105. 32
  106. 32
  107. 31
  108. 31
  109. 30
  110. 30
  111. 30
  112. 29
  113. 29
  114. 29
  115. 28
  116. 28
  117. 28
  118. 28
  119. 27
  120. 27
  121. 27
  122. 27
  123. 26
  124. 26
  125. 26
  126. 26
  127. 26
  128. 26
  129. 26
  130. 26
  131. 26
  132. 25
  133. 25
  134. 25
  135. 25
  136. 25
  137. 24
  138. 24
  139. 24
  140. 24
  141. 24
  142. 24
  143. 24
  144. 24
  145. 23
  146. 23
  147. 22
  148. 22
  149. 22
  150. 22
  151. 22
  152. 21
  153. 21
  154. 21
  155. 21
  156. 21
  157. 21
  158. 20
  159. 20
  160. 20
  161. 20
  162. 20
  163. 20
  164. 20
  165. 20
  166. 20
  167. 20
  168. 19
  169. 19
  170. 19
  171. 19
  172. 19
  173. 19
  174. 19
  175. 18
  176. 18
  177. 18
  178. 18
  179. 18
  180. 18
  181. 18
  182. 18
  183. 18
  184. 17
  185. 17
  186. 17
  187. 17
  188. 17
  189. 17
  190. 17
  191. 17
  192. 17
  193. 17
  194. 17
  195. 17
  196. 17
  197. 17
  198. 17
  199. 16
  200. 16
  201. 16
  202. 16
  203. 16
  204. 16
  205. 16
  206. 16
  207. 16
  208. 16
  209. 16
  210. 16
  211. 16
  212. 15
  213. 15
  214. 15
  215. 15
  216. 15
  217. 15
  218. 15
  219. 15
  220. 14
  221. 14
  222. 14
  223. 14
  224. 14
  225. 14
  226. 14
  227. 14
  228. 14
  229. 14
  230. 14
  231. 14
  232. 14
  233. 14
  234. 13
  235. 13
  236. 13
  237. 13
  238. 13
  239. 13
  240. 13
  241. 13
  242. 13
  243. 13
  244. 13
  245. 13
  246. 13
  247. 13
  248. 13
  249. 13
  250. 13
  251. 13
  252. 13
  253. 12
  254. 12
  255. 12
  256. 12
  257. 12
  258. 12
  259. 12
  260. 12
  261. 12
  262. 12
  263. 12
  264. 12
  265. 12
  266. 12
  267. 12
  268. 12
  269. 12
  270. 12
  271. 12
  272. 12
  273. 12
  274. 11
  275. 11
  276. 11
  277. 11
  278. 11
  279. 11
  280. 11
  281. 11
  282. 11
  283. 11
  284. 11
  285. 11
  286. 11
  287. 11
  288. 11
  289. 11
  290. 11
  291. 11
  292. 11
  293. 11
  294. 11
  295. 11
  296. 11
  297. 11
  298. 11
  299. 11
  300. 11
  301. 11
  302. 10
  303. 10
  304. 10
  305. 10
  306. 10
  307. 10
  308. 10
  309. 10
  310. 10
  311. 10
  312. 10
  313. 10
  314. 10
  315. 10
  316. 10
  317. 10
  318. 10
  319. 10
  320. 10
  321. 9
  322. 9
  323. 9
  324. 9
  325. 9
  326. 9
  327. 9
  328. 9
  329. 9
  330. 9
  331. 9
  332. 9
  333. 9
  334. 9
  335. 9
  336. 9
  337. 9
  338. 9
  339. 9
  340. 9
  341. 9
  342. 9
  343. 9
  344. 9
  345. 9
  346. 9
  347. 9
  348. 9
  349. 9
  350. 9
  351. 9
  352. 8
  353. 8
  354. 8
  355. 8
  356. 8
  357. 8
  358. 8
  359. 8
  360. 8
  361. 8
  362. 8
  363. 8
  364. 8
  365. 8
  366. 8
  367. 8
  368. 8
  369. 8
  370. 8
  371. 8
  372. 8
  373. 8
  374. 8
  375. 8
  376. 8
  377. 8
  378. 8
  379. 8
  380. 8
  381. 8
  382. 8
  383. 8
  384. 8
  385. 8
  386. 8
  387. 8
  388. 8
  389. 8
  390. 8
  391. 8
  392. 8
  393. 8
  394. 8
  395. 7
  396. Medovukha Putin probably rose to power after seeing what the US was doing. When the USSR collapsed, they did their own thing. US instead seeked to grow NATO. That was completely fine until they started using their power abusively. You can talk about Russia on human rights abuses like bombing hospitals and schools, but what about the US? They to have struck hospitals and schools in Syria and Afghanistan too. Not to mention they killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's after 9/11, in which they don't even know who did it. Iraq was un-related, as the only reason for going into Iraq was WMD's. Lets not forget what Iraq is like today. How about Libya? If it were truly about ousting dictators, than Libya would be better off than it is today. Instead, it's over run by US backed extremists is it not? How about Syria? Same deal, except i was correct about Russia. Only difference is that Syria is a Russian ally, and as such, it was the US's biggest mistake to draw red lines and attempt to push Syria down the same dismal and disgusting life path of Iraq and Libya. Your argument is pointless and only filled with your misguided opinions. The US needs to change its policies, and perhaps they can get some credibility back. But hey, you can make up every excuse in the world that the US is the world savior and loves Democracy. It can't even uphold it's own Democracy. Wikileaks already proved that, and of course the US's only defense is to blame Russia to hide the contents of the leak. But hey, continue believing what you want to. Just remember, war helps no one. Russia fought hard to defeat the Nazi's and Fascism too. They understood what it meant when they first sided with Hitler and then got stabbed in the back. They learned their lesson and lost millions of lives to their foolishness. But before you discredit Russia again, remember the US didn't care about Hitler until Japan bombed Hawaii, which is the only reason the US entered the war. They only then used their entrance from then on as a glorious fight against fascism.
    7
  397. 7
  398. 7
  399. 7
  400. 7
  401. 7
  402. 7
  403. 7
  404. 7
  405. 7
  406. 7
  407. 7
  408. 7
  409. 7
  410. 7
  411. 7
  412. 7
  413. 7
  414. 7
  415. 7
  416. 7
  417. 7
  418. 7
  419. 7
  420. 7
  421. 7
  422. 7
  423. 7
  424. 7
  425. 7
  426. When you said Foreign Policy isn't really a big factor, that really struck me as an ignorant comment. Foreign Policy is HUGE for voters. More so now than before with the new Cold War as well as consistently staged events designed to bring us to War with Iran. Second, the reason people see Bernie as a stronger candidate than Warren, is because Bernie has a historical record of People funded, people driven ideas and movements for the working class. This includes the rust belt. Warren however, has only just begun using ideas similar to Bernie because that's the ONLY way to stay in the race. Bernie's ideas work, and people realize that, so the rhetoric from other candidates will be similar to Bernie, but that doesn't necessarily mean those other candidates truly care about those ideas like Bernie does because his life, his record, revolves around those ideas. He wont shaft the voters. Lastly, the idea that when old people think of Bernie as less attractive, is because of the day and age old people had to live through the Red scare and McCarthysm. They hear "Socialism" as a smear against Bernie, and automatically rule out support. What they dont understand is that Social Democracy is actually closer to what the Constitution envisioned. Socialism in South America was used as an economic target for Neo-Cons during the 1900s, which is why if you talk to historians most of those countries were covertly or directly overthrown by the US because of imperialist ambitions that relate to today's conflicts in places like Syria, Libya, and Venezuela. They're not legitimate conflicts, they're unconstitutional, illegal, and brutal violations of all morality.
    7
  427. 7
  428. 7
  429. 7
  430. 7
  431. 7
  432. 7
  433. 7
  434. 7
  435. 7
  436. 7
  437. 7
  438. 7
  439. 7
  440. 7
  441. 7
  442. 7
  443. 7
  444. 7
  445. 7
  446. 7
  447. 7
  448. 7
  449. 7
  450. 7
  451. 7
  452. 7
  453. 7
  454. 7
  455. 7
  456. 7
  457. 7
  458. 6
  459. 6
  460. 6
  461. 6
  462. 6
  463. 6
  464. 6
  465. 6
  466. 6
  467. 6
  468. 6
  469. 6
  470. 6
  471. 6
  472. 6
  473. 6
  474. 6
  475. 6
  476. 6
  477. 6
  478. 6
  479. 6
  480. 6
  481. 6
  482. 6
  483.  @Gggbvcx  actually no, this just proves you're typical master manipulator. The Moors go farther back than you think. Europe was not conquered by them. Spain had history with Moors because the Moors are Builders and Scholars, and they spread their knowledge for free and taught the people of the world, from Ancient Egypt, they built the Great Library of Alexandria, which was destroyed by colonizers because that's the best way to conquer, is to erase history and rewrite it to fit your narritive. The Moors never did such thing. They gave the world knowledge and know how, accepted everyone and taught them things, but the Europeans got greedy and began using the knowledge they learned to destroy those that gave it to them, and then claimed it is theirs. Hence why Europe tries to wash and inject their finger prints in every corner of the earth, create institutions like "Egyptology", and other projects of white washing history of African nations by claiming they "peacefully settled" their first like in South Africa. Just like in the Americas with Colombus. The Moors were in the Aztecs too, hence the Pyramids. Arabs too havn't been very friendly to them either. Like everyone else they simply tool the knowledge and used it against the Moors in Deceit, Deception, and Manipulation. They pushed Africans out of North East Africa and called it the Middle East. Everyone knows the Nubians were in Egypt before forced to flee to the Horn of Africa. At least, those who are educated scholars. The Moors gave Humanity grand Knowledge. The Europeans took it and turned the world into a grand Dystopian Nightmare filled with global wars, slavery, and holocaust just to do away with the real history and make it seem like Europeans were the discoverers. The scholars, the teachers, the grand achitachrts and yet they still can't figure out how the Moors built the Pyramids.
