Comments by "ANDROLOMA" (@ANDROLOMA) on "Destiny" channel.

  1.  @abdullahanselin8474  And everyone thinks their god is the only and best god. It's like a shared insanity competition. Whose mania is the most demented?
    3
  2. Bible is anything but right.
    3
  3.  @7sonderling  Tell that amazing revelation to all the world's scientists. They could use a laugh.
    2
  4.  @7sonderling  Do you know the meaning of the word "meaning?"
    2
  5. More logical than Genesis.
    2
  6.  @abdullahanselin8474  “Doth some one say that there be gods above? There are not; no, there are not. Let no fool, Led by the old false fable, thus deceive you.” -Euripides The first atheists and polytheists were ancient Greeks. Not Muslims. Polytheism predates monotheism. Why is that? And please consider no longer trying to teach me anything. I might be as much as 30-40 years older than you are.
    2
  7.  @user-sc8ph2ds2m  Calling heliocentric solar systems fantasy puts your scientific knowledge at about pre-15th century levels. Do you also believe in witches and griffins?
    2
  8.  @user-sc8ph2ds2m  I have met so many alleged experts on YouTube, I could sell them on Ebay. It's so comedic, how so many of you people consider yourselves experts, especially Christians. And if you really did have a masters in anything, you'd be more mature than ending your messages with that insipid semicolon and parentheses bracket. So don't be a poser. It's tacky.
    2
  9. Existence implies the right to exist. Cogito ergo sum.
    2
  10.  @ladislavholub3547  Creators are mental constructs of admittedly fallible humans. The truly divine wouldn't display such base origins.
    2
  11.  @lilydewinters4729  Such proves the best response to human concepts: senses are indeed unreliable. Especially with the precepts that dictate when certain deities who want us to act in the ways some unreliable people say those deities want us to behave.
    2
  12.  @lilydewinters4729  Your praise is sweet, thank you. I'm just a student of Socrates, declared the wisest man on Earth by the oracle of Delphi. Socrates was honest enough to admit that the more he learned, the more he discovered he actually knew nothing. Creation, existence, consciousness? Once again, I must defer to Descartes. Cogito, ergo sum. I also embrace Voltaire's dictum that the best thing we can do with our lives is to cultivate our own gardens (Candide). Existence implies the right to exist. May we all find peace in what little time we're allowed. May you never know want.
    2
  13.  @ladislavholub3547  Saying it doesn't make it true. And such declarations are second hand: someone said he said that. Hearsay evidence. Inadmissible in any court of law. Please try harder.
    2
  14.  @ladislavholub3547  If you blame reason for the two world wars then you're confusing correlation with causation. Which is quite illogical. The entire Bible is filled with so many contradictions that you're wasting your time quoting it to me. And not a single question about your perception of your god answered. That's typical.
    2
  15.  @lilydewinters4729  Yup, you're far more educated than I am. From my theosophic perspective, I consider myself UNDECIDED. That decision in itself presents the uttermost ideation against the precept of freewill. My freewill decides not to decide. Being undecided, how may I be punished or rewarded by any alleged deities intent on punishing me for my misdeeds of disbelief? In my possibly mistaken opinion, all religion becomes an excuse for salvaging the veracity of previous written metaphysical tomes. I take the hard, logical look at such stipulated allegations which take for granted the existence of gods and souls, angels and demons, heavens and hells. Truth for truth's sake would welcome inquiry. Inquiry scorned hides deception. Always pleasant to discourse with you, Lily! Good health and wealth to you. I don't get many opportunities for intelligent conversation, so I thank you for that. 💞
    2
  16.  @craigpenninga9847  If as many contradictions as confirmations exist in the relating of any past events, then the event may be described as "contested." Thereby, a "he said she said" testimony of conflicting witnesses would negate any allegations, making any impartial decision unrenderable. Even the multiple accounts differ, proving lack of consensus.
    2
  17.  @ladislavholub3547  Lily might know the answer to this paradox better than me. I've read that the Torah says no man may die for the sins of another man. Yet that is exactly what Christians say Jesus did, in violation of Jewish dogma, and the Jewish god YHWH's dictates. By definition. Jesus is a heretic by defying previous convention. Why would YHWH use such a sloppy method of saving the world from himself? If religions can't spin internally consistent and logical chains of events, they prove themselves errant, and thereby faulty and unworthy of serious consideration. And it's statistically impossible for me to be incorrect 100% of the time in me comprehending such vague mysteries. It's not my fault I lack understanding. It's the books' faults for being so poorly written.
