Comments by "Golag Is watching you" (@golagiswatchingyou2966) on "Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell"
channel.
-
29
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Leafeon-gd5en potentialy but they could also be used for specific military targets, imagine nuking major weapons production sites, "hidden" nuclear sillo's to stop other side from attacking, air craft carriers, the nuking of cities is a considered tactic because of maximum moral, civic and human lives losses, such a blow would demoralize any resistance to keep fighting.
They will kill in the millions, though if you wish to see them gone it's just not going to happen, what you can do however is make clear treaty and communication lines to prevent a misunderstanding which has happened a number of times before, one russian commander even saved the world by disobeying orders to nuke the west due to communication error which told them they were under attack.
The only way to even consider removing them is to use the uranium for neclear energy production.
The worst case situation would be neclear terrorism, nukes in the hands of fanatics is unthinkable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I did not expect these guys would talk about IQ or IQ statistics, so a little introduction.
IQ tests were used by the US military since ww1 to determine if someone has the general intelligence to perform basic tasks and remember their training properly, if they did not pass the minimal nessisary IQ they would not be allowed to serve the military because it would have been a waste of time, money and human resources to train that person.
IQ tests are not biased or catered to a specific demografic, it's simply a tool used to measure and quantify Intelligence.
now for the spicy part some people for some reason have issue with IQ tests, not all human population groups have the same general intelligence and there seems to be a gap between specific demografic groups that indicates a lower IQ and therefor lower Intelligence than others, which makes sense if you understand evolution, evolutionary pressures and sexual selection.
people who are smart have a higher IQ compared to people who are generaly less Inteligent, due note that IQ is not an indication of success, many people who are very smart are also autistic and have trouble socializing and getting ahead in human societies, not only that but from a evolutionary perspective, less intelligent people tend to have more children so they are evolutionary more successfull compared to smart people who tend to have few children if at all also many smart people have mental disorders.
IQ is not an indication of someone's superiority, it's a measure of someone's potential to perform and advance specific fields of science, art, education, technology or other ventures.
I would hope most people here are open minded enough towards this concept and not shout people down or demand their opinions to be silenced which happens way to often these days.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaelpapadopoulos6054 not realy true, a single nuclear power plant has more maintance then a single wind turbine but in terms of energy produce of a single nuclear power plant, beats way more then equal amount of wind turbines, plus the use of land is much more compact and less damaging to nature, the environment and can be used 24/7 and is not dependent on the wind.
I don't understand why some people think wind turbines are such a great thing, they are horrible, cost a lot, kill animals, don't produce a lot of energy and other methods of green energy are much better than wind alone, solar is good, hydro is very good, geothermal is also very good, wind? It's the most useless, expensive and inefficiënt way of producing clean energy and mostly only exists to give some people that are in favor of it the illusion that they are helping the planet and fighting climate change.
While Germany fell back on their co2 reduction aims and reopened coal plants and build more wind turbines, France reached their goals and more, why? Because they use nuclear energy.
There realy is no logical and rational argument against nuclear energy, it's just fear, lack of understanding of technology and government policy, the only real argument you can make is that such power plants can be potentially used to create enriched uranium and thereby potentially build a nuclear bomb, so basicaly nuclear power works so good that not all nations want it because it's so potent and amasing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1