    6
  484. 6
  485. 6
  486. 6
  487. 6
  488. 6
  489. 6
  490. 6
  491. 6
  492. 6
  493. 6
  494. 6
  495. 6
  496. 6
  497. 6
  498. 6
  499. 6
  500. 6
  501. 6
  502. 6
  503. 6
  504. 6
  505. 6
  506. 6
  507. 6
  508. 6
  509. 6
  510. 6
  511. 6
  512. 6
  513. 6
  514. 6
  515. 6
  516. 6
  517. 6
  518. 6
  519. 6
  520. 6
  521. 6
  522. 6
  523. 6
  524. 6
  525. 6
  526. 6
  527. 6
  528. 6
  529. 6
  530. 6
  531. 5
  532. 5
  533. 5
  534. 5
  535. 5
  536. 5
  537. 5
  538. 5
  539. 5
  540. 5
  541. 5
  542. 5
  543. 5
  544. 5
  545. 5
  546. 5
  547. 5
  548. 5
  549. 5
  550. 5
  551. 5
  552. 5
  553. 5
  554. 5
  555. 5
  556. 5
  557. 5
  558. 5
  559. 5
  560. 5
  561. 5
  562. 5
  563. 5
  564. 5
  565. 5
  566. 5
  567. 5
  568. 5
  569. 5
  570. 5
  571. 5
  572. 5
  573. 5
  574. 5
  575. 5
  576. 5
  577. 5
  578. 5
  579. 5
  580. 5
  581. 5
  582. 5
  583. 5
  584. 5
  585. 5
  586. 5
  587. 5
  588. 5
  589. 5
  590. 5
  591. 5
  592. 5
  593. 5
  594. 5
  595. 5
  596. 5
  597. 5
  598. 5
  599. 5
  600. 5
  601. 5
  602. 5
  603. 5
  604. 5
  605. 5
  606. 5
  607. 5
  608. 5
  609. 5
  610. 5
  611. 5
  612. 5
  613. 5
  614. 5
  615. 5
  616. 5
  617. 5
  618. 5
  619. 5
  620. 5
  621. 5
  622. 5
  623. 5
  624. 5
  625. 5
  626. 5
  627. 5
  628. 5
  629. 5
  630. 5
  631. 5
  632. 5
  633. 5
  634. 5
  635. 5
  636. 5
  637. 5
  638. 5
  639. 5
  640. 5
  641. 5
  642. 5
  643. 5
  644. 5
  645. 4
  646. 4
  647. 4
  648. 4
  649. 4
  650. 4
  651. 4
  652. 4
  653. 4
  654. 4
  655. 4
  656. 4
  657. 4
  658. 4
  659. 4
  660. 4
  661. 4
  662. 4
  663. 4
  664. 4
  665. 4
  666. 4
  667. 4
  668. 4
  669. 4
  670. 4
  671. 4
  672. 4
  673. 4
  674. 4
  675. 4
  676. 4
  677. 4
  678. 4
  679. 4
  680. 4
  681. 4
  682. 4
  683. 4
  684. 4
  685. 4
  686. 4
  687. 4
  688. 4
  689. 4
  690. 4
  691. 4
  692. 4
  693. 4
  694. 4
  695. 4
  696. 4
  697. 4
  698. 4
  699. 4
  700. 4
  701. 4
  702. 4
  703. 4
  704. 4
  705. 4
  706. 4
  707. 4
  708. 4
  709. 4
  710. 4
  711. 4
  712. 4
  713. 4
  714. 4
  715. 4
  716. 4
  717. 4
  718. 4
  719. 4
  720. 4
  721. 4
  722. 4
  723. 4
  724. 4
  725. 4
  726. 4
  727. 4
  728. 4
  729. 4
  730. 4
  731. 4
  732. 4
  733. 4
  734. 4
  735. 4
  736. 4
  737. 4
  738. 4
  739. 4
  740. 4
  741. 4
  742. 4
  743. 4
  744. 4
  745. 4
  746. 4
  747. 4
  748. 4
  749. 4
  750. 4
  751. 4
  752. 4
  753. 4
  754. 4
  755. 4
  756. 4
  757. 4
  758. 4
  759. 4
  760. 4
  761. 4
  762. 4
  763. 4
  764. 4
  765. 4
  766. 4
  767. 4
  768. 4
  769. 4
  770. 4
  771. 4
  772. 4
  773. 4
  774. 4
  775. 4
  776. 4
  777. 4
  778. 4
  779. 4
  780. 4
  781. 4
  782. 4
  783. 4
  784. 4
  785. 4
  786. 4
  787. 4
  788. 4
  789. 4
  790. 4
  791. 4
  792. 4
  793. 4
  794. 4
  795. 3
  796. 3
  797. 3
  798. 3
  799. 3
  800. Serena Elisa Odd... Getting mad to easily isn't what i see. It's more like he gets angry when people blatently lie about destructive policies that have been ruining the U.S., and are now major issues today. But he's only human. He's not aloud to get upset now? Obama has gotten upset too, and for good reason. He's been dealing with 8 years of resistance, and still he's got a great deal done, imagine if he had gone 8 years without such resistance. Bernie, i don't think he'd face the same fate... or maybe he would. But lets just say he doesn't experience that resistance. His policies are quite well thought out. Lets look at some contrast. Mexico and Drug Related Wars Trump - Wall Hillary - more laws and regulation Bernie - More jobs and opportunities and assistance for those who turn to drugs as an alternative. Hmmm... Foreign Policy Trump - Screw everyone else, America first, no one does anything for us. Hilary - Israel must be strong, and the rest about the middle east of mostly a mystery... still. Bernie - Israel and Palestine must work together. We need to work with the world to make lives better, and fight climate change, which includes cleaning up dirty drinking water, and ending fracking in the US first as an example for others to follow. Alternative energy other than oil, a main weakness of the US and most countries depend on oil the most, and are easily susceptible to it's status on the market. Refugee's Trump - Keep them all out until we can find out what's going on. Hilary - ... Not sure Bernie - Understands what is going on. That refugee's are fleeing ISIL because Muslims are the main target of ISIL.  Should i continue? Bernie's policies provide a vision of actual solutions. He understands the problems, and calculates a solution. Is that not what a good leader is? It's the same with Foreign policy, and lets not forget that foreign policy isn't just about Bernie, because lets be honest, the Department of defense, the Pentagon, and even the Military Industrial complex all have their own Agenda's. As for Hilary, she stepped down as Secretary of defense. Not to mention she was even put on criminal trial, but because she was in the race for the presidency, last i recall that trial went out the window. Should someone being investigated really be aloud to run for president? We still don't know all the details of why exactly she got into that situation, all we know is it still has to do with some classified emails, and Libya. This screams inexperienced, despite her having been the secretary. And to be completely honest, look at the Foreign Policy under Obama as well? To me, Obama is great, a fantastic leader. But his biggest weakness IS foreign policy, and Hilary did all but help with that. Right now, Russia, China, and Iran are the US's biggest active and growing threats. Those are 3 major super powers. That's something you don't mess around with. But relations between the US and those countries have been steadily deteriorating, as well as when she was in SOD position. Of course things are getting better as the US tries to coordinate with Russia more, but honestly, i think Bernie would do fine. Not having come out with a Foreign Policy strategy, is NOT a sign of weakness, or simply not ready to handle it. He doesn't want to start talking of a foreign policy this early. Any smart person wouldn't really get too deep into that topic while still running for president. Take Taiwan's soon president for example, one of a few leaders with the most dangerous foreign policy history. Not a word from her yet, and she has been elected. It's likely the same deal here. 
    3
  801. 3
  802. 3
  803. 3
  804. 3
  805. 3
  806. 3
  807. 3
  808. 3
  809. 3
  810. 3
  811. 3
  812. 3
  813. 3
  814. 3
  815. 3
  816. 3
  817. 3
  818. 3
  819. It was mentioned, but wasn't even close to being the subject of this video, yet there's were many comments slandering the phrase. But it's sad, how people can talk crap for such a group when they've tried so hard to promote peace and fairness and improve, or bring awareness to a broken policies in our system and are then attacked for it. No, it's not because of riots or looting by uneducated youths, those are in way way shape or form related to the BLM movement... but the Media easily manipulates the population to believe so, with their opinions, and not facts. They ignored every peaceful protest and events where BLM held hands with cops and sung songs, and had cookouts, and covered the riots instead. But the worst part is that the only reason the term "All Lives Matter" exists was to counter Black Lives Matter, which was already supported by every other ethnic group, mainly because BLM wasn't bringing awareness for just blacks. It was for everyone. But when you have other ethnic people killed by cops, the term "All Lives Matter" wasn't there. It was just a smoke. Just an attack. No problems being solved because they ere too busy attacking BLM that they didn't care to realize there system is degrading, and Black people were smart enough to expose it. But instead of saying, "hey look, Police Officers should be trained, those are American people, American kids, being killed ", they were all like, "You're not oppressed, sit down, shut up". Crazy. When Colin Kaepernick did sit down and shut up in protest, it broke the internet, and he was attacked even worse. Even with half our Veterans backing his protest, people still hate him. It's quite obvious these haters don't care. you simply cannot fix these people. They are the true source of racial divide.
    3
  820. 3
  821. 3
  822. 3
  823. 3
  824. 3
  825. 3
  826. 3
  827. 3
  828. 3
  829. 3
  830. 3
  831. 3
  832. 3
  833. 3
  834. 3
  835. 3
  836. 3
  837. 3
  838. 3
  839. 3
  840. 3
  841. 3
  842. 3
  843. 3
  844. 3
  845. 3
  846. 3
  847. 3
  848. 3
  849. 3
  850. 3
  851.  Vermonster90  No. Those were CIA backed and it's proven. Unlike you, I will even go as far as citing sources from International Investigative Journaists who don't get paid by "Pro-War" Think Tanks. In the case of Venezuala: https://www.globalresearch.ca/imperialist-aggression-learn-attempted-coup-venezuela/5668496 Declassified Chile involvement related to overthrowing Venezuala: https://www.globalresearch.ca/chile-and-the-united-states-declassified-documents-relating-to-the-military-coup-september-11-1973/5668290 The fact that you ignore that today's attempts to overthrow Venezuala is just the United States (rogue government) 68th Coup in a long list of "business as usual" policy that's as standard as a Ball Point Pen. If you want to talk about people frustrated of Communism from Russia and China, take a look at Venezuala. We intervened and tried to do the same to them, but not only did we lose, Vietnam is much better off because we lost and pulled out. Everyone country we invaded and claimed "mission accomplished" are so bad you wouldn't dare step foot on their soil. From Iraq, to Libya, we've done more harm than good not just to these people but to our own constitutional obligations and image around the world. The rest of the world hates us more today than any other country because of it, yet, you seem to just point to countries anger as them being a threat. They have a damn good reason to hate us for what we've done. It doesn't make sense you continue trying to defend these bullshit policies that are much more of a threat to our country than any nuclear armed state.
    3
  852. 3
  853. 3
  854. 3
  855. 3
  856. 3
  857. 3
  858. 3
  859. 3
  860. 3
  861. 3
  862. 3
  863. 3
  864. 3
  865. 3
  866. 3
  867. 3
  868. 3
  869. 3
  870. 3
  871. 3
  872. 3
  873. 3
  874. 3
  875. 3
  876. 3
  877. 3
  878. 3
  879. 3
  880. 3
  881. 3
  882. 3
  883. 3
  884. 3
  885. 3
  886. 3
  887. 3
  888. 3
  889. 3
  890. 3
  891. 3
  892. 3
  893. 3
  894. 3
  895. 3
  896. 3
  897. 3
  898. 3
  899. 3
  900. 3
  901. 3
  902. 3
  903. 3
  904. 3
  905. 3
  906. 3
  907. 3
  908. 3
  909. 3
  910. 3
  911. 3
  912. 3
  913. 3
  914. 3
  915. 3
  916. 3
  917. 3
  918. 3
  919. 3
  920. 3
  921. 3
  922. 3
  923. 3
  924. 3
  925. 3
  926. 3
  927. 3
  928. 3
  929. 3
  930. 3
  931. 3
  932. 3
  933. 3
  934. Facts we know. Drone was in Iranian Airspace, a Violation of Sovereign Territory. It wasn't shot down off the Coast of Forida, it was shot down off the Coast of Iran. Iran was Denied Access to the United Nations to provide the evidence to the World Stage. US claims their evidence would only prove them right, which, if that's the case, why deny them entry? Obstruction of international justice. The Drone was shot down just says after the Tanker incident, which also failed to create a context for War from the American Populace. The Admirl + Crew of the Tanker Kokuka testified that the Tanker was attacked by a Projectile before the Cree witness the second shot. This happened on the opposite side shown in the alleged video provided by the US of a mine being removed, around the same time the US was conducting a Marratime Mine Training Session. After these events failed to provide evidence of Iran's involvement in incidents that would overwhelmingly cause a conflict in the region to the benefit of Neo-Cons, the Neo-Cons themselves began a Tour to Saudi Arabia, Israel, the UAE, and other nations to for a Coalition of countries that would help coax the United States into yet another Unconstitutional War with Iran. TLDR; the US has been creating tensions, pulled out of Peace Agreements, tormented violence, manufactured evidence convicting Iran of being Aggressive in their own territorial borders, and when all else has failed to create a pretext for Unconstitutional War via. Manufactured Conscent, rogue elements within Washington seek to create a Coalition outside of the US in order to drag the US into War. #Tulsi2020
    3
  935. 3
  936. 3
  937. 3
  938. 3
  939. 3
  940. 3
  941. 3
  942. 3
  943. 3
  944. 3
  945. 3
  946. 3
  947. 3
  948. 3
  949. 3
  950. 3
  951. 3
  952. 3
  953. 3
  954. 3
  955. 3
  956. 3
  957. 3
  958. 3
  959. 3
  960. 3
  961. 3
  962. 3
  963. 3
  964. 3
  965. 3
  966. 3
  967. 3
  968. 3
  969. 3
  970. 3
  971. 3
  972. 3
  973. 3
  974. 3
  975. 3
  976. 3
  977. 3
  978. 3
  979. 3
  980. 3
  981. 3
  982. 3
  983. 3
  984. 3
  985. 3
  986. 3
  987. 3
  988. 3
  989. 3
  990. 3
  991. 3
  992. 3
  993. 3
  994. 3
  995. 3
  996. 3
  997. 3
  998. 3
  999. 3
  1000. 3
  1001. 3
  1002. 3
  1003. 3
  1004. 3
  1005. 3
  1006. 3
  1007. 3
  1008. 3
  1009. 3
  1010. 3
  1011. 3
  1012. 3
  1013. 3
  1014. 3
  1015.  @nathanielmathews2617  Bernie did the strategic thing at the time. If he fought over it then, it would be difficult to fight over it now. Bernie didn't know it was rigged until it was too late. Warren knew. Tulsi knew. But only Tulsi stood up for Bernie like the soldier she is, and she fought to ensure the debates were more fair before she found out it was rigged. She tossed aside everything, her career at the DNc, a sacrafice of her future when given the ultimatum to give up her freedoms for Political Guarantees, instead for the Nation and yet it still wasn't enough because of the power Hillary had then. But hindsight is 2020, and I believe Bernie is waiting until the Generals or until it's confirmed they cheated him again to take out the sword of justice. If you've been paying attention, what they've been doing to Tulsi is only apart of their strategy against Bernie. Tulsi just happened to be the one they didn't expect, which is why Kamala went from 2nd place in the polls, down to 5%. That's a huge defeat which leads me to the final conclusion. The establishment are scared. Either way if Trump wins, they win. If Warren wins, they win. However... If Trump went up against Bernie, he would be destroyed... But, if he went up against Tulsi... it would take just 60 seconds for Tulsi to do to him what she did to Kamala. Absolutely destroy him. The Establishment dont want Bernie or Tulsi. They want someone like Warren who wont shake up the status quo. We cannot afford that anymore. It's either Political Revolution by Diplomacy, or Political Revolution by a REAL Revolution.
