Comments by "Scott Tovey" (@scotttovey) on "Fox News" channel.

@Randy58-zn4ez When Jesus Christ returns, all you evil people that refuse to believe God is and does exist, will have no more points of argument. You will either repent and believe, or you will be gathered together with all those which do iniquity, and be cast into the furnace of fire. Matthew 13:41: The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42: And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
5
@cpr75 "did he use his attorney’s money then repay it as legal expenses?" Have you even thought that through? The attorney takes an action you are not aware of. He has an accuser sign an NDA and then pays the accuser out of his own money. You have no reason to suspect that the attorney has taken these nefarious actions that will do you harm. You have not signed the NDA. Did you even see it? If you didn't sing the legal document, is there a legal binding agreement? You pay the attorney legal expenses, they are not itemized, thus, you have no idea what all the expenses entail. Later, you are charged with falsifying records by stating the payment to the attorney, is legal expenses. Why would you not know that the expenses are too high? You run a billion dollar corporation. Attorney fees will vary depending on the time that an attorney puts into a job. It all smells of entrapment to me.
5
@tessaducek5601 "He used tax payers money to pay them off." That is not being alleged in the trial because it would be quickly and easily dispelled. Trump funded most of his campaign for the 2016 election, thus, even if he used campaign funds, which he himself provided out of his own pocket, it was not tax payers money, it was still his money.
5
Does anyone else realize that finding an individual in contempt for not breaking the law is both corruption and abuse of office? It is also a prosecutable crime that the constitution does not protect Senators from. Do you think Attorney General Barr will prosecute those Senators? It would be poetic if he did, and funny as all get out!
5
Big tech's history of manipulation, censorship and subverting free elections. All the actions by big tech and the democrats in this report are things that the enemies of the United States want to impose on the people of the United States. All the actions by big tech and the democrats that Tucker reports on, are acts of treason. Trump MAGA 2020
4
Toto Mckerrow "alstarii Headboard Harris should be arrested for treason and sedition." "Toto Mckerrow Why..." Harris is a Senator. The Constitution of the United State requires congress to guarantee to the States a Republican form of government. In addition; the Constitution of the United States requires elected Presidents, Senators, Representatives and Judges, elected or appointed to take an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States. For any of these individuals to work to overthrow the Republican form of government is: TREASON. For individuals to campaign for any form of government other than a Republican form of government is: TREASON. The marxist left rioting and looting until they get what they want is waging war against the United States; this also is: TREASON. Read the Constitution of the United States. You will be amazed at how well crafted it is so as to sustain the nation for generations to come. All it takes is for government to follow it's mandates.
4
@sarbantz "I am born snow white American with gun always on me and even I am afraid when going out because I didn't vote for Trump." Well, gun owners that vote for politicians, which habitually levy war against the United States, and pass unconstitutional laws which abridge the right of the people to keep and bear arms; are voting against the very rights they are exercising. The end result of this contrariness is a state of fear. You vote against your own right to keep and bear arms believing that the people who you vote for, and are seeking to strip you of your rights, are your friends and allies. Then, when a man that works to protect your rights is elected, you cower and hide in fear believing he is the enemy, when your true enemy is the face in the mirror you see every day. You may want to ask God to take this madness out of you, because dude, when the people I believed were my allies turned out to not care if I died, I stopped believing them to be my allies as they proved by their actions, that they are my enemies.
3
@kentas-sd "That is what Trump has been doing. "Lock her up. lock him up" without the evidence. Gets mad when his people can't find any evidence. Then, threatens to fire them and so on. Barr, FBI, CIA and other directors face his backlash. So who is punishing their political opponents?" What are your sources? Where are your links? You are the accuser, it is your responsibility to provide the evidence to convict. Without evidence, your charge is thrown out of court having no bases or bearing in fact.
3
@AdmoreMethod "On what statistic do you base this idea on...?" Like the fascist leftist, the fascist right pulls unproven mythical numbers and generalizations out of thin air and find everyone guilty of their charge without due process, choosing to oppress the poor and needy rather than resolving their legitimate problems with logical, workable solutions. Fortunately, neither of these two groups can be found in the kingdom of heaven as their members are not allowed in God's kingdom.
