Comments by "Golag Is watching you" (@golagiswatchingyou2966) on "2020 Forecast: Europe" video.
-
56
-
12
-
10
-
6
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@uther2917 most educated people stay in eastern and southern European parts of the country, mostly cheap labor most effected by the recession of 2008 went to other European nations, the amount of immigration between EU members is quite minimal, the import from 3rd world countries is insane to the point of threatning the existence of whole nations, mostly the UK, Germany, Sweden and France.
The EU is why many European nations were able to trade cheaper goods and services and have free movement of people within EU member states, the Euro currency is also good for trade as is the single market, the EU recently passed a nee trade deal with south america, lowering the price of beef and pork, while potentialy hurting the native beef market, the benefits outweigh the problems.
That being sayd the EU has had a series of setbacks, problems and poor leadership in my opinion but lets also not forget the USA Actions that promotes these developments.
In short the situation is more complex then EU bad, though I don't blame you for thinking this way, I did so too not too long ago.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@AtomicReverend not accuate at all, Russia is no threat to Europe, in fact Russia trades the most with Europe and the sanctions on Russia and Germany are promoted by the USA and it's easy to see why, the USA loves it's power projection and good relations between Europe and Russia stand in the way of that.
We don't need NATO, you need NATO, hell we are likely to go to war with Turkey which the USA has propt up whole waging wars in the middle-east threatning Iran (who just so happen to be a major trading partner for Europe)
The USA benefits the most from NATO, it pays rather little for the amount of influence they get, in exchange for free movement, Logistic support and supplylines for it's wars in the middle-east.
The USA has weakend Europe, caused waves of migrants and is the main reason we even have multiculturalism in Europe, it's not the European media calling white people racists for existing, mostly US media and US NPO's.
The USA even allied with Saudi-arabia who funds most terrorism in Europe to begin with.
I don't think your very intrested in hearing our opinion on the matter, nor do you seem to care that anti americanism is more populair than anti migrant sentiment, the USA won't lift a finger to help us, won't support nationalism for us and most likely will engage in hostile action and support of our enemies to try and destabalize us, I don't like Merkel or the rest of the globalist trash but you do realise globalism is a US ideology one you only resently with Trump, kinda, sorta not realy tried to adress.
Demografics in the USA are much more severe and the retoric much more anti white than in Europe, with exception of the UK and perhaps Sweden.
2
-
2
-
@Atrid you do realise much of the multicutural crap (which I agree is cancer) was implemented on the national level and it started in the USA.
Secondly how can the US dollar work for it's fast and international commerce but not in Europe? The southern European nations (mostly greece) sould not have been allowed to adopt the Euro, they ran their economy into the dirt and the EU had to bail them out multiple times, now after a harsh periode of reform they are kinda sorta doing oke but they need a lot more investment and realy they don't have much to offer the world or the EU besides nice holiday locations and good food.
Thirdly most of the migrants come from africa and the middle-east because of US intervention in those regions which destabalized Both them and us, the USA don't mind they can hide from the fallout of their wars, I think NATO sould be disolved, USA is not a very reliable ally, their alliance with saudi arabia is why we have so many wahabi terrorists in the west, nothing to do with Iran btw.
And finaly, yes the commision is not directly voted on and they reserve the right to make legisation, however the parlement must still aprove it and in the past the parlement had no vote at all.
Personality I blame Merkel and her actions during the debt crisis and migrant crisis that made Europe so unstable, she tried to kill two bird with one stone, get cheap slave labor and curb the aging problems of Europe which only angered and divided the whole of Europe, however she is going out and we have a new push by reformers and identitarian movements to try and subvert the EU, I understand where your coming from but the USA won't change, the EU can if it can not then it's truely doomed.
2
-
@manofcultura I actualy hate communism why do you think I dislike the USA so much?
Also you clearly don't know who protected the people who created political correctness.
You have people like Noel ignitvit who created this myth of white privilage, in the USA.
The mossad was the one who provided the means to wage war in the middle-east, it's the USA who in the 1960s implemented open borders and that ideology because of the cold war spread to us.
The USA allong with the UK and France who wanted a less nationalistic and more international and US led global order.
I could go on and on and on, why the USA is most responsable for the cuckery and stupid globalism you see today, that's why both the far right and the far left in Europe is so anti american, even some of the socialists here don't want globalism, look up PM of dennmark for example of things to come.
The USA fears competition from Europe, that's why the USA has sanctions on Russia, Germany and Iran, we trade with them.
Reagan and Thatcher both opened up the borders and sold out to corporate intrest, you have been mislead and misinformed my friend.
But it does not matter, hopefully w can get rid of NATO, hopefully not have war with Turkey (who you proped up thanks for that) and get rid of US globalism, saudi money (your allies) and multiculturalism, the demografics in the USA look even worse then in Europe.
