Comments by "Scott Tovey" (@scotttovey) on "Dr. John Campbell"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GR-wi2nh
"He didn't save people from this nightmare. So I don't think he does."
More people chose this nightmare than chose His righteous laws. In addition, there are prophesies that must come to pass. Those prophesies are on a countdown of fulfillment and that fact prevents Him from intervening whenever people want Him too.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.
Micah 4:3: And he shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.
The only way to get to a place where nations shall learn war no more is for all the earth to go through the brier patch as it were. We are in the time when the Lord shakes the heavens and the earth.
Isaiah 13:13: Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the LORD of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger.
Haggai 2:6: For thus saith the LORD of hosts; Yet once, it is a little while, and I will shake the heavens, and the earth, and the sea, and the dry land;
If you're expecting the LORD to refrain from accomplishing His word and become a liar in order to save you from the evil that is at hand, you will always be disappointed. God does not change, neither is He liar.
By my reckoning, we are less than 10 years from the return of Christ and the beginning of His 1000 year reign of peace on earth.
Malachi 3:6: For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.
Habakkuk 2:2: And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.
3: For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry.
4: Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@artyclafidooo8851
"Nurse Campbell pushed the shots when they came out"
When a medical professional advises others to take medicine as a result of false and misleading information he or she was given, and then, after finding out that the information was false and misleading, he or she expresses regret for having advised the taking of the medication and informs people that said medication is not good, that individual is not as culpable as those who intentionally lied and deceived the masses in order to make billions of dollars, at the expense of people's lives and health.
Claiming that John Campbell and others like him that now show regret for not only having taken the jab, but advised people to take the jab, is not only bearing false witness, it is scapegoating. You are attempting to divert attention away from the powers that be, which intentionally levied war against their perspective nations and people, and place the blame on those who were intentionally lied too, deceived and misinformed, as well as ordered to follow an evil protocol.
You're not seeking to fix the problem you are seeking to exacerbate the problem and that makes you part of the problem.
1
-
1
-
"How dare you question me" is a religious attitude of pride.
That attitude is typical of religious leaders that presume that they are not to be questioned because they are God's prophet. They in essence; lord it over their flock.
But; what does God say about questioning leaders?
In Isaiah God says come and let us reason together.
You can not reason together if one is not permitted to ask questions.
Isaiah 1:18: Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
Jesus tells us that we are not to exercise dominion or lordship over others. And while it is necessary to exercise both dominion and lordship in order to maintain law and order, that is not the same as exercising absolute dominion and lordship which people are not permitted to question.
Matthew 20:25: But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them.
26: But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister;
27: And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant:
28: Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.
Mark 10:42: But Jesus called them to him, and saith unto them, Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and their great ones exercise authority upon them.
43: But so shall it not be among you: but whosoever will be great among you, shall be your minister:
44: And whosoever of you will be the chiefest, shall be servant of all.
45: For even the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Presidential pardon does not extend to violations of State laws.
Nor does it extend to violation of laws in foreign lands.
From:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_pardons_in_the_United_States
Federal pardons in the United States are granted only by the U.S. president, pursuant to their authority under the U.S. Constitution to grant "reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States".[1] Pardons extend to all federal criminal offenses, except in cases of impeachment,[1][2] and entail various forms of clemency, including commuting or postponing a sentence, remitting a fine or restitution, delaying the imposition of a punishment, and providing amnesty to an entire group or class of individuals.[3][4] The pardon power extends to cases involving courts-martial against members of the United States Armed Forces, including the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Marine Corps, the Coast Guard, and the Space Force.
The president may grant pardons on their own accord or in response to requests made through the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of the Pardon Attorney.[5] The Pardon Attorney investigates and reviews applications for clemency but serves only an advisory role; the president may disregard the findings or bypass the office altogether.[6]
The president's pardon power extends to offenses committed in the District of Columbia. [United States v. Perkins (1885).] However, it does not extend to violations of state laws.
Since the Constitution specifically states: "A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime," Fauci can still be held to account for his crimes of fraud and medical malpractice.
They can be charged according to State laws.
Article. IV. - The States
Section 2 - State citizens, Extradition
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
(No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, But shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.) (This clause in parentheses is superseded by the 13th Amendment.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@selfloveisthekey
"I don't believe it's as simple as that. I will vote for what I believe in, but what if votes are not counted properly? What if the system will place whoever they choose in the positions, regardless of.who has the most votes? What if the person I want to vote for is not allowed to run? Will voting for the lesser of two evils be the same as voting for someone who'd actually make a difference? To me, if feels like an illusion..."
The lesser of two evils is not always the lesser of two evils.
Sometimes, it's the greater evil posing as the lesser of two evils.
Take Trump for instance.
Trump was vilified not because he was flawed, but because he was effective in doing the right thing.
The people that vilified him because has flaws, rather than appreciating the good job he did, refused to vote for him because it turned out that he was not a perfect god that obeyed everything they commanded.