    2
  18.  @craigpenninga9847  It seems to be a desperate ploy for attention, obsessed over insisting a specific event of a god begetting a son to die for the sins of past, present, and human peoples for a sacrifice a more omnipotent god could have changed the rules he set in the first place. A more efficient god wouldn't restrict himself by so many useless rules, such as "believe or be doomed." Humans set such demands, not gods. Isn't that rather obvious?
    2
  19. How to understand if your god is a mental delusion of yours: Does your god tell you how to look and what to think? Does your god have specific favorite political affiliations? Does your god agree with everything you criticize about science that seems to conflict with that god's dogma? Do you think that you should be automatically entitled to rewards after you die, instead of punishment with no further administrative review? Does your god have the genitalia to create humans after his own image? Does your god have a navel, or does his flowing white robe cover it up? Do you believe this god has children? Do you believe this god even knows who you are?
    1
  20. Tell that amazing revelation to all the world's scientists. They could use a laugh.
    1
  21.  @simplyphenomenal695  Better than the gods others blindly believe in, who are as illogical as insanity can create.
    1
  22.  @simplyphenomenal695  My reply was meant for another party. You're on a party line. Please hang up.
    1
  23.  @simplyphenomenal695  Did your boyfriend think so too?
    1
  24. 2000 year panic. Must be a human mania.
    1
  25. Prove it, or stfu.
    1
  26.  @philipmcdonagh1094  What would God smoke?
    1
  27.  @philipmcdonagh1094  I recommend Crazy Glue strain. Best stuff I ever grew.
    1
  28.  @philipmcdonagh1094  The Clinic dispensaries.
    1
  29. In science, there are questions which may never be answered. In religion, there are answers which may never be questioned.
    1
  30.  @marknieuweboer8099  More of a hard scientific theory. Only a fact with irrefutable evidence. Such as first-hand observation.
    1
  31.  @marknieuweboer8099  To arrive at conclusions based on initial observations disregards the first rule of logic: CORRELATION DOES NOT EQUAL CAUSATION. To conclude inferences is to reason defectively.
    1
  32.  @marknieuweboer8099  Why repeat what I told you? Overestimating your own intellect again?
    1
  33. Mmm, dank herb...
    1
  34. There's no crying in science. And no, Jesus didn't invent the universe, because he wasn't born yet.
    1
  35.  @skidachilles3749  Unacquainted with Christian apologetics, are you? You have my envy, friend. You're absolutely correct.
    1
  36. What created god?
    1
  37. Naw, God didn't.
    1
  38.  @JollyFlys  Kingdoms are monarchies, not democracies. Monarchies are the worst form of humanly contrived governance, because they exalt the elite while debasing the lowly. Now, why would any sane deity use a decrepit form of governance? Have you ever thought out theosophy that far?
    1
  39.  @JollyFlys  Any god who is so insecure to punish unbelievers eternally reveals itself to be a human construct instead of an actual supreme being. Only human-made gods call themselves "God." That's not your god's name. "For thou shalt worship no other god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God." (Exodus 34:14) There is a simple test to determine if your loving god is a mental delusion or not. Imagine your god's genitals, if you can. Is your god male? Then he'll have a penis. Is the penis circumcised? Does he have pubic hair, and testicles? If your god is too holy for genitalia, then it can be referred to with gender neutral pronouns, such as "it" and "itself." And if your god doesn't have genitals, it can hardly boast that it created humans after its own image. Is your god a eunuch, or a dirty old man? Or have you never spent that much intellect contemplating the uncontemplated?
    1
  40.  @JollyFlys  And everyone thinks their god is the only and best god. It's like a shared insanity competition. Whose mania is the most demented?
    1
  41.  @JollyFlys  " Everything created points to God?" You forget, correlation does not equal causation. If your god cannot conform to logic, it must, by definition, be false.
    1
  42.  @JollyFlys  Your god resides in books that contain contradictions in logic people have been noting for centuries. If you worship an illogical god, that's an exercise in futility.
    1
  43.  @JollyFlys  Please explain to me why your logical god created dinosaurs? Was he experimenting? Where's the logic of creating such reptiles, then letting them go extinct? Did the dinos have souls and saviors too?
