Comments by "Golag Is watching you" (@golagiswatchingyou2966) on "Mapping the Human Footprint" video.

when we look at these maps there is a diffrent response to diffrent people, lets try and analise them and try to predict their outcomes long term the humanist might see this and say ''look at how many people there are, humans are more interconnected, more wide spread and more developed than ever before, how wonderfull'' the enviromentalist might see this and say ''look at how many people there exist, how can the enviroment deal and sustain such people? how horrible what can we do to prevent long term damage to nature?'' the globalist might see this and say ''look at how far we have gotten as a species, all this interconnected and trade relations must be good for humanity and human civilization overal'' the nationalist might see this and say ''look how many people exist in the world, who knows when massive waves of migrants and refugees may come to our shores if they can no longer sustain this growth, we must defend what's ours no matter what'' all these viewpoints in my opinion have some merrit and truth to them, some people like it, some people hate it, some people view it as progress, others as evil, some as unsustainable but in all cases it seems we as a species have no controle over how civilization develops, we can't stop growing, we can't stop reproducing and those that don't reproduce will find themselves being replaced or swarmed by those that do, such is the way of nature and human behavior. thus I ask you what will become of us in this dynamic? what future awaits us? who is right? who is wrong? do you disagree on moral grounds? pragmatic grounds? or ideologicaly grounds? is this good or bad? idk but I don't think the outcome will be as great as some people think, nor as evil as some imagine.
69
@bodombeastmode yes and no, the industrial nations will have lower birthrates but when the labor or consumer markets dry up or age up then nations just import people from the 3rd world, so you make them yourself or you will get migration waves from more poor nations with higher birthrates. I don't think humanity wil lower it's birthrates collectively because those that don't will have an advantage over those that do.
2
it won't be a free internet and most will become flooded by nonsense news, social media and bogus information.
2
it's like with the old food production limit argument, back in the 18th century food production was already at it's max so from the perspective of those with the current data of the time, the prediction of mass starvation seemed likely, then we had the green revolution and food production skyrocketed, something they could not have forseen. likewise with oil, the oil production methodes of the past made it seem like human society was running out of oil, oil prices were very high and production started to slow down, thus the idea of peak oil seemed rational at the time, then the new technology of fracking became widespread which is how the USA went from being a oil importer to oil exporter with fast reservers being still untapped. many people today have and use models which with new data will become outdated and seem silly in the future.
2
it will probably be much worse then just their 9 to 5 jobs, they probably won't have any homes, families, friends or futures, no wonder so many people end up killing themselves
2
@erdelegy in the west perhaps but ironically due to the enviromental policies corporations tend to outsource their production to less enviromental countries, first China and now China is exporting their more poluting heavy industry to africa.
1
Nspnspker one man's ideal is another man's horror, one man's utopia is anothers distopia, what worries me is the sense that there is no choice at all and then we are always moving to one goal, growth and destruction.
1
@toddharig8142 well nationalists are the only onces who want to prepare for the future, everyone els wants to just let them all into our nations and destroy everything, globalism is corporate tyrany. I do think nationalists sould be more pan nationalistic long term we already see this with things like the European union and the african union
1
@Sasha Da Masta the UK right now does not have a future, I can only call it a tragity
1
@toddharig8142 clearly you never met a nationalist before, I find your comment very amusing but also sad because the truth is that globalists, corporatists and progressives tend to rely on shunning everyone but the strong (aka the rich), creating pages of pages of dehumanzing propaganda and they are far more ruthless and manipulative then any nationalist alive today which includes actual fascists. There is no capitalism, there is corporatism which means the government must create the Tyrany for them in the first place, it was not capitalism that forced a global lockdown due to a disease, that's the state the same state leftists, socialists and progressives want to empower even more and believe libertarians are the same as fascists. The USA was based on racial nepotism and expansion through war, that's how they became a superpower in the first place, China today the second largest economy in the world is 99% han Chinese, India wants to be the same kind of country with a strong hindu identity. Meanwhile in the west we allow rape gangs to run free because our police don't want to be called racist, can't have any promotion of our own population growth without being labeled nazi's, how els would you preserve and create a new pan European identity without using the identities of the European nations and people's that exist in the first place? Seems very irrational and illogical to me, almost anti white and racist to presume otherwise. But from your use of language I don't think you are intrested in any logical, rational, mature conversation, more likely trying to convince your own ideology of being somehow superior while ignoring reality, well as long as you don't wish to censor me or use violence to defend your corporations I don't mind, I just hope we can stop the mass migration waves before democracy is destroyed from within which it already has to a large degree.
1
@toddharig8142 nationalism is winning all over the world btw, despite all the censorship and mass migration we already have had over the decades, though you might have a point that corporations and governments can just endlessly import the third world while the native population gets to pay for everything but if democracy can be so easily subverted why would anyone value it? People want to protect their homes, their families, their futures, if democracy can't defend those values people will flock to those that will, it is inevitable.
1
@toddharig8142 ahhh I see your a leftist troll, no use talking to you then, I do hope you read some more US History, basic economics, demografics and about the current anti white racism that's at work in our society today. Things like "white privilage" is racist by it's very intention. I would try and anwser your questions in more details but that would be 20 pages long, cause your defence mechanisms to kick in and most likely my comment would get censored at the 2e page by youtube. USA was very special in it's collonialism you sould read up on it, it's rather intresting, in fact the EU is at it's core an attempt at copying the US model for superpower status, except we messed up by adopting the anti white and multicultral policies of the USA too, which is why our societies are in such great decline. I'm having a hard time taking you serieusly if you refuse to look at things objectively and with a more critical and open minded mindset, it's sad realy. Do you think the UK is beter off due to mass migration and state enforced multiculturalism? I think it's utterly backwards and regresive.
