Comments by "Helmuth Schultes" (@helmuthschultes9243) on "Should a car try to detect if you're drunk u0026 disable the vehicle?" video.

  1. Not only alcohol, drunk driving, but general drugged state is required to be tested. Currently more accidents are tracked to drug indiced state than DUI. But now also propsed are detection of tiredness, drowsy driving, lack of attention to road, all done by permant monitoring of eyes, blinking, droppy eyelids, looking regularly away from driving view, even failing in required checking of rear and side mirrors for awareness of other traffic. We will soon be monitored for reaction times etc, and if not in any fit state be prevented to drive. Cars will be forced to self drive away from traffic and stop/park and refuse to run until driver is replaced or fit to clntinue. Well sad for most of us, but there are now, in view of all too many 'authorities', just too many crashes created by total inattention of other ehicles, impaired body, drunk, drugged, tired, distracted by phone etc Soon we can nolo ger get enjoyment in driving, autonatic speed control, by car recognising speed limit sign, no harsh accerlation, no fun at all. All part of very totalittarian systems, no personal responsibility or FREEDOMS, all under leader directive/mandate, controls over entire life. Is there really life when every action is regulated and controlled, where does this over control stop. How long can we accept this from our voted in representative, who truely are believing they have god like rights the mere public can not have Be glad for your US constitution, but then there seem extreme efforts currently to remove/cancel these, to gain more control of people like us.
    1