    3
  1016. 3
  1017. 3
  1018. 3
  1019. 3
  1020. 3
  1021. 3
  1022. 3
  1023. 3
  1024. 3
  1025. 3
  1026. 3
  1027. 3
  1028. 3
  1029. 3
  1030. 3
  1031. 3
  1032. 3
  1033. 3
  1034. 3
  1035. 3
  1036. 3
  1037. 3
  1038. 3
  1039. 3
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. ***** With one yellow cake they would do what? As apposed to North Korea, who has always claimed to have nukes, why not invade them then? Why was Iraq singled out? Under the basis that specific nations can obtain WMD's, what makes it right to militarily prevent one from gaining access to them, but verbally scold another from trying to do so? Just as the same goes for, if the US were truly dedicated to it's cause of making the world a better place by ousting dictators, wouldn't they have already gotten rid of them all? Or, is it just mere politics? Of course, it's obvious it's the latter. Take Libya for example, the mass people were told by media he was quote, "a ruthless dictator". Yet NATO went in and ended up bombing the Great Man-made River, which was Libya's water supply that many depended on for survival, it was basically a pipeline that transported water to 90% of Libyans. No one knew what Libya was like before 2011, unless they did extensive research or lived there. There were no refugee's from Libya in other countries. People wanted to move to Libya. But, after 2011? It went from a vague, "Ruthless dictator", to a torn apart country plagued by ever growing presence of ISIL terror group sympathizers due to the power vacuum, yet again, another Iraq, and what could have been Syria. And for a nation, the US, to lead the most powerful military bloc that possibly existed, incapable of stabilizing a country after taking out it's leadership? IT's better off minding it's own damned business... But it doesn't, because they know exactly what they're doing. One word. Capital.
    2
  1046. 2
  1047. LeonNугало Even Muslims don't condemn? No, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Jordan, the UAE Israel and Syria would not being fighting ISIS if that were the case. The only reason it's not going so well, is because the Political system is broken. Every country has their own Agenda's. Hence why Russia is defending Assad, while others want him out of office for killing so many of his people, even civilians during the beginnings of the civil war. ISIS's goal is the make the world hate Islam. That's why they exist. Even Al Qaeda has denounced ISIS because of their overly barbaric ways. That's saying something. where do ISIS get their power? Oil. Oil means money, and with the politics I mentioned before, money makes the gears grind. You can do anything as long as you have money or Oil, and that's the sad part about it. Someone is spending billions on Oil provided by ISIS. Where I live, Muslims and all other religions have lived in peace. No problems here for years. Of course until 9/11. That's when people started getting scared because the US made all Muslims look bad. Then, years later ISIS broke off from Al Qaeda, and claimed they were the new and original Muslim, and anyone else besides them die if they don't follow their rules. This is when millions start saying that all Muslims are bad simply because some group in the middle east says so. This is ISIS's goal, and it's working. They want to the world to Fear Muslims so it makes It easier for them to cause terror. It's worked. The lack of action by the UN and all nations to form a large Coalition and wipe ISIS out of the Middle East and Boko Haram out of North Africa is all the same reason they're able to do so much damage in the Western and Free worlds.
    2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. +Serena Elisa You know, after a deep down investigation into all the candidates running for the US presidency, this is my conclusion. Trump is a brilliant man, he really is. But his policies are that of a small mind. Not only that, but he almost always speaks before he thinks. Not good because we have too much of that. We need critical thinkers who can calculate the outcome of their actions before they make a move. Hilary... not a good character. She simply doesn't have the qualities of a leader. She also resigned as secretary of defense under Obama. Speaking of Obama, he hinted towards Bernie in the beginning of it all. Now about Bernie. This is the interesting one. He is liked by everyone. Yet, hated by them at the same time. Everyone agree's he's honest, and yet, the only dirt they can find on him to put against him, is the claim that his version of Socialism, is the same as dated Russian socialism back when Lenin was leader. They literally try to relate Bernie, to Lenin, and point to famine as the outcome. Bizarre isn't it? When i look at Bernie's record, you can see, in video footage, the man never lies. In fact, he talked about every issue that the US went through over the years... He was correct about every one of them to date. This, is someone we need to lead the country. He is no fool. Conclusion, Bernie wins in my view. He has all the characters of a good leader. He is honest, well spoken, and does not screw around on the campaign trail. He doesn't mock or make fun of others, and he only talks about issues we face as a nation. He hasn't mentioned a foreign policy plan yet, which is actually quite key, as Foreign policy isn't just something you can toss in the air, respectively foreign policy is the most sensitive part of being a world leader today. In contrast, Trump has already destroyed in reputation globally, and most of the US's most important allies have all had something to say about how Trump carries himself. Bernie on the other hand, does it right. Hilary and the rest of the candidates, honestly come off as clueless to the world around them, and all sound like they're only in it for their Agenda's and not America's. This is what i've obtained so far throughout this campaign. Everyone has their opinions. But this has all been looked into well.
    2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. ***** Alright, i was only mirroring your posture from your previous comments However, i can dance. Let's talk civilized. They aren't doing it because it serves their interests. They're doing it to keep Democratic Chinese national from being wiped off the map. They lost the war, but managed to survive, and seek independence because Communist China is still lost in it's disgusting ways, and slaughters anyone with a different mindset or opinion. The US backs Taiwan to prevent them from ending up slaughtered. It's one of the reasons people don't practice Falun Gong in Mainland China. They can only do it underground, in Hong Kong, Taiwan, or abroad. They are not doing it join this fantasized "United States Evil Empire". Democracy has proven to be a well developed way of life that's advanced society in many nations. And believe me, Democracy has had it's evils. Slavery is one example. But look at how far Democracy has come. People with great minds can express themselves without be silenced, or used for one countries own benefit. Communism really was brought up to fight a war properly, due to the fact that the Czar's in Russia were causing Russia to suffer. Thus the workers party rose up to power, and ruled with an Iron fist in order to keep their country from being destroyed during the great wars. Then of course, like any political culture, it has it's bad leaders. Stalin, after the second great war thought he didn't get enough out of the war, that he went out of his way to sign a separate surrender of the Germans. Then he began taking land, just like Hitler was trying to do, and started developing nukes just because the US had ended the war with it. But anyway, after the USSR eventually fell, the new Russian Federation rose from it's ashes, it's still a little dirty because of it's past, but it's technically no longer a communist, or authoritarian nation. China should have been the same way. But instead, there were an elite group of corrupt individuals who ended up rising to power, and destroying China. One in particular, had spent years finding out how to ban people from practicing Falun Gong. Do you know who he is? He couldn't find a single reason to ban it because there was nothing wrong with it. But because of communist nature, he was able to create his own police force to slaughter millions who did practice it. he got arrested recently i think, was thrown in jail by Shi Jin Ping. Anyway though, Taiwan, isn't going to end up in the same hands as mainland China. If they could join NATO, they would have. But since that was prevented due to mainland China, they remain a personal ally of the US and many other Democracies. This is to ensure that their escape from total genocide wasn't in vein back then.
    2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. ***** Ukraine was NOT the first to start shelling. Ukraine was winning by using ground forces and Special Forces. Then the Russians started handing the DNR armor and Artillery, along with the limited mortars and automatic grenade launchers the DNR already had. The DNR used Artillery and Mortars to counter Ukraine's progress. There's reports and even posted information from Active Russian soldiers who had posted on social media clearly helping the DNR via. over the border Artillery support, and night crossing with Armored vehicles. I'm not lying to myself. Ukraine had to defend itself, and it did exactly that. You could blame Great Britain for carpet bombing Germany and it's civilians during World War 2 in order to strike fear into Hitler, but you'd be speaking German if that didn't happen. Now of course, the Ukrainian leader would be right to step down and let the political system fix his screw ups, but the point is that it's still called the Ukraine, and not the Donetsk Republic, or some splinter nation under the Russian Federation. And as i said earlier, war is war. Ukraine doesn't have the means to deliver super accurate bombs that can only kill the rebels while avoiding the civilians their positioned so close to. When you think about it, maybe the DNR rebels should have thought of another place to put up a fight rather than risking it's own towns population because it just wants the world to view it's enemy as the bad guys for trying to defend themselves. And yes, Riot police have the right, and all means to protect themselves when being attacked. Peaceful protests are the ONLY kind of protests. Otherwise it's just an armed conflict between the law enforcement. However, like in any protest in the Modern 21st century... You have one or a few people with their own Agenda's within said protest that could easily turn a peaceful protest into a violent clash and send a country into a deteriorating situation.
    2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. I'm not making excuses, i'm stating a fact. Guess what, when the good role models lose power, guess who is there to take it. Those who go through hard lives, with only violence as their asset. These rappers and what not display their violence as power through their music, and young kids follow, because they think it's a form of protection, when it's the exact opposite. Once they're in under the arms of these gangsters, it's hard for them to leave, as it's intense peer pressure, and a violent lock. Some fear leaving means death, or loss of protection, in most cases, that is high possibility. The thing you don't understand though, is that most of those kids are not "gangsters", and are out to get adrenaline. To rally with everyone else, because "everyone" is doing it. They're young and foolish, and probably have homework to do. Now to say they are violent, it's not always the case. But when the ones who hold the power convey violence as the answer, this is what you get. It''s like me calling all German's Nazi's, and if that were the case, than Germany wouldn't exist, they wouldn't have given up the way they did. But it's very similar, in the fact that a ton of young kids feel that being "gangster" is the only way to become strong, powerful, be a man. This is what happens when there is no real positive role model anymore. Obama, don't get me started. I'll wait till he's out of office and the facts come out till i tell you how much he's actually done, but that's a different story of 8 years facing total friction from the opposing party. Anyhow, these kids don't know what they're rioting for. Of course you can argue that all black are violent. But it's not the case. Before King died, there was no violence from African Americans at all. Before they were brought to build America, they weren't violent either. What your seeing is direct cause of those that put African Americans in a bad spot, and now with the only positive idol's gone, they have no one else to fall back on for a good example, and that is the problem plaguing a massive generation.
