Comments by "Golag Is watching you" (@golagiswatchingyou2966) on "The Future of Ideology." video.

  1. 31
  2. 8
  3. 7
  4. 6
  5. 5
  6. 5
  7. 4
  8. 4
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 20:06 dude what are you talking about? it honestly is confusing to make sense of what your saying, the USA wants to decide these policies, the whole reason of NATO is to keep russians out, germans down and the americans in, that's what NATO is, what you are basically saying here is that it's pafetic that the Europeans do what the USA wants them to do and allows the USA to dictate to them how to run their countries, how big their armies are allowed to be and what kind of treaties they are allowed to make with Russia and other nations, the NATO high command of Europe specifically says that the USA does not want Europe to have it's own military or to go against the US wishes or get involved in the middle east unless it is led by the USA or NATO directly. unlike most European leaders, I deeply distrust the USA and think we would be better off building up our own military, rejecting US protection and should find a way to get Russia into the Euro-sphere of influence but the USA does not want that and since the EU is not a full federation like the USA and the USA also does not want Europe to be it's own entity without US support, it puts Europe in a catch 22, we are made fun of and weak if we follow the USA and their model and agenda or we pick our own side and get crushed or divided by the americans or russians to keep us divided. for Europe to reclaim it's place in the world it would have to become more hostile to the USA and their interest while either taking over russia or getting them in our sphere, working with other nations like China, while exploiting the middle east and africa whenever possible, Germany would have to pull a Bismark and create a federal European state in a moment of crisis where every member state would feel threatened by external presures and basically strong arm everyone else to their agenda while the USA does nothing. if there are two mistakes the europeans did after ww2 that hurt them the most, it's trusting the USA too much and not finding more ways to unite into a single continental federation.
    2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30.    I agree, the more we reject who we are as a people the more we move towards this sad and miserable state of being, I however would add that since we are animals under darwinistic presures, there is the inevitable that those people who are weak and bend over backwards for the outsider groups and bow to their desires will cease to exist while those who reject it and embrace more ''far right'' views will likely grow in size, power or seen as nessisary, we already have seen this and continue to see this in Europe, with populism and nationalism taking center stage while centrist parties are forced to resort to desperate measures, adopt those same populsit policies they reject to get relected or forced to face the truth that assimulation is not happening and there are issues we need to solve. I would say Europe right now is a lot like weimar germany, lots of conflicting ideologies, problems in the right wing and left wing, minority groups seen as problems (real or imagined) diseases, economic depressions, crisis, incompetent leadership, it's all there. im not saying or hoping the nazi's come back or the commies but I think from this will most likely come a new type of ideological which will be seen as radical and will most likely attempt to unify Europe into a single state in order to give it new purpose and to reject elements within society that it sees as threats or burdens to reach that goal, I'm already seeing it in many of the youth, even if they are far left or far right they both have some form of pan European idealism some out of a sense of culture others out of pragmatism others still more racially or enviromentally focused.
    1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37.  @nightprowler6336  I'm not so sure about that, while it is true that a christian society had more morals, more self restraint, was more negative ethnocentric, had higher birthrates, stronger sense of community, it also inspired the pathways to terrible wars, very nationalistic and self destructive behavior which ended up becoming the downfall of Europe to begin with. Furthermore, the ironically aspect of this decline is that after ww2 Europe was divided between the godless and atheist east in the USSR and the capitalistic, christian west by the USA, what's ironic is that western Europe is more atheistic today than eastern europe, yet at the same time western Europe is richer, more technologically advanced yet has equal or less worse demografic crisis compared to the east and Russia. what to me is at the core of European decline is more to do with americanism and a lack of a proper enemy to bind these nations together, along with the changes with technology, globalism and the nature of society, the ironic part of your comment is also that many christian groups in Europe and christian political groups are in favor of all the things which have brought about our decline, just look at the behavior of the current pope. I do think some form of ideology or religion has to take the place of the current decline society we see but I doubt it will be christianity, islam or any of the old religions that are in decline and can't lead into the future, it's going to have to be something else or a new way from the older religions, like idk a christianity focused on recreating a eden on earth with technology, I could see that happening.
    1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. ​ @hopeintruth5119  I don't consider myself a racist, I consider myself just sane and wanting to support my own self interest, I have no problems with other people's if they intergrate and become part of the majority, to me that's just pragmatic not racist. unless you think racism is being pragmatic, I don't quite see it that way but if that's how you view it then that's how you view it, in that case lots of things become racist without it actually being racist. not supporting minority victimhood complex becomes racist, defending cultural identity becomes racist, human rights become racist, nationalism becomes racist, having a strong military becomes racist, family values becomes racist, so on and so forth, so I reject this myth of racism and simply view it as nationalistic pragmatism, if people aren't usefull or pose a threat to society, wanting them removed or reduce in presence is not racism, it's just self interest and I''m much more focused on our own mistakes and rejecting people of my own ethnic group for supporting outsider groups that cause problems, so would that then make me racist towards my own ethnic group? i just don't get this labeling stuff it makes no sense to me. if people don't intergrate the country becomes unstable, you will get a balkanization of society and will end in civil wars and internal conflicts, not the basis of a stable, modern and technologically advanced society, in fact the USA seems to be in decline largely due to this conflict internally which they did not have before same with Europe. in places like India with a lot of diversity of cultures and people's they are trying to create a single cultural and hemogenic society centered around hindu identity which will put them at odds with islam, you see the same going on in France now.
    1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57.  @gentleshark972  I don't think that's realistic or something people actually want, it's something forced on them that they have to accept or be threatened with, this creates resentment and alienation in the public which can only be suppressed by authoritarian governments and equal resentment from migrant populations for not being accepted or seen as equals. In many ways it's tragic, both sides lose, nobody gains anything of any real value and the only people that profit from it are authoritarian politicians who now have more tools to divide people with without solving issues in their community and corporations that erode resistance towards their power, influence and controle on both the public and the governments that they have in their pockets. I can't imagine it having a happy ending, just more white flight, resentment and political radicalism while at the same time less of a footing on the global scale compared to China, India or the USA and before you say it the USA also suffers from this ideology, they however have the benefit of being able to leave their urban cities to rot while most European nations lose their identity, self respect and trust in the government that is suppose to represent them. In way it's a repeat of the conditions that led to fascism, communism and national socialism, disfunctional governments, a humiliating state of their nations and culture and the temptation creeping in that only anti democratic and counter authoritarian ideology can save them. I don't have any faith in that future generations will be greatfull for the legacy we are leaving them, they have no hope with the status quo and everything to gain by seeing it collapse.
    1
  58. 1