3
@bobbarns4516 Trump is dong what he is doing because it takes a pompous, arrogant nut like him to push back against the leftist, socialist, politically correct agenda that the United States is messed up with. If you vote against him because of his methods, you are voting for the leftist, socialist, politically correct agenda. The end result is that you betray your country all because you got your poor wittle feelings hurt. American up dude!
3
@sarbantz "he will get you when you least expect." Is that supposed to be a threat? Who will get me when I least expect it?
2
Thanks for letting us know what you and the democrats are doing Bernie.
2
@Craig Bowen You, and anyone else that claims this to be a major breach of security, are over stating the situation. The total number of troops withdrawn from that area was 48 or 50. I've heard both numbers. How big of a force can 50 soldiers keep at bay?
2
@jimmccarley3191 "I take a look at the students and what they are actually able or unable to do." That's the way it should be regardless the age of the individual. I was sitting in an interview and had the guy say to me: "you probably can't do it because you have not done it in a while." I was so shocked at the stupidity of the statement I thought: How does someone come up with something that stupid; and I was to shocked to come up with a good and quick retort. The job by the way, was scanning documents. Such idiocy from the educated does a great deal of harm.
2
@Fat89789 "In the US however, it barely made a whiff that close associates of Trump got contracts." What are your sources? Where are your links? You are the accuser, it is your responsibility to provide the evidence to convict. Without evidence, your charge is thrown out of court having no bases or bearing in fact.
2
@JohnSmith-fe5br I have this tendency to really annoy people by taking apart things people say and stating the obvious meaning of words. I'm really not in the mood to stir up the trolls and the deranged that think 2 + 2 = 5 because they say it does.
2
@minkman99 The facts are: When attempting to legitimately solve a problem, one must: 1) make a decision and go with it. 2) if that decision did not work, make corrections until the desired outcome is achieved. This is a lot cleaner when developing a new device for marketing. When doing it in a centuries old war torn middle ease; it is majorly messy. What the -democrats - globalist are really angry about is that Trump is succeeding in undoing decades of intentional actions to undermine the stability and security of the United States with the intentions of ultimately destroying the United States. Their biggest problem however is: God!
2
@Josh Potatoes What president has not run our country of a deficit? You can't say Clinton because he started with a deficit. The truth is, the United States Government has run on debt from it's founding and there is only 1 single year in history in which the United States was not in debt. The following year a recession hit and congress borrowed money to stimulate the economy. The United States has been in debt ever since. That is the simple facts of US history.
2
@michaelcortez1092 The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land. Despite this fact, the Democrats have long done everything they can to subvert that law by interpreting it contrary to the original intent of the founders and authors thereof. The current group of young Democrats are worse than any previous group seeking to impose an illegal socialist, totalitarian government upon the people of the United States. Every one of them should be prosecuted for conspiring to undermine the Constitution of the United States and for violating their oath of office to uphold and protect the Constitution. Sadly, Republicans are not willing to impose the just penalties for those attempts as there are some of them that are just as guilty as the Democrats.
2
@Shila799 "This rhetoric is not helping. It Normalizes concepts and ideas that we should not accept. Either way. Aren’t we standing against radicalizing and resorting to violence? It only edges each side closer to a reality most of us do not want." The Colonists held that view towards Great Britain for a very long time. The Revolutionary war was the result of the fact that the wicked, refuse to stop being totalitarian despots and violating the rights of the people. A bully on the playground remains a bully until one of his victims stands up and educates him on the fact that; he is not the toughest kid on the playground. The left will continue fighting to remove gun rights, voter rights and the Constitution of the United States. They will do so until patriots stand up and exterminate them. The reason this has happened throughout history is because there are times when; that's the only way to solve their malfunction. Operating under any other ideal; is being willfully ignorant, naive, and stupid.
2
@1ManNamedDan Maybe that's the secret of how to not melt down.
2
@Tamara61622 That is real. Daniels owes Trump $500,000 per a court order. An order that she has vowed not to pay.