They will claim that they did not vote for Biden, but by not voting for Trump, they voted to let Biden be elected which is the same as voting for Biden.
While voting one's conscience sounds good on the face of it, many people that will tell you to do so, don't really want you to vote "your" conscience, they want you to vote their way and their way is not necessarily the right way.
The more people that vote for Trump in November, the harder it will be for the democrats to cheat the way they did in 2020. While people on the left will claim that's a conspiracy theory, the fact of the matter is; you cannot have the high number of legitimate complaints that were not investigated, without real nefarious activity going on. Where there is smoke, there is fire.
It is not possible to have, in at least one district, more cast votes in the district than people that actually reside in that district, without cheating going on. But the left will claim it didn't happen. The videos that showed pollsters cheating, in their mind doesn't exist if you can't remember the hard to remember cryptic url address of the video.
People that allow their hate for a man to override their love for country, are evil traitors that need to be exiled and stripped of their citizenship.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stephenwilliams3213
"People make mistakes.
if they were lying they would have changed the out patients levels. But that does not fit your narrative."
As if it has to fit my narrative to not be suspicious.
That makes you less intelligent than you think you are.
Certainly, not suspicious enough to avoid being deceived and stuck in the arm with an untested drug that is more likely to kill you than the virus it is supposed to protect you from.
The micro point is, if you want people to believe you when you are speaking the truth, you have to be so accurate and forthcoming with data, that people accuse you of having OCD. You have to be so accurate and detailed that any honest error you make and don't catch, will be obvious and clear to someone that catches it, and they will point out the error.
There is no longer time for people to argue their position without also revealing the facts and data that has lead them to that position.
Do you think this is over kill?
Of course it is. But that is how you defeat and overthrow an overkill of people habitually lying to the populous and claiming that any questioning of them, is questioning science.
Or, you can just keep going on the way you are and people will presume that you are a government spy looking to silence the truth with nonsensical generalizations.
Personally, I don't thin you are smart enough to implement my solution to the epidemic of lies and restore trust. I've seen your type before. I've confronted your type before. You think the piece of paper you got from university makes you instantaneously smart like the scarecrow in the wizard of Oz. But the fact of the matter is; a piece of paper doesn't give you a brain. And it doesn't matter how much education you have.
If you are an idiot when you start college or university, you will be nothing more than an educated idiot when you finish college or university because you will believe the biggest lie they defraud students with. That having a degree makes a person smart like the scarecrow with the degree, and not having a degree makes a person dumb like the scarecrow without the degree. But the truth of the matter is; the scarecrow did not have a brain before getting the degree, and the scarecrow didn't have a brain after getting the degree.
It doesn't take a whole lot to memorize and throw out facts.
It takes a logical thought process of critical thinking, to analyze that data properly.
1
-
1
-
@stephenwilliams3213
Some one, that you take seriously.
Fair enough.
"You are far too entrenched to have a reasonable debate about this specific swindon case."
The only reason y0u hold that opinion is because you are too lazy to read my entire original post.
Real solutions to problems can never be made concise.
If you do so, an idiot will assume everything is up to interpretation and use that as an excuse to double down on the stupidity that caused the mistake, and then make everything ten times worse if they had just left it alone.
Case in point, the lock downs that did more harm than good.
"Some one made a mistake and not checked. Not everything is a conspiracy."
Everything is a conspiracy if you don't want to take the steps necessary to insure that in correcting a mistake, the cause of the mistake is made transparently known as well as how the mistake was corrected.
It is also a conspiracy when the alleged correction of the mistake, has an undeniable mistake in it.
"It happens. Does anyone ever make mistakes at your work? Of course they do!!!!"
Let's see. The last jobs I had someone did make a mistake.
In the last full time job I had I was terminated because I was taking a legally obligated 15 minute coffee break after being on the road for 6 straight hours.
The last part time job I had, I was terminated from a job because, someone decided that rather than transferring me to a lighter duty job, until I could figure out why I was so weak I couldn't throw 40 and 50 pound bags around for 2 straight hours without taking a breather.
Yeah, sure. People make mistakes and mistakes can be forgiven.
The question is; are you going to make damn sure that should you make a mistake, it won't negatively affect the life of another person?
If you have a problem with taking precautions against such mistakes, and insuring that when such mistakes do happen, they are addressed transparently in such a way as to insure they do not happen again. Then you are part of the problem.
What I see in you is a callous individual that shrugs off mistakes as though they are unimportant, as though they don't matter, as though improvements are not necessary, and as though they won't one day cause the death of another human being, perhaps you.
You're naiveté will one day come back to roost, and you will suffer from as a result of choosing to remain naive.
Mistakes happen yes, but mistakes must always be addressed from the stand point that you learn from the mistake. You grow from the mistake. You improve from the mistake. And you take steps so that the mistake never happens again. Otherwise, you risk never seeing the forest for the trees, and you will continue to fail to water your crops and wonder why you can never grow any food.