But just keep blaming us for having to clean up your mess, must be nice being that lazy and ignorant.
2
-
2
-
there is some truth in what you say, the the UK has a lot of soft power, good military, good economy, it has the pound it could very well totaly change it's main forms of trade and seek more international ties becoming a kind of switserland of the seas, however if you look into the demografics, the youth vote, the elites in charge, the situation in N-ireland and scotland and the current situation with the USA, I think the UK will remain in the single market, try to keep things going as they are, seek to reduce immigration to relax tensions internaly and at some point seek to return to the EU, could be wrong but that's honestly how it seems like it.
I used to support brexit 4 years ago and I still think the vote was nessisary to sake up the disaster policies of the EU, which to a degree it did but the UK won't become truely independent with brexit and they might have been beter off staying in the Union.
they won't get rid of their wahabi muslims or their social unrest anytime soon.
2
-
2
-
@viktator4205 so does most of the western world, including the USA and esspecialy the UK and Sweden.
Russia is pretty big and shares borders with many muslim majority countries so it's no wonder they have more immigrants, esspecialy because of their demografic problems, that being sayd if the west under the USA did not engage in constant sanctions perhapd they could invest more in their own people, which btw the Russian goverment has tried to do, unlike most western nations.
Being part of a "gene pool" or rather "national identity" takes more effort then being an individual, your born an individual, you can mostly work for your own individual gains, convincing others to join your side as a strong, collective actualy takes a lot of effort, those who fail to do so will become victims by those that do, otherwise you would not have a state of Israel, a European civilization, a Chinese civilization, a US civilization, it's the base line one we have negelected and paying the price for our neglect.
1
-
@e1123581321345589144 I sayd most not all, the african people work hard but have no machines, no infrastructure, esspecialy not in central Africa, africa also has no deep water ports and like you sayd the local tribalism and lack of western style institutions makes it a very unstable place.
Braindrain from the west is also a major problem, now if they Just studied in the west and went back home to enrich their local economies that's diffrent, most of them decide to work in the west, which the governments and big corporations like but alienates the natives.
Africa has to play at what they have in abundance which is resources, food production (with modern technology) and solar energy production, to do that they need infrastructure and energy projects funded by other nations or themselves but to secure that investment they also need protection, so perhaps mercenaries? Private military contracts? China? They still have to implement property rights in much of their nations and try and reduce corruption.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LegendNinja41 so you are in favor of population transfers? too bad the west backed a coup and so the Russians acting in their own national intrest, looks bad on them if they abandon their people to another nations mercy, that's just the way it is.
you are acting on a dubble standard, the west can engage in whatever way they want but Russia can not? Russia faces sanctions by the US that costs Europe billions as well as Russia billions, the USA is now targeting Nordsteam 1 and 2 which would give Russia a way to sell more gas to Europe.
and about independence, idk if you heared but Catalonia in Spain voted to leave but the spanish goverment and support from the EU denied it, don't pretend like one is not the same like the other, Russia faces a lot more hardships than the rest of Europe so their behavior is not that strange.
besides all these sanctions are just bringing Russia closer to China, making Putin stronger because the Russians see him as their great leader, I think the USA wants bad relations between the west and Russia because the USA wants to keep their power and global military running so they need to fear and warmonger, if we had rejected the sanctions, if we allowed trade to flow, then we could work to divide Russia towards more western intrest.
it was Russia who defended Syria when Obama tried to invade them, the USA can't be trusted anymore, Russia is a starving dog, we need more stability not threats of war.
1
-
@LegendNinja41 the problem however is that it was russian territory and was given to ukraine in the 1980s i believe, what was given can be taken back and many nations have annexed and ethnically cleansed lands that were not theirs, latest of which is golan hights by israel so the idea that this is some huge threat is kinda overblown.
This is however how geopolitics works and Gets messy when both sides have arguments and secret agenda's for proxy conflicts.
Population transfer are a bloody and messy affaire, people resist, people die, need to be relocated, start over, lose their homes, some become terrorists, having Russia annex cremea might not have been the best but might also have prevented further bloodshed.
As for sanctions you are correct the sanctions hurt Russia more then they do the US or the EU but that does not make it oke, it creates conflicts, it hurts people and those who enforce order which is the whole purpose of them, divide the nation of Russia, weaken it to the benefit of the USA, Europe does not benefit, Russia is not closer in our sphere, we can't influence their society in isolation, they get stronger ties with China, much beter plan would have been to lift sanctions on Russia and demand sanctions or limits on Chinese intrest in Russia, divide and rule, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
I don't consider Russia a threat, they are paranoid and surely must be matched in greater or equal force in case of a military conflict but trade and diplomatic solutions are beter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1