Comments by "Golag Is watching you" (@golagiswatchingyou2966) on "" video.

moral arguments don't refute science, science is cold and calculating where as religion is warm and wants to view humanity as devine
4
@joelfry4982 depends on what you mean by ''right'' if by right you mean accurate and true in reality than science is 99% always correct, depending on the margine of error that exist within it's method of collecting data and making models to predict events or behavior of subjects. if you mean right as in moraly right, is this the correct moral thing to label as correct than it's much more subjective to the person who deems it correct or incorrect, there is no reason religion and science can't cooexist it's just that most scientists and well educated people don't believe in god or religion. right or wrong, it's all so subjective, i prefer science, those who let science get blocked too much by morality are doomed to lose in my view from those that don't, that's the sad truth im afraid.
1
@joelfry4982 but the laws are not drawn by religions, in fact religion would say if they thief was a priest that he being more devine than you would be allowed to steal or given less sever punishment compared to a normal person. It's the rejection of religion and the scientific and enlightenment values that we have that created such laws and morality, this is not to say religion have no values or purpose in modern society but that the perspective that they are equal in value is just inaccurate.
1
what about the nazi's then? were they not extreemly group selecting and religieus towards their ideology? could a artifical ideology stand to be as effective as a religieus one?
1