1
@gsmeeuwsen "Someone should be fired for executing free speech..?" Free speech does not come without consequences. When you exercise your free speech to say, do, and be morally depraved, you will pay the consequences for that stupidity. They claim that they did not intend to be offensive. When it comes to wicked people such as this, intentions are irrelevant. They are irrelevant because those people never learn. They are worse than the bully on the play ground that keeps beating up smaller kids until one of those smaller kids just happens to be bigger than the bully. At that point, the bully usually stops. These people, they refuse to stop even after being ridiculed. As a result, there must be consequences such as loosing one's job.
1
@maplebones "No apology required. I thought it was cute. I'm a Christian and it doesn't bother me a bit. I'll bet Jesus would have gotten a kick out of it. Lighten up, for crying out loud." You're not a true Christian. You are nothing more than a Christian in name only. You don't have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, and you don't know Jesus. Jesus would not have gotten a kick out of it. Lighten up? Those people are going to hell in a hand basket and you are being dragged right behind them as you are tied to that basket by your tolerance of their immorality, and making light of the Just and Holy Christ that died to bring wickedness like this, to an end. You are a friend to the world, and therefore an enemy of God, and an enemy of Christ. Romans 8:7: Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. James 4:4: Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.
1
@JonathanMclaurine-l6z "God bless my fellow American ❤"" 😎👍
1
@TsiratiugZ "Such a kind and loving God you have there." So kind, loving and merciful that He sent His only begotten Son to die in your place for your sins because He does not want you to be cast into the fiery furnace which justice demands. We have all violated His laws and in accordance to His laws, the penalty is eternal damnation. However, by accepting the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, God's only begotten Son and believing on His name and repenting from your sin, you will receive forgiveness and the remission of sins, you will be pardoned. My God is loving and kind as well as just and holy. His judgment is just and His actions justified. He is far more righteous than any man can be. He is everlasting and the wicked in the earth are as finite as the grass of the field. God is most kind and most loving and merciful. You're refusal to believe on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, His only Begotten Son for the remission of sins, your refusal to receive His pardon however, is evidence of how unkind, unloving and unmerciful you are to both yourself and those around you.
1
"she said something that is false, but directionally true" No she didn't she told an outright lie. Sounds like the dude has been taking lessons on doublespeak from democrats. Just as half truths are not truths but lies; so too is a false statement that is said to be directionally true. For it is not possible to make a false statement that directs one towards truth. Only true statements can direct one to the truth. Drinking from the toilet implies that you took water from the toilet and drank it. It does not imply that you drank from a faucet that is near the toilet. If you are having a difficult time understanding the difference, get a dog. the canine will be more than happy to show you the truth of the matter. AOC is an evil wicked Jezebel! A traitor that is actively working to undermine the stability and security of the United States of America., So are all those that supports her.
1
@jimmccarley3191 👍😎
1
Who wants recognized terrorists inside the United States? Enemies of the United States. and traitors which are; Citizens levying war against the United States. Citizens that have adhered themselves to the enemies of the United States, and are giving them aid and comfort. Article III. - The Judicial Branch Section 3 – Treason Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
1
I would have asked if demanding that a suspect be criminally charged despite the lack of evidence to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is abuse of power? Which is what the democrats did throughout the hearing.
1
@Ratbert32305 "I’m going to ask you to show proof of your accusation" Given the assertions made in this post, you're going to have to specify who it is you are referring to by quoting them. If you are referring to the statement by Julie Brothers: "Why is it that so many... ladies look like they’re men in politics.. and vice versa?" That is clearly an opinion on her part based on her observation of the way they dress and present themselves.
1
@JohnSmith-fe5br Now, fair is fair. If the dems can call obstruction of justice where there is no evidence of the same, then Miklamesh Xe can do it too.
1
@JohnSmith-fe5br You laughed? Oh great! Now I have to think of something even dumber, otherwise it won't be funny.
1
@JohnSmith-fe5br It's more fun when you can see the look on people's faces as they try and figure out what you mean by what you just said. If you really want to get them, just be real literal with a play on words that's supposed to be a joke. You win when they give up and tell you: "just go away".