1
-
@stephenwilliams3213
"they said they will improve by checking before sending.
Hence it’s been addressed."
Just because they said it's been addressed, does not mean it's been addressed. And their idea of addressing it appears to be making things up.
And ten months later you are still waiting for that refund they were supposed to receive within 45 days.
"I am acting callous about the mistake as I am realistic."
Actually, you are being naive.
Until they show you how they addressed the mistake, the mistake has not been addressed. Until they show you how they are providing accurate data so that you know for a fact the data is accurate, you should be holding them suspect.
"The real data does not show any significant issue regarding covid and covid vaccines."
That's the problem, because there is a significan issue regarding both covid and covid mRNA drugs.
With the original strain of COVID, there is a 1 in 2000 chance of an individual having an adverse condition that leads to hospitalization, and death.
With the mRNA COVID drugs, there is a 1 in 800 chance of an individual having a severe reaction that leads to a severe medical condition, disability or death.
That makes non elevated numbers are a lie.
"This is not the same as making a mistake when the NHS are operating on some one etc.
Or when you not allowed breaks and get to tired.
They harm someone one.
This was a mistake and been corrected,
John got some egg on his face.
Lots of readers now want to think it’s a conspiracy, but they we’re conspiracy theorists before anyway."
This was a cover up plain and simple, and the claim that the new data which does not have elevated numbers is correct; is false and a misrepresentation to the known facts and issues of both COVID and the mRNA COVID drugs that result in elevated sever health issues.
Undoer normal circumstances, the mRNA drug would never have been released onto the market and if the population had been left untreated by that drug, fewer people would have died.
The data therefore is false and does not resemble the reality of the history of COVID and the mRNA drug.
1
-
1
-
@martinb99
"Oh, do you believe the original figures were correct? If so, how would you explain Swindon having THREE HUNDRED TIMES the average number of pericarditis incidences per year before the pandemic even started? Use your brain, if you have one."
It's about trust.
After all the intentional misrepresentation of the truth that certain individuals engaged in, in order to line their pockets, it's no longer just about accepting one set of numbers over the other.
It's about trust.
Trust is built, not demanded.
If you lie to me, I will cease to trust you.
You can demand that I trust you all you want; but all that will succeed in doing is convince me that I need to lock and load and be ready to open fire when you are around.
If People In Government Service want to be trusted, THEY must REBUILD that trust through complete transparency.
The fact that the corrected numbers indicate that more people were released from hospital than were admitted to hospital with the one of the two conditions, not only requires explanation but also requires that one be very skeptical of the new numbers now presented as the correct numbers.
They broke trust. The only way they can REBUILD trust is to present the raw data to the public and allow the data to be peer reviewed by multiple parties that would like to do so.
After 6+ years of political bureaucracies lying to the public and in their face about what "they must believe"; an unwillingness to simply trust what the political bureaucracies say is a very healthy position to take for a people that love freedom and liberty. To not have that unwillingness is not just unhealthy, it is suicidal.
It is reasonable to expect an elevation of the conditions because you are dealing with both a virus that is known to cause Myocarditis as well as a drug to treat the virus that has previously been linked to causing Myocarditis. Thus, an apparent lack of increase, is unreasonable.
Claiming that the corrected data must be trusted without question despite not showing an elevation; is a good indication that it is you who are the one without a brain.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidroberttaylor57
"Calm down, I couldn't miss the point because I didn't address it. John Campbell does not have a medical degree, his background is in Nursing; I agree with a lot of his posts but he invites attacks on his credibility by falsely naming his Channel DOCTOR John Campbell."
That's such a deep pile of manure, you can't blame it on a bull.
John Campbell has a PhD, I believe he said in academia.
That fact gives him the legal right to use the Dr. Title and be called Dr.
The only idiots I ever hear using the accusation of "He's not a Doctor", are the educated idiot medical Doctors attempting to discredit DOCOTORS of Chiropractic Medicine as they teach people about nutrition.
They don't ever say; he got this wrong, or he got that wrong, they just shout; "He's not a medical doctor". That's as credible as shouting; "She's not a mathematician", as an 8 year old girl is teaching; 2 + 2 = 4.
The person making that statement, is the person that loses credibility.
Given that the medical community has proven over the past 4 years that credentials do not a professional make, I suggest you address the information, and stop making yourself look like a fool by attempting to discredit the individual's credentials.
1
-
1
-
@kevinschmidt2210
"Why is God Almighty sending Christ Jesus back?"
It is time for God's kingdom to come, God's will to be done, in earth as it is in heaven.
Matthew 6:9: After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.
10: Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.
He comes to destroy those which destroy the earth.
Revelation 11:18: And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.
"Does he want a refund?"
No. When He comes, all that offends, and those that do lawlessness will be rounded up, judged and removed from the earth.
Matthew 13:41: The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
42: And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
43: Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.
1
-
1