1
@toddharig8142 what insecurity? Being a nationalist takes great courage and constant slander and attacks by ideologically possed conformists, im also not merely a nationalist but a pan nationalist which is what the goal is of the EU.
1
@toddharig8142 https://www.cloudwards.net/internet-censorship/ https://youtubecensorship.com/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/631236/voter-turnout-of-the-exit-polls-of-the-2016-elections-by-race/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pON4pNHeZCU https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/grooming-gangs-sex-abuse-manchester-police-exploitation-asian-a9283146.html
1
@toddharig8142 sorry did not read all, I don't think you are realy worth talking to since you are kinda stuck in a leftist loop mindset of thinking im somehow a "white supreemist" while ignoring the effects of demografics and actualy policies made by the EU and it's goal as a organisation, how pretending ethni-city does not matter in a collection of nation states based on ethno-cultural identities is beyond me. I feel like your stuck in a loop where if someone mentions say nationalism, you automatically respond with certain defence mechanisms, try to change the subject or make assumptions and then believe your assumptions are true. If I mention the ra-pe cases by isl-amic groo-ming gangs in the UK, you say that does not matter or X is a bigger deal or you believe X matters so you must be a na-zi, how would anyone be able to make you doubt your own authoritarian believes and anti whi-te rac-ism if anything someone says can be warped into somehow being w-hite supreemism? Regardless if you think it does not matter or whatever assumptions you think are true, in real politic and in power politics, demografics matter, that's how Russia was able to get a vote in one cremea, why the state of israel exists, how peace came to Europe after a series of population exchanges after ww1 and ww2, why the british government needs to censor people's opinions if they offend certain people, why terrorism happens on all sides in western nations, why certain political parties like pro migrant parties in Europe exist, due to immigration in the first place. I don't understand why you pretend like these things don't exist, don't matter or why you would write pages of pages of word for word responses rather then adressing the overal message of the comment, idk how I would be able to convince you nor would it realy matter since what actualy influences society is demografics, education, censorship, media, government action and immigration policy more so then rational debate which we aren't realy having right now because I can't seem to break through your ideological bubble your in.
1
@toddharig8142 why are you even mentioning the kkk? Why do you pretend certain facts don't exist? Why do you deny the significance of anti white racism today which is the main driving force for nationalism today which is still rising, why would people be "white nationalists" if they weren't under attack somehow? Are they all just insecure people? That's an easy way to never go any deeper in the subject don't you think? Idk why you think the way that you do, I assume it's some sort of defence mechanism to hold back countredictory information from the indoctrination you have had most of your life, your using all the same words, sentences and irrational behavior that I have seen in many leftists hundred of times before and im not trying to insult you, it's just very bizzar and confusing to see and to understand. Perhaps we are both stuck in echochambers that cloud our critical thinking but I don't think that is the case since I want to understand how you think and I often wished I was wrong yet I can't find any evidence that is the case and most of what I see and read about and predict comes true and I face a lot of censorship likewise most of the people I follow as well yet I rarely of ever see or hear anyone on the leftwing talk about it, or mentions rationally why demografics matter to civil society and liberal values.
1
@toddharig8142 I find it fascinating how you can write so much yet say so little at the same time, I only skimed through most of it but certain things keep poping up like "far right thinktanks" what even is that? Who told you that this or that is far right? What does that mean? Apperently it means not wanting to be abused, colonized or attacked but I suspect you will Just write it off as that not being the case because that would be a conspiracy theory, idk how to talk to you but I find it intresting how you write. People aren't realy free if their free speech has to be censored and elites have to act against the people's wishes and attack those that reflect poorly on their choices as leaders.
1
@toddharig8142 After reading just a few parts of your comment I got the idea you are deeply biased and indoctrinated, reading it felt like an attack on rationality itself, so much opinion, so much deflection, so many ad hominin attacks, so many petty insults. Going through each and every sentence would take way too long for my taste and my reply would likely be censored by youtube anyways, so what's the point? Im more intrested in how you think and why you think the way you do rather then your arguments because frankly I can't realy take them serieusly, sorry if that offends you.
1
@toddharig8142 Etiquette? This coming from the guy who calls my opinions and links far right and white sup-rem-acist? And can't write a single response without an insult thrown in? Perhaps im just frustrated at your snobish and judgmental attitude but il try to remain civil as best I can.
1
it's the worst time to be alive realy and the USA is not free, nor does it love freedom, it loves greed and power and hates all that wish to take that from them, not freedom.
1
@sumnerwaite6390 thank god Trump stopped arming islamic terrorists, finaly the USA is starting to act more like a civilized nation.
1
in reality they are the only real threat, the others being climate change (polution and over population) and nuclear war both of which seem less likely then a mutated virus, don't forget when millions of people die due to disease that may cause or motivate people to war.
1
@hendrikdependrik1891 ''mass defamation of the Dutch by Latin countries might be more interesting for the near future.'' no idea what your talking about here, dutch btw. Germany is not weak, in fact the main power drives in the EU and Europe in general is Germany, France and the Netherlands, of course they don't want to give money to the southern and eastern European states without getting something back in return, Poland has benefited the most from trade within the union, only countries like Italy, Spain, Portugal and greece have not realy benefited though that's more their own fault and partly the disfunctional traits of the EU and waves of migrants that cause stress and conflict, we already pay for most of the rest of Europe, we don't mind to pay as long as we can have a voice in trying to change things for the beter and in that respect most of Europe can learn a thing or two from Poland and visa versa.
1
as Turkey becomes more hostile to Europe and the EU and the USA more hostile to Europe and Russia at some point the leaders within Europe might consider breaking apart from NATO but for now without their own strong militaries being on par with the USA, Russia or China they have a long way to go before abolishing NATO.
1