Comments by "" (@josephcoon5809) on "A Guide to American Liberalism" video.

  1. 3
  2. 2
  3. 0:01 Already I love that you put ‘liberals’ in quotes. I hope you touch a little on etymology and explain that ‘liberal’ and ‘liberty’ have a common root for a reason. It’s the same reason tyrants appropriated the term in the first place. By evoking emotions of “freedom”, tyrants hide the fact that they are completely willing to force their ideas on those who disagree by passing laws to turn a diverse culture into a more monolithic one. 0:20 EXACTLY!! The Socratic method demands establishing mutually accepted definitions for terms BEFORE proceeding to the meat of the conversation. Rational discourse is hampered by words improperly used based on a common connotation applies to a word. Perhaps you can do another video on the difference between “capital” (individualism; free market) in capitalism versus “means of production” (collectivism; planned economy) in socialism. “Profit” and “surplus” follows the same methodology of applying a negative connotation to one of two terms with the same meaning and a positive connotation to the other so that the ideology associated with the former subconsciously biases participants into negative associations that are unjustified. Surplus implies good handling of finances by government which shows good stewardship of stolen wealth, while profit implies a successfully executed greed. 0:30 “…or a Progressive…” Another good one. The Founders revolted against a heavily centralized government because it was tyrannical. Centralization every where else leads to instability, susceptibility to corruption, and exponentially increasing inefficiency. It was actually progressive to move towards decentralization as every complex system does when it grows. People who argue for MORE federal laws are the antithesis of progress. Going BACK to what the Founders fought a bloody revolution to leave behind is the definition of regression. 2:30 “mutual respect backed by law” 😂 An oxymoronic turn of phrase I had never heard before. How is it a sign of mutual respect to codify what you mutually agree on? If you agree on it, then no law is necessary. All a “mutually agreed to” law does is say, “we agree, but I don’t trust that you mean it.” Otherwise a law says, “we don’t agree, but I’m going to force you to agree.” 12:45 Liberalism isn’t a government system because it isn’t FREEDOM if it’s GOVERNED. 1984 was happening long before book was written. So much double speak. So little time to undo it all…
    1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1