    2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. Jake Moyo No there isnt. Where? Pictures of kids amid smoke with water being poured on them? Its well known now there were no symptoms of Chemical weapons, otherwise thw victims woild either have warts, chemical burns on the skin or foaming at the mouth, that if which none of these symptoms were found, as they were just paniced, the most they had was hard breathing from regular smoke and dust from downed buildings. The problem occured when the whitw helmets ran in with Camera's and yelled "Chemicas", as many witnesses explained. There's your evidence. Evidence of a blatant fabrication. If you want more evidence, i can provide it, because the US bombing the attack sites before an investigation, and THEN blaming Russia for tampering with the sites is obviously not a blatant attempt to save face whem they knew nothing was going to be found. So they said "hell with intrrnational law", and just shot 244 million worth of tax payer money at a bunch of lies. Its been known for YEARS, that chemical attacks would be faked. But theres even more evidence to suggest the US and the rebels they back faked it in order to enforce a red line their predecessor didn't. Its funny how the previous administration opted to help get rid of chemical weapons with Russia, where as we are now blaming them for using weapons we helped them get rid of? Are we then suggesting we are simply incompitent and allowed him to keep some just to puposely frame him later? Possible, but the reality is that there simply wasn't chemical use, not once from the government at least, but rebels backed by the US have used them in the past including Daesh.
    2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. 2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359. 2
  1360. 2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 2
  1369. 2
  1370. 2
  1371. 2
  1372. 2
  1373. 2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. 2
  1377. 2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. 2
  1402. 2
  1403. 2
  1404. 2
  1405. 2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 2
  1411. 2
  1412. 2
  1413. 2
  1414. 2
  1415. 2
  1416. 2
  1417. 2
  1418. 2
  1419. 2
  1420. 2
  1421. 2
  1422. 2
  1423. 2
  1424. 2
  1425. 2
  1426. 2
  1427. 2
  1428. 2
  1429. 2
  1430. 2
  1431. 2
  1432. 2
  1433. 2
  1434. 2
  1435. 2
  1436. 2
  1437. 2
  1438. 2
  1439. 2
  1440. 2
  1441. 2
  1442. 2
  1443. 2
  1444. 2
  1445. 2
  1446. 2
  1447. 2
  1448. 2
  1449. 2
  1450. 2
  1451. 2
  1452. 2
  1453. 2
  1454. 2
  1455. 2
  1456. 2
  1457. 2
  1458. 2
  1459. 2
  1460. 2
  1461. 2
  1462. 2
  1463. 2
  1464. 2
  1465. 2
  1466. 2
  1467. 2
  1468. 2
  1469. 2
  1470. 2
  1471. 2
  1472. 2
  1473. 2
  1474. 2
  1475. 2
  1476. 2
  1477. 2
  1478. 2
  1479. 2
  1480. 2
  1481. 2
  1482. 2
  1483. 2
  1484. 2
  1485. 2
  1486. 2
  1487. 2
  1488. 2
  1489. 2
  1490. 2
  1491. 2
  1492. 2
  1493. 2
  1494. 2
  1495. 2
  1496. 2
  1497. 2
  1498. 2
  1499. 2
  1500. 2
  1501. 2
  1502. 2
  1503. 2
  1504. 2
  1505. 2
  1506. 2
  1507.  @Stephen-lt1tp  Doesn't matter, the new investigation with this evidence was already approved by a Federal Attorney just recently, couple days ago the New York Fire Comissioners all signed on unanimously. But sure, tell me then mr.Wizard, how does 2 Airplanes take down 3 buildings? Answer is it's impossible. The airplanes were a distraction. Without the airplanes, it would be clear as day what happened. The airplanes were not designed to take down the buildings, they were only used as a cover for the rest of the events which is why Building 7 came down without being hit by any aircraft. Lastly, aprox. 60 seconds before the first Tower Collapsed, one of the Italian firefighters radioed out after reaching the 78th floor with his men quote, "theres two fires, separate, just two lines and we can knock this out". Translation, there were two separate fires from the Airplane strike, it would only take two firefighting squads to put out the two flames. So, then why did the building collapse 60 seconds later after this transmission? Because it was a planned Demolition. Demolition is a career that is designed to make tall or complex buildings come down in its footprint, to save infrastructure around it. It's impossible to make a building fall straight down without a team of educated specialists using specific planted thermite explosives that cut steel. They had to hook it up mathamatically to destroy the main structure within seconds of each other, otherwise the tall building would lean and fall over onto other buildings.
    2
  1508. 2
  1509. 2
  1510. 2
  1511. 2
  1512. 2
  1513. 2
  1514. 2
  1515. 2
  1516. 2
  1517. There isn't a time in history your leaders worked for you, or cared for you as they say they do. Niether left, nor right. They speak soft tounge to your ears what you want to hear, and they win you over, and that's enough to hand them the power which they do as they please with it. They spend nearly 1 Trillion per year now of Your money, up from 500 Billion of the previous years, and they tell you they are defending and fighting for your interests. But you never had a say, nor a vote in where your sons or daughters went to fight. But only if you understand the damage we've done to the world. https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-has-killed-more-than-20-million-people-in-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051 We preach peace and tell other nations what to do, yet rip up peace deals with North Korea and Iran, and tell you they don't have a right to defense. At we preach to countries like China and Russia about communism and authoritarianism... yet just recently Monopolies like Google have ditched transparency and free speech policies, and have forced other companies like YouTube to demonatize and censor content that tells the truth like it is. We're now living in an Era far scarier than the rise of Hitler. A scenario similar to that of World War 2, except the country with the most nukes has become the most malign and belligerent while it's people sit quietly and in silence of their constitutional obligations to defend peace, liberty, and freedom for all. They would rather protest the distraction of same sex marriage when they can't reproduce and trans genders when they fail to simply love who they are, but for the next 3 million years, none of that, or this, will exist should we go to nuclear war.
    2
  1518. 2
  1519. 2
  1520. 2
  1521. 2
  1522. 2
  1523. 2
  1524. 2
  1525. 2
  1526. 2
  1527. 2
  1528. 2
  1529. 2
  1530. 2
  1531. 2
  1532. 2
  1533. 2
  1534. 2
  1535. 2
  1536. 2
  1537. 2
  1538. 2
  1539. 2
  1540. 2
  1541. 2
  1542. 2
  1543. 2
  1544. 2
  1545. 2
  1546. 2
  1547. 2
  1548. 2
  1549. 2
  1550. 2
  1551. 2
  1552. 2
  1553. 2
  1554. 2
  1555. 2
  1556. 2
  1557. 2
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. True, no country is perfect and without issues. It is also true African nations have many problems ranging from division of people, to extremists attack their people just like in the middle east. But his argument isn't 100% bizarre as it sounds. There are billions of billions of people in the world. It is fine to start at home, if they were to help their own, and then branch out to other countries to do the same, then you would have people at home helping, and people from abroad, also helping. The connection between those two things would be more powerful than only one going abroad, or one staying. If those helping at home and those from abroad were to collaborate in a sense, to do what they do, they would learn more, be more effective. Then, it ultimately goes two ways. Now, i can see the Ebola argument. Ebola is something people already have, you and me have it, we are born with it. It' only becomes dangerous when you get someone else's strand of it. The thing is, Ebola isn't that serious compared to other issues. If you look at the map of Ebola the "outbreak" is this very small region. Nigeria had actually completely got rid of Ebola cases on it's soil before America even got there to help them get rid of it. Africans can help themselves, as long as they work together, and work at home. Also having some abroad is also good, as they are able learn some things that they may not be able to at home, and bring the knowledge back, just like how many Americans, Europeans, and Latin Americans learn at home and travel Abroad, and at home, doing both broadens the spectrum of learning, and keeping an open mind on issues.
    1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. Let's look at the facts. ISIS is using US military gear, captured by the Blitz they started, that played siege to most of Syria and Iraq when they chose to break off from Al Qaeda. Iraq's troops were ill prepared, ill trained for a large force of ISIS fighters, who were not very skilled themselves, but were juiced up on drugs, which made them careless, and hard to take down. ISIS soldiers, were not afraid to die. The US then funded the YPG and YPJ, along with a bit of help to the FSA. The FSA or, Free Syrian Army, is a group fighting Assad's forces, after Assad ordered his military regime to fire on it's citizens, initially setting off the civil war in that country. The YPG and YPJ meanwhile, took on most of the brunt force of ISIS in Iraq, and parts along the border with Syria. Today the YPG, YPJ, FSA, all fight ISIS. Assad also fights ISIS where needed, and does not fight the YPG and YPJ, usually holding cease fires on each other's forces when ISIS is around. Turkey, however, finds time to attack the Kurdish, and not lay a finger on ISIS, until they got attacked. They then changed their minds. So now while all of this is in motion, people are forced to leave the country, finding a place to live in other nations. While they try to find peace, they find the opposite, in a society in many nations, that are divided my opinion, taught to many that rise the fears of the migrants being quote, "terrorists", and invaders. People complain about it, and say the migrants, and Refugee's have no place in Europe, Asia, or America. These people are usually uneducated, and point the blame, at current world leaders, for the situation. Did Putin do it? Did Obama do it? The Answer to that last question, is none. Nor Putin or Obama, are the cause for this situation in the middle east. However, it is the cause, of a long lost war, some say, is returning. Here's some History. After WWII, it become clear the Nuclear Bomb was the most devastating weapon man ever created. The Soviet Union and the US clashed for power, in the global eye after the Great War, the two Powers with different ways of life, and the Soviet Union, left with a sort of pain, of not gaining enough from the end of the War. Later down the line, Soviets and US backed rebels in the middle east clash. This destabilized the region in the middle east and North Africa. The Soviet's and the US, fought a proxy war in the middle east, to avoid Nuclear conflict. They chose to fight a proxy war, over peace. What they wanted, was power. What they caused, was pain. Now, years later, that same conflict, proved to have destabilized the region so much, that those same rebel groups, still operate, and without backing, find means to hold their own, even against the US's Modern might. When Bush went to Iraq over 9/11, not only did it create anger, it created a sort of Phobia against Islamic, which was carried with US Military personal. Everyone was seen as enemy to some, even civilians. With a force meant to get revenge, and not solve any particular issue, it further destabilized the situation. Bush kept this going, as he also set out for side missions, such as Oil, but never once, did he find a WMD, which is what the original statement of the conflict, was aimed at. The threat of a WMD, was brought out, a fear, of old times with the Cold War. Now, Obama hits office, and faces harsh resistance from hard-line Conservatives, no one trusted him the moment he was elected. With ease, he found Bin Laden, that of which Bush could never track down. Obama had set out to pull out US forces from the Middle East. He helped the Afghans before pulling out a majority of the forces. He lay waste to Al Qaeda where ever he could, and worked to fix relations with China, Russia, and the Middle east. China and the Middle East grew to be more assuring of the US, and it's ambitions. Russia was ok too, until the Ukraine sought to join NATO. This, Putin say as a danger to the Russian Federation, a threat, a fear brought back, from a Cold War, a war of just that. Fear. The relations became stale when Putin ordered a secret Annexation of Crimea, a large portion of Ukrainian land, also a key strategic point of access to the Russian Navy. It didn't stop there, Putin needed something else to cover up the real reason behind his Annexation of Crimea besides just a fear of NATO nations all around the Russian Federation. So he ushered support to Russian Speaking citizens in Crimea and East Ukraine. He used the same, unknown soldiers with no markings in Crimea to help form a rebel group, now known as the Donetsk Republic, and others joined them. They entered Ukrainian Law Enforcement buildings, Police stations, Government buildings, and quickly created a situation in which the Ukrainian's were forced to use Force to protect their Sovereign Nation. The Region still today, is destabilized, and even after a tragedy that is presumed a Russian made BUK system with Amateur rebels at it's hands, had accidentally shot down a civilian place carrying Hundreds of people. To the Rebels, it was just a plane over a war zone, that of which wasn't likely something the pilot was aware of, how badly the situation in east Ukraine had become. Back in Syria, ISIS had formed, a sub group for Al-Qaeda. They'd become so barbaric that even the leader of Al-Qaeda had spoken out against them. After months, then Years over destruction, and Barbaric murder of anyone who would not join them in their crusade, force people to find a save heaven. From the Middle East, to North Africa, the same problems had grown even worse. Boko Haram, joining ISIS's ranks to form an even stronger, and total controlling force of evil, kidnapping thousands of girls, selling them, killing the families, and torching their towns with every attack. No humanity, one would dare say worse than Hitler himself, ISIS was a force of pure, and total evil, with no foreign support. Just pure, Barbaric destruction of all things humane. That is the struggle was face now. All because of the Cold War. The struggle for Power, Resources, Greed. The need for oil to power the war machines, develop new, more powerful weapons of destruction, the one up to their adversaries, had caused a world strife. The fate of Humanity lied in the hands of the Soviets, and the Americans. Their war, their Greed, their thirst for Power, had put us all in danger, no one but government officials having a say, in weather to cover the Earth in Nuclear dust today, or tomorrow. Respectfully, with new leadership at it's hands, the United States, and the Russian Federation, should be the two nations that set aside their differences, their past, their ugly war, and fix the problem their past leaders caused. The world, is here to help. At last, at the UN Summit and Assembly, this could be reached. The thirst for power, and Nuclear Arms could be put to rest, if the World comes together, to make that happen.
