Comments by "Golag Is watching you" (@golagiswatchingyou2966) on "The Distant Glimmer of a Possible Hard Brexit" video.

  1. @Frank Castle Patton and MacArthur are the only americans during ww2 that deserve any respect, very good generals and leaders.
    3
  2. hahahahaa they be stupid if they do that, they got the most money and investment from the Eu, hell they are the most in support of a EU army, poland needs the EU more than the EU needs poland.
    2
  3. then why would they vote for a hard brexit and get fucked in the ass by the USA that will demand more british soldiers die for israel?
    2
  4. yeah more muslims, more money for israel, less controle, more dependent on US military, ohhh the US would love that.
    2
  5. yeah trust the USA that will never backfire ever.
    2
  6. USA does not like competition, why you think they helped disolve collonialism? divide and rule the motto of the romans and the USA.
    1
  7. can you just explain to me how that would work? tell me how do you think this will play out? realistically, not doom and gloom like the left claim, nor one dimensional optimism.
    1
  8. try leaving NATO see what happens.
    1
  9. if the british have a hard brexit that might mean they lose scotland and north ireland, not a good look if you ask me, you can dislike the EU hell I do everyday but trading one tyrant in for another ain't going to fix shit.
    1
  10. wage more wars on Europe? perhaps bomb some more cities into dust? won't be used against china or any enemies of the west im sure.
    1
  11. yeah then the USA can abuse Russia and the rest of the European continent even more, ohhh they love that.
    1
  12. yeah building that EU army takes time and in the meantime they will just chip away at scotland and north ireland, make the UK look bad and incompetent.
    1
  13. yeah make it clear the USA hates competition and will use any dirty tactic they can to remain top dog in a world that does not need them anymore, I fully support this.
    1
  14. you mean muslim land, since their goverment loves to arm muslims and defend saudi arabia while attacking seculare goverments and those that save sayd seculare goverments, like Russia.
    1
  15.  @kenhawkins1033  then annex parts of Germany because the americans won their war for them. USA loves to divide nations and alliances as long as it benefits them, no wonder the USA wants to break up the EU, makes it easier to controle nations. You can change the EU, you have a vote and a say, you don't have that with the USA and they are the nost untrustworthy country today, besides perhaps north korea and israel.
    1
  16.  Wylvien  how about Europe for the Europeans? Why save just poland? As if that's even possable on their own.
    1
  17.  @treygowdyspurpletie9878  side with the Americans and you can forget it buddy.
    1
  18.  @kenhawkins1033  for themselves they benefited the most from ww2.
    1
  19.  @AsG_4_  just like Turkey, just like south korea, where ever enemies of the USA are they want to strenghten those borders, not Germany, not potential threats to the USA global hegemony, they would backstab the polish the moment they got belerus in their "alliance" Besides USA is the one warmongering after Russia, makes sense if you understand US intrest, divide and rule.
    1
  20.  @Immortal_Liberty  true I just read that a polish law to force retirement of it's old supreem court was deemed to be unlawfull bu European law, they then downscaled it in 2018 and now have completly reversed it this year. European laws trumps polish law, agree or disagree that's the reality.
    1
  21. @Ford Prefect I worked with polish people, they might drink a lot and say "Kurwa" every 3 sentences but they work hard and I can't imagine them being the ones getting all the benefits when the majority of people coming in claiming benefits and causing problems are muslims not polish people. Also if the EU is giving the polish and other eastern European nations money how is the UK paying for it? The UK did not even paid the most, they did not have the Euro they were the most privilaged members within the EU. They are free to leave of course but it makes no sense to claim they paid poland when most polish workers came to work in Germany, the Netherlands and everywhere within the EU.
    1
  22.  mannix flint  nobody owns anyone anything, the polish took lands from Germany and they killed lots of germans, people allowed it because nazi's and the british did abandon the polish people as well as all of Europe realy together with the USA but the british are paying the price now as they did when they lost the empire, we have beter things to worry about than opening up old wounds for economic benefit.
    1
  23.  @kaetamine  USA won their war, step back and let the polish military commit mass murder on germans living there, you can say eye for an eye but you can't claim they weren't involved.
    1
  24.  @kaetamine  try 700.000 germans killed or went missing in the expulsion of sayd germans by the polish military.
    1
  25.  @kaetamine  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_and_expulsion_of_Germans_(1944–1950) Ohhhh look perhaps up till 1-2 million deaths, my mistake the deathtoll was even higher. The more you know.
    1
  26.  @kaetamine  hahaha clearly you did not read the rest, try again, troll.