1
@minkman99 You will never be able to solve problems with that attitude. Remember, there is that which looks good on paper but in practice does not work. I worked at the GM proving grounds in Flint Michigan back in the early 90's and was told by one of the fabricators that he would have to waste money making a part despite knowing full well that the part was designed wrong. The reason for having to waste money and make the part; the engineer would not believe him that he needed to adjust his design slightly for the part to fit where it was designed to fit. After the fabricator made the part according to the plans and showed the designer that it did not physically fit as he stated it would not, the designer would change the plans so that the part fit. The years of experience the engineer had enabled him to see that the design was improperly designed. The degree the engineer had, caused him to think his degree enabled him to disregard the realities of life and the real world. Just because something looks good on paper, does not mean it will work in real life. You may have to make adjustments as you go along. It's the only way to be able to solve problems rather than just implement policies that do nothing but cause additional problems.
1
@gailregula8176 "If you had a job and mortgage, you wouldn't be voting Democrat. As far as your car goes, is mommy still making the payments?" That's not true. I don't have a job and mortgage, and I won't be voting democrat. In fact, the only time I voted for a democrat was because the Lord revealed to me that she would be elected. Otherwise, I would not have voted for her either.
1
@davidrhodes1287 "The numbers for this interview were fact checked right after and most were found to be untrue. Fact check them yourself it's easy to do." Why would anyone take your post seriously? This was not an interview, it was a news report. Any fact checker worth his salt would declare your statement untrue as a result of you claiming this is an interview when it is clearly not. Just a hint, it takes a minimum of two people to have a proper interview.
1
@arvindaeizadeh292 "She mentions that NY has 126 deaths per 100,000 but their data shows 5-10 deaths per day for the last couple months so not sure where the numbers came from." Most likely the determination is total population divided by total deaths. But even if you use the official numbers from the State, those numbers may be skewed in an attempt to prove that Trump is a bad guy. The complete total intentional disingenuous attitude of the democratic party is beyond tolerable. Yet, there are people that not only tolerate their lies, they support them telling their lies.
1
@1031E " 34 counts of falsifying business records. Isn't that enough?" According to one report, the records entered, were entered in 2017 after Trump had handed operations over to Trump Jr. Additionally, most CEO's don't touch the books, that's what their accountants are hired to do. So how is Trump guilty of falsifying business records?
1
And he still doesn't because you are not knowledgeable enough or intelligent enough to actually communicate that to him. You're just on the extreme right which is still wrong for America.
1
@michaelcortez1092 Not really. The republican congress actually balanced it, but that's just arguing semantics. It didn't last very long and the nation still had a massive debt that didn't go down very much.
1
Fran Ra "That's odd. I thought Jesus knew EVERYTHING." You are speaking in a literal, technical sense of the term. Jesus however, speaking figuratively said:: Matthew 7:15: Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16: Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17: Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18: A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19: Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20: Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. 21: Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22: Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23: And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. 24: Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: 25: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock. 26: And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: 27: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.
1
@tessaducek5601 You apparently misread my post. But that cannot be determined because you are too lazy to quote what you are responding too, and since I have multiple posts in this thread, it is not possible for me to determine what you are responding too by going back and reading my post. I never took a debate class which means my skills are not that great. That being said; if you want to win a debate with me, be a better communicator. In a thread such as this, you have to quote what you are responding too otherwise people will think your off your rocker.
1
@miskatonicalumni5612 Typical leftist liberal lie. It appears that you do not know what you are talking about, otherwise, you would have explained your position. Are you not aware of the fact that just as it is unlawful to force an individual to sign a contract under duress; it is also unlawful to coerce an individual into breaking the law? Why are you so ignorant of the law? Or is it more so that you have no concern for law and order?
1
Andre Lucas "and NO WALL" You leftist like to conveniently leave out the fact that it was your law suites that prevented the wall from being built until the Supreme Court ruled against you.
1
@Worldwatcha "As of 2016 a person does not need credentials.. to be potus.. you didn’t notice" 1) Straw man argument. The OP said nothing about credentials. 2) Read the Constitution of the United States. A person has never needed credentials to be President of the United States. There are only two requirements in the Constitution that a person must meet to be President of the United States. 1) Be born within the United States. 2) Be 35 years of age or older.
1
I don't believe that the open boarder policy was a mistake. I think it was an intentional act of war against the United States. I think it was the democrates adhering to the enemies of the United States, giving them aid and comfort. It is in line with the war against gun rights being conducted by activist prosecutors. The democrates have Trump derangement syndrome and Hate America Disorder. They are marxist, attempting to overthrow the Constitutional Republic of the United States.
1