    1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. ARVIN Good question. Firstly, it's good to know ever State has the right to their own defense. Just like they have the right to rule however they want to on their own estate, unless of course they're invaded themselves and taken over. Take China for example, they're powerful enough and economically connected to pretty much the entire world, that an invasion would end up doing more harm than good. Now take North Korea for example, my favorite example. Everyone thinks it's easy to topple such a tyrannical dictator right? Well, maybe not. Did you know that North Korea has so much Artillery, that the second they feel they're being invaded, they can fire 189 rockets per second. PER SECOND. That's 11,340 rounds per minute, or 680,400 rounds per hour landing on Seoul, the Capital city of South Korea, where MILLIONS of civilians are just enjoying their lives, not to mention tourists from all over the world. So is it worth just rushing in and invading countries just because we think they aren't following rules of how all of humanity should live? No, that's mental, and you're selfish for thinking that way. Not all Americans are stupid. (PS, notice how i only mentioned Artillery, and not the rest of North Korea's assets, which is probably the largest standing military on the planet. Gives you chills doesn't it) Lastly, this all proves my newly found theory, that it's easier to deal with other countries when one another aren't at war, or on the brink of war.It's easier to negotiate peace, during peace. But if you must fight, you better fight well. This is how i feel. the US isn't necessarily getting in China's face. It's just that China has started building islands, and claiming them to be historical claims, when about 5 other countries have historical islands in those same waters, and yet they don't have a say in it only because their Militaries aren't as big as China's. That's why the US is stepping in, peacefully i might add, in order to keep China in check until the other countries can bolster up enough of their own resources to defend themselves, if need be, or to lay claim to their own territory in the region. Otherwise China would have it there way, and that entire sea would have a chain link military shield that China can project it's entire military from. Now i'm not saying China's intentions are sour. But one thing's for damned sure. Capitalism, and Communism, don't mix.
    1
  1707. Sbuko2002 Nkosi Sort of. The US has a non-negotiable pact with Taiwan, that if Taiwan is attacked, the US has no choice but to defend them, even if it means drafting so that there's enough manpower. Though, the only way this pact can be altered is if the US Leadership does so themselves, otherwise external nations and organizations have no say in the matter.This is good and bad. It means no one is going to attack Taiwan, yet. Though it's bad because when they eventually do, it means that the US can either hold true to its word, or change it's mind and let China have Taiwan. In the end however, millions of people currently living under a democratic system, oddly enough better than the US's Democratic system, are at risk. This is never a good position to be in, because it means after a conflict, people will be forced to live a completely different life style. Right now in Taiwan, people can pretty much speak their minds. Under PRC rule, there would be loyalty to the Communist Party, or otherwise you're better off fleeing to another country or you might end up jailed, or worse, in "re-education". As for the UN... I wouldn't count on them doing anything. The UN is weak, and incapable of enforcing any such rules, hence why China is already putting military bases all over the SCS within the Nine-Dash-Line. But the US right now isn't really interested in getting involved militarily. The only reason they put armed ships through is because if they were to sail an un-armed ship, China would get brave and capture it, along with all of it's crew. They don't want that. So they make sure it's military so that any such attempt at capturing the ship in international waters would literally be an act of war.
    1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. colourmegone Lol, giving up because you have nothing more valid to say? I see, you Americans were never one to admit defeat, or to accept the fact that change is a good thing. After all, that is the circle of life, it's ever changing. Deal with it. And if you think i'm wrong, just look at history. Any historian will tell you. Come the End of the First and Second World War, came the rise of a deep greed driven Economy. No nation gets where it does so fast without vast exploitation, and some presidents have been a big part of it, especially Bush. Oil is one example, and you can't even argue that, it's in history books, it's been recorded in the fabric of time. Bush was the peak of Oil exploitation that had been started long ago, when both Soviet Union and the US realized they both needed oil for their vast machines of war to wage against each other and have the upper hand, it was the need to be able to deliver a nuke anywhere, at any time, and have the ability to do so for the longest period of time. But those times have ended, or so it seems, many left and right wingers refuse to let go of those times, because it was a rush. A sort of excitement for them. But the only threat to the US, is isn't own corruption, and you can thank Obama for exposing most of it, even before he hit office he had received the most unprecedented amount of bigotry from the right wingers. They tried to impeach him for 8 straight years, spent countless ours and money to create those Government scandals you mention. That's one of the reasons Obama had to even shun his own Secret Service, he had men jump the fence more than any other president had ever experienced. It could get worse. Your denial things need to change, is simply an example of why they need to.
    1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. You know, if the law was never broken, there would still be slavery, and other heinous laws preventing certain people from certain unalienable rights. But hey, you're entitled to your opinion. What about the kid who got shot for NOT breaking the law? Cop asks person if he had a gun. Person said yes Cop asks person to show him, ID. Person goes to get ID. Cop shoots suspect thinking he's getting the gun instead, in which the person said he had a license for. Person bleeds to death with cop still pointing gun even though accidentally shot person. but follow the law Ok, how about the mental therapist attending to an autistic man. Suddenly cop shoot therapist in leg. Later is hospital, Therapist asks cop, "why did you shoot me?" Cop replies, "I don't know". Later, the Official Police Department changes the story in favor of a the cop without the cop's consent, making it blatantly clear the department covers for the officers even if they've made stupid mistakes. Not even covering for them in the proper way, but straight up changing the story? but just follow the damned law Conclusion? You're an idiot. You take things with a simple, closed mind. There's far too much going on with far too much history behind these systems that you simply can't comprehend, So unless you do some research, you really should shut the fuck up and stay off video's meant to give a closer look into these communities and what's going on. But as i said, you're entitled to your opinion. Just don't try to feed it to other's as facts. Have a splendid day.
    1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. Just another distraction. A handful of people die in Berlin and they want to flatten the middle east, and/or deport all Muslims on the basis the religion is the problem. Meanwhile in Syria, and Iraq, Hundreds of Thousands of Muslims have been brutally killed or executed by the same group that attacked Berlin, attacked France, attacked the US, once or twice. But no one cares for those in Syria. Hundreds of thousands, and you bastards in Europe think you have problems? Do you people realize it's the Proxy Wars that the West Vs. Russia have been the root cause of the problem, but because your all too stuck up in your mass of bullshit, you fail to realize that Muslims are the ones who have died to most to the hands of "terrorists" who one or the other government supports, but at the same time doesn't, of course, at least not publicly. Selfish 1st world people. Then you wonder why every other country is starting to look to China and Russia for their security and help, because Democracy, "freedom and liberty" has torn their countries apart, stripped it of resources and then left them for dead. The US couldn't fix Iraq in a decade, Russia turned the tide of war in a month, and a year on, is on it's way to securing all of Syria with the Syrians. But it shouldn't be surprising anymore, obviously. It was bright as day Democracy died when the US, claiming to be the leader of the "free world", destroyed Libya's Democracy, and liberties. They told you "ruthless dictator", but the media had no evidence, while not a single Libyan population lived outside of Libya because they didn't like their country. They built modern water systems in a dessert nation to ensure 90% can drink clean water, and yet the US claims Human Rights abuses in Aleppo when NATO bombed the water supply management systems supporting the survival of all Libyans. What a bunch of bullshit.
    1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. ***** But it is a universal value. People all over the world, from every single country you can think of, have seeked out, and moved to the US because of it's beneficial laws. Now of course, at times it can be corrupt. But so can any nation, under any value. However, the  most corrupt would be a communist or fascist country. Why? Because the regime makes damned sure that anyone with a certain opinion is wiped out. Thus Communist corruption will last longer, as they control the military through totalitarian rule. In a Democracy like America,if the government ever becomes so corrupt as to be of harm to the nations people, the Military can, and will seek out and destroy the corruption. Also because people can speak their minds and express their  intelligence at will, it's possible to change from a corrupt Government to a better one through the power of the people. In a communist nation, you can't do that, they'll shoot you dead. The US is not imperialist. Other countries come to us for our support. Look at South Korea, when the communists attacked first while UN peacekeepers were there, the US stepped in and pushed the North Korean's all the way into China. After China stepped in to help keep them communist, it ended up the same way again. You can see the contrast between the two, loud and clear. Communist Korea is suffering deeply, because their communist roots have them trying to be a dominant military. Meanwhile South Korea's been defended in the same way, but uses it's money and democracy to grow it's social and  economic relations with the rest of the world. South Korea has brilliant transportation, schools, cultural centers, a robust technological society, and more. Meanwhile, North Korea is busy testing nukes, launching missiles from Submarines, and China gets pissed off at the DPRK, but i bet that they realized, that's the monster they created. Had they not helped North Korea, or sorry, had they not kept the cancerous Kim Dynasty in power, perhaps North Korea, and South Korea would simply be just... Korea. It would be Democratic, but instead of half the peninsula starving while a fat child orders nuclear blueprints and high end cheese from Switzerland (and yes, it's true, Kim does order cheese, millions worth), maybe all of Korea would be developed with roads and big cities.
    1
  1770. ***** It is true, the values can't be put on other countries. I'm glad you mentioned that, because look at Vietnam. They like the US now, but back then, they kicked the US's ass. The reason  being is because the Vietcong, most of them were forced to fight for Communism, but 100% of them didn't want Communism, or the US helping them. Some did want US help, but the others didn't because it was their revolution. They wanted to fight their own communist government, and the US stormed in all gung-ho with their flag, which does kinda get rid of the legitimacy of some people in a civil war. However, when other countries do ask for the US help, that's fine. Mostly these days, the US will no longer jump into a conflict. They'll simply say, "dont do that, that's a sovereign nation", and then if someone attacks, they'll condemn them, slap a couple sanctions on the aggressive nation, and that's about it. But to be honest, it depends on the politician. Some feel this sort of obligation to help other nations at war because their interests align with theirs. It shouldn't really be that way. I agree, a nation should be great on its own. However, we now live in a time where almost every nation is connected in some way or another. Thus if two countries get into a conflict, one or the other will jump in, weather it be official, or by proxy war. But you can't really deny that after these conflicts, it is conflicting interests that put us all at danger the most, ever since the end of World War 2. But Taiwan, they are already an ally with the rest of the world. China however, wants to completely dominate it's population, market, and government. Taiwan is already technically it's own country, so that won't happen, and with the rest of the world by it's side, if China furfills it's promise to take Taiwan by force, it will start a massive conflict that will kill millions, possibly billions of people. All because China wants that total influence over all other Asian nations. Like Stalin after the World War 2, he felt he didn't get what he deserved. China also feels it didn't get what it deserved. They hate Japan, and want all other nations to be under Chinese influence. It's a horrible situation. No one should give into hate like that.