    1
  27.  @kaetamine  read again.
    1
  28.  @kaetamine  your boring me if you can't even be bothered to read, it's quite clear what it says and you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand how ethnic cleansing works.
    1
  29.  @kaetamine  just keep telling yourself that, uncomfortable? Intresting choice of word, as I specifically sayd your boring me, it seems you realy can't read. So il repeat myself, your boring me, also writing in caps shows that your very angry, probably because you don't want to look at the truth. Read it again, if you can.
    1
  30.  @kaetamine  I find it intresting that poland is able to annex lands supposedly ethnically cleansed by sovjets yet given to poland, yet Russia had already annex parts of poland, so tell me why would they do that mmmmm? Out of the goodness of their heart? Or does it not count if the polish leaders and military do so with approval of the allies and the sovjets? If that's the case why is Germany held responsable for the war? After all the nazi's did it not the germans? Also funny how supposedly the polish military had nothing to do with it "it was not the polish people! Or military! It were the sovjets, I mean the polish people annex the land, gave the former german towns polish names and became settled by polish people but clearly they had nothing to do with it" right.... Because that makes sense right? And who am I to Believe? Some west-german puppet goverment set up by the allies? The records from the nazi's? The sovjets? Or the polish? What if there are no records? Did it realy happen then? I think it's fairly clean that the polish people and their military pushed for this out of revenge and to ensure that old wounds aren't reopened they reduce the numbers after all it's not genocide, nor is is ethnic cleansing but "population transfer" anyone with a basic understanding of linqistics can see that these terms and these excuses are used for national intrest by the polish state, blame the sovjets, blame the allies but not the innocent polish, they can do no wrong because ww2 is a creation myth more than anything els, each side just makes shit up as they go allong and it's easy to see way. But like I sayd your boring me, we can go back and forth but I can see who benefited and I can see through this bullshit.
    1
  31.  @kaetamine  At the Potsdam Conference (17 July–2 August 1945), the territory to the east of the Oder–Neisse line was assigned to Polish and Soviet Union administration pending the final peace treaty. All Germans had their property confiscated and were placed under restrictive jurisdiction.[148][154] The Silesian voivode Aleksander Zawadzki in part had already expropriated the property of the German Silesians on 26 January 1945, another decree of 2 March expropriated that of all Germans east of the Oder and Neisse, and a subsequent decree of 6 May declared all "abandoned" property as belonging to the Polish state.[155] Germans were also not permitted to hold Polish currency, the only legal currency since July, other than earnings from work assigned to them.[156] The remaining population faced theft and looting, and also in some instances rape and murder by the criminal elements, crimes that were rarely prevented nor prosecuted by the Polish Militia Forces and newly installed communist judiciary. The German Federal Archives estimated in 1974 that more than 200,000 German civilians were interned in Polish camps; they put the death rate at 20–50% and estimated that over 60,000 probably died.[158] Polish historians Witold Sienkiewicz and Grzegorz Hryciuk maintain that the internment: resulted in numerous deaths, which cannot be accurately determined because of lack of statistics or falsification. At certain periods, they could be in the tens of percent of the inmate numbers. Those interned are estimated at 200–250,000 German nationals and the indigenous population and deaths might range from 15,000 to 60,000 persons.
    1
  32.  @kaetamine  it says the polish people's militia and the communist apointed leadership in poland, how is this not in self intrest of poland? How are you this dense? Also there are more articles that go into further depth if you bothered to read. You can debate who did most of the work the sovjets or the polish people themselves but to claim they were uninvolved or that it did not happen is the same thing holocaust deniers do. Im done with you, your ignorant, childish, boring and your opinion means nothing to me. I only responded so other people can look into it themselves and not be convinced by your ignorance. Bye now.
    1
  33. but the USA and UK are clean as can be right?
    1
  34.  Phillip Aubin  doubtfull the USA won't make trade deals that benefit other nations like that and are subject to change whenever the USA feels like it, an alliance with the powerfull is never to be trusted.
    1
  35. a coward who flees with his tail between his legs and can't be trusted? for once I agree with you.
    1
  36.  Berkshire 88  what's a sperg? Someone who is accurate?
    1
  37.  Wes Takahashi  indeed that's why we need to get rid of NATO at all costs.
    1
  38.  @TiggerTheRed  you have a vote in the EU, you can change it as it has already, you can't change US intrest to keep their competition weak and divided.
