Comments by "" (@josephcoon5809) on "Why doesn't English have genders? Well... it did!" video.
-
1
-
6:50 Genders for objects that don’t have distinguishing traits, like males and females do, don’t require gendered distinctions. Humans, on the other hand, do have quite important distinctions. It’s a false equivalence to say inanimate objects are the same as humans that are quite drastically genetically different.
Language’s sole purpose is to transmit an idea from one location to another by encoding the idea into a physical pattern that is decided at the destination. This process only works if the source and the destination agree to the terms used. This means language has been around for as long as a living organisms have been able to present simple ideas to other living organisms. This evolved to the point the neurons in your brain encode meaning into patterns of electrochemical reactions from one neuron to the next. The interactions created by a particular wavelength of light impinging on the photoreceptors in the retina trigger a cascading pattern of electrochemical reactions that culminate in the prefrontal cortex such that particular patterns are understood as various “colors.”
Light is the physical experience, and color is the symbolic language that describes it.
So, transmitting ideas is the sole purpose of language, and any word that doesn’t convey novel information with respect to the words around it, it is superfluous and a waste of resources. Conversely, words can be lacking in information making communication “blurry”.
Gendered pronouns to describe one of two, or more, people that have a distinguishing characteristic, such as their sex, would offer value by imbedding information about their sex in a monosyllabic pronoun: his/her towel…
1
-
1
-
1