    1
  1771. ***** You're right, and then that brings us to the main problem in the 21st century. Politicians, the Leaders. While some leaders were great, some leaders were bad, some were really good, and some were really bad. Currently the US has a good one, not keen on getting into too much problems. At first we were on good terms with Russia, and China. soon after, relations diminished, first because every country has it's own Agenda, it's own ego to become an empire. Russia, China, are no different than the US, the actions of leaders, and opinions are what spin the world. But you blame the US for everything, some of it's actions are based on other nations actions too. It's sort of like a global tug of war. Sometimes is good, fun, other times it's serious, intense, bad. Vietnam exposed the problem in that era of leaders, wanted more influence abroad than anything. They were in direct competition with the USSR, and it's grasp for the same ideals, total Communist influence. Of course though, the communist tended to take things to the most extreme when it came to how it treated people down to the individual person. You can see this with how many engineers, and aircraft designers, military engineers they killed in the USSR when something didn't work right, or when they ran out of money. They never got the chance to improve, but were simply, jailed, or executed. In the western world, people were treated as the people in charge, up until recent days, people now are more pawns with idea's, but it depends on where you look. 
    1
  1772. ***** You're smart. You're not wrong. But i won't say you're right either, because in a situation like this, i suppose it's difficult to say either of us are. The East and the West are two most messed up developed societies. You look at either, they both have their goods and bad. However, when you said that Western Society was using media to potray an image of free living for it's society, and you called it a lie, i can honestly say it's not true. In the Democratic world, there are freedoms. However, there are rules set to limit these freedoms, for obvious reasons. You can free fly an airplane all you want to, but you can't ensure you'll come back down to Earth safely, or in a single piece. Its the same deal. You have free speech, you can say what ever you want about people around you or even the government. What you can't do, is threaten the Government, or it's officials lives however. This isn't like in Communist nations where if you say something negative about them, they'll make you disappear. Look at the Book Authors in Hong Kong that... "Vanished". Those Authors had written books, critical of the Communist Party in China, and they were taken out of a sovereign state in China that provides it's people Democratic freedoms. It's illegal for mainland China to go in and arrest people for writing a book that questions Chinese Communist officials for corruption. But two of the 5 missing Authors ended up in mainland China without their passports, one on news admitting to a crime he committed some 8-10 years ago? The other was reported in media by Pro Communist channels, that he was "helping Chinese Officials in an investigation". Sure, it's their country, they can do what they want. How about the United States? You have at least 2 or more news stations in each state that constantly bash the status of the Government here. the main  channels are Fox, they  constantly rattle about impeaching the president here, because he's not doing his job. Then after 8 years, they're still trying to do it... They've been holding the US president back for 8 years, and complain about him not getting much done, meanwhile, there is proof he's probably done more good than any other president. Now, here's a good example, you say the US is bad for getting in other countries business, the people here voted to get out of the middle east before the US Military was even able to stabilize Iraq, or Afghanistan. So they leave, and Daesh show up ransacking, and capturing millions of Iraqi equipment and then take over half of Syria and Iraq. Then people are blaming him for not being a good leader. You see how it works? In Communist regime, the Regime controls everything. In Democracy, the people control everything. So what is the perfect solution? Yes, in a Democracy, the government can become corrupt, and control people, however... Not in a Democracy where it's stated by law, that if the government becomes corrupt, the people are allowed to form a military force, and over throw them, and stabilize the country. This is law. In a communism, if they become corrupt, the people can't do anything about it. China is a perfect example of this, because back before Jin Ping took charge, one of the most corrupt group of leaders formed a secret military that isn't controlled by the official government directly, but a sort of behind the curtains military service. What did he use it for? To kill anyone who practiced Falun Gong. Now, you decide, which kind of way of life is better? You can only choose one. Or, create one. A balanced one. 
    1
  1773. ***** Fuuny you say that, because the US supported China during it's civil war... There are 2 China's. PRC, which is Communist controlled, and Taiwan, which is Democratic. China has always had Democracy, until the civil war, when the comunists started wiping out the Democracy. Why? Same reason the Bolsheveks rose up against the Czar's in Russia, which was to prevent their country from falling into Fascist hands. They needed power to fight against the Germans efficiently, and the Czar's were holding them back. But in China, i don't think the Democratic Chinese were holding them back from fighting efficiently against Imperialist Japan. To be honest, i don't know why the Chinese felt the need to rid their nation of decent morals and human rights. But there was a time when China was thriving with decent living, was the time people were allowed to freely practice Falun Gong in public in large quantities, and it was praised by the Chinese Government for being good for health and mind. But then things changed, corrupt communist Politicans gained poewr, formed a secret military, and started slauthering Falun Gong practitioners. Why? No one knows but the man who did it. I think he's currently in jail, but i can't remember his name. But how could China go from something like that, to what it is now? And when you think about it, if China stayed the way it was, growing a large military would have been fine. But the communists are much more unsettling because of the way they treat their own people. Yes, you're right, every nation has it's hands dirty, but this is the 21st century. Times have changed, and the world is connected, unlike back then, everyone was pretty much alone except for their neighbors. couldn't communicate unless you traveled by boat for months. Now everyone can talk in seconds. The time is here for the world to work together, but we can't do that when people are being slaughtered for simple acts of good health, and living standards.
    1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. ***** I mentioned nothing about color. I simply simplified the fact that the Europeans invaded the African Continent, simply to gather the muscle of African men to do Europe's work they were too lazy to do for themselves. This also resulted in of large exploitation of humans as objects, because other countries got involved and threw in money, turning it into a competitive business, except the product were peaceful Africans, who did nothing more than enjoy life by survival of the fittest. Now, if we look at it now, of course it's not like that anymore, thanks to people seeing the in-humanity and disgust of it all. Many African nations have great Cities, and Economics, and technology. The problem is conflict, ethical, and religious divide caused by International actions. Let's take Boko Haram for example, a now branch of ISIS, which was at many times "accidentally" funded by the Americans. Of course, Chad and Nigeria have both by now almost completely killed or kicked Boko Haram out of North Africa, but many problems still exist. Lets look at people trying to escape from other countries, are leaving because conditions there are worse, and either they have no other choice, they don't know what to do because of corruption. That's another thing, while Billions would be poured into African countries, some use it well, while Europe fails to realize that some countries are still corrupt since past events through out history. Hell, Rwanda is still having issues today, the Corruption is still there. But while these people are trying to find a better life because they can't make their lives better int heir own country due to the corruption, they are either going to drown because no one wants to help, someone sinks them, or, this one rich man decides to make a difference in the world, and get's them out of there, simply because it's the right thing to do. 
    1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. Max Schlepzig Freedom of expression. I can say what ever i want, critical of my leader and not get punished in any which way or form. Freedom of expression allows for the people to shape their country the way they feel it should go. In most cases this is good. Look at Taiwan for example. NATO, don't get me started. I believe NATO is obsolete, in the term that the way it's currently functioning is complete and totally reckless in regards to Russia's safety and concern, and over the Ukraine, which honestly, is more connected to Russia then Europe, and doesn't represent a real threat to NATO to begin with. I'm not even sure why the hell there's still a conflict. As for NATO's involvement? They were not directly involved in the Ukraine when it first started the whole mess. The conflict started between Russia and Ukraine, and the EU was the main factor, as well as later on consideration of joining NATO, which obviously, if your neighbor was about to join a gang you don't like you'd beat the hell out of them too. That's all fine and well, but it shows that there was no democratic decision in the first place because any progress towards joining EU or NATO was quickly stopped by Russia. Conclusion? I couldn't care less, other than for those who lost their lives. It's a shame. NATO has become reckless and it's even more noticeable now with Turkey manhandling Europe with the lives of thousands of refugee's in the balance, and Daesh at it's fingertips command, and well as abusing NATO protection and shooting down a Russian jet that was doing nothing but anti-terror operations. With recent events it's clear that NATO has become a major problem, and at by this time, i too feel extremely concerned about NATO's actions from this point forward. Freedom of speech will allow people like me to express that concern in order for the possibility of our allies looking into abusive NATO actions. So you should be glad that democracies have that power. Go to mainland China and question their military. You'll end up vanishing without a trace, and people will simply forget about you.
    1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. Jordan Wendt Saudi Arabia is the least of our worries. If there's any country responsible for supporting Terror, it's none more than our most loved NATO ally, Turkey, who is currently buying Oil directly from Daesh, at the same time as causing tensions between Russia to rise and bombing Kurdish forces, whom US Special Forces support due to them being the ONLY effective, and moderate group with human morals on the ground taking teh fight to Daesh. As for drilling oil in our own country, it's fine, but it won't last for ever. The whole damned point of stopping Drilling AND buying, is two reasons. Firstly, the environment. The Earth is dying weather you want to accept it or not, and it's in no small part due to our activities, and it's not just drilling. Oil is the main hurdle in the way of making progress towards renewable energies that will remove us from the puppet strings Oil producers have on us. Secondly, it's so that when we actually do need Oil in the future, we'll still have some of the damned stuff left. Don't get me wrong, we'll have plenty of it for years to come... granted there's not another global conflict. But the point is to have some left in case there is. We use it all up, that means the military can no longer operate, and i think you get the point after that. It's all about thinking of the future, but every damned human being only thinks about the now, and yet the future ain't too damned far away either. It's not just Liberals, while Liberals and Conservatives both have some common sense, but for the majority of both groups, they're the dumbest on the planet.
    1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. ***** Of course they started shelling Donetsk, because there were reports of militant rebels taking over the entire region with help of Armored forces, and un-marked men, who have long since been confirmed as Russian "soldiers on vacation", AKA volunteers to prevent direct blame to going on the Russian Federation. MH17... Of course theirs no clear evidence, it's called war on information. No side accepts the responsibility, like a bunch of children they all refuse to tell the truth even though one of them clearly did it. But the evidence revealed a few weeks ago proved it was a Russia developed AAA weapon, which either side could have. So how you you tell who hit the plane? Easy. Look at where the plane was headed. You think Ukraine would shoot down a civilian plane that had already been flying for hours over it's territory? If they didn't shoot it while it was already over their country, there's no reason to hit it while it's about to leave Ukrainian Air Space. They already knew it  was friendly. Second, look at the DNR. They'd BEEN shooting down tens of Ukrainian Aircraft. The DNR is a rebel force, they don't have Air Assets. Why the hell would anyone need Mobile Anti-Air against a rebel group with no Aircraft? The remaining points then is clear. Since the DNR had already downed a lot of Ukrainian planes and Helicopters, they were easily capable of hitting a civilian aircraft they would have assumed to be just another transport or bomber headed in their direction. They could have though ti was dropping bombs, or carrying paratroopers behind their lines. Or Russia, but that's unlikely, Russian forces aren't that stupid to screw up that bad.
    1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. SirVixIsVexed Nope, but because the US and Europe did. Were talking about extremest groups like Daesh and Al Nursa/Qaeda, are all the result of a proxy war between the US and Russia, with the rest getting thrown in the mix with Iran being a Russian influenced nation and Saudi Arabia being a US influenced nation. Thus you have many proxies competing for dominance, all because the bigger nations can't fight each other. This is basic shit, not complicated. They're spreading into neighboring countries as a result, some creating totally different splinter groups for their own dominance, and some swearing allegiance to bigger groups like Daesh, for example, Boko Haram in Nigeria, and some other group in Egypt, as well as Libya. The only Middle Eastern invasion of Europe would be what the Ottomans failed to do long ago. Other than that, it's all Proxy Wars, and influence, with barbarianism in the mix. But hey, i like how you don't mention that countries like Russia aren't really having that much of an issue because they learned their lesson in Afghanistan and screwed off. They went back into Syria, an old ally, and ended up preventing the country from being completely annexed by Daesh. Right now, the best solution to your European problem? Is by not being such obnoxious neighbors to nations like Russia who can actually help the situation. The US is already given in, and their helping Russia now. Countries like Poland need to get the stick our of their ass. But anyhow, back to the Topic, when people start watching media 24/7, it's poison. I turn on my TV when i want to hear Trump joking on someone's relatives, or when i want to see how our Justice system fails to address domestic issues all the from a kid dying for getting his ID when asked to a former Sec. Of Defense getting away free because she "didn't intend to break the law".