    1
  39.  Berkshire 88  what's the JQ? Im talking about the state of Israel? Zionism? But lets just ignore the major reason fact that israel stole nukes from the UK, lets also forget the last 20+ years of constant wars because of the mosad and israel, lets just live in a bubble where we only talk nonsense like a bunch of leftists, im sure that will make the world beter. So again sperg is someone who is accurate? Cus it sure seems like it, I wonder how long it wil take for this comment to be censored for being "inaccurate"
    1
  40.  Berkshire 88  grow up, boy.
    1
  41.  Berkshire 88  thanks for proving my point, enjoy your echochamber.
    1
  42.  Berkshire 88  yeah that's about what I expected from you. Thanks for wasting my time, bye now.
    1
  43.  @Parayogi  Boris was offered to be PM before and he turned it down, im very sceptical of his abilities, he might look good compared to the rest but he is still a fool.
    1
  44. source? I find that highly unlikely since they benefited the most from the EU and their investments, hell they are the most in support of an EU army, if anything they might use it as a threat to presure the EU, I don't think they are that stupid to actualy do it. the UK is diffrent they always were the outsiders within the Union and they still had their own currency.
    1
  45. it was great, it can still become great again.
    1
  46. well it's good for us since a lot of british capital has come to the netherlands but on the otherhand the EU now wants us to be their second wheel in the EU, we don't realy mind since we got beter plans and less multicultralism than the UK but still a bit mixed opinion accros the board.
    1
  47.  @sanniepstein4835  74 years of ''protection'' so destroying everything the west stands for, waging war on seculare muslim nations, allowing communism to ravages half of Europe and selling out to the chinese is ''protecting'' these days? gees I can only imagine what you guys have planned for us in the future then, nuke our capitals? or arm some more terrorists? USA is why Europe is so weak to begin with, all americanized, all weak, no wonder China took over so easy.
    1
  48.  Jacob Howell  you cowards were too chickenshit to fight communism and hated the idea of Germany copying your model. Your the delusional one, cold wars over NATO is just a burden for us, time to pack your bags and get out. You let communism thriumph in Europe, you are just as much responsable for the countless deaths caused by that stupid ideology, no nuremburg trial for communism, hell I remember being told how "greatfull" we sould be for the americunts siding with the communists. We aren't communist but we still have commies thanks to you cowards. Go arm some more muslims they are your real soldiers.
    1
  49. hard brexit, soft brexit it won't change a thing, USA will make claims on the british islands at some point and demand more military bases. trade one tyrant in for another.
    1
  50. been fucked for so long by the USA, they probably won''t even feel it.
    1
  51. Yes indeed globalism and anti nationalism and anti white racism started in the USA and now look where we are, good observation.
    1
  52. won't be the first time the USA sides with commies to backstab their ''allies'' in the back. USA hates Russia because Russia is actualy pro western.
    1
  53. but that would threaten the USA economy and wars, why would they be in support of that? the brits ''won'' ww2 and today we see what's left of them, you realy want to do all that crap over again?
    1
  54. yes and Italy is making their own as well, what's your point?
    1
  55.  @theotherstevesteve  for now. Besides size is not everything, one good sub torpedo and boom goes the dynamite. Having ICBM'S is a beter deterent than carries and combine all the fleets of members of the EU and im sure they will prove a match to the UK, USA not yet though, again for now.
    1
  56.  @saphojuiced  you do realise the European nations in the EU if they all did just 2-3% of their gdp for military spending they would be close to the ammount the USA spends per year, they just don't do it because the USA would react by putting sanctions on us and threat all sorts of nasty stuff. Why would we invest in military spending if the USA is going to waste it's money on endless wars for it's own benefit anyways? Let the USA bleed themselves dry, going into useless wars while we try and get our shit in order. The USA is the most expensive army in the world but it has not spend that money very wisely, only real exception to this is their navy and air force which btw they need to secure the seas which is very profitable for them. I don't think you understand how geo-politics works, the EU wants it's army, they would love a navy to defend their seas with, many here want to end NATO, hell most of our future enemies are people the USA propted up while forcing treaties on us that limits our militaries, you don't seem to know that because you don't care.
    1
  57. yeah more cuckholding to muslims and immigrants that will be just wonderfull for the UK.
    1
  58.  @nillynush4899  then why would they side with the USA? the armers and main supporters of islam to begin with? hell why you think the british are so islamized to begin with? closest to the USA and their pro islam model.
    1
  59. I prefer rotting in the ground.
    1
  60. I downvoted it because it's one dimensional and poorly made, he has to go more in debth not just use buzzwords to get his fans erect.
    1