Comments by "ANDROLOMA" (@ANDROLOMA) on "Earliest Depictions of Jesus in Art" video.
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
These are the cries of the carrots
And the angel of the lord came unto me, snatching me up from my place of slumber. And took me on high, and higher still until we moved to the spaces betwixt the air itself. And he brought me into a vast farmland of our own midwest. And as we descended, cries of impending doom rose from the soil.
One thousand, nay a million voices full of fear. And terror possessed me then. And I begged, "Angel of the Lord, what are these tortured screams?"
And the angel said unto me, "These are the cries of the carrots, the cries of the carrots! You see, Reverend Maynard, tomorrow is harvest day and to them it is the holocaust."
And I sprang from my slumber drenched in sweat like the tears of one million terrified brothers and roared, "Hear me now, I have seen the light! They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers!"
Can I get an amen? Can I get a hallelujah? Thank you Jesus.
Life feeds on life feeds on life feeds on life feeds on........ This is necessary.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Shroud of Turin (Italian: Sindone di Torino), also known as the Holy Shroud (Italian: Sacra Sindone [ˈsaːkra ˈsindone] or Santa Sindone), is a length of linen cloth bearing the negative image of a man. Some describe the image as depicting Jesus of Nazareth and believe the fabric is the burial shroud in which he was wrapped after crucifixion.
First mentioned in 1354, the shroud was denounced in 1389 by the local bishop of Troyes as a fake. Currently the Catholic Church neither formally endorses nor rejects the shroud, and in 2013 Pope Francis referred to it as an "icon of a man scourged and crucified". The shroud has been kept in the royal chapel of the Cathedral of Turin, in northern Italy, since 1578.
In 1988, radiocarbon dating established that the shroud was from the Middle Ages, between the years 1260 and 1390. All hypotheses put forward to challenge the radiocarbon dating have been scientifically refuted, including the medieval repair hypothesis, the bio-contamination hypothesis and the carbon monoxide hypothesis.
-wikipedia
1
-
1
-
1
-
That's the entire problem religious adherents have in visualizing their deities.
I'm currently doing research on God's genitals. What color are they? Is his penis circumcised, or uncircumcised? Did he use holy semen to impregnate the virgin Mary's unholy egg? Did he use the Holy Spirit to do this deed in a ménage-a-trois? If God has no genitals, then shouldn't we use gender neutral pronouns when speaking of him, instead of gender specific pronouns? Does God have pubic hair? Did God insert said penis into Mary's vulva, or did he magically fly the sperm into the egg? Was her placenta also holy enough to be saved as a relic? Did Mary have an orgasm during her immaculate conception? Did YHWH climax? If God does not have genitalia, how can it be said he created humans in his own image? If he does have genitalia, then why does he if he doesn't need them or use them?
There is a simple test to determine if your loving god is a mental delusion or not. Imagine your god's genitals, if you can. Is your god male? Then he'll have a penis. Is the penis circumcised? Does he have pubic hair, and testicles? If your god is too holy for genitalia, then it can be referred to with gender neutral pronouns, such as "it" and "itself." And if your god doesn't have genitals, it can hardly boast that it created humans after its own image. Is your god a eunuch, or a dirty old man? Or have we never spent that much intellect contemplating the uncontemplated?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1