    1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. Barack Obama was supposed to fixed the problems Bush started. But instead he ended up listening to all the crazy people who keep this fire burning. He listened to McCain when he said arm the rebels. He listen to most of the American people when they said bring their soldiers out of Iraq and let them kill each other in the middle east. Why? Good fucking question. It's crazy, this isn't just Obama's fault though. It's the people's fault too. Most of them voted to get soldiers out of Iraq, so ISIL filled that void. That vacuum. That empty space left behind grabbing all the weapons and equipment from Iraqi forces fleeing. They they got supported via. McCain, and the government. People don't understand that when they only think about themselves? They got their families home, sure, they become soldiers for a reason though, to fight. They came home and let the enemy grow, and because of that the enemy became more dangerous than ever. They Government recently put on a global travel warning, telling people to vacation near Embassy's? Better off staying at home don't you think? We can got a bunch of people in this country that are screwed up. It's not even a Democracy, it's a Capitalism. People don't fight for morals and common sense anymore, they fight with their hands open for power and money. Greed. It's destroying not just the US. But the world. The United States needs an ENTIRE new government system. No, i don't believe it's the President himself. He's just listen to the people around him, while congress calls the shots, and half the population hold him back from doing his job. No, it shouldn't be this way. All of Congress need to be expelled, the GOP needs to be expelled, the entire Government system needs a FUCKING reboot. Hard cold, but it's the truth.
    1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. Hairy Pixels That's different. That's common sense though. you commit a crime, you pay for doing it. Don't do the crime, you won't have to deal with anything. That's not the issue here though. The issue is when you don't commit a crime and still have to end up dealing with something or another. This whole thing is mainly due do un-armed instances, where people were killed because they ended up being mistreated by cops who, being the law, use their ego's excessively. In other words, cop asks for your ID, and also asks if you have a weapon. You reply yes to both. He asks you for ID, and you go to get your ID. You get shot because he thinks your going for a weapon. He's then scared by the fact he just shot you, and you're stuck in a situation where your in pain but can't move or you may end up getting shot more, despite the fact your now bleeding out. Then there's cases like the kid who was playing with a toy gun, and gets shot. Of course, everyone likes toy guns right? First of all, who calls cops on a kid playing with a toy gun, it's a common thing in this country. Second, cop is scared of a kid with a gun, a kid who has no experience firing a gun, can't aim, isn't trained. I would've just told him to drop it or he'd be in lots of trouble, it's a kid. Now trust me, i support the Police 100%, but there's cases where you have cops who just happen to be plain idiots. Then you have straight up sinister cops. There out there, and recently a few of them have been arrested, too. I think that Police Forces in general need to go through a monthly training cycle, where everyone is tested to make sure they're still capable of doing their job, in order to root out the bad apples. Now, the rest is the fault of the Media. They simply just take news and twist it all sorts of ways for views, it's a business, that's all. That needs to change.
    1
  1914. /r/NationalSocialism Death of Marxism and Birth of The New Order Interesting prospect, that you listed countries that don't take in refugees, yet, half of them do, including Russia, just not as much, an Turkey, which has MILLIONS of refugees. So many refugees that they threatened to send them to Europe if the EU doesn't follow through with some visa deal they made awhile ago. So you are incorrect with that statement in regards to hypocrisy and communist nations not taking in any. Second, the reasons you're having problems with Refugees commuting crimes based on their old way of life, isn't the fault of the Refugee. It's the fault of the way said government, or nation accepts in the Refugees. Canada, my nation, has plenty. US has plenty. Yet, we don't get these problems that Europe are having, because unlike the EU, were not retarded, as we create systems designed to give the Refugee's a way to steadily convert to our lifestyle, rather than just tossing them into the thick of it without any help, or anything. Re-education, in other words. You have to accommodate for those things. But for some reason, the EU wants to come up with every excuse in the book as to why they can't do something, and to be quite honest, they're the most incompetent organization on the planet right now. But yet you go on to say diversity is the most destructive policy to mankind? No, segregation, institutional oppression is the opposite, that's the reason everyone's fighting, is because of being perceived to be different, and one person held lower or higher than another based on ethnicity, sex, gender, instead of their human characteristics. Meanwhile, Canada is teh biggest mixing pot on earth, with the most diverse cabinet running the nation, somehow, we're not falling apart? No, Diversity isn't the problem, is the policies my friend. You're putting the blame on the house for falling apart when in reality, it is your foundation that's made of sand.
    1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. /r/NationalSocialism Death of Marxism and Birth of The New Order I understand the uneasiness about the US elections. Understand this. NO ONE, support's either Hillary Clinton, or Donald Trump. Those are the two most hated politicians in US history, and yet somehow, both are the candidates for the election ONLY because people have voted for one, over the other. This mess wouldn't happen if Clinton didn't set up Bernie Sanders, and while he knew he was being screwed, and while Socialism isn't the best for of ruling, it sure as fuck is better than Trump an Clinton combined. How we let it get to this? Don't ask me. US elections have never been fair for awhile, Voting hasn't been overhauled to keep up to date with it's very weakness. In short, the US isn't very good at keeping up to date with things. The Liberals push too much new laws and don't really think things out right, meanwhile the conservatives constantly try to hold everything back. Thus no real progress is made. They're just tearing themselves apart. As for Fascism, i'm not a fan. I like Nationalism, but ONLY when it includes all of the people, and maybe some who would like to become apart of the Nation, and it's culture. I don't like excluding others from joining unless they are a direct threat to the Nation's peace, and cultural image. A Nation with respect to all religions is great, if it respects all religions. IF there's a dis-balance, it must be re-balanced. In the US, they are not very smart in dealing with this. They're too busy protecting Europe from Russia. The US spends 600 billion a year, so why are they moving so much resources into Europe? You'd think Europe as a whole could collectively protect itself. 600 billion is a fuck ton of money. I can't say i like Israel. Why? They're like you. They're Fascist. They kill or abuse anyone that isn't them, in their most extreme imagine. They're looking into appointing a hardline officer into top defense positions, and they even have enough guts to steal a little girls bike and throw it into a bush as she cries that she owns it. How is that defending Israel? They block Gaza and Palestine from even living properly. Anyone who's considered a terrorist, as well as their family, have their house destroyed. Worse, the government of Palestine can't even build anything, because they're not aloud to have any concrete imported, much less build period. So how are people supposed to live if their towns are being destroyed? Where do they go? What do they do? If you take everything from them, what are they going to resort to? It's obvious. If terrorists hold the power, and the people none, and they've lost their home, their family and their will, they will turn to the terrorists. This is logic. This is why i don't like Israel, not because of their religious orientation. Anyways, Nazi's weren't very smart. Hitler wasn't even German, and he had a Micro-Penis. There is a reason he wanted this imaginary, "Room to Live", he couldn't find any other reason to compensate for his life mis-fortunes.
    1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. Comonsensaintsocomon First of all, ISIS and Al Nursa are not backed by the US. They are Iran's creation, it's been proven,, i've got a friend in Saudi Arabia who notified me their SF uncovered plans by ISIS including the Haji incident, and to attack Saudi Arabia. They also found tons of weapons, MG3's, and much more supplied by Iran. Secondly, Putin is alone with Assad, and Iran. everyone else see's the root of the problem, which is ISIS, and Al Nursa. Of course, we're not going to let any of them just do what they want. I like how Russia goes into Syria and everyone calls Putin a Hero. We've been fighting ISIS, Putin meanwhile is killing the FSA and the reason it's a big deal is because the FSA are the ones doing damage to ISIS, aside from the YPG who's efforts are also keeping ISIS weakened, with the help of US, Saudi, Jordan, Iraq, the UAE, UK, Canada, France, Germany, and sort of Yemen. The focus of the Middle Eastern and West Coalition is on ISIS and Al-Nursa, and Al Qaeda. Putin is only there to defend Assad. He's actively fighting the Civil War for the Syrians. The US are not doing that. FSA only received weapons, and not even that much, it's mainly food and rations, the most i heard they got supplied from the US, are 14 Trucks, not even armed. I'm talking civilian trucks by the way. So to claim the US is backing ISIS and all that BS, you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. It's the world that needs to put boots on the ground, not just the US, or Russia. It needs to be the world against Terrorist states. It needs to be a quick and devastating offensive that completely corners them into destruction, else ISIS is only going to grow. Putin being there isn't helping anything. He's just making room for ISIS to move further into Syria.
    1
  1957. 1
  1958. Comonsensaintsocomon  Miss information? I already told you, i got my information straight out of Saudi Arabia. A friend of mine has friends in Iran, no one likes the Iranian Regime. Iran's Government is screwing it's own people, all to obtain power. Lets say for an example, suppose you're right. Putin would then ally with Iran and Syria, and maybe even Afghanistan. Remember the Soviet Union got screwed last time it went to the middle east, so did the US. This isn't about power though. They're not there to claim territory or politics. You what happens if Russia and Iran ally? Iran get's a nuke. You know what happens if Iran get's a Nuke? The extreme right wing in Iran will find a way to either bomb who ever they hate with it, or, they'll sell a nuke to terrorists, and you can't even fathom what terrorists would do with nuke's. You want to know the sole cause of all this violence in the middle east? Soviet and US wars, all for power, and greed. It calmed down after the cold war, until Bush went it claiming they had WMD's. Where do you think they got WMD's from? I'm certain it wasn't a nuke. Chemical weapons are WMD's, which is why you hear stories of Vet's in Iraq preparing for a chemical attack. Which country had the biggest stockpile of Chemical Weapons in the world just a few years ago? Syria. So it's Syria's fault that their own civilians got gassed, maybe they should have agreed with the rest of the world to get rid of them long time ago. The US and about every other country in the world then forced Syria to get rid of them. It was that, or get bombed. The Civil war is now still pushing on. Now of course the situation with ISIS showed up. Where did they come from? ISIS branched off of Al-Qaeda, and Al-Qaeda denounced them because they were "too inhumane". A terrorist group, calling another group far too harsh to even exist, can you believe that? Sounds like extreme Right Wing Iranian morals. The Extremists in Iran's regime are so filled with hatred of Israel, Saudi Arabia, and everyone around them all they focus on is obtaining nuclear weapons. Most powerful nations have Nuke's, but you know what? no one ever threatens to use them. Only Russia has threatened to. The US had invented them, keeps them, but vowed never to use them again after World War 2 and the Cold War. Everyone else wants this power. North Korea, and Iran are much the same. Tyrants to the world. This is only in regards to their Governments. the Kim Dynasty of North Korea is just about as disgusting as Iran's Regime. They only want total power, and will attempt ending the world if they get it. So i'll ask you this, who is the bad guy really?  Also, China doesn't work with Russia or Iran. China is good friends with Pakistan, and is heading to Iraq, not Syria. China is a sovereign state like Canada, they don't like getting involved with the major parties, and do their own thing. This is good policy, as they don't get caught up in drama. If China begins fighting ISIS in Iraq, it's simply what i've been hoping for the world to be doing. Everyone needs to pitch in and defeat ISIS. Once we defeat them, then we can all just pressure Assad and the FSA to stop fighting and solve their Civil war in a diplomatic manner.