    1
  44.  @JollyFlys  I'm not trying to outsmart God. I'm trying to show those who believe in God that God isn't in the pages of the books that people say God is in. Now do you finally understand? Humans who describe gods without meeting gods prove themselves dishonest, not divinely inspired. If they were divinely inspired, there wouldn't be so many factual contradictions among the words. A perfect god would have a perfect book. Since the book is imperfect, the god must be too. We try to teach you children that you should avoid thinking past mythology means present reality, and yet you persist in the error of your ways. We type our fingers to the bone nagging and scolding, and do you have any idea how hard it is typing with boney fingers? Have you no regard for science and logic, that you should disregard them for metaphysical theories, while bickering over details the entire way? Will the Muslim get 72 virgins in the afterlife? Will the Christian get a halo and a harp? Or are you all just fooling yourselves? Which sounds more plausible? If you've wasted your life, why wouldn't you waste the afterlife as well? Atheists laugh at gods. How may every knee bow if we're supposed to all be spirits on Judgement Day? Spirits don't have knees, and brains to process neural responses of pain and pleasure sensations. I'll produce one 100% inaccurate Bible prophecy, and you try to explain why it failed so utterly: Matthew 16:28: “Truly I tell you, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.” Of course, in the manner of all prevaricators, you will insist that this prediction is true and that my understanding of it is defective. Such does not make me defective; such denial makes you deceptive. See how that works? If your gods don't prevail in the face of logic, then they fail the test of reality and need be relegated to the psychological abnormality of all other, previous mythologies. What kind of sadistic god metes infinite punishments for finite misdeeds, or the crime of exercising the freedom of disbelief? Only the gods that live inside your head. And try as they may, they can't hurt me from inside such a hollow wasteland. 😁
    1
  45.  @JollyFlys  Here is a list of the Gods and holy figures that existed before Jesus and were crucified and reborn….. Thulis of Egypt, 1700 B. C. Krishna of India, 1200 B.C. Crite of Chaldea, 1200 B.C. Atys of Phrygia, 1170 B.C. Thammuz or Tammuz of Syria, 1160 B.C. Hesus or Eros 834 B.C. Bali of Orissa, 725 B.C. Indra of Thibet (Tibet), 725 B.C. Iao of Nepaul (Nepal), 622 B.C. Buddha Sakia (Muni) of India, 600 B.C. Mitra (Mithra) of Persia, 600 B.C. Alcestos of Euripides, 600 B.C. Quezalcoatl of Mexico, 587 B.C. Wittoba of the Bilingonese, 552 B.C. Prometheus or Æschylus of Caucasus, 547 B.C. Quirinus of Rome, 506 B.C. Salivahana of Bermuda Zulis or Zhule of Egypt Osiris of Egypt Oru of Egypt Odin of the Scandinavians Zoroaster of Persia Baal of Phoenicia Taut, "the only Begotten of God" of Phoenicia, inventor of letters Bali of Afghanistan Xamolxis (Zalmoxis) of Thrace Zoar of the Bonzes Adad of Assyria Deva Tat of Siam (Thailand) Sammonocadam (Sommona-Codom) of Siam (Thailand) Alcides of Thebes Mikado of the Sintoos Beddru of Japan Bremrillah of the Druids Thor son of Odin of the Gauls/Norse Cadmus of Greece Hil/Feta of the Mandaites Gentaut of Mexico Universal Monarch of the Sibyls Ischy of Formosa (Taiwan) Divine Teacher of Plato Holy One of Xaca (Fohi) of China Tien of China Adonis son of the virgin Io of Greece Ixion of Rome Mohamud or Mahomet of Arabia. What makes Jesus any different from all those listed above…. What you’re saying is that what you believe in came into existence ONLY 2000 years ago. Which means that you readily dismiss anything that came before what you believe in. What's the probability of that? Zero to none.
    1
  46. If you've never been to hell, you don't know.
    1
  47. Bias.
    1
  48. If God created humans in his own image, humans have certainly repaid the compliment. Did God create dinosaurs in his image too?
    1
  49. Gods don't believe in science.
    1
  50.  @abdullahanselin8474  In all of the holy books of every religion, the word "logic" never appears. The peculiar aspect to that fact is that the discipline of logic, created by a pagan culture, is older than all the religious books which don't mention it.
    1