Comments by "Golag Is watching you" (@golagiswatchingyou2966) on "" video.

  1. Does this mean we might get a return of Eugenics? In such a crisis it's hard to imagine that not being the case in most of the world, esspecialy places like China.
    9
  2. Innovation might prolong such a collapse for sure but unless you get a worldwide effort to controle or influence birthrates it is inevitable that growth spikes will happen and continue to grow, the assumption here is that humanity will continue to exist for the next 500 years at least and have no major wars, while retaining or even regaining high population growth. It's important to note we can't predict the future and that Malthusian presures do exist but we tend to innovate to adapt to changes but assuming that's going to work forever to me is not wise.
    3
  3.  @joejoejoejoejoejoe4391  no i mean in human society we are cramped very much together in an artifical way, closer to nature we would have groups of only 500 people, now most people live in cities with millions of people, diseases are everywhere but we have medicine to deal with that, there is plenty of food and water but very few housing and immense social and sensory overload via technology, so the brain is tricked into believing this is not a good time to mate and whenever groups from high birthrates populations come here they change to reflect the same birthrates in a short amount of time, that indicates it's the environment not the genes that reflect this behavior.
    2
  4. But we aren't mice, still an interesting experiment.
    1
  5.  @joejoejoejoejoejoe4391  to me it looks more like a natural behavior to bad enviromental conditions, animals in times of great crisis, hunger, predators, other will sometimes not mate and pass on their genes because the conditions are so bad that attempt would lead to loss of offspring and waste of energy, so they postpone having children till conditions improve, human beings are so much bombarded with information, large numbers of people in small area, abundance of unhealthy food, enviromental conditions that demand sitting at a desk all day filing paperwork or being on the computer that it might be tricking the brain into thinking conditions are bad, this is supported by the fact that people who are religeus have more children, as well as more rural area's, they are less exposed to these presures. Of course this is an over simplification and all industrialized nations have decline in birthrates regardless of other factors but it's clear that while we can produce a lot of goods and services those same conditions seem to reduce our population growth. Perhaps the solution is a return to more rural lifestyles? Perhaps have less urban cities? Idk.
    1
  6. You don't think that's true? Why?
    1
  7.  @mohsinshah705  im sorry to hear that, YouTube loves to censor comments these days, it's quite tiresome.
    1