    1
  1959. 1
  1960. ***** So i guess you didn't read it yourself then. "Referring to Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, Biden said, “They were so determined to take down Assad and essentially have a proxy Sunni-Shia war, what did they do? They poured hundreds of millions of dollars and tens, thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad—except that the people who were being supplied were al Nusra and al Qaeda and the extremist elements of jihadis coming from other parts of the world.” and "According to Biden’s narrative, only in the summer of 2014 did these countries realize that ISIS was a threat to them as well as to Assad, and shifted, joining in the US campaign of air strikes against ISIS targets in Syria. He gave as an example the position of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, suggesting that he had admitted the error of a permissive policy towards the extremists: “President Erdogan told me, he is an old friend, said you were right, we let too many people through, now we are trying to seal the border.” Which is great, i forgot to mention, Turkey also supplied ISIS, because the Turkish hate the Kurdish YPG and YPJ fighters. Thus, they allow ISIS to fight right along side their border, which there's even video footage from CNN Literally recording them LIVE, having a fire fight over some hills some 300 meters away. Biden also mentions Saudi Arabia, and the UAE's disputes between Syria as also being the cause of ISIS being so well fitted. But, if you hadn't realized, you're directly blaming the President for arming ISIS. Funny, because i've pretty sure the president only agree's or disagree's with decisions, and in the article it says they (Biden being Vice president and presumably his cabinet under command from the president) tried stopping who ever is below them, from supplying the rebels. Given the lack of communication between the YPG and YPJ, it only makes sense for them to stop the supplies from falling into the wrong hands, which it did. Thus, it's not Obama's fault for ISIS being where it is. It's a combination of micro-mismanagement by multiple parties, some for right reasons, being the US trying to help the Kurdish fight against ISIS in the first place, and some Arab nations trying to take advantage of the situation, and likely tried arming the FSA, but ended up arming ISIS instead. Now, i can easily blame Turkey and Saudi Arabia for this accident, given Saudi Arabia and Turkey some time ago actually arrested literally Hundreds, maybe even a thousand ISIS related individuals. Some even killed. However Turkey, is more of a cause, and it's surprising that Turkey is a NATO member, much less an Ally of most nations. their hate for the Kurdish keep ISIS strong. So back where we started. The Obama didn't purposely arm ISIS. It was a combination of micro-mismanagement by multiple parties. Your're story even with multiple sources i've now read on the matter, doesn't add up. I suggest you start educating yourself, because even though you like to pick and grab "credible facts", your story still isn't good enough of a lie, blaming one man for the entirety of ISIS. Your hate for one side of your political party is probably what keeps you so determined. Well it shouldn't, because if you haven't noticed, both Parties are pretty dumb, mainly because a majority of Americans can't really get a grasp on reality. Everyone's got a personal Agenda, everyone wants power, control, not to sustain, or improve the country. It's a disgrace.
    1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. Pickpocket The Government only does things the people vote for. No Americans in the Middle east? Yup, ISIS took our place cus that's what Americans voted for. Guns kill people? Well most Americans voted to restrict gun rights, and that's why most are stuck with 5 round mag's now. Those are just two examples, that it's not the president who runs the country, he deals with some of the more important stuff most everyday people can't do. Most everyday people are responsible for everything else. You got people complaining about Mexicans working harder than they could ever hope to, and claim they're stealing jobs, but yet you got Indians setting up huge communities, and staying off the radar, making profits from loopholes that every big corporation in America knows about. No one's voting against them, people just want the hard workers out of the country because it makes the lazy look bad. So they want to build a massive wall on the South Border. Why not build one on the North side too, because I've seen some Hard Working Canadians in the states too. Humor aside, I do hope Bernie Sanders get's elected. Not because I think he'll do anything for me, particularly. But because he brought up a large number of issues all other candidates REFUSED to talk about. Questions were asked, and all of them were brushed aside. They didn't want to answer Americans questions. They didn't want to serve the American people. Bernie, does. I suggest when he does get elected, you too should help for vote for issues that matter. It's time to stop spending 4-8 years resisting someone who already won office, and if you see an issue, vote on it. Make a deal about it, talk to your representative, and bring it up. This is how the system should be, not ranting on the internet about why a Muslim president from Africa got elected as president. But rather, vote about the 2nd amendment, and how 75+ Americans don't know that Guns are not an issue when it comes to shootings, but a mental health issue, that needs to be addressed. Even veterans suffer from mental issues.
    1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. Rodrigo de Moraes didnt say citizens should habe unregulated access, funny fact is, they dont. They have very heavily regulated access. But the point is despite that, after a mass shooting, before even given the condolences to the victims, mass media went on a rampage with the first thought being, "get rid of guns" or any narrative close to it. It's illogical. Whether it was some random cunt who decided to end the lives of people enjoying their night, or a planned attacked, it does not give people the right to infringe on constitutional rights, which strictly prohibits such a thing as preventing citizens from getting assets for their defense. It's just common sense. It doesn't have to be political. But it always comes to this. But in reality, honestly, if the country ran more based off the constitution than what ever the he'll it runs off of now, we would be so much better off, but the media just insists on seeing divisions in the country to such lengths that both right and left are beginning to turn on eachother with the common sense citizens being left inbetween with their right and moral values under attack. We just want our country to abide by the rules on which it was founded. The guideline on how this free nation should be run outlined by the supreme law of the land. This isn't North Korea. This isn't China, or France, or Saudi Arabia, or Canada. This is the US, the beacon, the sole reason the world has a Democracy to look up to, but it's fading. All because were leaving the constitution behind.
    1
  2076. Rodrigo de Moraes not true. Slavery was abolished and it won't exist ever again. But in case you need a refresher on why the constitution works, you should do some research on Black Panthers, the Original group. They were the first to uphold the constitution to ensure equality in environments where they were otherwise treated as lesser humans. It worked for quite sometime until Cointelrpo, which is an FBI terror operation. That's right, they were ordered by the presidents at the time to ensure that people of color couldn't exist equally among others, and definitely wouldn't be able to essentially police the police, which involved heavy use of the second amendment and open carry to let them know that if they're treated wrong, they will uphold the laws with their rights. They walked around with the rules of law, and literally had to make sure the police followed it. Fun fact, the struggle we face now, is the same as then. The black panthers. They were destroyed because the FBI was then ordered to disobey the law to destroy them, which followed a series of gunfights, which allowed the media to label Black Panthers as extremists, and strip them of their rights, which is why the gun laws in California were changed to be so strict and still remain so to this day. You aren't even aloud to defend yourself on your own property because you can then have charges pressed on you, and your things taken. But if that wasn't clear enough, I don't know what is. The 2nd Amendment was used to uphold the constitution, and yet, despite people saying that the idea the government wouldn't disobey the constitution, clearly don't know real US history. They wont teach you these things in school. They'll teach you how great the country has been in foreign wars though, and that those who lead in times of war were heros. The reality is much worse, MUCH darker, and much more dangerous than anyone realizes.
    1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. We already won the "race" War when MLK united the people here and everywhere with not just words, but with actions of Peace and Love. The only divisions that exist today, are the divisions created as a means to keep the people divided, and are not a product of the way people truly feel, but the way they're being manipulated and distracted from seeing the real problem in the country. The Real problem is the consistent decay and disregard for the constitution, the continued abuse of the terms, "Human righte", and "Freedom", no longer reign true to the US. Its been hijacked by tyrants and neocons who wish nothing more than to use as flash words while spreading war and suffering abroad. MLK warned the people of this. He was killed. Then JFK did the same in a much more public way. He was also killed. They took those words and made it seem like it was the Soviets. The reality was it wasn't the foreign enemy. It was the domestic one. And while many swear an oath to defend against both, the domestic threat has been left unchecked for decades. But if you wish to reverse the degradation of the Liberty, the Freedoms, and the Justice this country needs right now... You can start by helping prosecute those found guilty of MLK's Murder and work your way up from there. Its been declassified that the Federal Government was indeed found guilty of MLK's death. But its up to you, the people, to redeem what it truly means to be American, by bringing justice to the true leader and beacons of freedom, and continuing the fight for unity they left behind, first at home, and then you can spread true freedom, true peace, across the world.
    1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280.  @jeanmoke1  well we could start by respecting the land that they do have. But yes, they also need their lands back, more healthy land. I'm not sure if you're aware that Native Americans live in very grungy places where the US has stored Nuclear Waste. That's just some of the disgusting things the United States does. As for Canada, I'm unsure of the situation there, but I'm sure there's worl that needs to be done there to. If we stopped invading countless other countries we would have enough money and time to fix all of the problems here in the US within a decade, or a Generation. But War, imperialism, neo-colonialism is just too profitable. Supported by the Inteligence Agencies, Main Stream Propaganda and the Military Industrial Complex, these endless wars have proved these entities have removed the balance of power enshrined in the US Constitutional and Bill of Rights. As Rand Paul said best, we need The power returned to the People and to Congress, and the Balance of Power restored to the appropriate branches. The corruption needs to be removed, and Agencies like the CIA should not have the ability to have military installations over seas or on US soil. It should be an intelligence Agency, not a secret military force. We need to do here in the US, in Washington, exactly what the French have begun doing in Paris. We have to remove the corruption, unconditonally, and soon. Otherwise, If you want to really know what I think about the US? I don't think it will exist in the next 20 years. That's an educated estimate.
    1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294.  @johnhall5427  It's not about Socialism. Yes, the two party system is corrupt to hell. Bernie is like Trump, but the difference is Bernie is a working man, Trump is a business man who grew up wealthy. The opposite ends of the financial spectrum. Bernie only became wealthy because being a senator comes with pay. Also, he sold a book, successfully, which is worth millions. But, that's not the problem. There's something you need to understand. The DNC, what you think they're doing to Trump, they're doing to Bernie 10x worse. The Democratic Party is at War. Literally. On one side is Bernie with the non-corrupt. On the other, the DNC Elite and their entire Military Industrial Complex following goons. The problem this country faces right now is that Trump ran on the same thing Bernie is running on, in 2016, but the DNC rigged Bernie. Otherwise, as Trump admitted on tape, Bernie would have won. But Trump didn't intend on ending the Military Industrial Complex. Veterans, Americans, EVERYONE was depending on him not to fall into the trap. But he hired and surrounded himself with literal deep state officials. He had 4 years to finally restore honor and greatness... instead, Nanci Pelosi is applauding him for doing the MIC's bidding. Her ripping up of his speech is ONLY for show. It's to keep the fantasy of the 2 party divide alive. They're playing us all for fools, which is why even the DNC use "Socialism" smears against Bernie. The DNC wants Trump re-elected more than they want a TRUE uncorrupted President.
    1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. @softwhere30 People decide, but that doesn't mean their views are adhered to, especially in the United States. Not a single American who had to choose between Trump and Clinton, wanted either of them. They wanted Bernie, but because he got cheated out of the election, they were stuck between Hitler or Mousalini with no alternative. There was no re-vote or re-election, which should have happened. Never should a people be forced to pick whether to hang themselves or swallow poison. That's essentially what the 2016 election was when progressives were removed from the picture. That however, will be impossible in 2020 if were still alive by then, seeing as Trump like every other Establishment tool thinks that starting an Illegal War is the way to ensure his re-election. Even if it means going down the path of Mutually assured destruction with countries like Russia. This, by the way, is why Hillary lost. Her arrogance would have caused a third world War within months. Trump has somehow managed to delay that, but because of Clinton using Russia as a scapegoat to conceal her 2016 cheating habits which are widely documented, it's now pushing Trump to "Prove to them" that he's not weak, by bringing us closer to apocalypse. But sure, you can pretend like Bernie and "Socialism" is some kind of nightmare, when Bernie explained Democratic Socialism on Fox news, everyone agreed with him. Odd, how when you understand exactly what it is he's selling that it benefits you, and isn't what the Oligarchy is making it out to be.
    1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. Let me break this down. US Citizens and the Nations Interests are quite simple. However, when divided up into two parties, Left and Right, Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, what you think is Democracy ends up just being a mechanism of control when manipulated by certain people who have gained too much power in the governance system. For example, despite the fact both Hillary and Trump are criminals, both sides can have followers that blame the opposite sides and both believe the one who they follow is just, when in fact both are enemies of the people. In this way, the country is slowly destroyed while everyone bites eachother ears off, and nothing gets done. Meanwhile were all in the pit fighting, the establishment and their lobbies, the highjacked Media also controlled by corporate interests and lobbies, habe free rein to make their killings behind our backs, while they feed us seeds of division and problems to continue fighting over so they can continue tearing the rest of the world up. This is how our Military can help commit genocide in Libya, Syria, Yemen, and no one can do anything about it. Back in the day, people like MLK were able to shut down Washington with the whole people's nation in tow for support. Obviously, they had to off him because they couldn't do what they're doing now would we have our shit together. Our constitution wouldnt have been weakened by the AUMF, or over spending on military interventionism, illegal sanctions that harm our economy, middle, and working class.
    1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1