Comments by "Golag Is watching you" (@golagiswatchingyou2966) on "SJW Cannibalism as Climate Change "Movement" Declared "Too White"" video.

@Isaiah_McIntosh ever noticed how when a mixed person commit a murder or whatever he is labeled a ''white hispanic'' or ''mixed European person'' but when it's a black person they ignore it or say it's a sign of ''backlash against racism'' the whole ''white privilage'' thing also reminds me of the nazi's where someone is a ''full jew'' or ''quarter jew'' and therefor has diffrent rights and privilages in society.
4
@jeperstone is it though? so much effort put in to ignore diffrences, so much chaos and money wasted just to enforce this vision of the anointed, you can disagree where the diffrences begin, end and if they even matter but the fact we can't be honest is what produces this crap in the first place. ignoring reality seems to never end well and lead to horror and racism, in the perfect world i can say the N-word and someone can call me the C-word and we both laugh and go about our day but that's not how to world works does it?
4
@DpHsHd im not sure what your exactly talking about, i just thought it be intresting to share counter information from someone who also dislikes the climate fanatics, im well aware of corporate intrest into power and academics.
3
@intermenater chinese people do eat everything.
3
potholer54 makes a pretty good case for why the climate is changing and he even attacks the nutty leftwing who demand all kinds of nonsense, a rare treat worth looking into if you ask me.
3
@ECP90 I think most white nationalists secretly cheer when they try and put whites against non-whites because it makes their arguments seem not only legitimate but also logical ''see this group wants to destroy us, only we can save you vote for Richard Spencer or your families are doomed''
2
@DpHsHd I disagree, check out potholer54 he can explain it beter and would like to be refuted if he is wrong.
2
@C2K777 just like with Ozon layer? acid rain? acidification of the sea? death of ecosystems, the 6th mass extinction event, that's also just bullshit right? it's oke to be sceptical but assuming things is the road to destruction and death. always question everything and always be prepared to be wrong, I dont think im wrong for saying climate change is happening and I don't think climate deniers are wrong when they think our current ways of trying to fix it won't work, I agree. we need nuclear energy, we need massive political reform, we need to act and not in a stupid retarded, self destructive way like most of the climate change fanatics act these days.
2
@C2K777 agreed, the left sould plant more trees and protest less.
2
as someone who actualy does care about the climate, ecosystems and animals of the world, I can't decide who i dislike more, the climate change fanatics or the climate change deniers. one group says ''the world is ending, save the trees by selling out to corporations and meh diversity, anti white bullshit'' the other ''humanity can't change the climate, lets keep using oil, coal and polute the world because fuck it I don't care'' honestly the only ones who remain consistant on ''saving the planet'' at this point are the literal neo-nazi's ''save the trees by bathing the ground in non-white blood and having lots of white babies because they are the only ones who care about saving the planet'' omg it's so funny but also so fucking true.... sign of things to come if you ask me, beter or for worse.
1
@annother3350 I think potholer54 makes a pretty good case why that's not true.
1
his movement no doubt but i think the science remains consistant, the solution however is not. look up potholer54 and refute the claims being made plz.
1
@iambob6590 I don't quite follow your logic there but oke.
1
@andyfletcher3561 you mean the guy who keeps getting refuted by Potholer? Im not sure if you mean't anything specific but I don't find the climate change denying side very convincing, not that I approve of the climate change fanatics which is why i like Potholer.
1
@iambob6590 I don't realy see how that's true... Your argument seems to more be the cherry picking, he even admits when leftists get it wrong and when conservative are right or at least misunderstood by the left, seems pretty objective and rational to me. He does not ask for money and only asks if people want to donate to a charity, everything els is free unlike most climate deniers who wish to sell stuff or merch, nothing wrong with making money but he does not strike me as the dishonest manipulate type, i would be glad to see how that would be true though.
1